Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 93(3): 726-32; discussion 733, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22364967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair is becoming increasingly common and diverse in its application despite ongoing uncertainty about long-term durability. Recent reports detail late conversion to open surgical repair to treat disease progression and repair failure. We describe our experience with using thoracic or thoracoabdominal approaches to endovascular device removal and open aortic repair after previous endovascular procedures. METHODS: Thirty-five patients underwent open aortic repair through thoracotomy (n=7) or thoracoabdominal incision (n=28) 0.5 to 48 months after undergoing endovascular thoracic (n=27) or abdominal (n=8) aortic procedures. Indications for open repair included expanding aneurysm (n=23), device infection (n=8), fistula (n=5), pseudoaneurysm (n=2), aneurysm rupture (n=2), and restenosis (n=1). Endovascular devices were completely removed in 26 patients and partially removed in 9. Descending thoracic aortic repair was performed in 10 patients, thoracoabdominal aortic repair in 24, and juxtarenal abdominal aortic repair in 1. RESULTS: There were 2 in-hospital deaths (6%), both in patients who presented with endovascular device infection. There were 8 late deaths. Overall 1-year survival was 83%±7%. Among the patients who presented with infected devices, 3 experienced major late complications, including persistent infection, pseudoaneurysm, and recurrent fistula; 2 of these patients succumbed to late deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical repair after previous endovascular aortic procedures is successful in the majority of patients, particularly in those without device infections. Achieving definitive aortic repair in patients with infected endovascular devices is particularly challenging.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Device Removal/methods , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Thoracotomy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 91(3): 700-7; discussion 707-8, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21352982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch replacement remains among the most technically challenging cardiovascular operations, incurring considerable risk for perioperative death and stroke. The trifurcated graft technique, in which a double Y-graft is used to connect brachiocephalic branches to the main aortic graft, was recently developed to simplify arch reconstruction, reduce embolization, and minimize related cerebral ischemia. We examined early outcomes of aortic arch replacement performed by using single or double Y-graft variations of this technique. METHODS: Between December 2006 and May 2009, the Y-graft technique was used to perform aortic arch replacement in 55 patients. Thirty-three patients had prior median sternotomy (60%), and 34 (62%) had ascending aortic dissection. Axillary cannulation was used in 52 patients (95%), and hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion were used in all patients. Median systemic and cerebral circulatory arrest times were 65 minutes and 0 minutes, respectively. A first-stage elephant trunk repair was performed in 46 patients (84%). Follow-up data were obtained for all patients. RESULTS: There were no in-hospital deaths and one 30-day death (2%). Three patients (5%) had strokes, 1 of which was transient. Actuarial 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 80.0% ± 5.4% and 77.6% ± 5.7%, respectively. Thirty-one of the elephant trunk patients (67%) subsequently underwent second-stage completion procedures, 5 (16%) of them endovascular. CONCLUSIONS: Early results of aortic arch replacement by the Y-graft technique compare favorably with those of traditional approaches. The technique enables effective delivery of antegrade cerebral perfusion during complex arch procedures and incurs only a low risk of neurologic sequelae.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 212(4): 569-79; discussion 579-81, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21463791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent technologic advances in endovascular devices have led to alternative approaches to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair; these innovative approaches must be compared with the "gold standard" of conventional open TAAA repair. To facilitate such comparisons, we evaluated contemporary outcomes of open TAAA repair. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed data collected prospectively between May 2006 and October 2010 regarding 509 consecutive patients who underwent TAAA repair. Standard univariate statistical comparisons were performed, as well as multivariable modeling, to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients (59.9%) had degenerative aneurysms without dissection, and 204 (40.1%) had aortic dissection. There were 104 (20.4%) urgent or emergent repairs and 26 (5.1%) ruptured aneurysms. Operative adjuncts were used selectively. Of the 290 patients (57.0%) who underwent extensive repairs (Crawford extents I and II), 282 (97.2%) had cerebrospinal fluid drainage, 257 (88.6%) had left heart bypass, and 213 (73.4%) had intercostal/lumbar artery reattachment. The overall operative survival rate was 92.1% (469 of 509), and survival was better after elective repairs (93.8% [380 of 405]) than after urgent or emergent operations (85.6% [89 of 104], p = 0.005). Renal failure necessitating hemodialysis at discharge developed in 30 patients (5.9%). Permanent paraplegia occurred in 13 patients (2.6%). Actuarial survival was 79.1% ± 2.0% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary open TAAA repair is characterized by respectable early outcomes, particularly when repair is elective. Such results should be compared with those of evolving approaches, including endovascular and hybrid repairs.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Dissection/pathology , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/pathology , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Aortic Rupture/pathology , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 85(3): 1074-6, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18291202

ABSTRACT

Aneurysms involving a right-sided aortic arch and a right-sided descending thoracic aorta with an aberrant origin of the left subclavian artery are rare. We describe the successful surgical repair of this vascular anomaly by the combined use of a left carotid to subclavian artery bypass followed by endovascular stent-graft placement to exclude the aortic aneurysm. We also review the literature associated with this particular anatomic presentation.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/abnormalities , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Subclavian Artery/abnormalities , Subclavian Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL