Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
N Engl J Med ; 376(26): 2545-2555, 2017 06 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28657870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated skin abscesses are common, yet the appropriate management of the condition in the era of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, double-blind trial involving outpatient adults and children. Patients were stratified according to the presence of a surgically drainable abscess, abscess size, the number of sites of skin infection, and the presence of nonpurulent cellulitis. Participants with a skin abscess 5 cm or smaller in diameter were enrolled. After abscess incision and drainage, participants were randomly assigned to receive clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or placebo for 10 days. The primary outcome was clinical cure 7 to 10 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 786 participants: 505 (64.2%) were adults and 281 (35.8%) were children. A total of 448 (57.0%) of the participants were male. S. aureus was isolated from 527 participants (67.0%), and MRSA was isolated from 388 (49.4%). Ten days after therapy in the intention-to-treat population, the cure rate among participants in the clindamycin group was similar to that in the TMP-SMX group (221 of 266 participants [83.1%] and 215 of 263 participants [81.7%], respectively; P=0.73), and the cure rate in each active-treatment group was higher than that in the placebo group (177 of 257 participants [68.9%], P<0.001 for both comparisons). The results in the population of patients who could be evaluated were similar. This beneficial effect was restricted to participants with S. aureus infection. Among the participants who were initially cured, new infections at 1 month of follow-up were less common in the clindamycin group (15 of 221, 6.8%) than in the TMP-SMX group (29 of 215 [13.5%], P=0.03) or the placebo group (22 of 177 [12.4%], P=0.06). Adverse events were more frequent with clindamycin (58 of 265 [21.9%]) than with TMP-SMX (29 of 261 [11.1%]) or placebo (32 of 255 [12.5%]); all adverse events resolved without sequelae. One participant who received TMP-SMX had a hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with incision and drainage alone, clindamycin or TMP-SMX in conjunction with incision and drainage improves short-term outcomes in patients who have a simple abscess. This benefit must be weighed against the known side-effect profile of these antimicrobials. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00730028 .).


Subject(s)
Abscess/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Abscess/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Drainage , Female , Humans , Infant , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Prospective Studies , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/adverse effects
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 170, 2019 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community- associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) cause serious infections and rates continue to rise worldwide. Use of geocoded electronic health record (EHR) data to prevent spread of disease is limited in health service research. We demonstrate how geocoded EHR and spatial analyses can be used to identify risks for CA-MRSA in children, which are tied to place-based determinants and would not be uncovered using traditional EHR data analyses. METHODS: An epidemiology study was conducted on children from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2010 who were treated for Staphylococcus aureus infections. A generalized estimated equations (GEE) model was developed and crude and adjusted odds ratios were based on S. aureus risks. We measured the risk of S. aureus as standardized incidence ratios (SIR) calculated within aggregated US 2010 Census tracts called spatially adaptive filters, and then created maps that differentiate the geographic patterns of antibiotic resistant and non-resistant forms of S. aureus. RESULTS: CA-MRSA rates increased at higher rates compared to non-resistant forms, p = 0.01. Children with no or public health insurance had higher odds of CA-MRSA infection. Black children were almost 1.5 times as likely as white children to have CA-MRSA infections (aOR 95% CI 1.44,1.75, p < 0.0001); this finding persisted at the block group level (p < 0.001) along with household crowding (p < 0.001). The youngest category of age (< 4 years) also had increased risk for CA-MRSA (aOR 1.65, 95%CI 1.48, 1.83, p < 0.0001). CA-MRSA encompasses larger areas with higher SIRs compared to non-resistant forms and were found in block groups with higher proportion of blacks (r = 0.517, p < 0.001), younger age (r = 0.137, p < 0.001), and crowding (r = 0.320, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the Atlanta MSA, the risk for CA-MRSA is associated with neighborhood-level measures of racial composition, household crowding, and age of children. Neighborhoods which have higher proportion of blacks, household crowding, and children < 4 years of age are at greatest risk. Understanding spatial relationship at a community level and how it relates to risks for antibiotic resistant infections is important to combat the growing numbers and spread of such infections like CA-MRSA.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Population Surveillance , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Spatial Analysis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
4.
J Pediatr ; 172: 116-120.e1, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26935786

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Using case-control methodology, we measured the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the 2-dose monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) and 3-dose pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) series given in infancy against rotavirus disease resulting in hospital emergency department or inpatient care. STUDY DESIGN: Children were eligible for enrollment if they presented to any 1 of 3 hospitals in Atlanta, Georgia with diarrhea ≤10 days duration during January-June 2013 and were born after RV1 introduction. Stool samples were tested for rotavirus by enzyme immunoassay and immunization records were obtained from providers and the state electronic immunization information system. Case-subjects (children testing rotavirus antigen-positive) were compared with children testing rotavirus antigen-negative. RESULTS: Overall, 98 rotavirus-case subjects and 175 rotavirus-negative controls were enrolled. Genotype G12P[8] predominated (n = 87, 89%). The VE of 2 RV1 doses was 84% (95% CI 38, 96) among children aged 8-23 months and 82% (95% CI 41, 95) among children aged ≥24 months. For the same age groups, the VE of 3 RV5 doses was 80% (95% CI 27, 95) and 87% (95% CI 22, 98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Under routine use, the RV1 and RV5 series were both effective against moderate-to-severe rotavirus disease during a G12P[8] season, and both vaccines demonstrated sustained protection beyond the first 2 years of life.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/virology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Feces/virology , Female , Georgia , Humans , Infant , Male
5.
West J Emerg Med ; 18(2): 201-212, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28210352

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) carriage and infections and determine risk factors associated specifically with MRSA USA300. METHODS: We conducted a case control study in a pediatric emergency department. Nasal and axillary swabs were collected, and participants were interviewed for risk factors. The primary outcome was the proportion of S. aureus carriers among those presenting with and without a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). We further categorized S. aureus carriers into MRSA USA300 carriers or non-MRSA USA300 carriers. RESULTS: We found the MRSA USA300 carriage rate was higher in children less than two years of age, those with an SSTI, children with recent antibiotic use, and those with a family history of SSTI. MRSA USA300 carriers were also more likely to have lower income compared to non-MRSA USA300 carriers and no S. aureus carriers. Rates of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes were higher in MRSA carriage isolates with an SSTI, compared to MRSA carriage isolates of patients without an SSTI. There was an association between MRSA USA300 carriage and presence of PVL in those diagnosed with an abscess. CONCLUSION: Children younger than two years were at highest risk for MRSA USA300 carriage. Lower income, recent antibiotic use, and previous or family history of SSTI were risk factors for MRSA USA300 carriage. There is a high association between MRSA USA300 nasal/axillary carriage and presence of PVL in those with abscesses.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carrier State/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(4): 928-935, 2017 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27936349

ABSTRACT

Thirty-three infants aged ∼2 months had serial stool samples collected after receipt of Rotarix® vaccine dose 1, and were assessed for shedding of porcine circovirus type 1 DNA and Rotavirus group A RNA by molecular methods. We did not find strong evidence that porcine circovirus type 1 replication occurred. Porcine circovirus type 1 genome with the same sequence as that in Rotarix® was detected in a few infants as late as day ≥ 13; while this timing could suggest there may have been replication and not just transient passage through the gastrointestinal tract, the lack of increase in copy number in any infant supports transient passage and there are inherent limitations to the results. We found that 21% of infants did not shed Rotarix® RVA RNA beyond the day 3 sample, which may suggest lack of vaccine virus replication. Of the infants in whom Rotarix RVA RNA shedding continued, peak copy numbers were reached on days 3-5 for ∼40%, and after day 5 in ∼60%, and shedding can be prolonged (≥ 45 days).


Subject(s)
Circovirus/isolation & purification , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Feces/virology , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus/isolation & purification , Virus Shedding , Circovirus/genetics , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , RNA, Viral/genetics , Rotavirus/genetics , Time Factors , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage
7.
Vaccine ; 33(42): 5670-5677, 2015 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26322843

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Rotavirus remains the leading cause of severe diarrhea in children under 5 years worldwide. In the US, Rotarix (RV1) and RotaTeq (RV5), have been associated with reductions in and severity of rotavirus disease. Studies have evaluated the impact of RV1 or RV5 but little is known about the impact of incomplete or mixed vaccination upon vaccine effectiveness. METHODS: Case control study to examine association of combined RV1 and RV5 and rotavirus acute gastroenteritis, factoring severity of diarrheal disease. Children born after March 1, 2009 with acute gastroenteritis from three pediatric hospitals in Atlanta, Georgia were approached for enrollment. Survey was administered, stool specimen was collected, and vaccination records were obtained. RESULTS: 891 of 1127 children with acute gastroenteritis were enrolled. Stool specimens were collected from 708 for rotavirus testing; 215 stool samples tested positively for rotavirus. Children >12 months of age were more likely to have rotavirus. Children categorized with Vesikari score of >11 were almost twice as likely to be rotavirus positive. Prior rotavirus vaccination decreased the mean Vesikari score, p<0.0001. Children with complete single type vaccination were protected against rotavirus (OR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14-0.31, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Complete rotavirus vaccination with a single vaccine type resulted in protection against rotavirus diarrhea and decrease in severity of rotavirus gastroenteritis. Incomplete rotavirus vaccination either with a single vaccine or mixed vaccination types also provided some protection.


Subject(s)
Cross Protection , Gastroenteritis/virology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Diarrhea/virology , Female , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Georgia , Humans , Infant , Male , Rotavirus , Severity of Illness Index , Vaccination , Vaccines, Attenuated/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL