Diagnostic accuracy of a novel point-of-care test for simultaneous detection of anti-transglutaminase IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin IgG antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care tests (POCTs) may have a role in detecting undiagnosed cases of Celiac disease (CD). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel POCT, compared with the conventional serological methods, for simultaneous anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin (DGP) IgG antibody detection. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of different biological matrices (whole blood and serum) on test performance. METHODS: Serum and whole blood from celiac or suspected celiac patients who underwent duodenal biopsy were assayed for the presence of anti-tTG IgA and anti-DGP IgG both with the reference standard methods (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) and with the POCT (PRIMA Lab SA, Balerna, Switzerland). RESULTS: 266 sera (101 negative and 165 positive) and 60 whole blood samples (34 positive and 26 negative) were included in the study. POCT for anti-DGP IgG showed a sensitivity of 84.3% and a specificity of 90.1%, with positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of 91.07% and 82.73%. POCT for anti-tTG IgA showed a sensitivity of 98.31% and a specificity of 98.02%, with a PPV and NPV of 98.31% and 98.02%. Test accuracies were 86.94% and 98.17%, respectively. The agreement of the results between the two different matrices showed a strong correlation rate: 95% for anti-DGP IgG and 100% for anti-tTG IgA. CONCLUSION: The anti-tTG IgA/anti-DGP IgG-based POCT showed good diagnostic accuracy with comparable sensitivities and specificities to reference standard methods in detecting CD in symptomatic patients and could be considered as a mass screening test before referring to conventional serology.

Allergic reactions to midazolam: A case series from an Italian allergy unit.

Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with central nervous system depressing action, commonly used for conscious sedation for various procedures and for its pharmacologic properties.In literature, severe adverse reactions to this drug are described, but only in few cases positive allergological tests were demonstrated.The authors collected herein five clinical cases of different allergic reactions to midazolam demonstrated by positive skin tests.

Contrast Medium Hypersensitivity: A Large Italian Study with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to contrast media (CM) are a major problem. We compared differences of HRs to iodinated contrast media (ICM) versus gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), collecting data on prevalence, type, latency and severity. Secondly, the predisposition to perform new contrast tests, use of premedication and possible appearance of new reactions were explored in a long-term follow-up of 5 years. Clinical data, comorbidities, skin test (ST) results, re-exposure to CM procedures with any new reactions, premedication and CM used were collected. In a retrospective single-center study, 350 patients with mild to moderate HRs were enrolled. Asthma, food allergy, non-allergic drug hypersensitivity and neurologic disease were significantly more frequent in patients with HRs to GBCM compared to the high evidence of cardiovascular disease and history of cancer in patients with HRs to ICM. A marked delay in performing STs was reported by patients with negative results (66 months, p < 0.01). Iomeprol, iopamidol and gadobenic acid were the culprit CM most involved in HRs in patients with positive STs. During follow-up, 7.1% of responders reported new HRs to CM despite negative STs, premedication and infusion of alternative CM in most cases.

Mometasone Furoate in Non-Allergic Rhinitis: A Real-Life Italian Study.

BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal mometasone furoate in patients with non-allergic rhinitis (NAR), a real-life, observational, prospective study is performed. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (age 18-64 years) receive intranasal (mometasone furoate, 200 µg b.i.d. for 15 consecutive days per month for 6 consecutive months), plus isotonic nasal saline. The cytologic pattern of local inflammation, nasal airflow, through peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), quality of life (QoL), through the rhinitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), the short-form 36-item health survey (SF-36v2), and the combined symptom medication score (CSMS), and, finally, olfactory function, through Sniffin' sticks-16 identification test (SSIT-16), are evaluated at baseline and after treatment. RESULTS: NARNE is the most frequent cytological pattern (48% of the total sample). The therapeutic response shows improvement in olfactory function and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that intranasal mometasone furoate is an effective treatment for patients with NAR.

Datterino Trial: A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Crossover, Clinical Trial on the Use of Hydroponic Cultivated Tomato Sauce in Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome.

A low-nickel (Ni) diet, a key treatment for Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome (SNAS), is difficult in the long term and strongly impacts quality of life (QoL). Hydroponic agriculture could be an alternative to allow the reintroduction of tomato, an essential food in the global diet. In a first interventional, randomized, double-blind, single-center crossover study, we compared the possible effects of eating tomato puree deriving from hydroponic agriculture versus tomato puree from conventional cultivation, collecting data on subjective control of SNAS symptoms, adherence to treatment, and impact on QoL. Thirty subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatment groups: (1) a 12-week low-Ni diet plus 100% Italian Datterino tomato puree deriving from hydroponic technology; (2) a 12-week low-Ni diet plus 100% Italian Datterino tomato puree deriving from conventional cultivation. Then, after a 2-week washout period on the low-Ni diet, each patient crossed over to the other treatment. Patients reported lower symptom scores after eating Datterino tomato puree deriving from hydroponic technology; specifically, bloating (p = 0.0111, p = 0.0060), flatulence (p = 0.0090), abdominal cramps (p = 0.0207), constipation (p = 0.0395), and diarrhea (p = 0.0105). Overall, the adherence rate was high for both treatment arms. At baseline, QoL was poor, but significant improvement was observed after two treatments. In our study, precision medicine and precision agriculture merge in a holistic approach to the challenges of food allergies.

Diet Intervention Study through Telemedicine Assistance for Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic limited patients' access to hospital care. The aims of this study were to assess dietary nutritional status, quality of life (QoL), and adherence to dietary therapy before and after 30-day personalized diet therapy through telenutrition tools in patients with systemic nickel allergic syndrome (SNAS). METHODS: Each SNAS patient underwent the following allergological procedures: (a) face-to-face visit (nutritional visit and QoL evaluation) with prescription of one out of five personalized and balanced dietary plans different for calorie intake, (b) video call visit for dietary evaluation and assessment of adherence to diet after 15 days, and (c) video call visit for dietary and QoL evaluation and assessment of adherence to diet therapy after 30 days (end of study). RESULTS: We enrolled 20 SNAS patients. After 15 and 30 days, we found a statistically significant improvement in anthropometric findings after diet therapy, a significant adherence rate to low-nickel diet (60% and 80%, respectively), and an improvement in QoL with an increase in almost all psychometric indices. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that telenutrition can be a valid tool to monitor nutritional status and adherence to balanced low-Ni diet positively affecting QoL in SNAS patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Influence of Antihistamines on Basophil Activation Test in Food Allergy to Milk and Egg.

BACKGROUND: The basophil activation test (BAT) is used to improve the accuracy of food allergy diagnosis. To date, the influence of antiallergic drugs on BAT reactivity is poorly investigated. The aim of the study was to investigate if BAT results were influenced by antihistamine intake for 3 months in a cohort of patients with IgE-mediated food allergy to milk or egg. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, observational study was performed. We enrolled subjects with history of hypersensitivity reaction after specific food ingestion, positive skin prick tests and specific IgEs, concomitant allergic rhinitis, and, contraindication to the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge due to personal history of systemic reactions related to the ingestion of culprit food. Validated allergens (α-lactoalbumin, ß-lactoglobulin, casein, egg white, and yolk) for BAT were used. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with well-documented food symptoms and positive allergological workup were included in the study. BAT was positive in 29 patients. The mean percentages of CD63+ expression to specific culprit allergen did not change after the administration of drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study assessing the effects of oral antihistamines on basophil reactivity in cow's milk and egg food allergy. Antihistamines do not interfere with BAT results.

Allergic reactions to midazolam: A case series from an Italian allergy unit

Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with central nervous system depressing action, commonly used for conscious sedation for various procedures and for its pharmacologic properties. In literature, severe adverse reactions to this drug are described, but only in few cases positive allergological tests were demonstrated. The authors collected herein five clinical cases of different allergic reactions to midazolam demonstrated by positive skin tests. The 1° case is a suspected Kounis syndrome with cardiorespiratory arrest during an elective video laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The 2° and 5° cases are two systemic reactions with involvement of the skin and the gastrointestinal/respiratory system during elective surgeries in two patients with clinical history of atopia, while the 3° and 4° cases are local skin reactions in correspondence with the infusion site of midazolam during the execution of a colonoscopy. All the patients performed a complete allergological evaluation for the reaction involved drugs. In all cases, only the intradermal test (IDT) with midazolam at 0.5 mg/mL was positive. Allergological tests performed in 10 healthy controls with negative results supported the diagnosis. Therefore, midazolam is often considered a safe drug, because it does not have any active metabolites, in rare cases, it could cause different types of allergic adverse reactions: from severe anaphylaxis with cardiorespiratory arrest to simple local skin reactions. Skin tests remain the first line in the diagnosis of an immediate-type hypersensitivity to midazolam; even if they could lose in sensitivity with increasing latency from the event. However the concentrations recommended by current guidelines of European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) drug allergy interest groups might not rule out some false-positive reactions due to an irritant effect that should be considered (AU)