Ophthalmology Workforce Projections in the United States, 2020 to 2035.

PURPOSE: To analyze ophthalmology workforce supply and demand projections from 2020 to 2035. DESIGN: Observational cohort study using data from the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis (NCHWA). METHODS: Data accessed from the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website were compiled to analyze the workforce supply and demand projections for ophthalmologists from 2020 to 2035. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Projected workforce adequacy over time. RESULTS: From 2020 to 2035, the total ophthalmology supply is projected to decrease by 2650 full-time equivalent (FTE) ophthalmologists (12% decline) and total demand is projected to increase by 5150 FTE ophthalmologists (24% increase), representing a supply and demand mismatch of 30% workforce inadequacy. The level of projected adequacy was markedly different based on rurality by year 2035 with 77% workforce adequacy versus 29% workforce adequacy in metro and nonmetro geographies, respectively. By year 2035, ophthalmology is projected to have the second worst rate of workforce adequacy (70%) of 38 medical and surgical specialties studied. CONCLUSIONS: The HRSA's Health Workforce Simulation Model forecasts a sizeable shortage of ophthalmology supply relative to demand by the year 2035, with substantial geographic disparities. Ophthalmology is one of the medical specialties with the lowest rate of projected workforce adequacy by 2035. Further dedicated workforce supply and demand research for ophthalmology and allied professionals is needed to validate these projections, which may have significant future implications for patients and providers. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Effectiveness of Conventional Digital Fundus Photography-Based Teleretinal Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: This American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmic Technology Assessment aims to assess the effectiveness of conventional teleretinal screening (TS) in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted most recently in July 2023 to identify data published between 2006 and 2023 on any of the following elements related to TS effectiveness: (1) the accuracy of TS in detecting DR or DME compared with traditional ophthalmic screening with dilated fundus examination or 7-standard field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography, (2) the impact of TS on DR screening compliance rates or other patient behaviors, and (3) cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction of TS compared with traditional DR screening. Identified studies then were rated based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system. RESULTS: Eight level I studies, 14 level II studies, and 2 level III studies were identified in total. Although cross-study comparison is challenging because of differences in reference standards and grading methods, TS demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and good specificity in detecting DR; moderate to good agreement between TS and reference-standard DR grading was observed. Performance of TS was not as robust in detecting DME, although the number of studies evaluating DME specifically was limited. Two level I studies, 5 level II studies, and 1 level III study supported that TS had a positive impact on overall DR screening compliance, even increasing it by more than 2-fold in one study. Studies assessing cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction were not graded formally, but they generally showed that TS was cost-effective and preferred by patients over traditional surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional TS is an effective approach to DR screening not only for its accuracy in detecting referable-level disease, but also for improving screening compliance in a cost-effective manner that may be preferred by patients. Further research is needed to elucidate the ideal approach of TS that may involve integration of artificial intelligence or other imaging technologies in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema with Periocular and Intraocular Corticosteroid Therapies: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the effectiveness and complications of periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies for noninfectious uveitic macular edema. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted last in December 2021 and a post-assessment search was conducted in March 2023. The searches were limited to articles published in English and no date restrictions were imposed. The combined searches yielded 739 citations; 53 articles were selected for inclusion because the studies (1) evaluated periocular corticosteroid injection, intraocular corticosteroid injection or implant, suprachoroidal corticosteroid injection, or a combination thereof for uveitic macular edema; (2) had outcomes that included visual acuity (VA) or macular edema assessed clinically or imaged by OCT or fluorescein angiography; and (3) included more than 20 patients. RESULTS: This assessment reviewed 23 articles that provided level I or level II evidence from 18 studies on the use of periocular, suprachoroidal, and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections and intravitreal dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants or inserts in noninfectious uveitic macular edema. These reports consistently demonstrated that all investigated periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies improved VA, macular structure, or both. One comparative study showed that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and the dexamethasone intravitreal implant had effectiveness superior to that of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for these outcomes. As a group, the studies highlighted the potential for these therapies to elevate intraocular pressure and to accelerate cataract formation. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature provides high-quality evidence that periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies are effective and safe for the treatment of noninfectious uveitic macular edema. However, information on the relative effectiveness and complication rates across the different therapies is limited. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Intravitreal triple therapy with vancomycin, ceftazidime, and moxifloxacin for bacterial endophthalmitis: A Twelve-year experience.

PURPOSE: Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance in endophthalmitis have been reported. This study examines outcomes of triple therapy with intravitreal vancomycin, ceftazidime, and moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive series of all patients treated with abovementioned intravitreal antibiotics from January 2009 to June 2021. Percentages of eyes attaining greater than or equal to 20/200 and 20/50 Snellen visual acuities and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: 112 eyes met inclusion criteria. 63 of 112 eyes (56%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/200 during follow-up, with 39 (35%) returning to at least 20/50. In subgroup analysis, 23 of 24 (96%) eyes with post-cataract endophthalmitis obtained ≥ 20/200 acuity and 21 of 24 (88%) obtained ≥ 20/50 acuity during follow-up. There were no cases of macular infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal moxifloxacin (160 µg/0.1 mL) was well tolerated as an adjunct to vancomycin and ceftazidime for bacterial endophthalmitis. Use of this novel combination offers several theoretical advantages compared to standard therapy with two antibiotics, including expanded gram-negative coverage and potential synergy, and may be particularly valuable in geographies where the local antibiogram supports empiric use. Further study is merited to verify the safety and efficacy profile.

Potential Cost Savings Associated with a Multiuse Preoperative and Preinjection Eyedrop Protocol.

PURPOSE: To calculate the cost savings associated with a multiuse preoperative and preinjection eyedrop protocol. DESIGN: Economic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing ophthalmic surgical procedures requiring preoperative dilation and intravitreal injections. METHODS: Economic modeling with scenario analysis was used to derive the value for cost savings secondary to a protocol in which perioperative mydriatic eyedrop bottles are used across multiple patients versus the current protocol in which drop bottles are wasted after single-patient use. Similar analyses were performed for a multiuse povidone-iodine protocol for intravitreal injections. Sensitivity analyses were used to test baseline model assumptions with varying degrees of waste and patient volume. RESULTS: The multiuse mydriatic protocol allowed for a 97.1% reduction in the number of eyedrop bottles required for the single-use protocol (1037 bottles vs. 35 850 bottles). This led to an estimated 5-year cost savings of approximately $240 000 (nominal) per institution (performing an average of 1434 cases/year) in the base case. This savings varied minimally in sensitivity analyses accounting for practical limitations (loss, expiration, or contamination) of multiuse containers, with savings of 97.54% to 95.00% for excess supply ranges from 0% to 100% in the multiuse protocol. Likewise, the cost savings varied minimally in sensitivity analyses for eyedrop sizes, with savings of 99.23% to 96.69% for mydriatic eyedrop sizes of 15 µl per drop to 65 µl per drop, respectively, in the multiuse protocol. Over a 5-year period, for povidone-iodine drops before performing intravitreal injection, the multiuse protocol required 153 bottles compared with 41 954 bottles (99.6% reduction) for the current single-use protocol, resulting in a nominal cost savings of $41 801, which varied minimally in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Multiuse perioperative mydriatic eyedrops are a viable option for cost and environmental waste reduction for ophthalmologic procedures and surgeries requiring dilation. Likewise, multiuse povidone-iodine may allow for large relative cost reduction for in-office procedures. The total potential savings over 5 years was estimated at more than $280 000 before adjusting for inflation.

Implications of the presence of private equity in ophthalmology: an academic perspective.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Private equity acquisitions of ophthalmology private practices have been steadily increasing over the past decade with far-reaching implications. Ophthalmology departments at academic medical centers are not insulated from the impact of this trend. RECENT FINDINGS: The limited data on this subject in the ophthalmology literature identify the growing number of practice acquisitions. However, the lack of transparency obfuscates a clear understanding of the effect on patients and practice patterns. SUMMARY: Leaders at academic medical centers need to be aware of surrounding practice consolidation because of private equity as this could affect revenue streams and patient referral patterns, accelerating expansion. Trainees are entering an uncertain job marketplace that may create a compelling argument to practice in an academic medical center ophthalmology department.

INFECTIOUS KERATITIS-ASSOCIATED ENDOPHTHALMITIS: A 14-Year Study.

PURPOSE: To describe the demographics, characteristics, management, and outcomes of eyes with endophthalmitis related to infectious keratitis. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients treated for infectious keratitis-associated infectious endophthalmitis between 2001 and 2014 at University Hospital, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School. RESULTS: Thirty-eight cases with infectious keratitis-associated infectious endophthalmitis were identified (21 men [55%], mean age: 66.2 ± 20.7 years), with average time from the beginning of ulcer symptoms to endophthalmitis of 11.0 days. Associated systemic conditions (diabetes, HIV, immunosuppressive therapy, cirrhosis, or dementia) were present in 57.9%; 60.5% had previous intraocular surgery. Etiology showed gram-positive bacteria in 14 cases (36.9%), gram-negative bacteria in 7 (18.4%), fungi in 4 (10.5%), and no growth/unknown in 12 (31.6%). Nineteen cases (50%) presented with no light perception and were primarily enucleated. The remaining 19 eyes each received intravitreal antibiotics (mean: 1.5 injections); 8 (42.0%) underwent pars plans vitrectomy with vitreous biopsy, whereas 5 (26.3%) received emergency corneal transplantation. Final visual acuity was no light perception in 6 eyes (3 secondarily enucleated), light perception in 2, hand motion in 7, counting fingers in 2, and ≥20/50 in 2. CONCLUSION: Our study of 38 eyes with infectious keratitis-associated infectious endophthalmitis revealed generally poor visual outcomes and a high rate of systemic conditions and previous intraocular surgery.

Endogenous endophthalmitis associated with intravenous drug abuse.

PURPOSE: To describe demographics, characteristics, and management of eyes with endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) in intravenous drug abusers. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with EE who presented to University Hospital, New Jersey Medical School between January 2005 and October 2012. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients presented with a clinical diagnosis of EE during this time period. Eighteen patients (53%) had a history of intravenous drug abuse with at least 15 of the 18 patients reporting intravenous heroin abuse. Average age was 43 years (24-61 years), 13 were men. Three patients had bilateral involvement. Mean time from the onset of symptoms to presentation was 10 days (range, 1-42 days). Presenting vision in the affected eye ranged from 20/100 to no light perception; the majority of patients had vision of counting fingers or worse. All patients were admitted to the hospital for intravenous antimicrobials and further workup. Final best-corrected visual acuity at the last follow-up ranged from 20/20 to no light perception, with most patients having final vision of 20/400 or worse. CONCLUSION: We reviewed 21 eyes of 18 patients with EE and concurrent intravenous drug abuse over an 8-year period; our study shows extremely poor visual prognosis associated with EE in this setting.

Effects of Cost Sharing on Ophthalmic Care Utilization in the Affordable Care Act Marketplace.

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution and quantity of ophthalmic care consumed on Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans, the demographics of the population utilizing these services, and the relationship between ACA insurance coverage plan tier, cost sharing, and total cost of ophthalmic care consumed. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed ACA individual and small group market claims data from the Wakely Affordable Care Act (WACA) 2018 dataset, which contains detailed claims, enrollment, and premium data from Edge Servers for 3.9 million individual and small group market lives. We identified all enrollees with ophthalmology-specific billing, procedure, and national drug codes. We then analyzed the claims by plan type and calculated the total cost and out-of-pocket (OOP) cost. RESULTS: Among 3.9 million enrollees in the WACA 2018 dataset, 538,169 (13.7%) had claims related to ophthalmology procedures, medications, and/or diagnoses. A total of $203 million was generated in ophthalmology-related claims, with $54 million in general services, $42 million in medications, $20 million in diagnostics and imaging, and $86 million in procedures. Average annual OOP costs were $116 per member, or 30.9% of the total cost, and were lowest for members with platinum plans (16% OOP) and income-driven cost sharing reduction (ICSR) subsidies (17% OOP). Despite stable ocular disease distribution across plan types, beneficiaries with silver ICSR subsidies consumed more total care than any other plan, higher than platinum plan enrollees and almost 1.5× the cost of bronze plan enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmic care for enrollees on ACA plans generated substantial costs in 2018. Plans with higher OOP cost sharing may result in lower utilization of ophthalmic care.

Update on "Cell Therapy" Clinics Offering Treatments of Ocular Conditions Using Direct-To-Consumer Marketing Websites in the U.S.

PURPOSE: To assess the scope of U.S.-based companies advertising and administering non-Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved cell-based therapy (herein called NFACT) for ocular conditions based on information from companies' public websites after the FDA's legal actions against specific NFACT clinics in 2018 and 2019. Current findings are compared to previously published data from 2017. DESIGN: Trend study looking at U.S.-based companies that use direct-to-consumer marketing and have websites advertising therapy for ocular conditions. METHODS: A systematic and extensive keyword-based Internet search was utilized to identify, document, and analyze U.S. business websites offering NFACT for ocular conditions as of August 2022. Main outcomes measured include, clinic locations, marketed ocular conditions, types of NFACT offered, source of stem cells used, routes of administration, and treatment costs. RESULTS: From the prior analysis in 2017 to the 2019 analysis, there was a decrease in the number of NFACT clinics from 76 to 62 and companies from 40 to 39. Given the concerning persistence of NFACTs in August 2019 an additional analysis was performed in 2022 which showed a drastic decrease in NFACT clinics from 62 in 2019 to 18 in 2023 and from 39 companies to 13 in 2023. In both 2019 and 2022, the most commonly referenced ocular condition was age-related macular degeneration (2019 - 72%, 2022 - 92%). The state with the most clinics was in Texas (2019 - 12; 2022 - 5). Autologous adipose-derived stem cells were the most common cell type used in both analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In 2019 U.S.-based direct-to-consumer companies marketing NFACT persisted despite (1) a lack of high-quality clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of these procedures, (2) the association of some of these treatments with severe vision loss, and (3) increasing FDA oversight and recent legal action. In 2022 the number of clinics and companies decreased, but their persistence is a reminder that continued concern is necessary and ophthalmic associations need to continue advocacy efforts to protect patients from these potentially predatory organizations.

Effectiveness of bevacizumab step therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of bevacizumab step therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, eyes initiating treatment for nAMD at an academic medical centre from 2011-2019 were included. Exclusion criteria included previous intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, prior non-cataract intraocular surgery, <1 year of treatment, and not starting on monthly bevacizumab therapy. Of 895 eligible eyes, 548 were excluded, yielding 347 eyes in the study population. These eyes were treated for nAMD under the bevacizumab step therapy protocol with an option to switch to another agent in the event of predefined treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as losing 15 or more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters or switching to an alternative anti-VEGF agent. Eyes that did not meet these criteria were deemed treatment successes. Annual change in mean VA from baseline (ΔVA) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included treatment success rate, medication switch rate, and post-switch ΔVA. RESULTS: After 1 year, mean ΔVA was +8.4 letters (95% CI: +6.1 to +10.6 letters). 86% had treatment success, and 6% of eyes had switched to aflibercept. In years 2-7, ΔVA ranged from +7.0 to -0.7 letters, and treatment success rates ranged from 68 to 82%. 11% (n = 38) of eyes were switched to aflibercept. The post-switch ΔVA in these eyes was -7.1 letters (95% CI: -13.3 to -0.1) after a mean of 17.7 ± 12.6 injections over an average of 2.7 ± 2.0 years. CONCLUSION: A bevacizumab step therapy protocol in routine clinical practice is effective for long-term treatment of nAMD.