Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Neurooncol ; 101(2): 267-77, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20563833

ABSTRACT

The PRECISE study used convection enhanced delivery (CED) to infuse IL13-PE38QQR in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and compared survival to Gliadel Wafers (GW). The objectives of this retrospective evaluation were to assess: (1) catheter positioning in relation to imaging features and (2) to examine the potential impact of catheter positioning, overall catheter placement and imaging features on long term clinical outcome in the PRECISE study. Catheter positioning and overall catheter placement were scored and used as a surrogate of adequate placement. Imaging studies obtained on day 43 and day 71 after resection were each retrospectively reviewed. Catheter positioning scores, catheter overall placement scores, local tumor control and imaging change scores were reviewed and correlated using Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Cox PH regression analysis was used to examine whether these imaging based variables predicted overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) after adjusting for age and KPS. Of 180 patients in the CED group, 20 patients did not undergo gross total resection. Of the remaining 160 patients only 53% of patients had fully conforming catheters in respect to overall placement and 51% had adequate catheter positioning scores. Better catheter positioning scores were not correlated with local tumor control (P = 0.61) or imaging change score (P = 0.86). OS and PFS were not correlated with catheter positioning score (OS: P = 0.53; PFS: P = 0.72 respectively), overall placement score (OS: P = 0.55; PFS: P = 0.35) or imaging changes on day 43 MRI (P = 0.88). Catheter positioning scores and overall catheter placement scores were not associated with clinical outcome in this large prospective trial.


Subject(s)
Catheters , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy , Exotoxins/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/diagnosis , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Interleukin-13/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/mortality , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Glioblastoma/mortality , Humans , International Cooperation , Karnofsky Performance Status , Linear Models , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Odds Ratio , Proportional Hazards Models , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Neuro Oncol ; 9(3): 343-53, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17435179

ABSTRACT

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a novel drug delivery technique that uses positive infusion pressure to deliver therapeutic agents directly into the interstitial spaces of the brain. Despite the promise of CED, clinical trials have demonstrated that target-tissue anatomy and patient-specific physiology play a major role in drug distribution using this technique. In this study, we retrospectively tested the ability of a software algorithm using MR diffusion tensor imaging to predict patient-specific drug distributions by CED. A tumor-targeted cytotoxin, cintredekin besudotox (interleukin 13-PE38QQR), was coinfused with iodine 123-labeled human serum albumin (123I-HSA), in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. The spatial distribution of 123I-HSA was then compared to a drug distribution simulation provided by the software algorithm. The algorithm had a high sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (100%) for identifying the high proportion (7 of 14) of catheter trajectories that failed to deliver drug into the desired anatomical region (p = 0.021). This usually occurred when catheter trajectories crossed deep sulci, resulting in leak of the infusate into the subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid space. The mean concordance of the volume of distribution at the 50% isodose level between the actual 123I-HSA distribution and simulation was 65.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.0%-79.5%), and the mean maximal inplane deviation was less than 8.5 mm (95% CI, 4.0-13.0 mm). The use of this simulation algorithm was considered clinically useful in 84.6% of catheters. Routine use of this algorithm, and its further developments, should improve prospective selection of catheter trajectories, and thereby improve the efficacy of drugs delivered by this promising technique.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diagnostic Imaging , Glioma/drug therapy , Software , Adult , Drug Delivery Systems , Exotoxins/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Injections, Intraventricular , Interleukin-13/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 188(3): 703-9, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17312057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Convection-enhanced delivery is a promising approach to intracerebral drug delivery in which a fluid pressure gradient is used to infuse therapeutic macromolecules through an indwelling catheter into the interstitial spaces of the brain. Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that hyperintense signal changes on T2-weighted images produced by such infusions can be used to track drug distribution. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seven adults with recurrent malignant glioma underwent concurrent intracerebral infusions of the tumor-targeted cytotoxin cintredekin besudotox and 123I-labeled human serum albumin. The agents were administered through a total of 18 catheters among the seven patients. Adequacy of distribution of drug was determined by evidence of distribution of 123I-labeled human serum albumin on SPECT images coregistered with MR images. Qualitative analysis was performed by three blinded observers. Quantitative analysis also was performed. RESULTS: Infusions into 12 catheters produced intraparenchymal distribution as seen on SPECT images, but infusions into six catheters did not. At qualitative assessment of signal changes on MR images, reviewers correctly predicted which catheters would produce extraparenchymal distribution and which catheters would produce parenchymal distribution. Of the 12 infusions that produced intraparenchymal distribution, four catheters had been placed in regions of relatively normal signal intensity and produced regions of newly increased signal intensity, the volume of which highly correlated with the volume and geometry of distribution on SPECT (r2 = 0.9502). Eight infusions that produced intraparenchymal distribution were performed in regions of preexisting hyperintense signal. In these brains, additional signal changes were always produced, but quantitative correlations between areas of newly increased signal intensity and the volume and geometry of distribution on SPECT could not be established. CONCLUSION: Convection-enhanced infusions frequently do not provide intraparenchymal drug distribution, and these failures can be identified with MRI soon after infusion. When infusions are performed into regions of normal signal intensity, development of hyperintense signal change strongly correlates with the volume and geometry of distribution of infusate.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain/metabolism , Exotoxins/administration & dosage , Exotoxins/pharmacokinetics , Glioma/drug therapy , Glioma/metabolism , Interleukin-13/administration & dosage , Interleukin-13/pharmacokinetics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain/drug effects , Brain/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Female , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Immunotoxins/administration & dosage , Immunotoxins/pharmacokinetics , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Male , Middle Aged , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tissue Distribution
4.
Neurosurg Focus ; 20(4): E12, 2006 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16709017

ABSTRACT

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is the continuous injection under positive pressure of a fluid containing a therapeutic agent. This technique was proposed and introduced by researchers from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) by the early 1990s to deliver drugs that would otherwise not cross the blood-brain barrier into the parenchyma and that would be too large to diffuse effectively over the required distances were they simply deposited into the tissue. Despite the many years that have elapsed, this technique remains experimental because of both the absence of approved drugs for intraparenchymal delivery and the difficulty of guaranteed delivery to delineated regions of the brain. During the first decade after the NIH researchers founded this analytical model of drug distribution, the results of several computer simulations that had been conducted according to more realistic assumptions were also published, revealing encouraging results. In the late 1990s, one of the authors of the present paper proposed the development of a computer model that would predict the distribution specific to a particular patient (brain) based on obtainable data from radiological images. Several key developments in imaging technology and, in particular, the relationships between image-obtained quantities and other parameters that enter models of the CED process have been required to implement this model. Note that delivery devices need further development. In the present paper we review key features of CED as well as modeling of the procedure and indulge in informed speculation on optimizing the direct delivery of therapeutic agents into brain tissue.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain/surgery , Drug Delivery Systems/trends , Infusion Pumps, Implantable/trends , Animals , Blood-Brain Barrier/drug effects , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Brain/drug effects , Brain/physiopathology , Diffusion , Drug Delivery Systems/adverse effects , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Humans , Infusion Pumps, Implantable/adverse effects
5.
Neurosurg Focus ; 20(4): E15, 2006 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16709020

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is an increasingly used novel local/regional delivery method targeted directly to tissue. It relies on a continuous pressure gradient for distribution of therapeutic agents into the interstitial space, with administration of the infusate over a few days. Cintredekin besudotox (also known as IL13- PE38QQR) is a recombinant chimeric cytotoxin consisting of interleukin-13 and a truncated exotoxin produced by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterium, which targets malignant glioma cells. METHODS: Cintredekin besudotox was administered via intraparenchymal CED after resection of supratentorial recurrent malignant glioma. The safety and toxicity profile was reviewed for 53 patients in whom infusion catheters had been placed; 51 of them received CED of the study drug. Adverse events were categorized based on time of onset in relation to CED, and the causal relationship with catheter placement or delivery of cintredekin besudotox. Catheters were placed in 53 patients, although only 51 of them received cintredekin besudotox. Most adverse events related to catheter placement or the study drug originated from the central nervous system. Three symptomatic windows were defined: the first one was between surgical procedure and CED; the second was during CED and up to 1 week after its completion; and the third window was 2 to 10 weeks after treatment. Those windows generally reflected adverse events related to surgical procedures, mass effect from infusate, and drug effect on tumor-infiltrated and normal brain parenchyma, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The symptomatic windows identified in this study apply to any CED clinical trials, particularly those in which chimeric cytotoxins are used, and will help to determine the most likely underlying pathophysiological process causing symptoms. This information, in turn, will help to prevent adverse events or minimize their severity. Those events also have implications for dose escalation and outcome measures.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Therapy/methods , Exotoxins/administration & dosage , Glioma/drug therapy , Immunotoxins/administration & dosage , Infusion Pumps/trends , Interleukin-13/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Brain/drug effects , Brain/pathology , Brain/physiopathology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/standards , Drug Delivery Systems/adverse effects , Drug Delivery Systems/trends , Drug Therapy/trends , Exotoxins/adverse effects , Exotoxins/genetics , Exotoxins/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunotoxins/adverse effects , Infusion Pumps/adverse effects , Interleukin-13/adverse effects , Interleukin-13/genetics , Interleukin-13/immunology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/chemistry , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Neuro Oncol ; 12(8): 871-81, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20511192

ABSTRACT

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of cintredekin besudotox (CB) was compared with Gliadel wafers (GW) in adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) at first recurrence. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CB or GW. CB (0.5 microg/mL; total flow rate 0.75 mL/h) was administered over 96 hours via 2-4 intraparenchymal catheters placed after tumor resection. GW (3.85%/7.7 mg carmustine per wafer; maximum 8 wafers) were placed immediately after tumor resection. The primary endpoint was overall survival from the time of randomization. Prestated interim analyses were built into the study design. Secondary and tertiary endpoints were safety and health-related quality-of-life assessments. From March 2004 to December 2005, 296 patients were enrolled at 52 centers. Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 treatment arms. Median survival was 36.4 weeks (9.1 months) for CB and 35.3 weeks (8.8 months) for GW (P = .476). For the efficacy evaluable population, the median survival was 45.3 weeks (11.3 months) for CB and 39.8 weeks (10 months) for GW (P = .310). The adverse-events profile was similar in both arms, except that pulmonary embolism was higher in the CB arm (8% vs 1%, P = .014). This is the first randomized phase III evaluation of an agent administered via CED and the first with an active comparator in GBM patients. There was no survival difference between CB administered via CED and GW. Drug distribution was not assessed and may be crucial for evaluating future CED-based therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Exotoxins/administration & dosage , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Interleukin-13/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Carmustine , Catheters, Indwelling , Convection , Decanoic Acids/administration & dosage , Decanoic Acids/adverse effects , Drug Administration Routes , Exotoxins/adverse effects , Female , Glioblastoma/mortality , Humans , Interleukin-13/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Polyesters/administration & dosage , Polyesters/adverse effects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Young Adult
7.
J Neurosurg ; 113(2): 301-9, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20020841

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a novel intracerebral drug delivery technique with considerable promise for delivering therapeutic agents throughout the CNS. Despite this promise, Phase III clinical trials employing CED have failed to meet clinical end points. Although this may be due to inactive agents or a failure to rigorously validate drug targets, the authors have previously demonstrated that catheter positioning plays a major role in drug distribution using this technique. The purpose of the present work was to retrospectively analyze the expected drug distribution based on catheter positioning data available from the CED arm of the PRECISE trial. METHODS: Data on catheter positioning from all patients randomized to the CED arm of the PRECISE trial were available for analyses. BrainLAB iPlan Flow software was used to estimate the expected drug distribution. RESULTS: Only 49.8% of catheters met all positioning criteria. Still, catheter positioning score (hazard ratio 0.93, p = 0.043) and the number of optimally positioned catheters (hazard ratio 0.72, p = 0.038) had a significant effect on progression-free survival. Estimated coverage of relevant target volumes was low, however, with only 20.1% of the 2-cm penumbra surrounding the resection cavity covered on average. Although tumor location and resection cavity volume had no effect on coverage volume, estimations of drug delivery to relevant target volumes did correlate well with catheter score (p < 0.003), and optimally positioned catheters had larger coverage volumes (p < 0.002). Only overall survival (p = 0.006) was higher for investigators considered experienced after adjusting for patient age and Karnofsky Performance Scale score. CONCLUSIONS: The potential efficacy of drugs delivered by CED may be severely constrained by ineffective delivery in many patients. Routine use of software algorithms and alternative catheter designs and infusion parameters may improve the efficacy of drugs delivered by CED.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Catheterization/methods , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Algorithms , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods , Convection , Drug Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interleukin-13 , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Software , Tissue Distribution , Treatment Failure
8.
Neurosurgery ; 60(2 Suppl 1): ONS89-98; discussion ONS98-9, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17297371

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) holds tremendous potential for drug delivery to the brain. However, little is known about the volume of distribution achieved within human brain tissue or how target anatomy and catheter positioning influence drug distribution. The primary objective of this study was to quantitatively describe the distribution of a high molecular weight agent by CED relative to target anatomy and catheter position in patients with malignant gliomas. METHODS: Seven adult patients with recurrent malignant gliomas underwent intracerebral infusion of the tumor-targeted cytotoxin, cintredekin besudotox, concurrently with 123I-labeled human serum albumin. High-resolution single-photon emission computed tomographic images were obtained at 24 and 48 hours and were coregistered with magnetic resonance imaging scans. The distribution of 123I-labeled human serum albumin relative to target anatomy and catheter position was analyzed. RESULTS: Intracerebral CED infusions were well-tolerated and some resulted in a broad distribution of 123I-labeled human serum albumin, but target anatomy and catheter positioning had a significant influence on infusate distribution even within non-contrast-enhancing areas of brain. Intratumoral infusions were anisotropic and resulted in limited coverage of the enhancing tumor area and adjacent peritumoral regions. CONCLUSIONS: CED has the potential to deliver high molecular weight agents into tumor-infiltrated brain parenchyma with volumes of distribution that are clinically relevant. Target tissue anatomy and catheter position are critical parameters in optimizing drug delivery.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Convection , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Exotoxins/administration & dosage , Glioma/drug therapy , Interleukin-13/administration & dosage , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Catheterization , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Exotoxins/adverse effects , Humans , Injections, Intraventricular , Interleukin-13/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL