Are breast cancer patients with suboptimal adherence to cardiovascular treatment more likely to discontinue adjuvant endocrine therapy? Competing risk survival analysis in a nationwide cohort of postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: High rates of discontinuation undermine the effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) among hormone-receptive breast cancer patients. Patient prognosis also relies on the successful management of cardiovascular risk, which affects a high proportion of postmenopausal women. As with AET, adherence with cardiovascular drugs is suboptimal. We examined whether patient adherence with cardiovascular drugs was associated with the rate of AET discontinuation in a French nationwide claims database linked with hospitalisation data. METHODS: We identified postmenopausal women starting AET between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2020 and taking at least two drugs for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs and platelet aggregation inhibitors) before AET initiation. Adherence was assessed for each drug class by computing the proportion of days covered. Women were categorised as fully adherent, partially adherent or fully non-adherent with their cardiovascular drug regimen based on whether they adhered with all, part or none of their drugs. AET discontinuation was defined as a 90-day gap in AET availability. Time to AET discontinuation according to levels of cardiovascular drug adherence was estimated using cumulative incidence curves, accounting for the competing risks of death and cancer recurrence. Multivariate cause-specific Cox regressions and Fine-and-Gray regressions were used to assess the relative hazards of AET discontinuation. RESULTS: In total, 32,075 women fit the inclusion criteria. Women who were fully adherent with their cardiovascular drugs had the lowest cumulative incidence of AET discontinuation at any point over the 5-year follow-up period. At 5 years, 40.2% of fully non-adherent women had discontinued AET compared with 33.5% of partially adherent women and 28.8% of fully adherent women. Both partial adherence and full non-adherence with cardiovascular drugs were predictors of AET discontinuation in the two models (cause-specific hazard ratios 1.16 [95% CI 1.10-1.22] and 1.49 [95% CI 1.39-1.58]; subdistribution hazard ratios 1.15 [95% CI 1.10-1.21] and 1.47 [95% CI 1.38-1.57]). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that patients who do not adhere with their entire cardiovascular drug regimen are also more likely to discontinue AET. This stresses the importance of integrated care, as suboptimal adherence with both treatment components poses a threat to achieving ideal patient outcomes.

Trends in clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins use in women with infertility between 2010 and 2017: A population-based study in France.

PURPOSE: To describe temporal trends and assess factors associated with changes in the prescription of clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins between 2010 and 2017 in women with infertility aged 18-50 from metropolitan France. METHODS: 6321 prevalent women from a representative sample of the national medico-administrative database were identified. We performed a Cochran-Armitage trend test and calculated the rate ratios. A Poisson regression was used to derive the incidence rate ratios, for each treatment class. RESULTS: The prevalence rate and incidence rate of clomiphene citrate use significantly decreased by 20% (RR 0.80: 95% CI 0.71-0.90) and 23% (RR 0.77: 95% CI 0.66-0.89), respectively. Its initiation was higher in all age groups compared to the reference (18-24 years), with a downward gradient. It was also higher when the density of gynaecologists was higher and in disadvantaged areas. The prevalence rate and incidence rate of gonadotropin use increased by 11% (RR 1.11: 95% CI 1.01-1.22) and 33% (RR 1.33: 95% CI 1.14-1.55) respectively. Gonadotropin initiation was highest in the 31-35 age group, but it was also higher in the 25-30 and 36-40 age groups at a similar level (reference 18-24 years). Its initiation was higher when the density of gynaecologists was higher, but not associated with social deprivation. CONCLUSION: Our results showed an increase in gonadotropin use for infertility treatment in France during the 2010-2017 period and a decrease in clomiphene citrate use. Further work should be undertaken to analyse the use of these drugs in relation to women's care pathways.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of direct admission to acute geriatric unit versus admission after an emergency department visit for elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Elderly individuals represent an increasing proportion of emergency department (ED) users. In the Greater Paris University Hospitals (APHP) direct-admission study, direct admission (DA) to an acute geriatric unit (AGU) was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS), lower post-acute care transfers, and lower risk of an ED return visit in the month following the AGU hospitalization compared with admission after an ED visit. Until now, no economic evaluation of DA has been available. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DA to an AGU versus admission after an ED visit in elderly patients. This was conducted alongside the APHP direct-admission study which used electronic medical records and administrative claims data from the Greater Paris University Hospitals (APHP) Health Data Warehouse and involved 19 different AGUs. We included all patients ≥ 75 years old who were admitted to an AGU for more than 24 h between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. The effectiveness criterion was the occurrence of ED return visit in the month following AGU hospitalization. We compared the costs of an AGU stay in the DA versus the ED visit group. The perspective was that of the payer. To characterise and summarize uncertainty, we used a non-parametric bootstrap resampling and constructed cost-effectiveness accessibility curves. RESULTS: At baseline, mean costs per patient were €5113 and €5131 in the DA and ED visit groups, respectively. ED return visit rates were 3.3% (n = 81) in the DA group and 3.9% (n = 160) in the ED group (p = 0.21). After bootstrap, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €-4249 (95%CI= -66,001; +45,547) per ED return visit averted. Acceptability curves showed that DA could be considered a cost-effective intervention at a threshold of €-2405 per ED return visit avoided. CONCLUSION: The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis of DA to an AGU versus admission after an ED visit for elderly patients argues in favor of DA, which could help provide support for public decision making.

Patient stratification for risk of readmission due to heart failure by using nationwide administrative data.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients with heart failure (HF) who are most at risk of readmission permits targeting adapted interventions. The use of administrative data enables regulators to support the implementation of such interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a French nationwide cohort of patients aged 65 years or older, surviving an index hospitalization for HF in 2015 (N = 70,657), we studied HF readmission predictors available in administrative data, distinguishing HF severity from overall morbidity and taking into account the competing mortality risk, over a 1-year follow-up period. We also computed cumulative incidences and daily rates of HF readmission for patient groups defined according to HF severity and overall morbidity. Of the patients, 31.8% (n = 22,475) were readmitted at least once for HF, and 17.6% (n = 12,416) died without any readmission for HF. HF severity and overall morbidity were the strongest readmission predictors were the strongest readmission predictors (subdistribution hazard ratios 2.66 [95% CI: 2.52-2.81] and 1.37 [1.30-1.45], respectively, when comparing extreme categories). Overall morbidity and age were more strongly associated with the rate of death without HF readmission (cause-specific hazard ratios). The difference in observed HF readmission between patient risk groups was approximately 40% (21.9%, n = 2144/9,786 vs 60.4%, n = 618/1023). CONCLUSIONS: Segmentation of HF patients into readmission risk groups is possible by using administrative data, and it enables the targeting of preventive interventions.

Determinants of antidementia drug prescription in patients older than 65: A latent class analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antidementia drugs (cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine) are still widely prescribed despite their controversial effects and 2011 guidelines that no longer encourage their prescription. The objective was to assess which factors remained determinants of antidementia drug prescriptions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 2013. Patients suffering from dementia, aged 65 and over, identified in the French national health insurance database were included. Because we anticipated a high correlation between age, comorbidities, and health care use, we first identified the patients' health status by a latent class analysis. Second, we performed adjusted logistic regression models. The explanatory variables were patients' health status, gender, prescription of nonpharmacological treatments (physical and speech therapies), prescription of psychotropic drugs, and access to health care. RESULTS: Among the 3873 patients included, 38% received antidementia drugs. Three latent classes of patients with different health status were identified. Patients with poor health status received significantly fewer antidementia drugs (P < .001). Patients with speech therapy or antidepressant drugs received significantly more antidementia drugs (P < .001), whereas patients with physical therapy received significantly fewer antidementia drugs (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Antidementia drugs were less likely to be prescribed for patients with poor health status. This result is encouraging for these frail patients who are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of treatments. At the same time, this result encourage targeting specifically patients in good health status for the use of a decision aid, in an attempt to limit prescriptions by involving patients and families.

A top 5 list for French general practice.

BACKGROUND: Medical overuse is an issue that has recently gained attention. The "Choosing Wisely" campaign invited each specialty in each country to create its own top five lists of care procedures with a negative benefit-risk balance to promote dialogue between patients and physicians. This study aims to create such a list for French general practice. METHODS: A panel of general practitioners (GPs) suggested care procedures that they felt ought to be prescribed less. Using the Delphi method, a short list of those suggestions was selected. Systematic literature reviews were performed for each item on the short list. The results were presented to the panel to assist with the final selection of the top five list. RESULTS: The panel included 40 GPs. The list includes: i/ antibiotics prescription for acute bronchitis, nasopharyngitis, otitis media with effusion, or uncomplicated influenza, ii/ systematic prostate specific antigen testing in men older than 50, iii/ prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors for mild cognitive impairment and for Alzheimer's disease and memantine for Alzheimer's disease, iv/ statins prescription in primary prevention of cardio-vascular risk in older patients, and v/ benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine-like agents prescription for generalised anxiety, insomnia, and for all indications in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study resulted in a French top five list in general practice using a panel of GPs. All the items selected have a negative risk-benefit balance and are frequently prescribed by French general practitioners. This list differs from other top five lists for general practice, reflecting the local medical culture.

Préférences des femmes vis-à-vis du dépistage du cancer du sein.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, the balance between the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening (BCS) has been widely debated. To date, no French study has interrogated women's points of view and preferences (in the economic sense) for this controversial screening. This study aims to bridge this gap. We aimed to elicit women's trade-offs between the benefits and harms of BCS. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment questionnaire was developed and administered by a survey institute to French women in order to elicit their preferences and trade-offs between the benefits and risks of BCS (i.e., overdiagnosis and false-positive mammography). RESULTS: Eight hundred and twelve women, representative of the French general population (age, socioeconomic level, and geographical location), completed the survey. The women would be willing to accept on average 14.1 overdiagnosis cases (median = 9.6) and 47.8 women with a false-positive result (median = 27.2) to avoid one BC-related death. Results from our simulations predict that less than 50% of women would be willing to accept 10 overdiagnosis cases (respectively, 30 women with a false-positive mammography) for one BC-related death avoided. CONCLUSION: Women are sensitive to both the benefits and harms of BC screening and their preferences are highly heterogeneous. Providing balanced information on both benefits and harms to women through an informed decision-making process would be more respectful of women's preferences.

General practitioner consultation after a visit to the emergency department: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have demonstrated an association between poor continuity of care, high likelihood of 'inappropriate' use of emergency departments (EDs) and avoidable hospitalization. However, we lack data concerning primary care use after an ED visit. OBJECTIVE: Identify the determinants of a visit to the general practitioner (GP) after an ED visit.Methods. DESIGN: Observational study (single-centre cohort). SETTING: One emergency department in Paris, France. SUBJECTS: All adult patients who presented at the ED and were discharged. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We collected data by the use of a standardized questionnaire, patients' medical records and a telephonic follow-up. Descriptive analyses were performed to compare individuals with and without a GP. Then, for those with a GP, multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of the GP consultation. RESULTS: We included 243 patients (mean age 45 years [±19]); 211 (87%) reported having a GP. Among those who reported having a GP, 52% had consulted their GP after the ED visit. Not having a GP was associated with young age, not having complementary health insurance coverage, and being single. GP consultation was associated with increasing age [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.03], poor self-reported health status (aOR = 2.25), medical complaints versus traumatic injuries (aOR = 2.24) and prescription for sick note (aOR = 5.74). CONCLUSION: Not having a GP was associated with factors of social vulnerability such as not having complementary health insurance coverage. For patients with a GP, consultation in the month after an ED visit seems appropriate, because it was associated with poor health status and medical complaints.

[Eliciting women's preferences for breast cancer screening] / Préférences des femmes vis-à-vis du dépistage du cancer du sein.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, the balance between the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening (BCS) has been widely debated. To date, no French study has interrogated women's points of view and preferences (in the economic sense) for this controversial screening. This study aims to bridge this gap. We aimed to elicit women's trade-offs between the benefits and harms of BCS. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment questionnaire was developed and administered by a survey institute to French women in order to elicit their preferences and trade-offs between the benefits and risks of BCS (i.e., overdiagnosis and false-positive mammography). RESULTS: Eight hundred and twelve women, representative of the French general population (age, socioeconomic level, and geographical location), completed the survey. The women would be willing to accept on average 14.1 overdiagnosis cases (median = 9.6) and 47.8 women with a false-positive result (median = 27.2) to avoid one BC-related death. Results from our simulations predict that less than 50% of women would be willing to accept 10 overdiagnosis cases (respectively, 30 women with a false-positive mammography) for one BC-related death avoided. CONCLUSION: Women are sensitive to both the benefits and harms of BC screening and their preferences are highly heterogeneous. Providing balanced information on both benefits and harms to women through an informed decision-making process would be more respectful of women's preferences.

Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, the benefits and harms balance of breast cancer (BC) screening has been widely debated. OBJECTIVES: To elicit women's trade-offs between the benefits and harms of BC screening and to analyze the main determinants of these trade-offs. METHODS: A discrete-choice experiment with seven attributes depicting BC screening programs including varying levels of BC mortality, overdiagnosis, and false-positive result was used. Eight hundred twelve women aged 40 to 74 years with no personal history of BC recruited by a survey institute and representative of the French general population (age, socioeconomic level, and geographical location) completed the discrete-choice experiment. Preference heterogeneity was investigated using generalized multinomial logit models from which individual trade-offs were derived, and their main determinants were assessed using generalized linear models. Screening acceptance rates under various benefits and harms ratios were simulated on the basis of the distribution of individual preferences. RESULTS: The women would be willing to accept on average 14.1 overdiagnosis cases (median = 9.6) and 47.8 false-positive results (median = 27.2) to avoid one BC-related death. After accounting for preference heterogeneity, less than 50% of women would be willing to accept 10 overdiagnosis cases for one BC-related death avoided. Screening acceptance rates were higher among women with higher socioeconomic level and lower among women with poor health. CONCLUSIONS: Women are sensitive to both the benefits and the harms of BC screening and their preferences are highly heterogeneous. Our study provides useful results for public health authorities and clinicians willing to improve their recommendations of BC screening on the basis of women's preferences.

What Are the Determinants of Dental Care Expenditures in Institutions for Adults With Disabilities? Findings From a National Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the determinants of dental care expenditures in institutions for adults with disabilities. DESIGN: Health and disability survey and insurance database. SETTING: Institutional setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=2222) living in institutions for people with cognitive, sensory, and mobility disabilities. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used a Heckman selection model to correct for potential sample selection bias due to the high percentage of non-dental care users. The Heckman selection model is a 2-step statistical approach based on the simultaneous estimation of 2 multiple regression models-a selection equation (step 1) and an outcome equation (step 2)-offering a means of correcting for nonrandomly selected samples. The selection equation modeled whether the individual had consulted a dentist at least once, whereas the outcome equation explained the dental care expenditures. Disability severity was assessed by scoring mobility and cognitive functional limitations. Regressions also included sociodemographic characteristics and other health-related variables. RESULTS: Individuals with the highest cognitive limitation scores, without family visits, without supplementary health insurance, and with poor oral health status were less likely to consult a dentist. After controlling for potential selection bias, the only variable that remained statistically significant in the outcome equation was the oral health status: when individuals with poor health status had consulted at least once, they had a higher level of dental care expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Functional limitations were barriers to accessing dental care even in institutions for adult with disabilities. These barriers should be overcome because they may worsen their oral health status and well-being. Given the lack of literature on this specific topic, our results are important from a policy perspective. Health authorities should be alerted by these findings.

What Are the Determinants of Specialized Outpatient and Dental Care Use in Adults With Disabilities Living in Institutions: Findings From a National Survey in France.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the determinants of specialized outpatient care use (general practitioners excluded) in people with disabilities living in institutions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: National health and disability survey. PARTICIPANTS: People (N=2528) living in institutions for adults with cognitive, sensory, and mobility disabilities. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used different measures of disability severity available in the survey: (1) the continuous score of limitations based on a measure we constructed according to self-reported level of difficulty performing 18 tasks without aid; (2) the Katz Index; and (3) the respondent's self-reported perception of functional limitations. Logistic regressions were performed to examine the determinants of the likelihood of having consulted a specialized outpatient care physician or a dentist at least once in the previous year. RESULTS: Of the 2528 individuals, 45% (1141) and 28% (697) had respectively consulted a specialized outpatient care physician or a dentist at least once in the previous year. After adjusting for health care needs, higher functional limitation scores, dependency in all 6 activities of daily living, and self-reported perceptions of severe functional limitations were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of having consulted a specialized outpatient care physician (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], .95 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .94-.96]; AOR, .29 [95% CI, .23-.38]; and AOR, .51 [95% CI, .42-.62], respectively) or a dentist (AOR, .95 [95% CI, .94-.96]; AOR, .29 [95% CI, .21-.39]; AOR, .55 [95% CI, .44-.67], respectively) at least once in the previous year. Being a man, reporting a lack of family support, and having a low socioeconomic status also significantly affected specialized outpatient care use. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the method used to define and measure disability, a high degree of disability negatively affects specialized outpatient care use after adjusting for health care need. Further studies are needed to better understand the reasons why this association between the degree of functional limitation and unmet medical needs is also a reality for people with disabilities living in institutions.

Effectiveness of intervention led by a community pharmacist for improving recognition of sleep apnea in primary care--a cohort study.

Despite its high prevalence and major public health ramifications, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) remains underdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to determine whether the involvement of a community pharmacist (CP) in the care pathway of a patient at risk of OSAS, through the implementation of a community pharmacist (CP) intervention, was effective, i.e. increased the use of diagnostic tests in this population. We compared a cohort of patients included in a research protocol (exposed to a CP intervention) with patients having the same characteristics taken from a general population database who did not receive the intervention (unexposed group). The aim of the CP intervention was to educate patients about the risk of untreated OSAS, encouraging them to consult their general practitioner, and urging the doctor to continue investigations. We included 782 patients at risk of OSAS, i.e. taking one or more anti-hypertensive drugs, being overweight (body mass index >25) and snoring almost every night (88 in the exposed group and 694 in the unexposed group). After a 6-month follow-up, the number of patients who underwent an OSAS diagnostic test was significantly higher in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group (22.7 versus 11.4%, P = 0.003). Being exposed to the pharmacist intervention was associated with a higher chance of undergoing a diagnostic test for OSAS, adjusted odds ratio: 2.24 (1.25-4.01). In conclusion, these findings provide arguments for the implementation of a CP OSAS screening intervention in CP routine practice.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Guided by Cardiac Monitoring During High-Risk Abdominal Surgery in Adult Patients: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Esophageal Doppler and Arterial Pulse Pressure Waveform Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several minimally invasive techniques for cardiac output monitoring such as the esophageal Doppler (ED) and arterial pulse pressure waveform analysis (APPWA) have been shown to improve surgical outcomes compared with conventional clinical assessment (CCA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in high-risk abdominal surgery from the perspective of the French public health insurance fund. METHODS: An analytical decision model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of ED, APPWA, and CCA. Effectiveness data were defined from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials. The clinical end points were avoidance of hospital mortality and avoidance of major complications. Hospital costs were estimated by the cost of corresponding diagnosis-related groups. RESULTS: Both goal-directed therapy strategies evaluated were more effective and less costly than CCA. Perioperative mortality and the rate of major complications were reduced by the use of ED and APPWA. Cost reduction was mainly due to the decrease in the rate of major complications. APPWA was dominant compared with ED in 71.6% and 27.6% and dominated in 23.8% and 20.8% of the cases when the end point considered was "major complications avoided" and "death avoided," respectively. Regarding cost per death avoided, APPWA was more likely to be cost-effective than ED in a wide range of willingness to pay. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output monitoring during high-risk abdominal surgery is cost-effective and is associated with a reduced rate of hospital mortality and major complications, whatever the device used. The two devices evaluated had negligible costs compared with the observed reduction in hospital costs. Our comparative studies suggest a larger effect with APPWA that needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Empirical Testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option: The Case of Sleep Apnea.

There is an increasing use of the discrete choice experiment (DCE) method in health care to estimate preferences of individuals and the public for different services. Despite this increasing use, there are few studies that investigate the validity of the DCE in health. This study investigates the external validity of DCE by comparing the predicted treatment choices from the DCE to the actual treatment choices made by the same respondents using a decision board (DB) approach. The sample includes 140 patients who came for a sleep apnea routine visit in a hospital setting. Each respondent answered 10 DCE tasks and 1 DB task. The preferences were estimated with a generalized multinomial logit model and the predicted and actual treatment choices were compared both at the sample and individual levels. The results raise questions about the external validity of DCE in health. At the sample level, the comparison showed large but not significant differences between the two methods. This can be explained in part by the aggregation process that obscures variability in the individuals' preferences. At the individual level, the comparison showed that the two methods led to significantly different patterns of choices.

What are the patients' preferences for the Chronic Care Model? An application to the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

CONTEXT: The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been developed to improve the quality of medical care delivered by general practitioners to patients with multiple chronic conditions. Despite an increasing use of this model, it remains unclear to what extent the different recommendations are valued by the patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the preferences of patients with multiple chronic conditions for recommendations of the Chronic Care Model. METHODS: The patients' preferences were identified with a discrete choice experiment. The hypothetical general practice cares were described using 10 recommendations of the Chronic Care Model (i.e. shared decision making; informational continuity (INF); regular follow-up; planned care; communication; collaboration with a nurse; advices on health habits; patient empowerment; psychological support; coordination). Respondents were consecutively recruited in a hospital setting during routine follow-up visits to their pulmonary specialist. The sample of respondents included 150 patients with multiple chronic conditions in addition to an obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. RESULTS: The INF is highly valued by the patients. At the opposite, patients do not appear to value collaboration between nurses and GPs. To a large extent, the patients' preferences for the recommendations of the CCM depend on their gender, number of chronic conditions and self-perceived health condition. DISCUSSION: The INF appeared to be a minimal requirement to ensure high-quality general practice care. The significant interactions between the patients' socio-demographic characteristics and their preferences for the CCM highlighted the necessity to deliver personalized services.

Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context.

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases are major causes of disability worldwide with rising prevalence. Most patients suffering from chronic conditions do not always receive optimal care. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been developed to help general practitioners making quality improvements. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire was increasingly used in several countries to appraise the implementation of the CCM from the patients' perspective. The objective of this study was to adapt the PACIC questionnaire in the French context and to test the validity of this adaptation in a sample of patients with multiple chronic conditions. METHODS: The PACIC was translated into French language using a forward/backward procedure. The French version was validated using a sample of 150 patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and having multiple chronic co-morbidities. Several forms of validity were analysed: content; face; construct; and internal consistency. The construct validity was investigated with an exploratory factorial analysis. RESULTS: The French-version of the PACIC consisted in 18 items, after merging two pairs of items due to redundancy. The high number of items exhibiting floor/ceiling effects and the non-normality of the ratings suggested that a 5-points rating scale was somewhat inappropriate to assess the patients' experience of care. The construct validity of the French-PACIC was verified and resulted in a bi-dimensional structure. Overall this structure showed a high level of internal consistency. The PACIC score appeared to be significantly related to the age and self-reported health of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: A French-version of the PACIC questionnaire is now available to evaluate the patients' experience of care and to monitor the quality improvements realised by the medical structures. This study also pointed out some methodological issues about the PACIC questionnaire, related to the format of the rating scale and to the structure of the questionnaire.

Gender awareness among general practitioners in France: a cross sectional study using the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS).

Gender is a key determinant of health and healthcare use. The question of whether physicians are aware of gender issues is important to avoid gender bias in medical practice. This study aimed to validate the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS) in a representative population of French general practitioners (GPs) and to analyze their gender sensitivity and the presence of gender stereotypes among them. The N-GAMS, already validated in medical students, measures gender awareness through 3 subscores: gender sensitivity (GS) and gender-role ideology towards patients (GRIP) and doctors (GRID) (gender stereotypes). After translation into French, it was distributed to 900 GPs. The scale was validated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Psychometric properties were tested. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to explore the associations between GPs' characteristics and N-GAMS subscores. EFA identified 3 meaningful factors consistent with prior theory. Subscores exhibited good internal consistency. The main findings were that GRIP was significantly higher in older physicians, in male physicians, among those who less involved their patients in decisions, and those who were not training supervisors. For GRID, results were quite similar to those of GRIP. GS was significantly higher for physicians working in health centres or medical homes and for those with gynecological practices but lower when they less involved patients in medical decisions. This study suggests that it is necessary to teach gender issues not only in medical schools but also as part of continuing medical education.

Women's preferences for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment: A discrete choice experiment.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Shared decision-making has become a hallmark of quality care and is increasingly spotlighted in practice guidelines. Little is known about women's views for treatment of less active ectopic pregnancy. What are the preferences of women for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment-related attributes? DESIGN: A discrete choice model with 8 attributes depicting ectopic pregnancy treatment including varying levels of first-line treatment effectiveness, length of hospitalization, cost, length of sick leave, of convalescence, need for surgical management, for emergency care during convalescence and for tube removal was used. Childbearing aged women, i.e. those who might experience an ectopic pregnancy in the future, were recruited. They were asked to choose between hypothetical treatments in 18 choice tasks with different levels of all treatment attributes. A conditional logit McFadden's choice model was performed. The main outcome measure was preference weights for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment-related attributes. RESULTS: A total of 5770 observations from 178 women were analysed. The attributes displaying the highest marginal impacts on women's decisions included: higher rate of first-line treatment effectiveness, lower rate of tube removal, lower rate of surgical management, shorter length of hospitalization and, to a lesser extent, but still significant, shorter length of convalescence, absence of risk of emergency care during convalescence and lower cost. CONCLUSIONS: Trade-offs made by women between the attributes of less active ectopic pregnancy treatment suggest that no treatment option, either medical or surgical, is an obvious preferred option. These results encourage the promotion of shared decision-making.

Excess healthcare expenditure in adults treated for solid cancer in childhood: a cohort study in France.

BACKGROUND: Due to late effects, childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are more likely to have multiple chronic conditions than the general population. However, little is known about the economic burden of care of CCS in the long term. OBJECTIVES: To estimate excess healthcare expenditure for long-term CCS in France compared to the general population and to investigate the associated factors. METHODS: We included 5353 5-year solid CCS diagnosed before the age of 21 years before 2000 from the French CCS cohort and obtained a random reference sample from the general population for each CCS, matched on age, gender and region of residence. We used the French national health data system to estimate annual healthcare expenditure between 2011 and 2018 for CCS and the reference sample, and computed the excess as the net difference between CCS expenditure and the median expenditure of the reference sample. We used repeated-measures linear models to estimate associations between excess healthcare expenditure and CCS characteristics. RESULTS: Annual mean (95% CI) excess healthcare expenditure was €3920 (3539; 4301), mainly for hospitalization (39.6%) and pharmacy expenses (17%). Higher excess was significantly associated with having been treated before the 1990s and having survived a central nervous system tumor, whereas lower excess was associated with CCS who had not received treatment with radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Of the variables that influence excess healthcare expenditure, a lever for action is the type of treatment administered. Future research should focus on addressing the long-term cost-effectiveness of new approaches, especially those related to radiotherapy.