Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 73(3): 232-40, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25515682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if TNF, IL-1 or their endogenous controls, in relation to ACPA, are associated with radiological signs of ongoing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) bone tissue resorption and disc displacement in RA patients. METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive outpatients with TMJ of RA were included. Systemic inflammatory activity was assessed by DAS28. The number of painful regions in the body and ESR, CRP, RF and ACPA were analyzed. TMJ synovial fluid and blood samples were obtained and analyzed for TNF, TNFsRII, IL-1ra, IL-1sRII and ACPA. The ratios between the mediators and their endogenous control receptors were used in the statistical analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in closed- and open-mouth positions and evaluated regarding disc position and presence of condylar and temporal erosions of the TMJ. RESULTS: A high TNF level in relation to TNFsRII in TMJ synovial fluid correlated to the degree of TMJ condylar erosion. A high IL-1ra level in relation to TNF in TMJ synovial fluid was also correlated to the degree of TMJ condylar erosion. The total degree of TMJ condylar erosion was correlated with the number of painful regions. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that TNF in TMJ synovial fluid mediates TMJ cartilage and bone tissue resorption in RA. The study also suggests that the degree of endogenous cytokine control is of importance for development of bone tissue destruction.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/immunology , Temporomandibular Joint/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , Autoantibodies/analysis , Blood Sedimentation , Bone Resorption/immunology , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cartilage, Articular/immunology , Female , Humans , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/analysis , Interleukin-1beta/analysis , Joint Dislocations/immunology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Mandibular Condyle/immunology , Middle Aged , Pain/immunology , Receptors, Interleukin-1 Type II/analysis , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II/analysis , Synovial Fluid/immunology , Temporomandibular Joint/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/immunology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/pathology
2.
Singapore Dent J ; 34(1): 1-12, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24360260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses the effect of methods commonly used to manage the pulp in cases of deep caries lesions, and the extent the pulp chamber remains uninfected and does not cause pulpal or periapical inflammatory lesions and associated tooth-ache over time. STUDY DESIGN: An electronic literature search included the databases PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Reviews from January 1950 to March 2013. In addition, hand searches were carried out. Two reviewers independently evaluated abstracts and full-text articles. An article was read in full if at least one of the two reviewers considered the abstract potentially relevant. Altogether, 161 articles were read in full text. Of these, 24 studies fulfilled established inclusion criteria. Based on studies of at least moderate quality, the quality of evidence of each procedure was rated in four levels according to GRADE. RESULTS: No study reached the high quality level. Twelve were of moderate quality. The overall evidence was insufficient to assess which of indirect pulp capping, stepwise excavation, direct excavation and pulp capping/partial pulpotomy, pulpotomy or pulpectomy is the most effective treatment approach for teeth with deep caries. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the lack of good studies it is not possible to determine whether an injured pulp by deep caries can be maintained or whether it should be removed and replaced with a root canal filling. Both randomized studies and prospective observational studies are needed to investigate whether a pulp exposed to deep caries is best treated by measures intended to preserve it or by pulpectomy and root filling.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Dental Pulp , Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment , Dental Caries/therapy , Dental Pulp Capping , Humans , Prospective Studies , Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents , Pulpotomy , Root Caries
3.
Swed Dent J ; 37(3): 153-60, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24341168

ABSTRACT

This study comprises a survey of Swedish dentists'treatment preferences in cases of carious exposure of the dental pulp in adults.The survey was conducted as part of a comprehensive report on methods of diagnosis and treatment in endodontics, published in 2010 by the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. A questionnaire was mailed to a random subsample of 2012 dental offices where one dentist at each office was requested to answer all questions. Each questionnaire contained one of three sets of questions about endodontic practice routines.Thus around one-third of the subsample received case-specific questions about treating carious exposure. Only general practitioners aged below 70 years were included.The final study sample comprised 412 participants.The dentists were presented with two case scenarios. In Case 1 a 22-year old patient had a deep carious lesion in tooth 36 and in Case 2 a 50-year old patient had a deep carious lesion in tooth 14.The participants were asked to nominate their treatment of choice: pulp capping, partial pulpotomy or pulpectomy. For Case 1, 17 per cent of the respondents selected pulpectomy; the corresponding rate for Case 2 was 47 per cent. Female gender and age group 25-49 years were predictive of selection of less invasive treatment options. However, according to recent guidelines (2011) from the National Board of Health and Wellfare, Swedish dentists are recommended to elect pulpectomy prior to pulp capping/partial pulpotomy when confronted with a tooth having a cariously exposed pulp in adults.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Capping/statistics & numerical data , Dental Pulp Exposure/therapy , Practice Patterns, Dentists' , Pulpectomy/statistics & numerical data , Pulpotomy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data , Root Canal Obturation/statistics & numerical data , Specialty Boards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden , Young Adult
4.
J Orofac Pain ; 25(3): 223-31, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21837289

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess whether changes in diagnoses and management of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD) patients are influenced by radiographic findings and if there is an association between specific radiologic alterations and management strategy changes. METHODS: A total of 204 patients with TMJ symptoms were examined using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). Diagnoses and management were first decided without the aid of radiographs. Management categories were: pharmacology, physiotherapy, counseling and behavioral treatment, occlusal stabilization, surgery, additional examinations, and referrals, each with subcategories. Sagittal TMJ tomograms were assessed for the presence of flattening, erosion, osteophyte, and sclerosis in the TMJ components. Diagnoses and management were reevaluated after gaining access to the radiographs and radiographic classifications. Logistic regression analyses were performed with changes in management as the dependent variable and age and radiographic findings as the independent variables. RESULTS: Diagnosis was changed for 56 patients, mainly from arthralgia to osteoarthritis. Management was changed for 55 patients. Most changes occurred in pharmacology and physiotherapy followed by counseling and behavioral treatment, occlusal stabilization, referrals, additional examinations, and surgery. Changes were mostly within the categories, and the highest number of changes was seen in pharmacology, physiotherapy, and counseling and behavioral treatment. Radiographic degenerative findings increased the chance of change (any change) (odds ratio [OR] ⋝ 2.03) and the chance of change in pharmacology (OR ⋝ 2.56) and physiotherapy (OR = 2.48) separately. No other significant associations were found. CONCLUSION: Radiographic degenerative findings increased the chance of changes in management strategy. However, 73% of the TMJD patients had no changes in management after radiographic examination. In cases with changes, these were mainly adjustments within management categories.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Anatomy, Cross-Sectional , Arthralgia/diagnostic imaging , Chi-Square Distribution , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/pathology , Young Adult
5.
J Orofac Pain ; 23(2): 123-39, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19492537

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe evidence for a relationship between diagnoses and findings of clinical examination and diagnoses and findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination for degenerative and inflammatory temporomandibular joint diseases. METHODS: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched using specific indexing terms and reference lists were hand-searched. Included publications satisfied pre-established criteria. Primary studies were interpreted using a modification of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 219 titles and abstracts. Eighty-two studies were selected and read in full-text. After data extraction and interpretation with the QUADAS tool, 23 studies remained. There was a vast heterogeneity in study design, clinical examination methods, and diagnostic criteria. No clear evidence was found for a relationship between clinical and MRI diagnoses and findings. Several studies reported a relationship between clinical pain and internal derangements diagnosed with MRI, but the calculated odds ratio (OR) for this relationship was generally low (1.54-2.04). ORs for the relationship between pain and disc displacement without reduction (4.82) or between crepitation and disc displacement without reduction (3.71) were higher. CONCLUSION: This review reveals a need for studies with improved quality in reporting of samples, examination techniques, findings, and definitions and rationales for cutoffs, categories, and diagnoses. We recommend that standardized protocols such as the Research Diagnostic Criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) and the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement be implemented in future studies.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Arthritis/complications , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Facial Pain/etiology , Humans , Joint Dislocations , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Odds Ratio , Osteoarthritis/complications , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Physical Examination , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Reference Standards , Sound , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications
6.
Cranio ; 27(3): 185-93, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19697647

ABSTRACT

The aim of this research was to study if changes in condyle position in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients could be a factor that is affected by resilient appliance therapy and if it influences the treatment outcome. The study investigated 48 patients randomly assigned to a treatment group (T group = 21 patients, using resilient appliance) or a control group (C group = 27 patients, using nonoccluding appliance). Changes in the condyle-fossa relationship (with and without the appliance) were determined in an MRI examination. Ten weeks after treatment, the treatment outcome was measured. The results showed that with the appliance, change in condyle position occurred in 76% of the T group and 22% of the C group (p < 0.001). Sixty-seven percent (67%) of the T group and 44% of the C group experienced a successful treatment outcome. Treatment outcome was not related to changes in condyle position in patients with TMD pain.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/therapy , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Occlusal Splints , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Centric Relation , Facial Pain/complications , Facial Pain/pathology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
7.
J Orofac Pain ; 22(3): 239-51, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18780537

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify associations between clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders and radiographic findings. METHODS: Two hundred four adult patients (156 women, 48 men, mean age 40 years) with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain/sounds or changes in mandibular motion were examined according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). Bilateral sagittal corrected TMJ tomograms in closed and open positions were assessed for the presence of flattening, erosion, osteophytes, and sclerosis in the joint components and the range of mandibular motion. Logistic regression analyses were performed with the radiographic findings as the dependent variables and the following clinical variables as independent variables: opening pattern, maximal jaw opening, TMJ sounds, number of painful muscle/TMJ sites, duration of pain, presence of arthritic disease, depression and somatization scores, graded chronic pain, and age and gender. RESULTS: Coarse crepitus on opening/closing (odds ratio [OR] > or = 3.12), on lateral excursions (odds ratio > or = 4.06), and on protrusion (OR > or = 5.30) was associated with increased risk of degenerative findings in tomograms. A clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis increased the risk of radiographic findings (OR > or = 2.95) and so did increasing age (OR > or = 1.03 per year) and the female gender (OR > or = 2.36). Maximal assisted opening and maximal opening without pain (< 40 mm) was associated with a posterior condyle-to-articular tubercle position (OR > or = 2.60). No other significant associations were observed. CONCLUSION: Age, gender, and coarse crepitus, but no pain-related variables, were associated with increased risk of degenerative findings in TMJ tomograms. Maximal opening < 40 mm was associated with a posterior condyle-to-articular tubercle relation on opening.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis/diagnosis , Depression/diagnosis , Facial Pain/diagnosis , Facial Pain/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Joint Dislocations/diagnosis , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Male , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging , Masticatory Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Masticatory Muscles/pathology , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteophyte/diagnosis , Osteophyte/diagnostic imaging , Osteosclerosis/diagnosis , Osteosclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Sex Factors , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
8.
Clin Oral Investig ; 12(4): 353-9, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18548293

ABSTRACT

Modified condylotomy may be relevant in severe painful reciprocal clicking of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) where conservative treatment is insufficient. The effect of the modified condylotomy was analyzed and compared with conventional nonsurgical treatment in a randomized pilot study of eight patients, 19-44 years of age, with severe painful reciprocal clicking. Before and after treatment, assessments were performed by subjective reports, clinical recordings, and blinded evaluations of radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on the clinical evaluations before treatment, all conditions were disc displacements with reduction and arthralgia (Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders), but based on MRI, one patient had disc displacement without reduction and another had normal disc position. The treatment effect was significantly better and the disorders were significantly more reduced with condylotomy than with conventional nonsurgical treatment (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). In the surgical group, the clicking and locking had disappeared, the pain during function was significantly reduced (P < 0.05, Friedman ANOVA), and in two patients the disc position was normalized. The clicking still persisted in the nonsurgical patients and the disc position was unchanged. Our conclusion is that modified condylotomy is a promising option to reduce symptoms and signs in severe painful reciprocal clicking.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Condyle/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/surgery , Arthralgia/therapy , Auscultation , Facial Pain/etiology , Facial Pain/surgery , Facial Pain/therapy , Female , Humans , Joint Dislocations/complications , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Joint Dislocations/therapy , Male , Muscle Stretching Exercises , Occlusal Splints , Oral Surgical Procedures , Pain Measurement , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Sound , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Young Adult
9.
J Oral Maxillofac Res ; 8(3): e4, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29142656

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse differences in pharyngeal airway dimensions and head posture between obstructive sleep apnea patients with and without morphological deviations in the upper cervical spine and to analyse associations between pharyngeal airway dimensions and head posture in the total sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample comprised 53 obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients of which 32.1% had upper spine morphological deviations. Accordingly two groups were defined: 17 OSA patients with morphological deviations in the upper spine and 36 without upper spine deviations. Pharyngeal airway dimensions in terms of distances, cross-sectional areas and volume and upper spine morphological deviations were evaluated on cone-beam computed tomography. Head posture was evaluated on two-dimensional generated lateral cephalograms. Differences were analysed and adjusted for age and gender by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: OSA patients with upper spine morphological deviations had a significantly more backward and curved neck posture (OPT/HOR, P < 0.01; OPT/CVT, P < 0.05) compared to OSA patients without spine deviations. No significant differences were found in airway dimensions between patients with and without upper spine deviations. In the total group significant associations were found between head posture and pharyngeal airway distances and cross-sectional area at the nasal floor, epiglottis and hyoid bone level (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001). No significant association was found between head posture and airway volume. CONCLUSIONS: The results may contribute to differentiate obstructive sleep apnea patients and thereby may prove valuable in diagnosis and treatment planning of obstructive sleep apnea patients.

10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989706

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare 1) temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility between patients with and without reduced upper cervical spine (UCS) mobility and with and without TMJ osseous osteoarthritic-like changes, and 2) UCS osseous changes between patients with and without TMJ osseous osteoarthritic-like changes and with and without reduced UCS mobility. STUDY DESIGN: The study comprised 39 patients without pain from TMJ or UCS and with obstructive sleep apnea, 15 women (age range 26-72 years, mean 56.0) and 24 men (age range 27-71 years, mean 49.8). The range of motion (ROM) of the mandible and UCS was assessed clinically. Osseous changes of the TMJ and UCS were assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Differences were tested and adjusted for age and gender by multiple linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The mandibular ROM was within normal range (45-64 mm) but the UCS ROM was reduced in 15 patients. Osseous TMJ and UCS changes were both found in 38.5% of the patients. Osseous UCS changes were found more frequently in patients with than without TMJ changes (P = .0003; odds ratio 21.9). No other significant results were found. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings of comorbid osseous changes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea support a possible biomechanical relationship between the TMJ and the UCS.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Range of Motion, Articular , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging
11.
Swed Dent J ; 29(2): 81-7, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16035351

ABSTRACT

The aim was to evaluate the experiences of Swedish general dental practitioners (GDPs) with digital radiography and their opinion on the same, particularly regarding quality issues. A letter was sent to all GDPs in private care in Region Skåne, Sweden, asking whether they used digital radiography (n=513). The response rate was 79%. The number of private GDPs who replied that they used digital radiography was 106. The Public Dental Service in Region Skåne listed 33 GDPs who worked with digital radiography. Based on these answers, a questionnaire was sent to the GDPs working with digital radiography (n=139). The questionnaire comprised 27 questions about the dentists, the system of intra-oral digital radiography, and the GDPs' experiences of and opinions on issues regarding image quality and quality control. The response rate to the questionnaire was 94%. Almost all, 92%, worked with charge-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensors. Most GDPs were satisfied with their digital radiographic system. The majority (65%) experienced problems. Detector failure and trouble with the software were common. The GDPs wrote that they used lower exposure times in digital radiography than traditional film radiography. The estimated reduction in exposure time was said to be between 51% and 75%. Thirty-five per cent continued to use film parallel with digital radiography. The answers indicated that less than half of the equipment (40%) underwent quality control. Quality controls, when conducted, were undertaken once or twice a year, mainly by technicians from the companies that had sold the digital equipment. Based on the results of the questionnaire, there seems to be a need to improve the maintenance and the quality of digital radiography. It is also important that the GDPs become more aware of the problems that can occur when a new technique is introduced and that they develop the skills to handle these problems.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental, Digital/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentists , Dentists, Women , Female , Humans , Male , Practice Patterns, Dentists' , Private Sector , Public Sector , Quality Control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden
12.
J Oral Maxillofac Res ; 6(1): e5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937876

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with painful disc displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joint to determine whether the findings were able to predict treatment outcome of lavage and a control group treated with local anaesthesia without lavage in a short-term: 3-month perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bilateral magnetic resonance images were taken of 37 patients with the clinical diagnosis of painful disc displacement without reduction. Twenty-three patients received unilateral extra-articular local anaesthetics and 14 unilateral lavage and extra-articular local anaesthetics. The primary treatment outcome defining success was reduction in pain intensity of at least 30% during jaw movement at the 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Bilateral disc displacement was found in 30 patients. In 31 patients the disc on the treated side was deformed, and bilaterally in 19 patients. Osteoarthritis was observed in 28 patients, and 13 patients had bilateral changes. Thirty patients responded to treatment and 7 did not, with no difference between the two treated groups. In neither the treated nor the contralateral temporomandibular joint did treatment outcome depend on disc diagnosis, disc shape, joint effusion, or osseous diagnoses. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of disc position, disc shape, joint effusion or osseous diagnosis on the treated or contralateral side did not give information of treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging findings could not predict treatment outcome in patients treated with either local anaesthetics or local anaesthetics and lavage.

13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15243479

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of various regions in the maxilla before implant treatment and to investigate correlations between these values and the BMDs of the spine and hip. STUDY DESIGN: Eighteen patients were examined by means of quantitative computed tomography, and the BMD of the maxillary alveolar ridge was calculated. The same patients also underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and the total hip. Analysis of variance was used to compare BMD values between and within individuals. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to correct for sex and body mass and to calculate the correlation between the BMD of the maxillary alveolar ridge and the BMD of the spine and hip. RESULTS: The maxillary BMD varied significantly between individuals (P <.001) and within individuals (P <.001). The BMD of the anterior region of the maxilla was correlated significantly with the BMD of the lumbar spine (r=0.6; P <.05). CONCLUSION: A site-specific evaluation of maxillary bone tissue could be of value before implant treatment.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Hip/anatomy & histology , Lumbar Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Female , Hip/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Reference Values , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tomography, Spiral Computed
14.
Swed Dent J ; 26(4): 149-58, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12611144

ABSTRACT

A long-term (12 years) follow-up of treatment with intra-articular injections into the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of steroid or non-steroid agents was performed in 21 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and symptomatic TMJs. The aim of the study was to compare symptoms, signs and radiological appearance of the TMJ initially and at the follow-up in this group of patients. Eleven patients were assigned to a steroid group and 10 patients to a non-steroid group. Initial and follow-up clinical and radiological examination procedures were the same. The radiological evaluation was based on a grading system using standard reference films. At follow-up, 14 patients reported no pain from the TMJ and positive changes in most clinical variables were found in both groups. Radiographic follow-up examination was performed on 12 patients. Initially, all but 4 of the 24 joints had structural bone changes. At follow-up, 2 joints had lower, 11 joints had unchanged and 11 joints had higher radiological grades. Two out of 5 and 3 out of 10 joints in the steroid and non-steroid group, respectively, showed progression of structural bone changes. Among 9 untreated joints, 6 had higher radiological grades and 3 were unchanged. In the 11 TMJs with higher radiological grades at follow-up, there was in most cases moderate progression of erosive changes. The results suggest that the long-term development of symptoms and signs from the TMJ in patients previously treated was good and the long-term progression of joint destruction was low for both steroid and non-steroid agents in this patient group with RA.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Child , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Radiography , Steroids , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology
15.
Swed Dent J ; 26(3): 125-34, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12425226

ABSTRACT

The aims were to follow-up, analyse and compare the pain status after 4-9 years with that at the baseline examination of 109 consecutive patients referred to the Pain Group at the Faculty of Odontology in Malmö, Sweden during the period 1988-1993 due to long-lasting orofacial pain. A further aim was to identify predictive factors of significance for pain alteration. 85 (78%) women with a median age of 51 years and 24 (22%) men with a median age of 60 years were included in the study. A survey of the pain status at the follow-up was conducted by means of a mailed questionnaire. The questionnaire covered the following aspects: pain alteration, pain intensity, pain location, medication and education. After one reminder, the non-responding patients were called for a telephone interview. A response level of 85% was obtained. Significant improvements were noted by the patients in the answers of the questionnaire in mainly three areas; the patients answered individually that pain relief had occurred, pain intensity rated on the VAS was lower at follow-up compared to the baseline examination and a decrease in drug use was reported. The responses indicated pain relief for 75% of the patients. However, only 27% of the patients experienced total disappearance of pain. Medication at baseline with opioids, muscle relaxants with central effect, antidepressants, neuroleptics, hypnotics or sedatives was found to be a predictive factor for persistent pain.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/therapy , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Chi-Square Distribution , Chronic Disease , Dental Care , Educational Status , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Relaxants, Central/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Prognosis , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Swed Dent J ; 28(2): 77-84, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15272512

ABSTRACT

In July 2002, a new dental insurance program was introduced in Sweden. For all patients over 65 years, prior approval for all prosthetic work would need to be obtained from the Dental Insurance Office. From October to December 2002, 540 cases were randomly selected for evaluation from the 14,624 applications that had been sent from throughout Sweden to the Dental Insurance Office in Lund. Our aims were to appraise the quality of the radiographic examinations and to compare the quality of the digital with the film (X-ray film) radiographs. The radiographic examinations were evaluated as a whole in relation to the proposed treatment and in detail using specific criteria such as density, contrast, unsharpness, angulation, and receptor position error. The quality variables were evaluated as acceptable or unacceptable. A total of 4,687 intra-oral and 206 panoramic radiographs were evaluated. Thirteen per cent of the intra-oral radiographs and 9% of the panoramic radiographs were taken with a digital technique. Most of the digital radiographs--7o% of the intra-oral and 61% of the panoramic radiographs--were submitted on microdisk. Twenty-eight per cent of the intra-oral digital radiographs, however, were submitted on paper. The radiographic quality in 15o cases (28%) were found to be unacceptable for assessment of the proposed treatment. The most common error--both in digital and X-ray film radiographs--was in receptor position. Significantly more errors were found in the intraoral digital radiographs compared to the radiographs taken with X-ray film. Most of the errors in the digital radiographs were detected in the paper copies. In conclusion, it is possible to improve the radiographic quality in applications for treatment approval, and the dentists had more difficulties with the digital technique than with X-ray film.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental/standards , Aged , Humans , Insurance, Dental , Radiography, Dental, Digital/standards , Radiography, Panoramic/standards , Sweden
17.
Swed Dent J ; 28(1): 1-9, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15129600

ABSTRACT

Continues positive airway pressure (CPAP) is recommended for treatment of sleep apnoea (SA) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) but is not easily tolerated resulting in poor patient compliance. Mandibular advancement device (MAD) is designed to inhibit pharyngeal airway (PAW) obstruction and may be a valuable alternative. It has been proposed that MAD exerts its effect by increasing PAW dimensions. This has not, however, been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of MAD on PAW dimensions and SA in patients with CHF. Seventeen CHF-patients with mild to moderate heart failure, aged 68 +/- 6 years, (mean +/- SD), range 54-75 years, with sleep apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) > or = 10 were evaluated. PAW dimensions were studied with and without the MAD, using lateral radiographs in supine position. Nocturnal breathing patterns were studied using a portable polysomnographic device during a single night with and without MAD. A reduction of AHI > or = 30% (arbitrary level) for each individual was regarded as a successful treatment. Mean AHI was reduced from 25.1 +/- 9.4 to 14.7 +/- 9.7 (p = 0.003). The PAW increased in its inferior section in 13 patients (p = 0.0001). AHI decreased > or = 30% in 9 patients (p = 0.003) of whom 8 showed increased PAW dimensions. Reduction of AHI was not significantly related to increased PAW dimensions. In conclusion MAD increased PAW dimensions and reduced SA in patients with CHF. The results may indicate that MAD reduces SA by other mechanism than increasing PAW dimensions.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/complications , Mandibular Advancement/instrumentation , Pharynx/pathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/prevention & control , Aged , Airway Obstruction/pathology , Airway Obstruction/prevention & control , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Pharyngeal Diseases/pathology , Pharyngeal Diseases/prevention & control , Pharynx/diagnostic imaging , Polysomnography , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Radiography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/pathology , Supine Position , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Oral Facial Pain Headache ; 28(3): 233-42, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25068217

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To examine (1) the occurrence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal changes in the painful regions of patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and (2) the correlation of such findings to periapical bone defects detected with a comprehensive radiographic examination including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: A total of 20 patients (mean age 52 years, range 34 to 65) diagnosed with AO participated. Mean pain intensity (± standard deviation) was 5.6 ± 1.8 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale, and mean pain duration was 4.3 ± 5.2 years. The inclusion criterion was chronic pain (> 6 months) located in a region with no clear pathologic cause identified clinically or in periapical radiographs. In addition to a clinical examination and a self-report questionnaire, the assessments included radiographic examinations (panoramic, periapical, and CBCT images), and an MRI examination. Changes in MRI signal in the painful region were recorded. Spearman's rank correlation between radiographic and MRI findings was calculated. RESULTS: Eight of the patients (40%) had MRI signal changes in the pain region. The correlation to radiographic periapical radiolucencies was 0.526 (P = .003). Of the eight teeth displaying changes in MRI signal, six showed periapical radiolucency in the radiographs. CONCLUSION: MRI examination revealed no changes in the painful region in a majority of patients with AO, suggesting that inflammation was not present. MRI findings were significantly correlated to radiographic findings.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Facial Pain/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Toothache/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Process/pathology , Apicoectomy , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Facial Pain/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Periapical Periodontitis/diagnosis , Periapical Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Bitewing , Radiography, Panoramic , Self Report , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tooth Apex/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Apex/pathology , Tooth, Nonvital/diagnosis , Tooth, Nonvital/diagnostic imaging , Toothache/diagnostic imaging
19.
J Oral Facial Pain Headache ; 28(4): 331-7, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25347168

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) bony changes in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of adult subjects without ongoing orofacial pain or complaints from the TMJ. METHODS: The study included 84 TMJs from 28 men and 14 women (mean age [± SD]: 51 ± 11 years) without orofacial pain or TMJ complaints who were participants in a study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. They were examined before any treatment with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and with CBCT (NewTom VGi; 15 × 15 cm, exposure time 18 seconds, axial thickness 0.3 mm). Osseous TMJ deviations were assessed blindly and classified. RESULTS: Degenerative changes were noted in the CBCT images of 33 (39.3%) of the TMJs, of which 21 were classified as osteoarthritic alterations and 12 as indeterminate changes of osteoarthritis. Two TMJs were clinically classified as osteoarthrosis and 6 as disc displacement with reduction. The CBCT images of the 2 TMJs with a clinical diagnosis of osteoarthrosis showed also bony changes, but the CBCT images also revealed osteoarthritic bony changes in the 18 TMJs without any clinical diagnosis. CONCLUSION: CBCT images of asymptomatic adult TMJs commonly show degenerative bony alterations. Accordingly, such radiographic findings should be used with care and only as a supplement to clinical assessment.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Asymptomatic Diseases , Cartilage, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Male , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteophyte/diagnostic imaging , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis
20.
J Oral Facial Pain Headache ; 28(1): 6-27, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24482784

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The original Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I diagnostic algorithms have been demonstrated to be reliable. However, the Validation Project determined that the RDC/TMD Axis I validity was below the target sensitivity of ≥ 0.70 and specificity of ≥ 0.95. Consequently, these empirical results supported the development of revised RDC/TMD Axis I diagnostic algorithms that were subsequently demonstrated to be valid for the most common pain-related TMD and for one temporomandibular joint (TMJ) intra-articular disorder. The original RDC/TMD Axis II instruments were shown to be both reliable and valid. Working from these findings and revisions, two international consensus workshops were convened, from which recommendations were obtained for the finalization of new Axis I diagnostic algorithms and new Axis II instruments. METHODS: Through a series of workshops and symposia, a panel of clinical and basic science pain experts modified the revised RDC/TMD Axis I algorithms by using comprehensive searches of published TMD diagnostic literature followed by review and consensus via a formal structured process. The panel's recommendations for further revision of the Axis I diagnostic algorithms were assessed for validity by using the Validation Project's data set, and for reliability by using newly collected data from the ongoing TMJ Impact Project-the follow-up study to the Validation Project. New Axis II instruments were identified through a comprehensive search of the literature providing valid instruments that, relative to the RDC/TMD, are shorter in length, are available in the public domain, and currently are being used in medical settings. RESULTS: The newly recommended Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) Axis I protocol includes both a valid screener for detecting any pain-related TMD as well as valid diagnostic criteria for differentiating the most common pain-related TMD (sensitivity ≥ 0.86, specificity ≥ 0.98) and for one intra-articular disorder (sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.97). Diagnostic criteria for other common intra-articular disorders lack adequate validity for clinical diagnoses but can be used for screening purposes. Inter-examiner reliability for the clinical assessment associated with the validated DC/TMD criteria for pain-related TMD is excellent (kappa ≥ 0.85). Finally, a comprehensive classification system that includes both the common and less common TMD is also presented. The Axis II protocol retains selected original RDC/TMD screening instruments augmented with new instruments to assess jaw function as well as behavioral and additional psychosocial factors. The Axis II protocol is divided into screening and comprehensive self report instrument sets. The screening instruments' 41 questions assess pain intensity, pain-related disability, psychological distress, jaw functional limitations, and parafunctional behaviors, and a pain drawing is used to assess locations of pain. The comprehensive instruments, composed of 81 questions, assess in further detail jaw functional limitations and psychological distress as well as additional constructs of anxiety and presence of comorbid pain conditions. CONCLUSION: The recommended evidence-based new DC/TMD protocol is appropriate for use in both clinical and research settings. More comprehensive instruments augment short and simple screening instruments for Axis I and Axis II. These validated instruments allow for identification of patients with a range of simple to complex TMD presentations.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Consensus , Diagnosis, Differential , Evidence-Based Dentistry , Facial Pain/diagnosis , Headache/diagnosis , Humans , Joint Dislocations/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Masticatory Muscles/pathology , Myalgia/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Pain, Referred/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/pathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/psychology , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/diagnosis , Terminology as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL