Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
J Surg Res ; 301: 127-135, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925099

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Colon cancer (CC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Quality measures have been introduced by the American Gastroenterological Association and Commission on Cancer for optimal management of CC. In this study, we sought to identify factors that may hinder the timely diagnosis and treatment of CC at a safety-net hospital system. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients aged ≥18Ā y diagnosed with CC from 2018 to 2021. Primary outcomes were time from positive fecal immunochemical test to colonoscopy, time from diagnosis to surgery, and time from diagnosis to adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary end points were demographic characteristics associated with suboptimal outcomes in any of the above measures. RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients were diagnosed with nonmetastatic CC. The majority were Hispanic and non-English-speaking. 74.1% of patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test received a colonoscopy within 180Ā d. 59.6% of nonemergent cases received surgery within 60Ā d of diagnosis. 77% of those eligible received adjuvant chemotherapy within 120Ā d of diagnosis. No clinically significant demographic factor was associated with delay in colonoscopy, surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy. Most frequent cause of delay in surgery (38.0%) was optimization of comorbidities. Most frequent cause of delay in adjuvant chemotherapy (71.4%) was delay in surgery itself. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant demographic factor was associated with experiencing delays in diagnostic colonoscopy, surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colonoscopy , Safety-net Providers , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Safety-net Providers/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Risk Factors , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Delayed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over
2.
J Surg Res ; 283: 889-897, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915017

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There has been increasing national attention on reducing healthcare disparities. Prior studies cite worse surgical outcomes and less use of laparoscopy for Black patients with diverticulitis. Re-evaluation of these disparities is lacking despite national initiatives to improve health equity. This study aimed to evaluate the association of race with short-term outcomes and surgical approaches in patients with acute diverticulitis. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent nonelective surgery for acute diverticulitis from 2015 to 2019. Severity of presentation, morbidity, mortality, surgical approach, and ostomy creation were compared by race. RESULTS: Of the 13,996 patients included in the study, 82.4% were White, 7.6% were Black, 1.1% Asian, 0.61% American Indian/Alaska Native, and 0.20% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI). Overall 30-day morbidity was 44.3% and 30-day mortality was 3.9%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, compared to Whites, Black race was independently associated with higher 30-day morbidity (Odds Ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.43, PĀ =Ā 0.003) and NH/PI race was independently associated with higher mortality (Odds Ratio: 5.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-21.6, PĀ =Ā 0.019). There was no difference in complicated disease (abscess or perforation), use of laparoscopy, or ostomy creation among races. CONCLUSIONS: Despite national efforts to achieve equity in healthcare, disparities persist in surgical outcomes for those with diverticulitis. Black and NH/PI race are independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality, respectively. Use of laparoscopy, however, is no longer different by race suggesting some gaps may be closing.


Subject(s)
Diverticulitis , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Diverticulitis/surgery , Black People , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Healthcare Disparities , Treatment Outcome
3.
Surg Endosc ; 36(1): 307-313, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33523270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery (RS) has been increasingly incorporated into colorectal surgery (CRS) training. The degree to which RS has been integrated into CRS residency training is not well described. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to all 2019 accredited CRS residency programs within the United States and Canada. Program directors (PDs) were queried on how robotic surgery had been integrated into their program, specifics on RS curriculum and opinions on RS training during general surgery residency. We compared survey responses by program type (university-based, university-affiliated programs, or independent programs) and by geographic region. In addition, a chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in survey responses with respect to robotic curriculum components. RESULTS: Of 66 programs, 42 (64%) responded to the survey. Of the responding programs, 35 (83%) were university-based or university-affiliated, while 7 (17%) were independent. Most programs were in the Midwest (33%). Forty-one (98%) reported having a surgical robot in use at their institution, with 95% reporting active participation of CRS residents in RS. While 74% of programs have a formal RS training curriculum for CRS residents, there was considerable variability in the curriculum elements employed by each institution, and the differences in proportions of these elements were significant (χ2 99.8, p < 0.001). The median operative approach to abdominopelvic cases was estimated to be 33% robotic, 40% laparoscopic and 20% open. There were no significant differences in the survey responses between university/university-affiliated and independent programs (p > 0.05) or among the different regions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that almost all CRS residencies have integrated RS and have trainees operating at the robotic console. Most programs have a robotics curriculum and there are expanding indications for RS within CRS. This expansion calls for discussion on implementation of training standards such as curricular requisites, baseline competency assessments, and definitions of minimum case requirements to ensure adequate training.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , General Surgery , Internship and Residency , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , General Surgery/education , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/education , United States
4.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(8): 3599-3606, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149492

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Laparoscopy is the preferred approach to elective surgery for diverticulitis and is increasingly common in the emergent setting. Although diverticulitis is most prevalent among older adults, little is known about the safety of laparoscopy for elderly patients with diverticulitis. This study aims to compare 30-day outcomes of a laparoscopic versus open approach for diverticulitis among elderly patients undergoing elective and urgent/emergent surgery. METHODS: Patients ≥ 65Ā years who underwent surgery for diverticulitis from 2015 to 2019 were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database. Elective and non-elective groups were analyzed separately. Coarsened exact matching matched laparoscopic and open patients 1:1 based on preoperative factors to minimize selection bias by creating comparable cohorts. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery were compared. RESULTS: A total of 15,316 patients were included, 69.2% female and 88% White, with a mean age of 72.7 Ā± 6.1Ā years. Approximately half (50.9%) of cases were laparoscopic and 60.6% were elective. After matching, laparoscopy was associated with lower 30-day morbidity in both the elective (OR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.38-0.58) and non-elective (OR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.58-0.98) cohorts. Laparoscopic surgery in both cohorts was associated with fewer surgical site infections (SSIs) (elective, OR 0.43; 95%CI, 0.33-0.57; non-elective, OR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.44-0.98) and shorter length of stay (LOS) (elective, mean difference, 1.7Ā days; 95%CI, 1.5-1.9; non-elective, mean difference, 1.2Ā days; 95%CI, 0.43-2.1). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing both elective and non-elective laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis have less 30-day morbidity, SSIs, and shorter LOS compared to an open approach. Therefore, laparoscopy for elderly patients is safe in elective surgery and in select emergent cases as well.


Subject(s)
Diverticulitis, Colonic , Diverticulitis , Laparoscopy , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Colectomy , Treatment Outcome , Diverticulitis/surgery , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures , Length of Stay , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies
5.
Exp Mol Pathol ; 98(2): 300-3, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25708661

ABSTRACT

Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a rare soft tissue tumor with a slight male predominance. The tumor has a tendency to arise from deep soft tissue of the trunk and lower extremities. Rare cases are reported to arise from the mediastinal and retroperitoneal areas. Its deceptively bland histologic appearance makes this tumor difficult to diagnose. Also, there are several histologic mimics that may hinder in its diagnosis. We report a case of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma from a 48-year-old woman, first documented herein to arise from the sigmoid. We also report the value of CD99, BCL2 and MUC4 stains in the diagnosis of this tumor.


Subject(s)
Fibroma/diagnosis , Sigmoid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnosis , 12E7 Antigen , Antigens, CD/analysis , Cell Adhesion Molecules/analysis , Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Female , Fibroma/diagnostic imaging , Fibroma/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Mucin-4/analysis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/analysis , Radiography , Sigmoid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Staining and Labeling
6.
Surg Open Sci ; 17: 6-10, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235211

ABSTRACT

Background: Primary care physicians (PCP) play a key role in offering colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings, particularly amongst underserved populations. Given potential delays in or omission of CRC screening in the absence of a PCP, we aimed to determine stage of CRC at diagnosis in an underserved population. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at two Los Angeles County safety-net hospitals. Inclusion criteria were a CRC diagnosis between 2018 and 2021 and age between 50 and 75Ā years at diagnosis time. The primary outcome was the cancer stage at diagnosis. Results: A total of 373 patients were included, of those, 52.5Ā % had a PCP. Compared to others, PCP was similar in age, racial composition, and primary spoken language (Table 1). Of patients with a PCP, 52.0% were diagnosed by screening. After screening, the most common indication for colonoscopy were blood per rectum (24.9Ā %) and imaging findings (18.0Ā %). Patients with a PCP had a significantly lower rate of late stage CRC than those without a PCP (42.4Ā % vs. 68.0Ā %, pĀ <Ā 0.001). After adjustment, having a PCP was associated with significantly reduced odds of late stage CRC (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.83, 95Ā % Confidence Interval [0.68-1.04]). Having a PCP was not associated with any adjusted increase in number of adenomas or tumor size. Conclusions: Patients with a PCP, irrespective of undergoing screening, were diagnosed at earlier CRC stages. This underlines the crucial role of PCPs in CRC and diagnosis, reinforcing the need for their active involvement in these processes.

7.
Am Surg ; 89(11): 4955-4957, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416400

ABSTRACT

In surgical clinics, missed appointments may lead to delayed diagnosis and postponed surgical intervention. Automated reminder calls (robocalls) have replaced live staff phone calls in many systems as a cost-saving measure. This study aims to evaluate whether robocalls reduced the outpatient appointment no-show rate for surgical patients in a county hospital. Demographic and clinic data from two surgical clinics at a safety net hospital were collected over two time periods: 3-months immediately before robocalls went live and 3-months immediately after robocalls went live. No-show rates were compared between time periods. Multivariate analysis confirmed that robocalls were independently associated with reduced no-show rates (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.0-1.7; P = .032). In addition, new appointments were independently predictive of higher no-show rates (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.0-1.7; P = .048). Robocalls appear to be an effective tool for improving appointment attendance overall. Furthermore, robocalls may free limited staff to perform higher value work in the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Reminder Systems , Humans , Outpatients , Appointments and Schedules , Patient Compliance
8.
Am Surg ; 88(12): 2823-2830, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35757937

ABSTRACT

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer for Black patients have led to a significant mortality difference when compared to White patients, a gap which has remained to this day. These differences have been linked to poorer quality insurance and socioeconomic status in addition to lower access to high-quality health care resources, which are emblematic of systemic racial inequities. Disparities impact nearly every point along the colorectal cancer care continuum and include barriers to screening, surgical care, oncologic care, and surveillance. These critical faults are the driving forces behind the mortality difference Black patients face. Health care systems should strive to correct these disparities through both cultural competency at the provider level and public policy change at the national level.


Subject(s)
Black People , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Socioeconomic Factors , Racial Groups , Social Class , Healthcare Disparities , Health Status Disparities
9.
Am Surg ; 76(10): 1154-7, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21105633

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is third in mortality rate amongst Asian Americans. However, CRC characteristics in this patient population have been poorly defined. A retrospective review at an urban tertiary hospital located in an underserved region was performed to determine CRC characteristics for Asian Americans in comparison to other races. Four hundred fourteen patients were represented by Hispanics (n=161), African Americans (n=101), Asians (n=83), and Whites (n=69). The majority of Asian American patients (n=70, 84%) presented with a left-sided lesion. This proportion was higher than that seen in African Americans (59%, P < 0.0003), Hispanics (66%, P < 0.0033), and Whites (63%, P < 0.0036). Thirty-six Asian American patients presented with Stage III disease which was the most frequent presenting stage for this patient population and also statistically higher than all the other races. Furthermore, Asian Americans in this study still presented predominantly with left-sided lesions and in a more advanced stage. These findings suggest a potential benefit of initially offering flexible sigmoidoscopy given the decreased compliance among Asian Americans to obtain routine CRC screening. Ultimately, this modality may be more acceptable, leading to higher compliance for CRC screening in Asian Americans without likely degradation in cancer detection rates.


Subject(s)
Asian/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , California , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Sigmoidoscopy , Urban Population , Young Adult
10.
J Surg Educ ; 77(6): e245-e250, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32747315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Robotic surgery has been increasingly incorporated into the subspecialties of colorectal (CRS), minimally invasive/bariatric (MIS/Bar), and surgical oncology/hepatobiliary (SO/HPB) surgery, yet its impact on fellowship applicant evaluation and contribution to postresidency training remains undefined. The aim of our study was to evaluate how robotic training during General Surgery (GS) residency affects an applicant's competitiveness from the perspective of fellowship programs. DESIGN: A web-based survey was sent to all 235 accredited fellowship programs in CRS (nĆ¢Ā€ĀÆ=Ć¢Ā€ĀÆ66), MIS/Bar (nĆ¢Ā€ĀÆ=Ć¢Ā€ĀÆ122), and SO/HPB (nĆ¢Ā€ĀÆ=Ć¢Ā€ĀÆ47) within the United States and Canada. Fellowship programs were queried on the import of robotic surgery training during GS residency and its impact on an applicant's match potential. RESULTS: Of 235 programs, 155 (66%) responded to the survey - 42 (63.6%) CRS, 87 (71.3%) MIS/Bar, and 26 (55.3%) SO/HPB. Of responding programs, 147 (94.8%) have a surgical robot at their institution, and 131 (84.5%) have fellows actively operating at the console. Overall, 107 (69%) fellowship program directors rated robotic training during surgery residency as "somewhat" or "very" important for residents seeking fellowship. While 95 (61.3%) programs said GS residents should not prioritize robotic training, 60 (38.7%) felt they should, and 38 (24.5%) were more likely to rank an applicant higher if they had some console exposure. Still, 69.7% (nĆ¢Ā€ĀÆ=Ć¢Ā€ĀÆ108) of programs expect no robotic experience for incoming fellows. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that most fellowship programs have low expectations of robotic experience for incoming fellows. Still, it is notable that nearly a quarter of programs would rank an applicant more highly if they had robotic console exposure. While these findings appear reassuring to residents with limited access to robotic training, residency programs should be alerted to the growing importance of robotic exposure.


Subject(s)
General Surgery , Internship and Residency , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Canada , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate , Fellowships and Scholarships , General Surgery/education , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
11.
Exp Mol Pathol ; 86(2): 127-30, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19348061

ABSTRACT

Adenomyoma of the small intestine is an extremely rare condition characterized by abnormal glandular structures surrounded by smooth muscle. We report a case of adenomyoma of the jejunum. The patient was a 61-year-old female with cancer of the sigmoid colon and multiple liver cysts, who was sent to the operation room for exploratory laparotomy and sigmoidectomy. At surgery, a polypoid lesion was incidentally found in the lower jejunum, which was resected. On histologic examination, the morphologic features were typical of adenomyoma. However, new histopathological and immunohistochemistry features are described here, providing evidence that adenomyoma of the jejunum is a form of intestinal epithelial hamartoma.


Subject(s)
Adenomyoma/pathology , Jejunal Neoplasms/pathology , Jejunum/pathology , Adenomyoma/metabolism , Alcian Blue , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Jejunal Neoplasms/metabolism , Jejunum/metabolism , Middle Aged , Muscle, Smooth/metabolism , Muscle, Smooth/pathology , Staining and Labeling
12.
JAMA Surg ; 158(10): 1049, 2023 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531120
13.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 22(2): 361-362, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29188491

ABSTRACT

Primary colonic lymphoma is a rare large bowel malignancy usually found in the cecum or rectosigmoid junction. Because of its non-specific symptoms, patients often present with advanced disease requiring surgical intervention. Nevertheless, resection followed by chemotherapy appears to offer the best prognosis.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Cecum , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonoscopy , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/surgery , Prognosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
15.
JAMA Surg ; 158(11): 1220-1222, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728910

ABSTRACT

This quality improvement study investigates whether a chatbot can accurately answer surgery clerkship multiple-choice questions, explain incorrect answers, assess question difficulty, and generate a high-quality examination question.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , General Surgery , Humans , General Surgery/education
16.
Am Surg ; 73(10): 1063-6, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17983082

ABSTRACT

Direct invasion of colorectal adenocarcinoma into adjacent structures occurs frequently, but only rarely is the duodenum involved. This study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of en bloc resection of locally advanced right colon carcinoma invading the duodenum. A retrospective review of 49 patients with locally advanced colon cancer, surgically managed between 2000 and 2005, was performed. Forty-six patients underwent en bloc resection of colon and adjacent organs not involving the duodenum. Three patients with duodenal invasion underwent en bloc partial duodenectomy. The mean operative blood loss, length of stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality compare favorably between these two groups of patients. Of the 46 patients with en bloc resection of other organs, 27 are alive at 12 to 60 months follow up. Two patients with duodenal invasion are alive without recurrence at 15 and 20 months follow up. En bloc resection of colon cancer invading the duodenum can be performed safely because morbidity and mortality rates are comparable to those attending extended resections of other locally advanced colon carcinomas. Overall survival in patients who underwent surgery with curative intent justifies en bloc duodenal resection in selected patients.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Duodenum/pathology , Duodenum/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Wall/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Anemia/etiology , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Peritoneum/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
17.
Am Surg ; 82(10): 1005-1008, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779994

ABSTRACT

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who are newly diagnosed with rectal cancer undergo staging CT scan of the chest. It is unclear whether posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography (X-ray) alone would provide adequate staging for most of these patients. A retrospective review was performed on all patients who had a two-view chest X-ray along with a chest CT for rectal cancer staging from 2007 to 2015. A total of 74 patients had both modalities. Sixty-three (85%) had a normal chest X-ray and 11 (15%) had an abnormal chest X-ray. Of the 63 patients with a normal chest X-ray, 40 (63%) had a corresponding normal chest CT and 23 (37%) had a lesion only noted on chest CT. Four patients (17%) in the latter group had metastatic cancer to the lung at the time of workup and four out of five of the tumors found to metastasize were within 5 cm from the anal verge. Our data suggest that a staging chest X-ray is unlikely to diagnose metastatic lungs lesions from a primary rectal cancer. Conversely, staging chest CT will accurately stage metastatic disease but will also reveal benign lung lesions in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Am Surg ; 82(10): 1023-1027, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779998

ABSTRACT

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons rectal cancer checklist describes a set of best practices for rectal cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of operative reports for rectal cancer surgery based on the intraoperative American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons checklist items. Patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery at two public teaching hospitals from 2009 to 2015 were included. A total of 12 intraoperative checklist items were assessed. One hundred and fifty-eight operative reports were reviewed. Overall adherence to checklist items was 55 per cent, and was significantly higher in attending versus resident dictated reports (67% vs 51%, P < 0.01). Senior residents had significantly higher adherence to checklist items than junior residents (55% vs 44%, P < 0.01). However, overall adherence to rectal cancer checklist items was low. This represents an opportunity to improve the quality of operative documentation in rectal cancer surgery, which could also impact the technical quality of the operation itself.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Quality of Health Care , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , California , Checklist , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Societies, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL