Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinical Assessment Alone or With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Whether train-of-four (TOF) monitoring is more effective than clinical monitoring to guide neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is unclear. We compared clinical monitoring alone or with TOF monitoring to guide atracurium dosage adjustment with respect to drug dose and respiratory parameters. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical assessments every 2 hours with or without corrugator supercilii TOF monitoring every 4 hours in patients who developed ARDS (Pao2/Fio2 <150 mm Hg) in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the cumulative atracurium dose (mg/kg/h). Secondary outcomes included respiratory parameters during the neuromuscular blockade. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients in the clinical + TOF (C + TOF) group and 39 patients in the clinical (C) group were included in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The cumulative atracurium dose was higher in the C + TOF group (1.06 [0.75-1.30] vs 0.65 [0.60-0.89] mg/kg/h in the C group; P < .001) compared to C group, as well as the atracurium daily dose (C + TOF - C group mean difference = 0.256 mg/kg/h [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.099-0.416], P = .026). Driving pressures during neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) administration did not differ between groups (P = .653). Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was 22% in the C group and 27% in the C + TOF group (P = .786). Days on ventilation were 17 (8-26) in the C group and 16 (10-35) in the C + TOF group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARDS, adding TOF to clinical monitoring of neuromuscular blockade did not change ICU mortality or days on mechanical ventilation (MV) but did increase atracurium consumption when compared to clinical assessment alone. TOF monitoring may not be needed in all patients who receive neuromuscular blockade for ARDS.

High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure in Hypoxemic Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Noninvasive ventilation delivered as bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is often used to avoid reintubation and improve outcomes of patients with hypoxemia after cardiothoracic surgery. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy is increasingly used to improve oxygenation because of its ease of implementation, tolerance, and clinical effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-flow nasal oxygen therapy was not inferior to BiPAP for preventing or resolving acute respiratory failure after cardiothoracic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (BiPOP Study) conducted between June 15, 2011, and January 15, 2014, at 6 French intensive care units. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 830 patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgery, of which coronary artery bypass, valvular repair, and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy were the most common, were included when they developed acute respiratory failure (failure of a spontaneous breathing trial or successful breathing trial but failed extubation) or were deemed at risk for respiratory failure after extubation due to preexisting risk factors. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive high-flow nasal oxygen therapy delivered continuously through a nasal cannula (flow, 50 L/min; fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2], 50%) (n = 414) or BiPAP delivered with a full-face mask for at least 4 hours per day (pressure support level, 8 cm H2O; positive end-expiratory pressure, 4 cm H2O; FiO2, 50%) (n = 416). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as reintubation, switch to the other study treatment, or premature treatment discontinuation (patient request or adverse effects, including gastric distention). Noninferiority of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy would be demonstrated if the lower boundary of the 95% CI were less than 9%. Secondary outcomes included mortality during intensive care unit stay, changes in respiratory variables, and respiratory complications. RESULTS: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy was not inferior to BiPAP: the treatment failed in 87 of 414 patients with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (21.0%) and 91 of 416 patients with BiPAP (21.9%) (absolute difference, 0.9%; 95% CI, -4.9% to 6.6%; P = .003). No significant differences were found for intensive care unit mortality (23 patients with BiPAP [5.5%] and 28 with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy [6.8%]; P = .66) (absolute difference, 1.2% [95% CI, -2.3% to 4.8%]. Skin breakdown was significantly more common with BiPAP after 24 hours (10% vs 3%; 95% CI, 7.3%-13.4% vs 1.8%-5.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among cardiothoracic surgery patients with or at risk for respiratory failure, the use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy compared with intermittent BiPAP did not result in a worse rate of treatment failure. The findings support the use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in similar patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01458444.

Incidence of nosocomial pneumonia and risk of recurrence after antimicrobial therapy in critically ill lung and heart-lung transplant patients.

Little is known about the resolution of symptoms of nosocomial pneumonia (NosoP) after lung and heart-lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical response to antimicrobial therapy in (ICU) patients with NosoP after lung or heart-lung transplantation. Between January 2008 and August 2010, 79 lung or heart-lung transplantations patients were prospectively studied. NosoPwas confirmed by quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal aspirates. Clinical variables, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and radiologic score were recorded from start of therapy until day 9. Thirty-five patients (44%) experienced 64 episodes of NosoP in ICU. Fourteen patients (40%) had NosoP recurrence. Most frequently isolated organisms were Enterobacteriaceae (30%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25%), and Staphylococcus aureus (20%). Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score improved significantly at day 6 and C-reactive protein level at day 9. SOFA and radiologic scores differed significantly between patients with and without NosoP recurrence at day 3 and 9. The ICU mortality rate did not differ between patients with and without NosoP recurrence, and free of NosoP (14.3%, 9.5%, 11.4%, respectively) (p = 0.91). Severities of illness and lung injury were the two major risk factors for NosoP recurrence. Occurrence of NosoP has no impact on ICU mortality.

Limitations of right ventricular annular parameters in the early postoperative period following pulmonary endarterectomy: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Echocardiographic right ventricular (RV) annular parameters are probably not as reliable to evaluate the surgical success in the postoperative period after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), whereas RV end-diastolic/left ventricular end-diastolic area ratio (RVEDA/LVEDA ratio) could be more useful. This study examined the relationship between RV annular parameters or RVEDA/LVEDA ratio and ideal cardiac index (ICI), before and after PEA. METHODS: Among 80 patients who underwent PEA, the relationships between RVEDA/LVEDA ratio (21 patients), or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (32 patients), or systolic tricuspid annular velocity (55 patients) and ICI were modelled. RESULTS: Forty-eight hours following PEA, mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased (26 ± 6 vs 46 ± 12 mmHg, P < 0.0001) and ICI improved (2.8 ± 0.8 vs 3.0 ± 0.9 l/min/m2, P = 0.02). In contrast to the moderate association between RV annular indices and ICI in the preoperative period, no significant relationship was found in the postoperative period (r = 0.54 and 0.17 for tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and r = 0.46 and 0.16 for systolic tricuspid annular velocity, respectively). The RVEDA/LVEDA ratio significantly decreased postoperatively (0.97 ± 0.21 vs 1.19 ± 0.43, P = 0.002) and was correlated with ICI both in preoperative and postoperative periods (r = 0.57 and 0.57, respectively). There was a significant correlation between changes in RVEDA/LVEDA ratio and changes in total pulmonary resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Improved ICI and RVEDA/LVEDA ratio reflected the surgical success of PEA and lowering of total pulmonary resistances. In contrast to the RV/left ventricular area ratio, annular RV indices associated poorly with postoperative ICI. Recognizing this limitation is important in minimizing the overdiagnosis of RV dysfunction after PEA.

Efficacy of early passive tilting in minimizing ICU-acquired weakness: A randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: To investigate whether passive tilting added to a standardized rehabilitation therapy improved strength at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge. Material and methods: This single-center trial included patients admitted to an adult surgical ICU and ventilated for at least 3 days. Patients were randomized to daily standardized rehabilitation therapy alone or with tilting on a table for at least 1 h. The primary outcome was the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score at ICU discharge. Muscular recovery was a secondary outcome. Results: Of 145 included patients, 125 received mobilization, 65 in the Tilt group and 60 in the Control group. Total mobilization duration (median [25th­75th percentiles]) in the Tilt group was 1020 [580­1695] versus 1340 [536­2775] minutes in the Control group (p = 0.313). MRC sum scores at ICU discharge were not significantly different between groups (Tilt, 50 [45­56] versus 48 [45­54]; p = 0.555). However, the number of patients with weakness was higher in the Tilt group at baseline (Tilt: 60/65 versus 48/60, p = 0.045) and muscular recovery was better in the Tilt group (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Passive tilting added to a standardized rehabilitation therapy did not improve muscle strength at ICU discharge in surgical patients even if a faster recovery with tilting is suggested.

Non-Ventilator ICU-Acquired Pneumonia After Cardiothoracic Surgery: Accuracy of Diagnostic Tools and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia after cardiothoracic surgery is challenging to diagnose, and little is known about its impact on patient outcomes. Here, our primary objective was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of cultures of 2 types of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) specimens: endotracheal aspirates (FOB-EA) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (FOB-BAL). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of spontaneous sputum cultures and of the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) and to describe patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of consecutive cardiothoracic surgery subjects with suspected non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. Using FOB-BAL cultures ≥10(4) cfu/mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the accuracy of FOB-EA ≥10(5) cfu/mL and spontaneous sputum ≥10(7) cfu/mL. On the day of FOB, we determined the modified CPIS. Mortality and antibiotic treatments were recorded. RESULTS: Of 105 subjects, 57 (54.3%) received a diagnosis of non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. FOB-EA cultures had 82% (95% CI 69-91%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI 89-100%) specificity and were significantly less sensitive than FOB-BAL cultures (P < .004). Spontaneous sputum was obtained from one-third of subjects. Spontaneous sputum cultures had 82% (95% CI 56-95%) sensitivity and 94% (95% CI 68-100%) specificity and were non-significantly less sensitive than FOB-BAL (P = .061). A modified CPIS >6 had 42% (95% CI 29-56%) sensitivity and 87% (95% CI 74-95%) specificity for non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. Antibiotic therapy was stopped in all subjects without non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia, after 1.6 ± 1.2 d, without deleterious effects. CONCLUSIONS: The modified CPIS has low diagnostic accuracy for non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. FOB-EA cultures perform less well than do FOB-BAL cultures for diagnosing non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. Spontaneous sputum is valuable when FOB cannot be performed but could be obtained in only a minority of subjects. When cultures are negative, antibiotic discontinuation is safe.