Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 72(5): 298-304, 2022 07 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35512422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has put immense pressure on the National Health Service (NHS) and all healthcare professionals, not only physically but also mentally and the need to fully develop and implement a strategy to protect the mental health of healthcare professionals has never been more urgent. Research has demonstrated that staff can be supported by strengthening teams and offering frequent well-being support. AIMS: To assess the feedback from delivery of a strategy to provide psychological well-being support to NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether this 'Support for Teams' initiative made a positive impact on staff and in what way. METHODS: A mixed methods design was used to gain quantitative and qualitative feedback from staff. Feedback was collected from two groups: Well-being Leads and clinicians providing support and resources to Well-being Leads. Feedback was collected via online forms. RESULTS: Collectively, feedback responses were received from 70 staff members. The majority of staff members felt supported and benefitted from the provisions provided. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation showed that our healthcare system must continue to proactively implement and adapt staff support strategies to protect the mental well-being of healthcare professionals, both in the context of future health crises and in everyday practice. This study will assist and guide development and adaptations to health and psychological well-being support, ahead of future pandemics and to provide suitable support beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitals , Humans , Pandemics , State Medicine , Trust
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(1): 112-116, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34967518

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The Craniofacial Collaboration UK (CC-UK) has been established across the 4 highly specialized craniofacial centers in the UK since 2015. This joint collective aims to address the current limitations within developmental craniofacial research, using robust clinical data from a homogenous sample of children. This paper presents the third wave of findings from the CC-UK, with consideration to developmental and behavioral parent-report measures. Whilst previous data for sagittal synostosis have been presented, this article summarizes the analysis of these outcomes for children with metopic synostosis (MS) at 3 years who have undergone primary corrective surgery. Results highlight similar patterns to that of earlier CC-UK work, with the majority of children falling within 1 standard deviation of the population normative means across all measures. However, statistically significant difficulties were found between group means for children with MS on various developmental and behavioral domains. Prosocial skills and peer difficulties were reported as the greatest areas of behavioral concern for parents, with prosocial skills found to be below the level expected for their chronological age. In order to further understand the developmental trajectory of children with MS, longitudinal examination of individual diagnostic and specific age groups with single-suture craniosynostosis is crucial. The continuation of the CC-UK provides an opportunity to attain this goal.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , Child, Preschool , Cranial Sutures , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Facial Bones , Humans , Infant , Sutures , United Kingdom
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(1): 51-54, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890144

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The Craniofacial Collaboration UK (CC-UK) is a joint initiative that seeks to address some of the limitations of previous developmental research with this patient group by providing systematically collected, robust data from clinically and chronologically homogenous representative samples of children. The current paper outlines the developmental outcomes at the age of 5 for children who had previously undergone primary surgery for single-suture sagittal synostosis (SS). It shows broad consistencies with the previous CC-UK work, indicating that the majority of children with SS will perform within the average range compared to peers across a number of developmental, behavioral and emotional domains. However, the group mean for children with SS indicates significantly greater difficulties with fine motor skills and hyperactivity, relative to normative data. Unexpectedly, children with SS had significantly better problem solving skills. While it is reassuring that the majority of children are broadly developing in line with their unaffected peers, these small but significant differences may be early indicators of some of the subtle difficulties documented in older children with craniosynostosis. Longitudinal follow up is therefore important to understand the developmental trajectory for children with SS and identification of potentially 'at risk' sub groups within this diagnostic cohort.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , Jaw Abnormalities , Child, Preschool , Cranial Sutures , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Facial Bones , Humans , United Kingdom
4.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(Suppl 3): 1263-1268, 2021 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33904513

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Heterozygous mutations in the TCF12 gene were discovered in 2013 as a cause of craniosynostosis (CS). However, limited information regarding the behavioral phenotypic profile is available. Here the authors provide the first detailed study of the neurodevelopmental, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes for patients with a pathogenic TCF12 variant and associated CS.A clinical casenote audit was conducted at the 4 UK highly specialized craniofacial centers. A total of 35 patients aged 18 months to 10 years with an identified TCF12 pathogenic variant and CS (bicoronal CS = 45.7%, unicoronal CS = 40.0%, multisuture = 14.3%) were included. Standardized screening and/or assessment of full-scale intelligence quotient, social communication, development, behavior, and self-concept were conducted.In the majority of cases, outcomes were consistent with age-related expectations. About 75% of patients demonstrated no delay across any early developmental domain, while 84.6% demonstrated full-scale intelligence quotient scores within 1 standard deviation of the population mean. Significant behavioral difficulties were demonstrated by parent reporters in 26.3% to 42.1% of cases (dependent upon domain). Clinically elevated social communication profiles were present in (41.7%) of parent-reported cases. Levels of self-concept (at age 10) were consistent with age-related normative data.Most patients with a TCF12 pathogenic variant had a mild behavioral and cognitive phenotype, although they may be at a slightly increased risk of social communication difficulties and psychosocial issues. Although not measured statistically, there were no clear associations between surgical history and cognitive, behavioral, or psychosocial outcomes. This paper highlights the need for robust integrated developmental assessment of all CS patients, particularly those with an identified syndrome.


Subject(s)
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Craniosynostoses , Child , Child, Preschool , Cognition , Craniosynostoses/genetics , Heterozygote , Humans , Infant , Mutation , Phenotype
5.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 57(11): 1280-1290, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32383406

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychosocial adjustment of children born with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of psychosocial outcomes and cross-sectional comparison with published norms. SETTING: Retrospective clinical audit at a UK cleft center. PARTICIPANTS: Data available for 1174 participants born with a CL/P at ages 5 (n = 658), 10 (n = 415), and 15 (n = 171), with longitudinal data for a subset of the sample at 5 and 10 (n = 168) and 10 and 15 (n = 49). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Parental-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). RESULTS: The majority of children scored in the average range for overall adjustment. Children born with CL/P had significantly higher mean overall SDQ scores relative to normative data at ages 5 and 10. Longitudinal analysis highlighted that adjustment at age 5 was a significant predictor of adjustment at age 10. Gender was another significant predictor of adjustment at age 5 and 10, with boys reporting more problems than girls. However, effect sizes for the impact of age and gender were small. Cleft type was not a significant predictor of SDQ score at any age. CONCLUSIONS: Children aged 5 and 10 years of age born with a cleft may experience greater overall psychosocial difficulties than the general population. The domains on the SDQ on which children experience difficulty may be influenced by age and gender. Future research should focus on the specific impact of cleft-related issues, including speech, language, and hearing difficulties, on psychosocial adjustment.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(6): 1740-1744, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403506

ABSTRACT

The Craniofacial Collaboration United Kingdom (CC-UK) was established across the 4 Highly Specialized Craniofacial Centres (HSCCs) in the UK in 2015. This is the first wave of data to be analyzed, looking at 3-year-old children with sagittal synostosis who have had primary corrective surgery. This is a comprehensive, homogenous dataset, looking at parental measures of development and behavior. The results indicate that the majority of children are rated by their parents as falling within one standard deviation of the mean for both developmental and behavioral measures. However, there was a trend across the age groups within the sample which, although not statistically significant, indicates that more developmental difficulties may become apparent as children get older. Behavior was rated as more problematic, and the areas of greatest parental concern were Conduct (challenging or confrontational behavior) and Hyperactivity domains, where 24% of children were rated as within the clinically significant range. Although the majority of children were rated as falling within the average range, the difference in the mean between the sagittal and the normative group was significant in 5 of the 6 behavioral domains. Further research is required to examine whether these findings are stable over time and to look at the mechanism which might be driving these changes. It is anticipated that future CC-UK analysis will elucidate this more clearly.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Child, Preschool , Facial Bones , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL