Cold snare polypectomy vs. hot snare polypectomy vs. argon plasma coagulation for small (5-9mm) left-sided colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrence rates among three endoscopic treatment modalities for 5-9 mm left-sided colorectal polyps. METHODS: Consecutive adults referred for elective colonoscopy (1/2015-1/2018) with at least one polyp of eligible size (5-9 mm) located distally to the splenic flexure were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three treatment modalities: (1) cold snare polypectomy (CSP), (2) hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and (3) argon plasma coagulation (APC) ablation (50-60 W, flow: 2 l/min). The polyp site was marked with an endoscopic tattoo, and a follow-up colonoscopy with scar biopsies was performed >6 months after the index procedure. Outcomes were polyp recurrence rate and occurrence of complications. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were enrolled, of whom 112 (62.5% males, mean age 61.1 ± 9.9 years) with 121 polyps (CSP, 39; HSP, 45; APC, 37) returned for follow-up colonoscopy. Mean polyp size was 6.7 ± 0.91 mm, 58% were located in the sigmoid, 33% in the rectum and 8% in the descending colon. The majority of polyps resected by CSP or HSP were neoplastic (tubular adenomas: 25.9%, tubulovillous adenomas: 11.1% and sessile serrate adenomas/polyps: 17.5%). No cases of delayed bleeding or perforation occurred. Scar biopsies at follow-up colonoscopy (performed after a mean interval of 13.4 ± 3.8 months) revealed 7 (5.8%) cases of polyp recurrence, showing no significant difference among the three treatment groups [CSP, 3/39 (7.7%); HSP, 1/45 (2.2%); APC, 2/37 (5.4%); P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: CSP, HSP and APC-ablation are effective and well-tolerated treatment modalities for 5-9 mm left-sided colorectal polyps. The present randomized study did not detect any difference in polyp recurrence rate among the three endoscopic techniques.

The Greek Response to COVID-19: A True Success Story from an IBD Perspective.

BACKGROUND: After the first case of infection with the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, in China, an outbreak rapidly spread, finally evolving into a global pandemic. The new disease was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and by May 10, 2020, it has affected more than 4 million people worldwide and caused more than 270,000 deaths. METHODS: We describe the Greek experience regarding the response to COVID-19, with particular focus on 2 COVID-19 reference hospitals in the metropolitan area of Athens, the capital of Greece. RESULTS: The first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Greece was reported on February 26, 2020, and prompted a decisive response from the Greek government. The primary focus was containment of virus spread, considering shortage of ICU beds. A general lockdown was implemented early on, and the national Health Care System underwent massive re-structuring. Our 2 gastrointestinal (GI) centers, which provide care for more than 1500 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, are located in hospitals that were transformed to COVID-19 reference centers. To maintain sufficient care for our patients, while also contributing to the fight against COVID-19, we undertook specific measures. These included provision of telemedicine services, electronic prescriptions and home delivery of medications, isolation of infusion units and IBD clinics in COVID-free zones of the hospitals, in addition to limiting endoscopies to emergencies only. Such practices allowed us to avoid interruption of appropriate therapies for IBD patients. In fact, within the SECURE-IBD database, there have been only 4 Greek IBD patients, to date, who have been reported as positive for SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Timely application of preventive measures and strict compliance to guidelines limited the spread of COVID-19 in Greece and minimally impacted our IBD community, without interfering with therapeutic management.

COVID-19 pandemic: Pathophysiology and manifestations from the gastrointestinal tract.

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a newly identified ß-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a dire health problem, causing a massive crisis for global health. Primary method of transmission was firstly thought to be animal to human transmission. However, it has been observed that the virus is transmitted from human to human via respiratory droplets. Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) has been isolated from patient stools, suggesting a possible gastrointestinal (GI) involvement. Most commonly reported clinical manifestations are fever, fatigue and dry cough. Interestingly, a small percentage of patients experience GI symptoms with the most common being anorexia, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. The presence of viral RNA in stools is also common and fecal tests can be positive even after negative respiratory samples. The exact incidence of digestive symptoms is a matter of debate. The distribution of Angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 receptors in multiple organs in the body provides a possible explanation for the digestive symptoms' mechanism. Cases with solely GI symptoms have been reported in both adults and children. Viral RNA has also been detected in stool and blood samples, indicating the possibility of liver damage, which has been reported in COVID-19 patients. The presence of chronic liver disease appears to be a risk factor for severe complications and a poorer prognosis, however data from these cases is lacking. The aim of this review is firstly, to briefly update what is known about the origin and the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, but mainly to focus on the manifestations of the GI tract and their pathophysiological background, so that physicians on the one hand, not to underestimate or disregard digestive symptoms due to the small number of patients exhibiting exclusively this symptomatology and on the other, to have SARS-CoV-2 on their mind when the "gastroenteritis" type symptoms predominate.

Immunotherapy of Cancer: Developments and Reference Points, an Unorthodox Approach.

Oncology is currently a sector of medical science with accelerated progress due to rapid technological development, the advancement in molecular biology, and the invention of many innovative therapies. Immunotherapy partially accounts for this advance, since it is increasingly playing an important role in the treatment of cancer patients, bringing on a sense of hope and optimism through a series of clinical studies and cases with spectacular results. Immunotherapy, after the initial successes it experienced in the early 20th century, was forgotten after chemotherapy and radiotherapy prevailed and developed slowly in the background. Today, it is the new hope for cancer treatment, despite the unorthodox path it has followed. In this article, we study the course and key points of the discovery of immune-oncology from the oncologist's point of view. We also record the questions that have been posed about immunotherapy that sometimes lead to confusion or stalemate.

Prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an independent risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which is associated significantly with disease severity. We aimed to determine the rates of CDI among hospitalized IBD patients in major tertiary referral hospitals in Greece. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of stool cultures from hospitalized patients investigated for diarrhea, during 2016, tested for CDI with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B. RESULTS: In total, 6932 patients were tested for CDI; 894 were positive for GDH (12.89%) and 339 were also positive for C. difficile toxin (4.89%). The prevalence of CDI among all hospitalized patients was 1.6/1000 patient-days. Among these, there were 401 IBD patients, and 62 were positive for GDH (15.46%) and 30 were also positive for C. difficile toxin (7.48%). The prevalence of CDI in IBD patients was 2.5/1000 patient-days, significantly higher than in non-IBD hospitalized patients (30/401 vs. 309/6531, P=0.013). Among the 30 IBD patients (ulcerative colitis=18, Crohn's disease=12) with CDI, six were receiving biologics, three were on corticosteroids [one combined with azathioprine (AZA) and one combined with 5-ASA], nine were on AZA monotherapy and 12 were on 5-ASA monotherapy. The prevalence of CDI among patients receiving AZA monotherapy was significantly higher than in patients receiving other medications (9/68 vs. 21/333, P=0.047). Mild CDI (n=28) was treated with metronidazole and/or vancomycin, whereas severe CDI (n=2) was treated with vancomycin. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CDI is higher in hospitalized IBD patients than those without IBD and AZA monotherapy increases the risk of CDI.

Secondary metastatic lesions to colon and rectum.

Metastatic lesions of the colon are a rare clinical entity that may present difficulties in management. The incidence of these metastases appears to be increasing, as a result of physicians' greater awareness during follow-up investigations of a primary neoplasm. Furthermore, the presence of a greater proportion of these abnormalities at autopsy should be a triggering factor for further investigation for doctors dealing with colorectal oncology. Their clinical presentation may vary from asymptomatic to signs similar to those of colorectal cancer. However, immunohistological analysis is considered the cornerstone for differentiating metastases to the colon, originating from other primaries, from primary colorectal neoplasms. Survival reports and treatment options vary. This article concisely presents the main characteristics of the secondary lesions to the colon from neoplasms that metastasize to the large intestine (namely, lung, ovary, breast, prostate, kidney, and melanoma) focusing on their incidence, their clinical presentation and the workup investigation. Physicians aware of this uncommon entity are much better prepared to apply an efficient diagnosis and workup, as well as an appropriate treatment strategy.