PITX2 as a Sensitive and Specific Marker of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from a Cohort of 1157 Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

As neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) often present as metastatic lesions, immunohistochemical assignment to a site of origin is one of the most important tasks in their pathologic assessment. Because a fraction of NETs eludes the typical expression profiles of their primary localization, additional sensitive and specific markers are required to improve diagnostic certainty. We investigated the expression of the transcription factor Pituitary Homeobox 2 (PITX2) in a large-scale cohort of 909 NET and 248 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) according to the immunoreactive score (IRS) and correlated PITX2 expression groups with general tumor groups and primary localization. PITX2 expression (all expression groups) was highly sensitive (98.1%) for midgut-derived NET, but not perfectly specific, as non-midgut NET (especially pulmonary/duodenal) were quite frequently weak or moderately positive. The specificity rose to 99.5% for a midgut origin of NET if only a strong PITX2 expression was considered, which was found in only 0.5% (one pancreatic/one pulmonary) of non-midgut NET. In metastases of midgut-derived NET, PITX2 was expressed in all cases (87.5% strong, 12.5% moderate), whereas CDX2 was negative or only weakly expressed in 31.3% of the metastases. In NEC, a fraction of cases (14%) showed a weak or moderate PITX2 expression, which was not associated with a specific tumor localization. Our study independently validates PITX2 as a very sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker of midgut-derived NET in a very large collective of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Therefore, our data argue toward implementation into diagnostic panels applied for NET as a firstline midgut marker.

Frequency and Prognostic Significance of Intertumoural Heterogeneity in Multifocal Jejunoileal Neuroendocrine Tumours.

BACKGROUND: A recent study found that multifocal jejunoileal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) are genetically unrelated synchronous neoplasms. So far, it is unclear if this finding of synchronous independent neoplasms is mirrored by heterogeneity of key morphological parameters of SI-NETs and how it affects patient survival. METHODS: We separately assessed WHO grade (based on the Ki-67 index), expression of basal diagnostic markers (synaptophysin/chromogranin A/CDX2/serotonin), SSTR2a, and the contexture of the immunogenic microenvironment in 146 separate tumors from 28 patients with multifocal SI-NETs and correlated the results with clinicopathological factors and survival. RESULTS: Synaptophysin and chromogranin A were strongly expressed in all tumors. WHO grade was concordant within all multifocal lesions in more than 80% of cases and the highest grade was usually found in the most advanced primary. Intertumoral expression of serotonin, SSTR2, and CDX2 was discrepant in 32%, 43%, and 50% of all patients, respectively. Neither heterogeneity of any of the aforementioned markers nor multifocality itself had any impact on patient survival (p = n.s.). DISCUSSION: Multifocal SI-NET show considerable variability in some of the central diagnostic parameters. However, neither intertumoral heterogeneity of those parameters nor multifocality itself had any impact on patient survival, showing that extensive testing of all multifocal lesions is not necessarily required.