Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Value Health ; 21(6): 685-691, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient navigation programs to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence have become widespread in recent years, especially among deprived populations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the first patient navigation program in France. METHODS: A total of 16,250 participants were randomized to either the usual screening group (n = 8145) or the navigation group (n = 8105). Navigation consisted of personalized support provided by social workers. A cost-effectiveness analysis of navigation versus usual screening was conducted from the payer perspective in the Picardy region of northern France. We considered nonmedical direct costs in the analysis. RESULTS: Navigation was associated with a significant increase of 3.3% (24.4% vs. 21.1%; P = 0.003) in participation. The increase in participation was higher among affluent participants (+4.1%; P = 0.01) than among deprived ones (+2.6%; P = 0.07). The cost per additional individual screened by navigation compared with usual screening (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) was €1212 globally and €1527 among deprived participants. Results were sensitive to navigator wages and to the intervention effectiveness whose variations had the greatest impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation aiming at increasing CRC screening participation is more efficient among affluent individuals. Nevertheless, when the intervention is implemented for the entire population, social inequalities in CRC screening adherence increase. To reduce social inequalities, patient navigation should therefore be restricted to deprived populations, despite not being the most cost-effective strategy, and accepted to bear a higher extra cost per additional individual screened.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/legislation & jurisprudence , Mass Screening/economics , Patient Navigation/economics , Age Factors , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Female , France , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Patient Navigation/organization & administration , Patient Participation , Prospective Studies , Social Workers
2.
Prev Med ; 103: 76-83, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823681

ABSTRACT

Despite free colorectal cancer screening in France, participation remains low and low socioeconomic status is associated with a low participation. Our aim was to assess the effect of a screening navigation program on participation and the reduction in social inequalities in a national-level organized mass screening program for colorectal cancer by fecal-occult blood test (FOBT). A multicenter (3 French departments) cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted over two years. The cluster was a small geographical unit stratified according to a deprivation index and the place of residence. A total of 14,556 subjects (72 clusters) were included in the control arm where the FOBT program involved the usual postal reminders, and 14,373 subjects (66 clusters) were included in the intervention arm. Intervention concerned only non-attended subjects with a phone number available defined as the navigable population. A screening navigator was added to the usual screening organization to identify and eliminate barriers to CRC screening with personalized contact. The participation rate by strata increased in the intervention arm. The increase was greater in affluent strata than in deprived ones. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the intervention mainly with phone navigation increased individual participation (OR=1.19 [1.10, 1.29]) in the navigable population. For such interventions to reduce social inequalities in a country with a national level organized mass screening program, they should first be administered to deprived populations, in accordance with the principle of proportionate universalism. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01555450.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Occult Blood , Patient Navigation , Socioeconomic Factors , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
3.
BMC Public Health ; 17(1): 86, 2017 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28095815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In aggregate studies, ecological indices are used to study the influence of socioeconomic status on health. Their main limitation is ecological bias. This study assesses the misclassification of individual socioeconomic status in seven ecological indices. METHODS: Individual socioeconomic data for a random sample of 10,000 persons came from periodic health examinations conducted in 2006 in 11 French departments. Geographical data came from the 2007 census at the lowest geographical level available in France. The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, the areas under the curves (AUC) for each individual variable, and the distribution of deprived and non-deprived persons in quintiles of each aggregate score were analyzed. RESULTS: The aggregate indices studied are quite good "proxies" for individual deprivation (AUC close to 0.7), and they have similar performance. The indices are more efficient at measuring individual income than education or occupational category and are suitable for measuring of deprivation but not affluence. CONCLUSIONS: The study inventoried the aggregate indices available in France and evaluated their assessment of individual SES.


Subject(s)
Bias , Health Status Disparities , Health Status Indicators , Poverty , Social Class , Adult , Censuses , Female , France , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
BMC Public Health ; 17(1): 956, 2017 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing interest in place effect to explain health inequalities, there is currently no consensus on which kind of area-based socioeconomic measures researchers should use to assess neighborhood socioeconomic position (SEP). The study aimed to evaluate the reliability of different area-based deprivation indices (DIs) in capturing socioeconomic residential conditions of French elderly women cohort. METHODS: We assessed area-based SEP using 3 DIs: Townsend Index, French European Deprivation Index (FEDI) and French Deprivation index (FDep), among women from E3N (Etude épidémiologique auprès des femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale). DIs were derived from the 2009 French census at IRIS level (smallest geographical units in France). Educational level was used to evaluate individual-SEP. To evaluate external validity of the 3 DIs, associations between two well-established socially patterned outcomes among French elderly women (smoking and overweight) and SEP, were compared. Odd ratios were computed with generalized estimating equations to control for clustering effects from participants within the same IRIS. RESULTS: The analysis was performed among 63,888 women (aged 64, 47% ever smokers and 30% overweight). Substantial agreement was observed between the two French DIs (Kappa coefficient = 0.61) and between Townsend and FEDI (0.74) and fair agreement between Townsend and FDep (0.21). As expected among French elderly women, those with lower educational level were significantly less prone to be ever smoker (Low vs. High; OR [95% CI] = 0.43 [0.40-0.46]) and more prone to being overweight (1.89 [1.77-2.01]) than women higher educated. FDep showed expected associations at area-level for both smoking (most deprived vs. least deprived quintile; 0.77 [0.73-0.81]) and overweight (1.52 [1.44-1.62]). For FEDI opposite associations with smoking (1.13 [1.07-1.19]) and expected association with overweight (1.20 [1.13-1.28]) were observed. Townsend showed opposite associations to those expected for both smoking and overweight (1.51 [1.43-1.59]; 0.93 [0.88-0.99], respectively). CONCLUSION: FDep seemed reliable to capture socioeconomic residential conditions of the E3N women, more educated in average than general French population. Results varied strongly according to the DI with unexpected results for some of them, which suggested the importance to test external validity before studying social disparities in health in specific populations.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Small-Area Analysis , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Overweight/epidemiology , Reproducibility of Results , Smoking/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors
5.
Eur J Public Health ; 25(6): 966-72, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25829506

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the impact of socio-economic and geographic disparities on disease stage at diagnosis according to age in breast cancer (BC) patients. Secondary purpose was to describe survival METHODS: All women with primary invasive BC, diagnosed from 1998 to 2009 in the department of Côte d'Or were retrospectively selected using data from the Côte d'Or BC registry. European transnational ecological deprivation index (French European Deprivation Index) was used to measure the socio-economic environment. Relationships between socio-geographic deprivation and disease stage at diagnosis according to age were assessed by a multilevel ordered logistic regression model. Relative survival rates (RSRs) were given at 5 years according to tumour and patients characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 4364 women were included. In multivariable analysis, socio-economic deprivation was associated with disease stage at diagnosis. Women aged between 50 and 74 years and living in deprived areas were more often diagnosed with advanced tumour stages (stages II/III vs. I or stages IV vs. II/III) with odds ratio = 1.27 (1.01-1.60). RSRs were lowest in women living in the most deprived area compared with those living in most affluent area with RSR = 88.4% (85.9-90.4) and 92.6% (90.5-94.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic factors affected tumour stage at diagnosis and survival. Living in a deprived area was linked to advanced-stage BC at diagnosis only in women aged 50-74 years. This is probably due to the socio-economic disparities in participation in organized BC screening programmes. Furthermore, living in deprived area was associated with a poor survival rate.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 87, 2014 Feb 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24524213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The struggle against social inequalities is a priority for many international organizations. The objective of the study was to quantify the cancer burden related to social deprivation by identifying the cancer sites linked to socioeconomic status and measuring the proportion of cases associated with social deprivation. METHODS: The study population comprised 68 967 cases of cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 2009 in Normandy and collected by the local registries. The social environment was assessed at an aggregated level using the European Deprivation Index (EDI). The association between incidence and socioeconomic status was assessed by a Bayesian Poisson model and the excess of cases was calculated with the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF). RESULTS: For lung, lips-mouth-pharynx and unknown primary sites, a higher incidence in deprived was observed for both sexes. The same trend was observed in males for bladder, liver, esophagus, larynx, central nervous system and gall-bladder and in females for cervix uteri. The largest part of the incidence associated with deprivation was found for cancer of gall-bladder (30.1%), lips-mouth-pharynx (26.0%), larynx (23.2%) and esophagus (19.6%) in males and for unknown primary sites (18.0%) and lips-mouth-pharynx (12.7%) in females. For prostate cancer and melanoma in males, the sites where incidence increased with affluence, the part associated with affluence was respectively 9.6% and 14.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond identifying cancer sites the most associated with social deprivation, this kind of study points to health care policies that could be undertaken to reduce social inequalities.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/ethnology , Population Surveillance , Social Environment , Vulnerable Populations/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , France/ethnology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Population Surveillance/methods , Registries , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
7.
Prev Med ; 63: 103-8, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24345603

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated factors explaining low breast cancer screening programme (BCSP) attendance taking into account a European transnational ecological Deprivation Index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 13,565 women aged 51-74years old invited to attend an organised mammography screening session between 2010 and 2011 in thirteen French departments were randomly selected. Information on the women's participation in BCSP, their individual characteristics and the characteristics of their area of residence were recorded and analysed in a multilevel model. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2012, 7121 (52.5%) women of the studied population had their mammography examination after they received the invitation. Women living in the most deprived neighbourhood were less likely than those living in the most affluent neighbourhood to participate in BCSP (OR 95%CI=0.84[0.78-0.92]) as were those living in rural areas compared with those living in urban areas (OR 95%CI=0.87[0.80-0.95]). Being self-employed (p<0.0001) or living more than 15min away from an accredited screening centre (p=0.02) was also a barrier to participation in BCSP. CONCLUSION: Despite the classless delivery of BCSP, inequalities in uptake remain. To take advantage of prevention and to avoid exacerbating disparities in cancer mortality, BCSP should be adapted to women's personal and contextual characteristics.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , France , Humans , Middle Aged , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
8.
Int J Public Health ; 63(4): 469-479, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29480326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Analyze the association between socioeconomic deprivation and old-age survival in Europe, and investigate whether it varies by country and gender. METHODS: Our study incorporated five countries (Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, and England). A 10-year survival rate expressing the proportion of population aged 75-84 years who reached 85-94 years old was calculated at area-level for 2001-11. To estimate associations, we used Bayesian spatial models and a transnational measure of deprivation. Attributable/prevention fractions were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant association between deprivation and survival in both genders. In England that association was stronger, following a dose-response relation. Although lesser in magnitude, significant associations were observed in Spain and Italy, whereas in France and Portugal these were even weaker. The elimination of socioeconomic differences between areas would increase survival by 7.1%, and even a small reduction in socioeconomic differences would lead to a 1.6% increase. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with survival among older adults at ecological-level, although with varying magnitude across countries. Reasons for such cross-country differences should be sought. Our results emphasize the importance of reducing socioeconomic differences between areas.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly/psychology , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Longevity , Psychosocial Deprivation , Survival Rate , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bayes Theorem , England , Female , France , Humans , Italy , Male , Portugal , Spain
9.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 70(5): 493-9, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26659762

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite a concerted policy effort in Europe, social inequalities in health are a persistent problem. Developing a standardised measure of socioeconomic level across Europe will improve the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and causes of inequalities. This will facilitate developing, implementing and assessing new and more effective policies, and will improve the comparability and reproducibility of health inequality studies among countries. This paper presents the extension of the European Deprivation Index (EDI), a standardised measure first developed in France, to four other European countries-Italy, Portugal, Spain and England, using available 2001 and 1999 national census data. METHODS AND RESULTS: The method previously tested and validated to construct the French EDI was used: first, an individual indicator for relative deprivation was constructed, defined by the minimal number of unmet fundamental needs associated with both objective (income) poverty and subjective poverty. Second, variables available at both individual (European survey) and aggregate (census) levels were identified. Third, an ecological deprivation index was constructed by selecting the set of weighted variables from the second step that best correlated with the individual deprivation indicator. CONCLUSIONS: For each country, the EDI is a weighted combination of aggregated variables from the national census that are most highly correlated with a country-specific individual deprivation indicator. This tool will improve both the historical and international comparability of studies, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying social inequalities in health and implementation of intervention to tackle social inequalities in health.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Poverty , Aged , Europe , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 39(2): 256-64, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25579981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many international ecological studies that examine the link between social environment and cancer incidence use a deprivation index based on the subjects' address at the time of diagnosis to evaluate socioeconomic status. Thus, social past details are ignored, which leads to misclassification bias in the estimations. The objectives of this study were to include the latency delay in such estimations and to observe the effects. METHODS: We adapted a previous methodology to correct estimates of the influence of socioeconomic environment on cancer incidence considering the latency delay in measuring socioeconomic status. We implemented this method using French data. We evaluated the misclassification due to social mobility with census data and corrected the relative risks. RESULTS: Inclusion of misclassification affected the values of relative risks, and the corrected values showed a greater departure from the value 1 than the uncorrected ones. For cancer of lung, colon-rectum, lips-mouth-pharynx, kidney and esophagus in men, the over incidence in the deprived categories was augmented by the correction. CONCLUSIONS: By not taking into account the latency period in measuring socioeconomic status, the burden of cancer associated with social inequality may be underestimated.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Bias , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
11.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(5): 516-21, 2015 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25752955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The best method to quantify air contamination in the operating room (OR) is debated, and studies in the field are controversial. We assessed the correlation between 2 types of air sampling and wound contaminations before closing and the factors affecting air contamination. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included 13 ORs of cardiac and orthopedic surgery in 10 health care facilities. For each surgical procedure, 3 microbiologic air counts, 3 particles counts of 0.3, 0.5, and 5 µm particles, and 1 bacteriologic sample of the wound before skin closure were performed. We collected data on surgical procedures and environmental characteristics. RESULTS: Of 180 particle counts during 60 procedures, the median log10 of 0.3, 0.5, and 5 µm particles was 7 (interquartile range [IQR], 6.2-7.9), 6.1 (IQR, 5.4-7), and 4.6 (IQR, 0-5.2), respectively. Of 180 air samples, 50 (28%) were sterile, 90 (50%) had 1-10 colony forming units (CFU)/m(3) and 40 (22%) >10 CFU/m(3). In orthopedic and cardiac surgery, wound cultures at closure were sterile for 24 and 9 patients, 10 and 11 had 1-10 CFU/100 cm(2), and 0 and 6 had >10 CFU/100 cm(2), respectively (P < .01). Particle sizes and a turbulent ventilation system were associated with an increased number of air microbial counts (P < .001), but they were not associated with wound contamination (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that particle counting is a good surrogate of airborne microbiologic contamination in the OR.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Humans , Particulate Matter/analysis
12.
Bull Cancer ; 102(2): 126-38, 2015 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636359

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In France, breast cancer screening programme, free of charge for women aged 50-74 years old, coexists with an opportunistic screening and leads to reduction in attendance in the programme. Here, we reported participation in organized and/or opportunistic screening in thirteen French departments. POPULATION AND METHODS: We analyzed screening data (organized and/or opportunistic) of 622,382 women aged 51-74 years old invited to perform an organized mammography screening session from 2010 to 2011 in the thirteen French departments. The type of mammography screening performed has been reported according to women age, their health insurance scheme, the rurality and the socioeconomic level of their area or residence. We also represented the tertiles of deprivation and participation in mammography screening for each department. RESULTS: A total of 390,831 (62.8%) women performed a mammography screening (organized and/or opportunistic) after the invitation. These women were mainly aged from 55-69 years old, insured by the general insurance scheme and lived in urban, semi-urban or affluent areas. CONCLUSION: The participation in mammography screening (organized and opportunistic) in France remains below the target rate of 70% expected by health authorities to reduce breast cancer mortality through screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , France , Geography, Medical , Humans , Insurance, Health , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Residence Characteristics , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Suburban Population/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
13.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 96(2): 596-601, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23773731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the middle of October 2011, the Hygiene Department of Caen University Hospital suspected an outbreak of surgical site infections (SSI) after open-heart operations with an unusually high proportion of microorganisms belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family. The attack rate was 3.8%, significantly different (p = 0.035) from the attack rate of 1.2% in 2010 over the equivalent period. A case-control study was conducted to search specifically for risk factors for Enterobacteriaceae infections after median sternotomy in cardiac patients. METHODS: Case patients were defined retrospectively as patients with superficial or deep surgical site infection with Enterobacteriaceae within 30 days of median sternotomy. Four control patients were selected per case patient from patients matched for date of operation (± 15 days) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (<5, [5-10], >10). RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified the following risk factors: inappropriate skin preparation on the morning of the intervention (p = 0.046), use of vancomycin (p = 0.030), and number of sternotomy dressings (p = 0.033). A multivariate logistic regression analysis found that vancomycin use was independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative SSI with Enterobacteriaceae (p = 0.019; odds ratio = 7.4). CONCLUSIONS: Although vancomycin is known to be effective for preventing infection with methicillin-sensitive organisms, our results suggest that it was associated with a risk for the development of SSI with gram-negative organisms after median sternotomy. This study led to a multidisciplinary meeting that defined new guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic therapy before open-heart operations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Case-Control Studies , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sternotomy , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology
14.
Dig Liver Dis ; 44(3): 261-7, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22119218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The correct examination of lymph nodes is decisive for tumour classification into stage 2 and stage 3. The aim of this specialised population-based study was to investigate the influence of clinical factors and volume of surgical activity on lymph node assessment in France for patients diagnosed with localised colorectal cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2004, French digestive cancer registries recorded a total of 4197 cases of colorectal cancer. The volume of surgical activity was appreciated by the annual number of digestive surgery admissions in 2004. The probability of having at least 12 lymph nodes examined after surgical resection was analysed using a multilevel logistic regression model. RESULTS: Only 1900 patients had more than 12 lymph nodes examined (45.2%). The percentage of patients with at least 12 lymph nodes examined after tumour resection is directly associated with the volume of surgical activity within care centres for patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2000. This association was no longer significant during the second period study (2001-2004). CONCLUSION(S): This population-based study reports that only 55% of colorectal patients have a sufficient number of lymph nodes examined. This insufficient number of examined lymph nodes could be considered as a potential prospect for increasing treatment quality in cancer patients in France.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Lymph Node Excision/standards , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Logistic Models , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Registries , Residence Characteristics
15.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 66(11): 982-9, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22544918

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studying social disparities in health implies the ability to measure them accurately, to compare them between different areas or countries and to follow trends over time. This study proposes a method for constructing a French European deprivation index, which will be replicable in several European countries and is related to an individual deprivation indicator constructed from a European survey specifically designed to study deprivation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using individual data from the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey, goods/services indicated by individuals as being fundamental needs, the lack of which reflect deprivation, were selected. From this definition, which is specific to a cultural context, an individual deprivation indicator was constructed by selecting fundamental needs associated both with objective and subjective poverty. Next, the authors selected among variables available both in the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey and French national census those best reflecting individual experience of deprivation using multivariate logistic regression. An ecological measure of deprivation was provided for all the smallest French geographical units. Preliminary validation showed a higher association between the French European Deprivation Index (EDI) score and both income and education than the Townsend index, partly ensuring its ability to measure individual socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: This index, which is specific to a particular cultural and social policy context, could be replicated in 25 other European countries, thereby allowing European comparisons. EDI could also be reproducible over time. EDI could prove to be a relevant tool in evidence-based policy-making for measuring and reducing social disparities in health issues and even outside the medical domain.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Health Status Indicators , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Europe , France , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Poverty Areas , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results
16.
Diabetes Metab ; 37(2): 152-61, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21435929

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aimed to characterize the sociodemographic data, health status, quality of care and 6-year trends in elderly people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This study used two French cross-sectional representative surveys of adults of all ages with all types of diabetes (Entred 2001 and 2007), which combined medical claims, and patient and medical provider questionnaires. The 2007 data in patients with type 2 diabetes aged 65 years or over (n=1766) were described and compared with the 2001 data (n=1801). RESULTS: Since 2001, obesity has increased (35% in 2007; +7 points since 2001) while written nutritional advice was less often provided (59%; -6 points). Mean HbA(1c) (7.1%; -0.2%), blood pressure (135/76 mmHg; -4/-3 mmHg) and LDL cholesterol (1.04 g/L; -0.21 g/L) declined, while the use of medication increased: at least two OHAs, 34% (+4 points); OHA(s) and insulin combined, 10% (+4 points); antihypertensive treatment, 83% (+4 points); and statins 48% (+26 points). Severe hypoglycaemia remained frequent (10% had an event at least once a year). The overall prevalence of complications increased. Renal complications were not monitored carefully enough (missing value for albuminuria: 42%; -4.5 points), and 46% of those with a glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² were taking metformin. CONCLUSION: Elderly people with type 2 diabetes are receiving better quality of care and have better control of cardiovascular risk factors than before. However, improvement is still required, in particular by performing better screening for complications. In this patient population, it is important to carefully monitor the risks for hypoglycaemia, hypotension, malnutrition and contraindications related to renal function.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Quality of Health Care/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Complications/diagnosis , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Malnutrition/prevention & control , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 34(3): 309-15, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20403737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the literature on factors associated with mammography screening is abundant, reasons for underparticipation remain unclear, most studies having focused exclusively on individual factors. This study aimed at investigating the ecological influence of socioeconomic status and healthcare supply on compliance to organized breast cancer screening programs, on an unbiased sample based on data from the entire target population within a French geographical area, Calvados (n=98,822 women). METHODS: Individual data on participation and aggregate data on healthcare supply and socioeconomic status, respectively obtained from the structure responsible for organizing screening and the French census, were analyzed simultaneously using a multilevel model. RESULTS: Uptake was lower among the youngest (50-54 years) and the oldest (70-74 years) women, compared to the intermediate 55-69 year age-group, with respectively OR=0.73 (95%CI: 0.64-0.83) and OR=0.78 (95%CI: 0.67-0.91). Uptake fell with increasing level of deprivation, a difference in uptake probability being observed between the least deprived and the most deprived areas (OR=0.71; 95%CI: 0.59-0.86). Neither radiologist- nor primary care physicians-to-100,000 inhabitants ratios were associated with participation. CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel analysis allows to detect areas of weak participation statistically linked to areas of strong deprivation. So, even with organized breast cancer screening giving screening free of charge for target women, ecological socioeconomic factors have a more significant impact on participation than healthcare supply. These results suggest that targeting populations, in accurate geographical areas where women are less likely to participate, as identified socially and geographically in this study, could be adopted to reduce disparities in screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL