Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended in COVID-19 patients receiving dexamethasone because of potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions affecting anticoagulant concentration and activity. To evaluate short- and long-term pharmacokinetic interactions, serial through and peak DOAC plasma levels were prospectively measured during and after dexamethasone therapy, as well as during the acute phase and after recovery from COVID-19 in hospitalized, non-critically ill patients undergoing treatment with DOACs. Thirty-three (18 males, mean age 79 years) consecutive patients received DOACs (17 apixaban, 12 rivaroxaban, 4 edoxaban) for atrial fibrillation (n = 22), venous thromboembolism (n = 10), and acute myocardial infarction (n = 1). Twenty-six patients also received dexamethasone at a dose of 6 mg once daily for a median of 14 days. Trough DOAC levels on dexamethasone were within and below expected reference ranges respectively in 87.5 and 8.3% of patients, with no statistically significant differences at 48-72 h and 14-21 days after dexamethasone discontinuation. Peak DOAC levels on dexamethasone were within expected reference ranges in 58.3% of patients, and below ranges in 33.3%, of whom over two thirds had low values also off dexamethasone. No significant differences in DOAC levels were found during hospitalization and after resolution of COVID-19. Overall, 28 patients were discharged alive, and none experienced thrombotic or bleeding events. In this study, dexamethasone administration or acute COVID-19 seemed not to affect DOAC levels in hospitalized, non-critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Acute complications and mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute complications and mortality associated with COVID-19 remains poorly characterized. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to summarize the evidence on clinically relevant outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and medRxiv were searched up to April 20, 2020, for studies including hospitalized symptomatic adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The secondary outcomes included acute cardiac or kidney injury, shock, coagulopathy, and venous thromboembolism. The main analysis was based on data from peer-reviewed studies. Summary estimates and the corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were obtained through meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 44 peer-reviewed studies with 14,866 COVID-19 patients were included. In general, risk of bias was high. All-cause mortality was 10% overall (95% PI, 2 to 39%; 1687/14203 patients; 43 studies), 34% in patients admitted to intensive care units (95% PI, 8 to 76%; 659/2368 patients; 10 studies), 83% in patients requiring invasive ventilation (95% PI, 1 to 100%; 180/220 patients; 6 studies), and 75% in patients who developed ARDS (95% PI, 35 to 94%; 339/455 patients; 11 studies). On average, ARDS occurred in 14% of patients (95% PI, 2 to 59%; 999/6322 patients; 23 studies), acute cardiac injury in 15% (95% PI, 5 to 38%; 452/2389 patients; 10 studies), venous thromboembolism in 15% (95% PI, 0 to 100%; patients; 3 studies), acute kidney injury in 6% (95% PI, 1 to 41%; 318/4682 patients; 15 studies), coagulopathy in 6% (95% PI, 1 to 39%; 223/3370 patients; 9 studies), and shock in 3% (95% PI, 0 to 61%; 203/4309 patients; 13 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was very high in critically ill patients based on very low-quality evidence due to striking heterogeneity and risk of bias. The incidence of clinically relevant outcomes was substantial, although reported by only one third of the studies suggesting considerable underreporting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration ID for this study is CRD42020177243 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=177243 ).

Prevalence and Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Caregivers of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Cirrhosis.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease, affecting nearly 1 in 3 Americans.1 Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the clinically aggressive variant of NAFLD, has a propensity of fibrosis progression and increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NASH-related cirrhosis is now the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation (LT).2 Disease recurrence and progression to advanced fibrosis after LT are high3; however, the key contributors of these are unknown. We hypothesized that patients with NASH cirrhosis reside in a microenvironment conducive to not only development of NASH but also fibrosis progression, which likely persist after LT and contribute to disease recurrence. The hypothesis was tested by performing vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in primary caregivers and cohabitants of patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting LT.

Takotsubo syndrome: diagnostic work-up and clues into differential diagnosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Takotsubo syndrome represents an increasingly recognized clinical entity characterized by a reversible acute myocardial dysfunction, often triggered by an emotional or physical stress, and independent of an underlying epicardial coronary artery disease. The diagnosis is often challenging because of the nonspecific clinical presentation and the inconclusive noninvasive diagnostic imaging. RECENT FINDINGS: The present review provides a brief overview of Takotsubo syndrome clinical presentation and guides the clinician through the diagnostic work-up of Takotsubo syndrome, highlighting clues into differential diagnosis. A review of clinical management is also provided. SUMMARY: Despite increasing awareness and recognition, the diagnosis of Takotsubo syndrome remains challenging and Takotsubo syndrome is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed. The prompt recognition of Takotsubo syndrome portends relevant prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Alirocumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Virginia Commonwealth University Alirocumab Response Trial (VCU-AlirocRT).

Alirocumab improves outcomes in patients with a history of recent acute coronary syndrome, but treatment acutely at the time of myocardial infarction is untested. We present the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded pilot study of alirocumab treatment at the time of non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI). Twenty patients with type 1 NSTEMI and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >70 mg/dL despite high intensity statin therapy were randomized 1:1 to one dose of alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously or placebo within 24 hours of presentation. LDL-C and inflammatory biomarkers-including C-reactive protein-were obtained at baseline, 72 hours, and 14 days. Median (interquartile range) and number (%) were: age 59 (49, 65) years, 7 (35%) men, 16 (80%) black; baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C from baseline to 14 days by 64 mg/dL (-96, -47) compared with placebo [+1 mg/dL (-25, +16)] (primary endpoint). There were no significant between-group differences in C-reactive protein changes at any time point (all P > 0.2) or serious adverse events attributable to the study treatment. In conclusion, alirocumab administration at the time of NSTEMI significantly reduced LDL-C levels at 14 days, was safe, and had neutral effects on inflammatory biomarkers. Further studies are warranted to explore the effects on clinical outcomes.

The NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibitor, OLT1177 (Dapansutrile), Reduces Infarct Size and Preserves Contractile Function After Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in the Mouse.

BACKGROUND: Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is a primary driver of sterile inflammation in response to myocardial ischemia reperfusion. Pharmacologic inhibitors of the NLRP3 inflammasome are being developed. We proposed that OLT1177 (dapansutrile), a novel NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, could preserve myocardial function after ischemia reperfusion injury in the mouse. METHODS: We used an experimental murine model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury through transient ligation of the left coronary artery and measured the effects of OLT1177 (6, 60, or 600 mg/kg intraperitoneal dose) on infarct size at pathology and on systolic cardiac function at echocardiography. To simulate a clinical scenario, we investigated the time window of therapeutic intervention with OLT1177 (60 mg/kg) administered 60, 120, or 180 minutes after reperfusion. RESULTS: OLT1177 was rapidly detectable in the plasma following intraperitoneal injection and had no effect on cardiac function in healthy mice. OLT1177 treatment at reperfusion showed significant dose-dependent reduction in infarct size (-36%, -67%, and -62% for 6, 60, and 600 mg/kg, respectively; P < 0.001 for linear trend, P = 0.010 vs. vehicle for 6 mg/kg, and P < 0.001 vs. vehicle for 60 and 600 mg/kg) and preserved cardiac systolic function measured as left ventricular fractional shortening at 24 hours and 7 days after injury (P = 0.015 for 6 mg/kg and P < 0.01 for 60 and 600 mg/kg). OLT1177 reduced infarct size also when given after 60 minutes of reperfusion (-71%, P < 0.001 vs. vehicle). CONCLUSION: OLT1177 (dapansutrile) limits infarct size and prevents left ventricular systolic dysfunction when given within 60 minutes following ischemia reperfusion injury in the mouse.

Developing LRP1 Agonists into a Therapeutic Strategy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Cardioprotection refers to a strategy aimed at enhancing survival pathways in the injured yet salvageable myocardium following ischemia-reperfusion. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) is a multifunctional receptor that can be targeted following reperfusion, to induce a cardioprotective signaling through the activation of the reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) pathway. The data from preclinical studies with non-selective and selective LRP1 agonists are promising, showing a large therapeutic window for intervention to reduce infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion. A pilot clinical trial with plasma derived α1-antitrypsin (AAT), a naturally occurring LRP1 agonist, supports the translational value of LRP1 as a novel therapeutic target for cardioprotection. A phase I study with a selective LRP1 agonist has been completed showing no toxicity. These findings may open the way to early phase clinical studies with pharmacologic LRP1 activation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

An Orally Available NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibitor Prevents Western Diet-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction in Mice.

BACKGROUND: A diet rich in saturated fat and sugars (Western diet, WD) induces myocardial expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome and dysfunction in mice. We therefore hypothesized that a diet enriched with an orally available NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor could prevent WD-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice. METHODS: Ten-week-old CD-1 male mice were fed WD or standard diet (SD) for 8 weeks. The compound 16673-34-0, an orally active NLRP3 inhibitor, was added to the diet at a concentration of 100 mg/Kg. The plasmatic levels of the NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor were measured. Food intake, body weight, and glucose tolerance were assessed. Cardiac systolic and diastolic functions were measured by Doppler echocardiography at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. RESULTS: WD induced a significant increase in body weight (+14%, P = 0.02), impaired glucose tolerance (+34%, P = 0.03), and a significant increase in isovolumetric relaxation time (+129%, P = 0.03) and reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (-10%, P = 0.03), as compared to standard chow diet (SD). The treatment with NLRP3 inhibitor in the diet prevented cardiac systolic and diastolic dysfunction (P < 0.05 for left ventricular ejection fraction, isovolumetric relaxation time, and myocardial performance index in WD with drug vs. WD without drug), without significant changes in heart rate and metabolic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: An orally available NLRP3 inhibitor prevented WD-induced cardiac dysfunction in obese mice.

Unmet needs and barriers in venous thromboembolism education and awareness among people living with cancer: a global survey.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major preventable cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality in subjects with cancer. A global appraisal of cancer-associated VTE education and awareness is not available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate VTE-related education, awareness, and unmet needs from the perspective of people living with cancer using a quantitative and qualitative approach. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from an online-based survey covering multidimensional domains of cancer-associated VTE. Data are presented descriptively. Potential differences across participant subgroups were explored. RESULTS: Among 2262 patients with cancer from 42 countries worldwide, 55.3% received no VTE education throughout their cancer journey, and an additional 8.2% received education at the time of VTE diagnosis only, leading to 63.5% receiving no or inappropriately delayed education. When education was delivered, only 67.8% received instructions to seek medical attention in case of VTE suspicion, and 36.9% reported scarce understanding. One-third of participants (32.4%) felt psychologically distressed when becoming aware of the potential risks and implications connected with cancer-associated VTE. Most responders (78.8%) deemed VTE awareness highly relevant, but almost half expressed concerns about the quality of education received. While overall consistent, findings in selected survey domains appeared to numerically differ across age group, ethnicity, continent of residence, educational level, metastatic status, and VTE history. CONCLUSION: This study involving a large and diverse population of individuals living with cancer identifies important unmet needs in VTE-related education, awareness, and support across healthcare systems globally. These findings unveil multilevel opportunities to expedite patient-centered care in cancer-associated VTE prevention and management.

How to treat isolated distal deep vein thrombosis.

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a frequent manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE), accounting for up to 50% cases of lower­extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). As compared with proximal DVT, IDDVT is more frequently associated with transient risk factors and less often occurs unprovoked or in the presence of permanent risk factors. IDDVT generally carries a significantly lower risk of proximal extension, post­thrombotic syndrome, and recurrence than proximal DVT. Nevertheless, some patient subgroups, such as those with active cancer, other predisposing permanent risk factors, prior VTE, unprovoked IDDVT, persistently restricted mobility, and trifurcation or bilateral involvement, exhibit a non­negligible recurrence risk. Unlike in proximal DVT, the optimal therapeutic management of IDDVT remains uncertain. In clinical practice, the vast majority of IDDVT patients are managed with anticoagulation rather than with surveillance serial compression ultrasonography, which tends to be reserved to individuals at a high bleeding risk. Available data seem to favor anticoagulant therapy over no anticoagulation, thanks to a significant reduction in the risk for proximal extension and recurrence, without increased bleeding risk. Recent results of the RIDTS (Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis) randomized clinical trial with rivaroxaban further support the use of anticoagulant therapy for 3 months over shorter durations (eg, ≤6 weeks). In this review, we offer an updated overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical course of IDDVT, with a focus on the therapeutic management in light of current guideline recommendations and most recent evidence. We also present real­life clinical cases of IDDVT with proposed therapeutic approaches, and highlight major challenges and gaps in this field.

IL-1 blockade in cardiovascular disease: an appraisal of the evidence across different inflammatory paradigms.

Pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest a role for inflammation in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. The NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is activated during tissue injury and releases interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß). We describe three paradigms in which the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1ß contribute to CV diseases. During acute myocardial infarction (AMI), necrotic cell debris, including IL-1α, induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation and further damage the myocardium contributing to heart failure (HF) (acute injury paradigm). In chronic HF, IL-1ß is induced by persistent myocardial overload and injury, neurohumoral activation and systemic comorbidities favoring infiltration and activation of immune cells into the myocardium, microvascular inflammation, and a pro-fibrotic response (chronic inflammation paradigm). In recurrent pericarditis, an autoinflammatory response triggered by cell injury and maintained by the NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1ß axis is present (autoinflammatory disease paradigm). Anakinra, recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, inhibits the acute inflammatory response in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and acute HF. Canakinumab, IL-1ß antibody, blunts systemic inflammation and prevents complications of atherosclerosis in stable patients with prior AMI. In chronic HF, anakinra reduces systemic inflammation and improves cardiorespiratory fitness. In recurrent pericarditis, anakinra and rilonacept, a soluble IL-1 receptor chimeric fusion protein blocking IL-1α and IL-1ß, treat and prevent acute flares. In conclusion, the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1 contribute to the pathophysiology of CV diseases, and IL-1 blockade is beneficial with different roles in the acute injury, chronic inflammation and autoinflammatory disease paradigms. Further research is needed to guide the optimal use of IL-1 blockers in clinical practice.

Anamnestic frailty phenotype and adverse outcomes in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: Validation and comparative performance with frailty phenotype.

AIMS: The anamnestic frailty phenotype (AFP) is a quick, instrument-free tool derived from frailty phenotype (FP). We prospectively evaluated the discriminative capacity and prognostic value of AFP in ambulatory patients receiving DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE), and compared AFP performance with that of FP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), were estimated for bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in frail versus non-frail patients. Of 236 patients (median age 78 years), 98 (42%) and 89 (38%) were classified as frail according to FP and AFP, respectively (Kappa= 0.76). Frailty, as assessed by AFP, was associated with higher risk of bleeding (RR 2.3; 95%CI, 1.2 to 4.6), and mortality (RR 4.4; 95%CI, 1.3 to 19.7). Similarly, to FP, AFP exhibited modest sensitivity and specificity, but high NPV that was 91% (95%CI, 85 to 95) for bleeding, 98% (95%CI, 94 to 100) for thromboembolism, and 98% (95%CI, 94 to 100) for mortality. CONCLUSION: Among patients receiving DOACs for AF or VTE, AFP was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. AFP exhibited modest sensitivity and specificity, but excellent NPV. If confirmed, these findings suggest that AFP may represent a rapid, easy-to-use and unexpensive tool that may potentially help identify patients at lower risk for adverse outcomes and tailor anticoagulation management.

Inflammasome Signaling, Thromboinflammation, and Venous Thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major health burden despite anticoagulation advances, suggesting incomplete management of pathogenic mechanisms. The NLRP3 (NACHT-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome, interleukin (IL)-1, and pyroptosis are emerging contributors to the inflammatory pathogenesis of VTE. Inflammasome pathway activation occurs in patients with VTE. In preclinical models, inflammasome signaling blockade reduces venous thrombogenesis and vascular injury, suggesting that this therapeutic approach may potentially maximize anticoagulation benefits, protecting from VTE occurrence, recurrence, and ensuing post-thrombotic syndrome. The nonselective NLRP3 inhibitor colchicine and the anti-IL-1ß agent canakinumab reduce atherothrombosis without increasing bleeding. Rosuvastatin reduces primary venous thrombotic events at least in part through lipid-lowering independent mechanisms, paving the way to targeted anti-inflammatory strategies in VTE. This review outlines recent preclinical and clinical evidence supporting a role for inflammasome pathway activation in venous thrombosis, and discusses the, yet unexplored, therapeutic potential of modulating inflammasome signaling to prevent and manage VTE.

NLRP3 inflammasome and interleukin-1 contributions to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and immunothrombosis.

Immunothrombosis-immune-mediated activation of coagulation-is protective against pathogens, but excessive immunothrombosis can result in pathological thrombosis and multiorgan damage, as in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The NACHT-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome produces major proinflammatory cytokines of the interleukin (IL)-1 family, IL-1ß and IL-18, and induces pyroptotic cell death. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway also promotes immunothrombotic programs including release of neutrophil extracellular traps and tissue factor by leukocytes, and prothrombotic responses by platelets and the vascular endothelium. NLRP3 inflammasome activation occurs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. In preclinical models, NLRP3 inflammasome pathway blockade restrains COVID-19-like hyperinflammation and pathology. Anakinra, recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, showed safety and efficacy and is approved for the treatment of hypoxaemic COVID-19 patients with early signs of hyperinflammation. The non-selective NLRP3 inhibitor colchicine reduced hospitalization and death in a subgroup of COVID-19 outpatients but is not approved for the treatment of COVID-19. Additional COVID-19 trials testing NLRP3 inflammasome pathway blockers are inconclusive or ongoing. We herein outline the contribution of immunothrombosis to COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, and review preclinical and clinical evidence suggesting an engagement of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in the immunothrombotic pathogenesis of COVID-19. We also summarize current efforts to target the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway in COVID-19, and discuss challenges, unmet gaps, and the therapeutic potential that inflammasome-targeted strategies may provide for inflammation-driven thrombotic disorders including COVID-19.

Age- versus clinical pretest probability-adjusted D-dimer to rule out lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis in ambulatory patients with active cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), D-dimer thresholds adjusted to age or clinical pretest probability (CPTP) increase the proportion of patients in whom DVT can be safely excluded compared to a standard approach using a fixed D-dimer threshold. Performance of these diagnostic strategies among cancer patients is uncertain. AIM: To compare the performance of age- and CPTP-adjusted D-dimer approaches among cancer outpatients with clinically suspected DVT, and derive a cancer-specific CPTP rule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive ambulatory patients with active cancer and clinically suspected DVT of the lower extremity underwent CPTP assessment using the Wells rule, D-dimer testing, and whole-leg compression ultrasonography. Patients with normal ultrasonography were followed-up for 3 months for the occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Upon referral, DVT was diagnosed in 48 of 239 (20.1 %) patients. The age-adjusted approach showed higher specificity and efficiency than the standard approach. Compared to the standard and age-adjusted strategies, the CPTP-adjusted approach had 35 % and 21 % higher specificity, and 34 % and 21 % higher efficiency, respectively. Failure rate, sensitivity, and predictive values were similar across strategies. A simplified CPTP score derived from the Wells rule reduced unnecessary imaging with similar accuracy and efficiency, but higher failure rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort of ambulatory cancer patients with clinically suspected DVT, the CPTP-adjusted D-dimer approach held the highest specificity and efficiency, potentially safely reducing unnecessary ultrasonography examinations compared to other approaches. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate the use of a simplified clinical prediction rule in this setting.

Apixaban thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer and obesity: Insights from the AVERT trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients is uncertain. It is unclear if body mass index (BMI) affects the safety and efficacy of DOACs for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer. We sought to determine the outcomes associated with the use of apixaban for the primary prevention of cancer-associated VTE according to BMI. METHODS: The randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled AVERT trial evaluated apixaban thromboprophylaxis in intermediate-to-high risk ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. For this post-hoc analysis, the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were objectively confirmed VTE and clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding), respectively. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. RESULTS: Among 574 patients randomized, 217 (37.8 %) patients had BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Obese patients were overall younger, more likely to be female, had higher creatinine clearance and hemoglobin, lower platelet count, and better ECOG performance status. Compared to placebo, apixaban thromboprophylaxis was associated with reduced VTE in both obese (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.46; p < 0.0001) and non-obese (HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.29-1.00; p = 0.049) patients. The HR for clinically relevant bleeding (apixaban vs. placebo) was numerically higher in obese (2.09; 95%CI, 0.96-4.51; p = 0.062) than non-obese subjects (1.23; 95%CI, 0.71-2.13; p = 0.46), but overall in line with the risks observed in the general trial population. CONCLUSIONS: In the AVERT trial enrolling ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, we found no substantial differences in the efficacy or safety of apixaban thromboprophylaxis across obese and non-obese subjects.