Changes in bladder emptying during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury and predicting factors: data from the Dutch Spinal Cord Injury Database.

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of multicentre prospective observational data. OBJECTIVES: To describe methods of bladder emptying at admission and discharge in patients with recently acquired spinal cord injury (SCI) and to describe predictors of bladder emptying methods at discharge. SETTING: First inpatient rehabilitation in specialised rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands. METHODS: Data from the Dutch Spinal Cord Injury Database collected between 2015 and 2019 were used. McNemar-Bowker test was used to evaluate if bladder emptying methods differed over time; One-Way ANOVA and Chi-Square tests to see if bladder emptying methods differed by demographic and injury-related characteristics. Binary logistic regression was used to predict the type of bladder emptying at discharge with demographic and injury-related characteristics measured at admission. RESULTS: Of 1403 patients, 44.1% had cervical, 38.4% thoracic and 17.5% lumbosacral lesions at admission. AIS classification was mostly D (63.8%). The method of bladder emptying changed significantly (p < 0.001) from admission to discharge: decrease of clean intermittent assisted catheterisation (17.1% to 4.1%) and indwelling catheter (33.4% to 16.3%) and increase in clean intermittent self-catheterisation (CISC, 7.8% to 22.2%) and normal voiding (40.2% to 56.1%). Age, sex, SCI level, AIS classification and level of independence predicted the method of bladder emptying at discharge (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During first inpatient rehabilitation, the method of bladder emptying changed resulting in more patients discharged with normal voiding and CISC. Age, sex, SCI level, AIS classification and level of independence in self-care were all confirmed as factors playing a role in this change.

Long-Term Outcome of the GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term outcome of GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Arizona) for elective treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms and to evaluate performance of different generations of the device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 248 patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair with the GORE EXCLUDER between January 2000 and December 2015 in 2 hospitals. Primary endpoint was reintervention-free survival. Secondary endpoints were technical success, overall survival, rupture-free survival, endoleaks, sac diameter change (> 5 mm), limb occlusion, and migration (> 5 mm). Median follow-up time was 26 months (range, 1-190 months). RESULTS: Assisted primary technical success was 96.8%. Reintervention-free survival for 5 and 10 years was 85.2% and 75.6%, respectively. Independent risk factors for reintervention were technical success (P < .001), type I endoleak (P < .001), and type II endoleak (P = .003). Late adverse events requiring reintervention included rupture (0.4%), limb occlusion (0.4%), and stent migration (0.4%). Type Ia (4.8%), Ib (2.8%), II (35.9%), and V (6.5%) endoleaks were reported throughout follow-up. Sac growth was more prevalent with the original GORE EXCLUDER compared with the low permeability GORE EXCLUDER (P = .001) and in the presence of type I, II, and V endoleaks (P < .05). Three conversions (1.2%) were performed. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 68.4% and 49.0%, with no reported aneurysm-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the GORE EXCLUDER is effective with acceptable reintervention rates in the long-term and few device-related adverse events or ruptures up to 10 years. Observed late adverse events and new-onset endoleaks emphasize the need for long-term surveillance.