Facial Transplantation: Nonimmune-Related Hyperacute Graft Failure-The Role of Perfusion Injury: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the first case of acute facial allograft transplantation (facial allograft transplantation) failure with allograft removal and autologous free-flap reconstruction. METHODS: A 49-year-old female patient affected by neurofibromatosis type 1 with a massive neurofibroma infiltrating the whole left hemiface was planned for FAT for the left hemiface including the auricle, all skin and soft tissues from the temporal region, periorbital and nasal region, and up to the perioral area. The maxillary process of the zygomatic bone, left hemimaxilla, and hemimandible from contralateral parasyphysis to the incisura mandibulae were also included. RESULTS: Total surgical time was 26 hours. There were 2 intraoperative arterial thromboses that were solved with new anastomoses and sufficient flap perfusion. On postoperative day 2, the allograft became pale with suspected arterial occlusion and the patient returned to the operative room for exploration no flow into the FAT was found. The allograft was removed and the recipient site reconstructed with a skin-grafted composite left latissimus dorsi-serratus anterior flap. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperacute loss of FAT is a very dramatic event, and the activation of a backup surgical plan is crucial to save patient's life, give a reasonable temporary reconstruction, and return on the waiting-list for a second face transplantation.

Nasal Reconstruction: Current Overview.

The nose, with its conspicuous location, intricate convexities, and delicate 3-dimensional structure, continues to challenge the reconstructive surgeon. Today, there are a myriad of options available for reconstruction. The practitioner must take into account the location of the defect as well as the components needed to be restored. This article addresses the current practices in nasal reconstruction, including the different strategies for skin coverage, nasal lining, and structural support. We discuss both the newest techniques as well as basic principles of this long-standing procedure.

Trismus in Face Transplantation Following Ballistic Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Trismus can be a challenging consequence of ballistic trauma to the face, and has rarely been described in the setting of face transplantation. Almost half of all current face transplant recipients in the world received transplantation to restore form and function after a ballistic injury. Here we report our experience and challenges with long standing trismus after face transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of our face transplant recipients whose indication was ballistic injury. We focused our review on trismus and assessed the pre-, peri- and postoperative planning, surgery and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Two patients received partial face transplantation, including the midface for ballistic trauma. Both patients suffered from impaired mouth opening, speech intelligibility, and oral competence. Severe scarring of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) required intraoperative release in both patients, and additional total condylectomy on the left side 6 months posttransplant for 1 patient. Posttransplant, both patients achieved an improvement in mouth opening; however, there was persistent trismus. One year after transplantation, range of motion of the jaw had improved for both patients. Independent oral food intake was possible 1 year after surgery, although spillage of liquids and mixed consistency solids persisted. Speech intelligibility testing showed impairments in the immediate postoperative period, with improvement to over 85% for both patients at 1 year posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Ballistic trauma to the face and subsequent reconstructive measures can cause significant scarring and covert injuries to structures such as the TMJ, resulting in long standing trismus. Meticulous individual planning prior to interventions such as face transplantation must take these into account. We encourage intraoperative evaluation of these structures as well as peri- and postoperative treatment when necessary. Due to the nature of the primary injury, functional outcomes after face transplantation in these patients may differ substantially from those of other indications.

The Sternum-Nipple Distance is Double the Nipple-Inframammary Fold Distance in Macromastia.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty is one of the most commonly performed plastic surgery operations. For a majority of techniques, the most common long-term complication is pseudoptosis. It has previously been proposed that upper breast suspensory ligaments (SL) are weaker than lower breast SL. We tested this hypothesis through anthropometry of the proxies for upper and lower SL strength: the sternal notch-nipple (SN-N) distance and the nipple-inframammary fold (N-IMF) distance, respectively. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty in an academic faculty practice between 2008 and 2015 was conducted. Patient demographics included age, race, and body mass index (BMI); patient comorbidities included smoking status, diabetes, and hypertension. Breast anthropometric measurements included SN-N and N-IMF. Sternal notch-nipple was used as the primary metric of the upper SL strength, whereas N-IMF was used as the primary metric of the lower SL strength. Intraoperative details included reduction technique and resection mass. Postoperative complications were recorded, including nipple areola complex necrosis and hematoma. Linear regression analysis was performed with the primary endpoint of the relationship between SN-N and N-IMF distance in macromastia. RESULTS: Data from 208 patients, totaling 400 individual breast measurements, were collected. The mean SN-N length was 35.1 cm, mean N-IMF length was 16.0 cm, and mean resection weight was 1094 g. Linear regression found that N-IMF distance could be predicted as 45% of the SN-N distance (N-IMF = 0.454 * SN-N). This was a strong relationship, demonstrated by univariate analysis of SN-N and N-IMF (R, 0.624; P < 0.001). A Wise pattern was used in 89.9% of cases; an inferior pedicle was used in 83.7% of cases. Nipple areola complex necrosis occurred in 15 breasts (3.75%). Sternal notch-nipple (R, 0.127; P = 0.011) and N-IMF (R, 0.119; P = 0.017) were both predictive of nipple areola complex necrosis (Table 4). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, the N-IMF distance increased 0.45 cm for every 1 cm increase in the SN-N distance. This relationship strengthens our primary hypothesis that the lower pole ligaments stretch at a significantly slower rate than the upper pole ligaments. Taking this into consideration, we suggest that surgeons seeking to minimize pseudoptosis rates should favor techniques that minimally disrupt the lower SL.

Management of Rhinophyma: Outcomes Study of the Subunit Method.

BACKGROUND: Rhinophyma causes a nasal deformity and functional airway obstruction. Partial excision (eg, tangential) with secondary healing commonly removes hypertrophic soft tissues but does not improve nasal support. The subunit method for rhinophyma uses 6 nasal flaps to provide exposure for removal of rhinophymatous tissue and enhance structure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of subunit method. METHODS: Medical records of patients with rhinophyma treated with the subunit method between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed. The technique comprises degloving the distal half of the nose by elevating 6 subunit-based flaps; debulking phymatous tissues to perichondrium; enhancing nasal support with sutures/cartilage grafts; trimming excess skin; and redraping the soft tissues. Patient age, gender, need for cartilage grafts or skin grafts, revisions, and follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: The study comprised 8 patients (6 male). Mean age was 63 years (range 34-72). All individuals had interdomal sutures for tip enhancement and 4 patients underwent cartilage grafts (alar batten) to correct external valve collapse. One patient had 2 subunits (alar) replaced with skin graft. Average follow-up was 1.6 years (range 0.2-3.7). Six patients underwent revisional procedures primarily to modify the scar between the dorsum and tip subunits. CONCLUSION: The subunit method addresses the 3 fundamental problems of the rhinophymatous nose: hypertrophic sebaceous tissues, excess skin, and destruction of support. Most patients may benefit from a minor revisional procedure to optimize the result. Individuals should be counseled that operation will likely require 2 stages.

Osteocutaneous Second-Toe Free Flap as Alternative Option for Repair of Anterior Oronasal Fistula: Long-Term Results in Selected Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Palatal fistulas anterior to the incisive foramen, generally seen as a complication of cleft lip and cleft palate repair, can be extremely difficult to repair. The requirements of the defect necessitate nasal lining, oral lining, and bone for maxillary arch continuity. Local pedicled flap has limited use in such patients with extensive scarring from previous surgeries. The authors have recently described a technique involving osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer of second toe for anterior oronasal fistulas. METHODS: The authors describe their experience of patients with anterior oronasal fistula who underwent osteocutaneous free-tissue transfer of second toe. Between 1991 and 2014, 3 patients with oronasal fistulas were operated utilizing bilaminar osteocutaneous free tissue transfer. Described are the surgical decision making, postoperative course, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of the procedure was 45.3 years with a mean follow-up of 12.6 years. All the patients had significant improvement of their regurgitation and speech difficulty. One of the patients with very large fistula had recurrence of the fistula which was repaired by local advancement of the original free flap. CONCLUSIONS: Use of osteocutanous second-toe free flap can provide complete coverage of the fistula with nasal and oral skin lining and provides an alternative option for complicated anterior oronasal fistula.

Bipedicled Scrotal Flap for Penile Resurfacing.

BACKGROUND: Acquired penile defects can be secondary to various pathologic conditions, including infection, scar, or complications following urologic procedures. Penis defects with skin deficit carry a distinct challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Scrotal flaps can provide reliable coverage and can restore distinct qualities of native penile skin. METHODS: A series of patients presented with a variety of acquired penile defects. Each of these patients underwent staged bipedicle scrotal flap surgery for coverage by the senior author. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent bipedicle scrotal flap reconstruction for penile defects with a skin deficit. All eight patients had satisfactory outcomes postoperatively. Only two of the eight patients had minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: For select patients presenting with underlying deficit of penile skin, bipedicle scrotal flaps prove to be a safe, reproducible, and reliable reconstructive technique for penile resurfacing. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Impact of prior ipsilateral chest wall radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study compares complication rates between transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps based on previously irradiated versus nonirradiated superior pedicles to assess the impact of prior ipsilateral chest wall radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective study of 302 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions was performed; 76 TRAM flaps based on a previously irradiated superior epigastric pedicle were compared to 226 TRAM flaps based on a nonirradiated pedicle in medical comorbidities, oncologic data, and complications. RESULTS: Patients having undergone previous chest wall irradiation had a higher cancer stage, but demographic data were otherwise similar within the groups. Previous chest wall irradiation did not result in increased rate of flap loss, infection, and fat necrosis. However, there was a trend toward higher revision rate in the previously irradiated TRAM group. CONCLUSIONS: Previous radiation to the superior epigastric pedicle is not associated with a significant increase in flap complications and should be considered a viable modality for pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Preferred use of the ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction: an illustrated approach.

BACKGROUND: Recent experience with the ipsilateral TRAM flap has shown that it has the advantage of a longer functional pedicle length, which allows tension-free inset of well-vascularized tissue into the breast pocket. This leads to better positioning and shaping of the reconstructed breast with minimal disruption of the inframammary fold. The purpose of this article was to provide an illustrated approach to the ipsilateral TRAM flap and to clarify the technique when applied in the context of immediate breast reconstruction following cancer extirpation. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of 89 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer was performed. All patients underwent ipsilateral TRAM reconstruction. The innate insetting advantage of the ipsilateral TRAM flap is illustrated in the article. The key steps of the technique were as follows: (1) The ipsilateral corner of the flap was used as the axillary tail, leaving the more bulky part to form the main body of the breast; (2) To avoid undesirable twists, a right TRAM was rotated clockwise so that its apex points superiorly; (3) This flap was subsequently tunneled into the breast pocket while preserving the inframammary fold. The opposite maneuvers were done for the left side; (4) If the flap was congested, venous augmentation was performed where the tributary of the axillary vein or the thoracodorsal vein was anastomosed with the inferior epigastric vein from the flap with an interposed vein graft (17% of cases). RESULTS: All flaps survived and flap-related complications included partial necrosis of tissue across the midline (2.2%), palpable fat necrosis (22%), and hematoma requiring drainage (2.2%). All flaps were raised concurrent with the resection, and the combined operative time ranged from 3.5 to 6 h, with a mean hospital stay of 7 days. CONCLUSION: The ipsilateral TRAM flap was a reliable flap with low complication rates and short surgery time. It was our preferred choice for pedicled breast reconstruction in all cases, except for the ptotic breast or if abdominal scarring excludes its use.

Free Your Mind, Not Your Flap.

The pedicled flap has been a mainstay of soft tissue reconstruction since the earliest days of plastic surgery. Advances in surgical technology and skill have led to an erosion in the use of pedicled flaps in favor of increasingly popular free tissue transfers. Still, regional flaps without microvascular anastomosis remain a valuable reconstructive tool. Although still requiring microsurgical skills, these flaps are of particular benefit in patients with few or poor quality recipient vessels, in those who cannot tolerate antiplatelet therapy, and in those who cannot tolerate the often-extended anesthesia time necessitated by microvascular anastomosis. Furthermore, pedicled flaps may significantly reduce total cost of a reconstruction procedure with similar outcomes. In this case series, we report challenging scenarios where microsurgical approaches may have been typical choices but were instead reconstructed by pedicled options with desired outcomes. Difficult soft tissue defects were successfully reconstructed with a variety of pedicled flaps. Soft tissue transfers to the abdomen, flank, shoulder, and back are presented. None of the reconstructions required microvascular anastomosis.

A minimally invasive technique for burying free flaps and grafts.

The placement of large-volume flaps and grafts into a subcutaneous pocket often requires extensive incisions for accurate placement. We describe a technique that allows for the precise, atraumatic placement of these tissues through minimal incisions. No unusual or expensive surgical instrumentation is required, and the technique is easy to learn. We have found the technique especially useful in the augmentation of severe facial atrophy.

First aid for failing flaps.

Wound coverage with pedicled (local, regional, or distant) or free flaps is commonplace throughout plastic surgery. However, irrespective of the method of tissue transfer or type of tissue being transferred, inflow and outflow remain key parameters for success. Much has been written detailing complex tissue transfers and delineating arterial and venous anatomy. Despite this, simple venous insufficiency causing venous congestion is common. In experimental models, when arterial inflow is impaired, even mild venous inadequacy affects flap survival. Furthermore, studies have shown that venous congestion is more detrimental to the rate and percentage of flap area surviving than arterial ischemia. Obviously, complete venous occlusion typically requires operative exploration and correction, but many instances occur when venous congestion occurs for reasons other than complete venous thrombosis. Here we detail the basic postoperative "first aid" techniques available to optimize venous drainage. Although these techniques are not a substitute for sound anatomic flap selection, good surgical technique, or re-operation when a significant underlying problem exists, they do offer additional options to improve flap outcomes.

All hands on deck: Hand replantation versus transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Our hands play a remarkable role in our activities of daily living and the make-up of our identities. In the United States, an estimated 41,000 individuals live with upper limb loss. Our expanding experience in limb transplantation-including operative techniques, rehabilitation, and expected outcomes-has often been based on our past experience with replantation. Here, we undertake a systematic review of replantation with transplantation in an attempt to better understand the determinants of outcome for each and to provide a summary of the data to this point. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted PubMed searches from 1964 to 2013 for articles in English. In total, 53 primary and secondary source articles were found to involve surgical repair (either replantation or transplantation) for complete amputations at the wrist and forearm levels. All were read and analyzed. RESULTS: Hand replantations and transplantations were compared with respect to pre-operative considerations, surgical techniques, post-operative considerations and outcomes, including motor, sensation, cosmesis, patient satisfaction/quality of life, adverse events/side effects, financial costs, and overall function. While comparison of data is limited by heterogeneity, these data support our belief that good outcomes depend on patient expectations and commitment. CONCLUSION: When possible, hand replantation remains the primary option after acute amputation. However, when replantation fails or is not possible, hand transplantation appears to provide at least equal outcomes. Patient commitment, realistic expectations, and physician competence must coincide to achieve the best possible outcomes for both hand replantation and transplantation.

The contralateral rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for treatment of lower extremity lymphedema.

Lymphedema is common after inguinal lymphadenectomy or resection of groin tumors. Animal studies have shown success using the rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (RAM) flap as a treatment for lymphedema. Four patients with acquired lower extremity lymphedema were treated with a contralateral RAM flap with an inferior cutaneous pedicle left intact to facilitate lymphatic drainage into the unaffected groin. One patient also had lymphaticovenous anastomoses performed during flap transfer. All flaps survived with no postoperative complications. With a mean follow-up of 31 months, the mean reduction in limb circumference from the preoperative excess was 81% at the thigh, 70% at the calf, and 71% at the ankle. None of the patients with recurrent cellulitis had further incidences of groin cellulitis. Two patients required future flap debulking. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 1 patient and demonstrated reconstitution of lymphatic flow from the affected leg through the flap. According to this preliminary study, transfer of a contralateral RAM flap to the groin of a lymphedematous leg improves lymphedema and decreases the incidence of cellulitis.

Facial transplantation and immunosuppressed patients: a new frontier in reconstructive surgery.

Composite tissue transplantation in reconstructing complex facial defects has developed tremendous interest over the recent years, since the first report of partial face transplantation performed in France in 2005. However, the controversy over the ethical, immunological, and psychological issues remains. Recently, we obtained IRB approval to perform partial face transplantation at Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston. Here we present the rationale and IRB application process of our unique approach to this highly controversial procedure, which focuses on partial face transplantation on patients currently on immunosuppressants due to previous transplanted organ. 'Patient selection criteria', selection process, technical and immunological protocols are discussed. We currently share the concern that life-long immunosuppression associated with facial transplantation may not outweigh its benefits as compared to the alternative reconstructive methods. We asked ourselves the question of which patient population would risk less and overall benefit more from undergoing face transplantation, and identified those currently on immunosuppressive therapy the most suitable candidates. Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of malignancy, particularly skin cancer commonly located in the facial region, necessitating surgical resection and facial reconstruction. They also have to take immunosuppressants to prevent rejection of their primary transplanted organ, which will minimize the need for additional immunosuppression associated with facial allograft. Being a previous organ recipient also diminishes the difficulty of complying with the strict postoperative immunosuppressive regimen, commonly encountered by organ transplant recipients. This approach could be very beneficial for previously immunosuppressed patients and perhaps take its place in our reconstructive ladder options.

The Use of Prefabricated Flaps in Burn Reconstruction.

This article describes the use of prefabricated flaps in burn reconstruction. Several case examples are provided that demonstrate the versatility and power of this approach to restoration of form and function after burn injury.

Microsurgical Burn Reconstruction.

The treatment of burn-related wounds requires consideration of several factors, including defect size, available donor sites, exposure of critical structures, and the ultimate functional and aesthetic result of reconstruction. Although skin grafts and locoregional flaps are workhorses in burn reconstruction, they have inherent limitations that can directly impact reconstructive outcomes. Microsurgical free tissue transfer represents a viable option for the reconstruction of burn-related wounds in certain patients. Each anatomic region of the body has unique challenges that must be addressed to achieve a successful reconstruction. Therefore, the choice of free flap must be individualized to the wound and patients.

Eliminating the vertical scar in breast reduction-Boston modification of the Robertson technique.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons often advise patients with large ptotic breasts to undergo a Wise pattern reduction (WPR) mammaplasty using an inferior pedicle technique with consideration of a free-nipple graft. OBJECTIVE: We describe the Boston modification of the Robertson technique (BMRT), which allows for the elimination of the vertical scar using a low horizontal scar mammaplasty with a broad central-inferior pedicle. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the surgical characteristics of 239 patients who underwent mammaplasty using the BMRT technique (n = 145) and compared these with patients undergoing WPR (n = 94). Patients were eligible for BMRT if they had a minimum of 5 cm between the lower aspect of the new areola and superior aspect of the old areola. RESULTS: The BMRT patients were more obese than the WPR patients (BMI 32.4 +/- 6 kg/m(2) vs 28.0 +/- 5 kg/m(2)) and also were more ptotic. The average distance from the suprasternal notch to the nipple was (36.5 +/- 5 cm vs 30.1 +/- 3 cm). For bilateral reductions, the average combined weight removed was 1240 g for BMRT, and 700 g for WPR. The BMRT unilateral reductions also had more tissue removed than unilateral WPRs (980 g vs 465 g). Rates of hematoma formation, minor wound dehiscence, and scar hypertrophy were greater in bilateral WPRs compared to bilateral BMRT mammaplasties. CONCLUSIONS: The BMRT is a safe and reliable method of reduction mammaplasty when there is macromastia and significant ptosis. This technique avoids the vertical scar and hides the transverse scar in the shadow of the inferior breast.

Impact of Prior Unilateral Chest Wall Radiotherapy on Outcomes in Bilateral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior unilateral chest wall radiotherapy on reconstructive outcomes among patients undergoing bilateral immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients with a history of unilateral chest wall radiotherapy was performed. In each patient, the previously irradiated and reconstructed breast was compared to the contralateral nonirradiated side, which served as an internal control. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed. Multiple regression statistics were computed to identify adjusted associations between chest wall radiotherapy and complications. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 51.8 months (range, 10 to 113 months). Thirty-eight patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction; 32 patients underwent abdominal autologous flap reconstruction. Previously irradiated breast had a significantly higher rate of overall complications (51 percent versus 27 percent; p < 0.0001), infection (13 percent versus 6 percent; p = 0.026), and major skin necrosis (9 percent versus 3 percent; p = 0.046). After adjusting for age, body mass index, reconstruction method, and medical comorbidities, prior chest wall radiotherapy was a significant risk factor for breast-related complications (OR, 2.98; p < 0.0001), infection (OR, 2.59; p = 0.027), and major skin necrosis (OR, 3.47; p = 0.0266). There were no differences between implant-based and autologous reconstructions with regard to complications (p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Prior chest wall radiotherapy is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of postoperative complications following immediate breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.