ABSTRACT
Relatlimab and nivolumab combination immunotherapy improves progression-free survival over nivolumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma1. We investigated this regimen in patients with resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma (NCT02519322). Patients received two neoadjuvant doses (nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) followed by surgery, and then ten doses of adjuvant combination therapy. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate2. The combination resulted in 57% pCR rate and 70% overall pathologic response rate among 30 patients treated. The radiographic response rate using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 was 57%. No grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were observed in the neoadjuvant setting. The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100% and 92% for patients with any pathologic response, compared to 88% and 55% for patients who did not have a pathologic response (P = 0.005). Increased immune cell infiltration at baseline, and decrease in M2 macrophages during treatment, were associated with pathologic response. Our results indicate that neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab induces a high pCR rate. Safety during neoadjuvant therapy is favourable compared to other combination immunotherapy regimens. These data, in combination with the results of the RELATIVITY-047 trial1, provide further confirmation of the efficacy and safety of this new immunotherapy regimen.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nivolumab , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Macrophages/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether pembrolizumab given both before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) and after surgery (adjuvant therapy), as compared with pembrolizumab given as adjuvant therapy alone, would increase event-free survival among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma is unknown. METHODS: In a phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with clinically detectable, measurable stage IIIB to IVC melanoma that was amenable to surgical resection to three doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, surgery, and 15 doses of adjuvant pembrolizumab (neoadjuvant-adjuvant group) or to surgery followed by pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses) for approximately 1 year or until disease recurred or unacceptable toxic effects developed (adjuvant-only group). The primary end point was event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Events were defined as disease progression or toxic effects that precluded surgery; the inability to resect all gross disease; disease progression, surgical complications, or toxic effects of treatment that precluded the initiation of adjuvant therapy within 84 days after surgery; recurrence of melanoma after surgery; or death from any cause. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group (154 patients) had significantly longer event-free survival than the adjuvant-only group (159 patients) (P = 0.004 by the log-rank test). In a landmark analysis, event-free survival at 2 years was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 80) in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 49% (95% CI, 41 to 59) in the adjuvant-only group. The percentage of patients with treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or higher during therapy was 12% in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 14% in the adjuvant-only group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma, event-free survival was significantly longer among those who received pembrolizumab both before and after surgery than among those who received adjuvant pembrolizumab alone. No new toxic effects were identified. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Merck Sharp and Dohme; S1801 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698019.).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Melanoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Disease Progression , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
ALK-fused Spitz melanocytic neoplasms are a distinct subgroup of melanocytic lesions exhibiting unique histopathologic characteristics. These lesions often manifest as exophytic or polypoid tumors, characterized by fusiform-to-epithelioid melanocytes arranged in a nested, fascicular, or plexiform growth pattern. Several fusion partners of the ALK gene have been identified in spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms, with TPM3 and DCTN1 being the most prevalent. Less common fusion partners include NPM1, TPR, CLIP1, GTF3C2, EEF2, MYO5A, KANK1, and EHBP1. The MLPH gene, which encodes melanophilin (MLPH), playing a crucial role in regulating skin pigmentation by acting as a linker between RAB27A and myosin Va during melanosome transport, has also recently been recognized as a rare fusion partner of ALK in Spitz melanocytic neoplasms. Currently, there exists a sparse documentation within English literature, illustrating a limited number of cases featuring MLPH::ALK fusion in Spitz melanocytic neoplasms. In this report, we present two additional cases, including a previously unreported instance of Spitz melanoma, contributing to the expanding knowledge on ALK-fused Spitz melanocytic neoplasms. In addition, we provide a comprehensive review of the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features observed in documented cases with this novel fusion.
Subject(s)
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Melanoma , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Humans , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase/genetics , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell/genetics , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell/pathology , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against Nectin-4 that is used to treat urothelial carcinoma. Nectin-4 is inherently expressed in the skin and adnexal structures. Since therapeutic options for cutaneous adnexal carcinomas are limited, we sought to evaluate Nectin-4 expression in adnexal carcinomas and benign adnexal neoplasms to identify tumors that are potentially targetable with EV. METHODS: Eight sebaceous carcinomas (seven periocular and one lymph node metastasis), eight digital papillary adenocarcinomas, seven squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas, eight poromas, eight trichilemmomas, and seven sebaceous adenomas were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for anti-Nectin-4 antibody. H-scores for Nectin-4 expression were calculated. RESULTS: Benign adnexal neoplasms had a significantly lower mean (±SD) Nectin-4 H-score (142.6 ± 39.1) than did the adnexal carcinomas (198 ± 90.8; p = 0.006). Nectin-4 was expressed in 91% (21/23) of adnexal carcinomas. Sebaceous carcinomas frequently exhibited high expression of Nectin-4 (88% [7/8]), with a mean (±SD) H-score (258.1 ± 58.4) significantly higher than those for digital papillary adenocarcinomas (197.5 ± 52.5; p = 0.035) and squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas (131.4 ± 114.1; p = 0.031). Sebaceous carcinomas also had significantly higher H-scores than did sebaceous adenomas (186.4 ± 25.0; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Increased Nectin-4 expression in a subset of cutaneous adnexal carcinomas, particularly sebaceous carcinomas, reveals that EV is a potential therapeutic option for these tumors.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Papillary , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Nectins , Neoplasms, Adnexal and Skin Appendage , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Adenoma , Carcinoma, Ductal , Carcinoma, Skin Appendage , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Neoplasms, Adnexal and Skin Appendage/drug therapy , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Sweat Gland Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Spitz melanocytic neoplasms exhibit frequent chromosomal rearrangements leading to recurring gene fusions, such as ALK fusions. TPM3 and DCTN1 emerge as the predominant fusion partners of ALK, although less common partners such as NPM1, TPR, CLIP1, GTF3C2, MLPH, EEF2, MYO5A, and KANK1 have also been documented. Although ALK fusions are primarily associated with Spitz nevi or atypical Spitz tumors, instances of Spitz melanoma with ALK fusions documented in the English literature are exceedingly rare. Here, we present a case of Spitz melanoma harboring SLC20A1::ALK fusion, highlighting a novel fusion transcript not previously reported in Spitz melanocytic neoplasms, including Spitz melanomas. In addition, the tumor exhibits multiple aberrant chromosomal alterations characteristic of melanoma, along with a somatic mutation in GRM3.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: A 45-year-old woman with a history of previously treated left plantar foot melanoma presented with a left thigh mass. Fine needle aspiration findings were concerning for metastatic melanoma (MM). Imaging was remarkable for PET-avidity of both the biopsied thigh mass and of a left posterior knee nodule. The knee nodule was also enhancing on MRI, concerning for a site of metastasis. Resection of the thigh mass and intra-articular nodule was performed. The thigh lesion was positive for MM. The specimen obtained from the knee demonstrated a proliferation of spindle and epithelioid cells associated with focal fibrosis and scattered giant cells with brown pigment, raising the possibility of melanoma metastasis with treatment effect. Additional immunohistochemical studies with anti-SOX10 failed to demonstrate melanoma cells in the lesion. The final diagnosis for the knee nodule was pigmented villonodular synovitis. This case highlights the potential for pigmented villonodular synovitis to mimic MM, requiring additional pathologic analysis to yield an accurate diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular , Humans , Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , Melanoma/secondary , Melanoma/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/secondary , Diagnosis, Differential , Immunohistochemistry , Magnetic Resonance ImagingABSTRACT
AIMS: NUTM1-rearranged sarcoma is an emerging entity that differs from NUT carcinoma at the molecular level, with most of the former tumours harbouring fusions involving genes in the MYC-associated factor X dimerization (MAD) transcription family (MXD1, MXD4, MXI1 [or MXD2], and MGA). MGA::NUTM1 is one of the most recently described novel gene fusions associated with NUTM1-rearranged sarcoma. Herein we describe the clinicopathologic features of three sarcomas with an MGA::NUTM1 fusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: The three study patients were male, with an age range of 10-28 years. The tumour sites were deep soft tissue of the thigh, the chest wall, and the pelvis. All three tumours were aggressive, with multiple recurrences and metastases. Histologically, the tumours were composed of monotonous spindle, round, or epithelioid cells in variably hyalinized stroma and prominent aggregates of amianthoid fibre-like collagen or collagen rosettes. Mitotic activity was relatively low (5-12 mitotic figures per 10 hhpf). All tumours tested expressed NUT, with one tumour having S100 protein expression and two tumours having CD99 and CD56 expression. The genetic breakpoints were MGA exon 21, MGA exon 22, and NUTM1 exon 3. CONCLUSION: MGA::NUTM1 sarcoma often exhibits hyalinized stroma with amianthoid fibre-like collagen or collagen rosettes in the presence of monotonous round, epithelioid, or spindle cell morphology. NUT immunohistochemistry and molecular testing can help confirm the diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Female , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Sarcoma/genetics , Sarcoma/pathology , Gene Fusion , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/genetics , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Collagen , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors/geneticsABSTRACT
Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumors of notochordal origin usually arising in the spine or base of the skull. Skin involvement is rare and typically occurs via direct extension of the primary tumor to the skin. Although there are increasing reports of the skin being involved as a distant metastatic site in patients with chordoma, this remains an exceedingly rare occurrence. We present two cases of patients diagnosed with metastasis of chordoma to the skin that represented distant metastasis. In the first case, a patient with a primary thoracic/lumbar chordoma presented with isolated metastasis to the skin of the left lower jaw 9 years after initial diagnosis of the chordoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a chordoma of this site to develop distant skin metastasis. In the second case, a patient with a primary sacral chordoma presented with metastasis to the skin of the right side of his chin 6 years after initial diagnosis of the chordoma, following previous metastatic spread to the liver and lung. Finally, we briefly review the literature on chordoma metastasis to the skin and highlight salient features to raise awareness of this uncommon occurrence.
Subject(s)
Chordoma , Skin Neoplasms , Spinal Neoplasms , Humans , Chordoma/pathology , Chordoma/secondary , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Head/pathologyABSTRACT
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma that may occasionally present divergent histopathologic features. We present two cases of MCC demonstrating ductal differentiation, one on the lower lip of an 81-year-old man and another on the right forearm of a 67-year-old man. The histopathologic features included TTF1-negative, infiltrative, high-grade basaloid tumor with paranuclear punctate positivity for cytokeratin (CK) 20 and synaptophysin. Rare luminal structures lined by atypical epithelioid cells positive for CEA and CK19 were noted, confirming the presence of ductal differentiation. Although the ductal differentiation is unusual, other histopathologic features and the immunohistochemical profile supported the diagnosis of MCC. Like most divergent features, ductal differentiation is rare in MCC and typically constitutes a very small proportion of the tumor, and is therefore under-recognized. Although the clinical significance of this feature is unclear, recognition and documentation of ductal differentiation and distinguishing it from other mimics such as acantholysis within squamous nests and entrapped eccrine ducts is essential to determine its clinical significance. We also discuss the differential diagnoses of cutaneous basaloid neoplasms with ductal differentiation.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Aged , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Cell DifferentiationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since their first approval 25 years ago, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become important targeted cancer therapeutics. However, dermatologic toxicities associated with non-immune checkpoint inhibitor (non-ICI) mAbs may complicate the course of cancer treatment. Data on the incidence and types of these reactions are limited. METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted on dermatologic toxicities associated with different classes of non-ICI mAbs approved for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The review included prospective Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials; retrospective literature reviews; systematic reviews/meta-analyses; and case series/reports. RESULTS: Dermatologic toxicities were associated with several types of non-ICI mAbs. Inflammatory reactions were the most common dermatologic toxicities, manifesting as maculopapular, urticarial, papulopustular/acneiform, and lichenoid/interface cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) with non-ICI mAbs. Immunobullous reactions were rare and a subset of non-ICI mAbs were associated with the development of vitiligo cAEs. CONCLUSION: Dermatologic toxicities of non-ICI mAbs are diverse and mostly limited to inflammatory reactions. Awareness of the spectrum of the histopathologic patterns of cAE from non-ICI mAbs therapy is critical in the era of oncodermatology and oncodermatopathology.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Drug Eruptions , Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Drug Eruptions/pathology , Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
We report three melanoma cases in which BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC) was valuable for diagnosis. Patient 1: In a patient with a history of primary melanoma on the chest and metastatic melanoma to right breast after undergoing multiple local and systemic therapies, a lung metastasis exhibited chondroid differentiation, aberrant myofibroblastic marker expression, and rare pancytokeratin positivity, without melanocytic marker expression. Patient 2: After targeted and immunotherapy for primary melanoma on the scalp as well as regional and distant metastatic melanoma, an omental metastasis showed CDX2-positive glandular structures that were negative for melanocytic markers. It was initially misdiagnosed as primary gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma. Patient 3: A patient with history of melanoma showing epithelioid morphology on the right thigh presented with multiple soft tissue nodules on skin, lymph nodes and internal organs after being lost to follow-up for 4 years. A biopsy specimen from the right thigh showed spindled cells with scattered pancytokeratin cocktail positivity and ambiguous staining for melanocytic markers. For melanomas with ambiguous morphologies and/or immunophenotypes in each of the three patients, BRAF V600E expression by IHC was maintained in both primary and metastatic melanoma specimens examined. These cases highlight the utility of BRAF V600E IHC in the diagnosis of melanoma.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry , DNA Mutational Analysis , Melanoma/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , MutationABSTRACT
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) with DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement is a rare, recently described variant of LyP histopathologically characterized by a biphasic growth pattern, with epidermotropic small-to-medium-sized atypical T-cells and dermal large and transformed T-cells diffusely expressing CD30. LyP with DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement can mimic other cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PCALCL) or transformed mycosis fungoides (MF). Unlike PCALCL or transformed MF, LyP with DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement shows an indolent clinical behavior, with frequent spontaneous regression of untreated lesions. Thus, it is important to recognize this rare variant of LyP to avoid misclassification, which may potentially lead to unnecessarily aggressive patient management. To our knowledge, only 13 cases of LyP with DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement have been reported to date in the English literature. Herein, we describe an additional case of LyP with DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement in a 63-year-old man and provide a comprehensive literature review with regards to the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features of this novel entity.
Subject(s)
Lymphomatoid Papulosis , Mycosis Fungoides , Skin Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Lymphomatoid Papulosis/genetics , Lymphomatoid Papulosis/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Ki-1 Antigen , Dual-Specificity Phosphatases/genetics , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatases/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TPRS1) expression has been found to be highly sensitive and specific for breast carcinomas. The frequency of TRPS1 expression in cutaneous neoplasms such as mammary Paget disease (MPD) and extramammary PD (EMPD) is currently unknown. We assessed the utility of TRPS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the evaluation of MPD, EMPD, and their histopathologic mimics, squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) and melanoma in situ (MIS). METHODS: Twenty-four MPDs, 19 EMPDs, 13 SCCISs, and 9 MISs were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis using anti-TRPS1 antibody. The intensity (none, 0; weak, 1+ ; moderate, 2+ ; strong, 3+ ) and proportion (<1%, absent; 1%-25%, focal; 26%-75%, patchy; >75%, diffuse) of TRPS1 expression were recorded. Relevant clinical data were documented. RESULTS: TPRS1 expression was present in 100% (24/24) of MPDs, with 88% (21/24) of MPDs exhibiting strong, diffuse immunoreactivity. Sixty-eight percent (13/19) of EMPDs showed TRPS1 expression. Intriguingly, EMPDs lacking TRPS1 expression were consistently of perianal origin. TRPS1 expression was seen in 92% (12/13) of SCCISs but was absent in all MISs. CONCLUSIONS: TRPS1 may be useful to distinguish MPDs/EMPDs from MISs, but its utility is limited in distinguishing them from other pagetoid intraepidermal neoplasms such as SCCISs.
Subject(s)
Paget Disease, Extramammary , Paget's Disease, Mammary , Repressor Proteins , Female , Humans , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Immunohistochemistry , Paget Disease, Extramammary/diagnosis , Paget Disease, Extramammary/metabolism , Paget Disease, Extramammary/pathology , Paget's Disease, Mammary/diagnosis , Paget's Disease, Mammary/metabolism , Paget's Disease, Mammary/pathology , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: TERT gene amplification (TGA) is a mechanism of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) upregulation frequently utilized by acral melanomas (AMs). Currently, the utility of TERT immunohistochemistry (IHC) to predict TGA status in AMs is poorly documented. METHODS: AMs (26 primary and 3 metastatic) and non-acral cutaneous melanomas (6 primary) were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis using anti-TERT antibody to demonstrate protein expression and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess genomic copy number alteration. The relationship between TERT immunoreactivity and TGA confirmed by FISH was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: TERT expression was seen in 50% (13/26) of primary and 100% (3/3) of metastatic AMs and 50% (3/6) of primary non-acral cutaneous melanomas. TGA was found in 15% (4/26) and 67% (2/3) of primary and metastatic AMs and 17% (1/6) of non-acral cutaneous melanomas. The intensity of TERT immunoreactivity correlated with TGA (p = 0.04) and a higher TERT copy number-to-control ratio in AMs, with a correlation coefficient of 0.41 (p = 0.03). The sensitivity and specificity of TERT immunoreactivity for predicting TGA in AMs were 100% and 57%, with corresponding positive and negative predictive values of 38% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility of TERT IHC to predict TGA status in AMs appears to be limited given its low specificity and positive predictive value.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Telomerase , Humans , Gene Amplification , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Telomerase/genetics , Telomerase/metabolism , Mutation , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/metabolism , Melanoma, Cutaneous MalignantABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based cancer therapies cause a variety of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including immunobullous skin eruptions like bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, little is known about the underlying immunopathogenic drivers of these reactions, and understanding the unique gene expression profile and immune composition of BP-irAE remains a critical knowledge gap in the field of oncodermatology/oncodermatopathology. METHODS: BP-irAE (n = 8) and de novo BP control (n = 8) biopsy samples were subjected to gene expression profiling using the NanoString® Technologies nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) studies using markers for T-cells (CD3 and CD8), T helper 1 (TH 1) cells (Tbet), TH 2 cells (Gata3), TH 17 cells (RORγT), and regulatory T-cells (Tregs; FoxP3) were further evaluated using InForm® image analysis. RESULTS: Compared with de novo BP controls, BP-irAE samples exhibited upregulation of 30 mRNA transcripts (p < 0.025), including toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and genes associated with complement activation, and downregulation of 89 mRNA transcripts (p < 0.025), including genes associated with TH 2, TH 17, and B-cell immune response. BP-irAE demonstrated a greater density of Tbet+ (TH 1) cells in the dermis (p = 0.004) and fewer Tregs in the blister floor (p = 0.028) when compared with that of de novo control BP samples. CONCLUSIONS: BP-irAE exhibited activation of the TLR4/complement-driven classical innate immune response pathway, with dermal TH 1 immune cell polarization and decreased Tregs in the blister floor. TLR/complement signaling may underlie the immunopathogenesis of BP-irAE.
Subject(s)
Pemphigoid, Bullous , Humans , Blister/metabolism , Complement System Proteins , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Gene Expression Profiling , Immunity, Innate , Pemphigoid, Bullous/pathology , RNA, Messenger , Toll-Like Receptor 4/metabolism , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: To date, over 60% of the world's population has received at least 1 dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, with over 12 billion doses administered globally. Commonly reported adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination include fever, headache, myalgia, and injection site reactions. The spectrum of documented cutaneous reactions after COVID-19 vaccination is broad; however, pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP) or PRP-like eruption secondary to COVID-19 vaccine is exceedingly rare, with only 17 cases previously reported to date in the English literature. In this article, we describe an additional case of COVID-19 vaccination-associated PRP in a 50-year-old woman with a history of metastatic breast carcinoma, who developed a widespread cutaneous eruption characteristic of PRP, including palmoplantar keratoderma, 10 days after her third dose of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Punch biopsy specimen showed epidermal hyperplasia with overlying hyperkeratosis, alternating orthokeratosis and parakeratosis and focal follicular plugging, supporting the diagnosis of PRP. The patient improved within weeks of initiating oral acitretin and topical steroids, with resolution achieved after 3 months of continued therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third reported case of Moderna COVID-19 vaccination-associated PRP and collectively the 18 th after the administration of all COVID-19 vaccines currently available, including Pfizer-BioNTech, and AstraZeneca.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Exanthema , Keratoderma, Palmoplantar , Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Exanthema/complications , Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris/etiology , Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris/drug therapy , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Deep penetrating nevi (DPN), particularly those showing combined features, or combined deep penetrating nevi (CDPN), may show histopathological resemblance to blue nevus (BN) and melanoma. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) is a marker that helps distinguish melanoma from benign melanocytic lesions. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) has been proposed to be used in conjunction with ß-catenin for diagnosis of DPN. The immunohistochemical expression of PRAME and LEF1 was evaluated in 10 DPN (including 6 CDPN and 2 DPN-like proliferations with atypical features), 16 BN (including combined and cellular BN), and 2 melanomas with features of DPN or BN. PRAME was negative in most DPN (n = 10/10, n = 9/10, one case with discrepancy between readers) and all BN (n = 16/16), while the 2 melanomas included were positive (n = 2/2). All DPN were positive for LEF1 (n = 9/9) while only a subset of BN were positive (n = 6/16, P = 0.0028; n = 5/16, P = 0.001, per both readers). LEF1 seemed to be easier to interpret than ß-catenin because of its nuclear pattern of expression. The expression of LEF1 in the regular nevus component of combined BN presents a potential pitfall in practice because it may lead to misinterpretation of LEF1 as positive in the BN component of the lesion. However, a subset (approximately one-third) of combined BN seemed to show true LEF1 expression. Taking into account pitfalls in interpretation, the combinatorial panel of PRAME and LEF1, in addition to conventional histopathological features, may be useful to distinguish CDPN from combined BN and other benign and malignant mimics.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Nevus, Blue , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell , Nevus , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Nevus, Blue/diagnosis , Nevus, Blue/pathology , beta Catenin/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1 , Melanoma/pathology , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell/diagnosis , Nevus/diagnosis , Nevus/pathology , Transcription Factors , Diagnosis, Differential , Antigens, NeoplasmABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non-subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN). METHODS: Twenty-two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti-PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%-25%, 1+; 26%-50%, 2+; 51%-75%, 3+; and >75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME-negative melanomas and PRAME-positive nevi.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Nail Diseases , Nevus, Epithelioid and Spindle Cell , Nevus , Skin Neoplasms , Antigens, Neoplasm , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Melanoma/pathology , Nail Diseases/diagnosis , Nevus/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Melanoma, Cutaneous MalignantABSTRACT
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive, highly metastatic, cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with poor prognosis. Here, we describe a MCC excision specimen with a rare case of tumor-associated amyloid deposition in the absence of residual tumor cells. A 72-year-old man presented with a lesion of 5-6 months' duration on his left elbow, clinically thought to be a ganglion cyst. The biopsy specimen revealed a Stage IIA MCC with classic histomorphologic and immunophenotypic findings, with tumor extending to the tissue edges. The patient underwent wide local excision with negative margins and a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. Although the patient did not receive any presurgical chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy, the re-excision specimen showed only amphophilic, feathery deposits that were salmon-pink with Congo red stain and further confirmed as amyloid by electron microscopy; there were no residual carcinoma cells. Amyloid deposition in MCC has been described in rare case reports. Our case was extraordinary in that there was only amyloid deposition and an associated granulomatous reaction, without identifiable MCC cells. This case demonstrates that amyloid deposition may be evidence of a prior MCC at the site of a prior procedure and may warrant careful evaluation for residual MCC.