ABSTRACT
In the original publication of the article, the surname of one of the co-authors was misspelled as 'Mpfou'. This has been updated in this correction.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome in coronary heart disease (CHD). However, variability in HRQoL indicators suggests a need to consider domain coverage. This review applies a globally accepted framework, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), to map HRQoL measures that are reliable and valid among people with CHD. METHODS: The Embase, Pubmed and PsycInfo databases were searched, with 10 observational studies comparing HRQOL among 4786 adults with CHD to 50949 controls identified. Study reporting quality was examined (QualSyst). Hedges' g statistic (with 95% CIs and p values) was used to measure the effect size for the difference between group means (≤ 0.2 small, ≤ 0.5 medium, ≤ 0.80 large difference), and between-study heterogeneity (tau, I2 test) examined using a random effects model. RESULTS: Adults with CHD reported lowered HRQoL (gw = - 0.418, p < 0.001). Adjusted mean differences in HRQoL ratings, controlling for socio-demographics, were smaller but remained significant. Large group differences were associated with individual measures of activity and participation (WHOQOL g = - 1.199, p < 0.001) and self-perceived health (SF 36 g = - 0.616, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ICF provides a framework for evaluating and understanding the impact of CHD on HRQoL. The results demonstrate that HRQoL goes beyond physical symptoms, with activity limitations, social support and participation, and personal perceptions identified as key ICF domains in CHD assessment. Further investigations are needed to unravel the dynamic and inter-relationships between these domains, including longitudinal trends in HRQoL indicators.
Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/psychology , International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health/organization & administration , Quality of Life/psychology , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Stress management interventions can help to improve mental health for adults living with multiple sclerosis. However, uncontrolled study designs may overestimate intervention effects. A systematic search of the Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus databases identified eight randomized controlled trials evaluating cognitive behavioral approaches for a pooled sample of 568 adults with multiple sclerosis. Both group and individual-based stress management interventions appear to be effective in promoting self-management of stress. Further research is needed to confirm the optimal timing of stress management interventions across the MS spectrum and strategies to maintain intervention effects.