Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 38
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To verify the prevalence of positive Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, a screening test for metabolic-associated liver disease, in a large population-based sample in the Tuscany Italian Region, and to identify sub-populations at higher risk which could be targeted by specific screening programs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Population-based survey performed in the Italian region of Tuscany, with Tuscany health informative system's administrative data. We included 594,923 subjects, of which 32% had available data for the FIB-4 calculation. The overall proportion of subjects with an FIB-4 value > 1.3, was 41.6% of those with available exams, and 12,8% of the whole population, whereas 5.4% and 1.7% had FIB-4 >2.67. In those younger than 80 years, FIB >1.3 had a 33.1% and 9.4%. People with diabetes mellitus had higher figures (52.8.% and 28.9% for FIB>1.3). Among subjects aged 70 years or over, 74.9% of those with available data and 38.4% of the general population had a FIB-4>1.3, whereas 32% and 16% had a FIB-4 > 2. CONCLUSIONS: The relevant proportion of FIB-4 positivity in the general population poses a significant burden for further screening with liver elastography. Targeting people with diabetes, excluding people older than 80 years and/or adopting a FIB-4 threshold of 2 in those aged more than 70 years could increase the cost-effectiveness of the screening procedures.

2.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 34(1): 145-152, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention. Collection of epidemiological data is crucial for monitoring healthcare appropriateness. This analysis aimed to evaluate the proportion of high-risk patients who achieved guidelines recommended LDL-C goal, and explore the predictors of therapeutic failure, with a focus on the role of gender. METHODS AND RESULTS: Health administrative and laboratory data from seven Local Health Districts in Tuscany were collected for residents aged ≥45 years with a history of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE) and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2021. The study aimed to assess the number of patients with optimal levels of LDL-C (<55 mg/dl for patients with MACCE and <70 mg/dl for patients with T2DM without MACCE). A cohort of 174 200 individuals (55% males) was analyzed and it was found that 11.6% of them achieved the target LDL-C levels. Female gender was identified as an independent predictor of LDL-C target underattainment in patients with MACCE with or without T2DM, after adjusting for age, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and district area (adjusted-IRR 0.58 ± 0.01; p < 0.001). This result was consistent in subjects without lipid-lowering therapies (adjusted-IRR 0.56 ± 0.01; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In an unselected cohort of high-risk individuals, females have a significantly lower probability of reaching LDL-C recommended targets. These results emphasize the need for action to implement education for clinicians and patients and to establish clinical care pathways for high-risk patients, with a special focus on women.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Humans , Female , Male , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Cholesterol, LDL , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Sexism , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Factors
3.
Eur J Public Health ; 34(3): 592-599, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of individuals reports persistent clinical manifestations following SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) acute infection. Nevertheless, knowledge of the burden of this condition-often referred to as 'Long COVID'-on the health care system remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare utilization potentially related to Long COVID. METHODS: Population-based, retrospective, multi-center cohort study that analyzed hospital admissions and utilization of outpatient visits and diagnostic tests between adults aged 40 years and older recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred between February 2020 and December 2021 and matched unexposed individuals during a 6-month observation period. Healthcare utilization was analyzed by considering the setting of care for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection [non-hospitalized, hospitalized and intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted] as a proxy for the severity of acute infection and epidemic phases characterized by different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Data were retrieved from regional health administrative databases of three Italian Regions. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 307 994 previously SARS-CoV-2 infected matched with 307 994 uninfected individuals. Among exposed individuals, 92.2% were not hospitalized during the acute infection, 7.3% were hospitalized in a non-ICU ward and 0.5% were admitted to ICU. Individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 (vs. unexposed), especially those hospitalized or admitted to ICU, reported higher utilization of outpatient visits (range of pooled Incidence Rate Ratios across phases; non-hospitalized: 1.11-1.33, hospitalized: 1.93-2.19, ICU-admitted: 3.01-3.40), diagnostic tests (non-hospitalized: 1.35-1.84, hospitalized: 2.86-3.43, ICU-admitted: 4.72-7.03) and hospitalizations (non-hospitalized: 1.00-1.52, hospitalized: 1.87-2.36, ICU-admitted: 4.69-5.38). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased use of health care in the 6 months following infection, and association was mainly driven by acute infection severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Italy/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Cohort Studies , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data
4.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 71-79, 2022.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862562

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to analyze the difference of the SARS-CoV-2 infection impact between Italian and foreigner subjects, evaluating the trend of infections and access to diagnostic tests (molecular or antigenic swabs for the detection of SARS- CoV-2) in the two different populations, inducing the detection of new positive cases in the population. DESIGN: retrospective population study for the period February 2020-June 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Italian and foreign resident population on 1st January of the years 2020 and 2021 in the Regions participating to the project: Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Tuscany, Lazio (Central Italy), and Sicily (Southern Italy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: in the two populations, for every week and aggregated by macropandemic period were calculated: • the test rate (people tested on the population); • the swab positivity rate (positive subjects on those who are tested); • the new positives (positive subjects on study population); • the percentage of foreigners among the new positive cases. The ratio of the value of the indicators in the foreign and Italian populations (with 95% confidence interval) was calculated to evaluate the association between nationality (Italian vs not Italian) and outcome. The analyses were conducted at the regional level and at pool level. RESULTS: the trend of new positives by nationality (Italian vs not Italian) has a similar tendency in the different pandemic waves. However, the incidence of new positives during pandemic waves among foreigners is lower than in Italians, while it tends to increase during intermediate periods. Except for the summer periods, foreigners are less tested than Italians, but the percentage of new positives out of the total of new ones tested is higher among foreigners compared to Italians. The relative weight of new positives among foreigners tends to increase in periods with the greatest risk of inflow of SARS-CoV-2 for foreigners. CONCLUSIONS: the epidemic trends in the two populations are similar, although foreigners tend to show lower incidence values, probably in part because they are tested less frequently. Furthermore, in foreigners compared to Italians, there is a greater risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in periods of relaxation of containment Coronavirus measures, reopening of national borders, production and commercial activities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sicily/epidemiology
5.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 33-40, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in relation with the use of nasal swabs in the immigrant population in Italy, using data from the COVID-19 national surveillance system and to verify if a difference is present comparing natives and immigrant. DESIGN: descriptive study based on longitudinal health-administrative data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: general population of six Italian Regions (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio) covering about 55% of the resident population and 72% of foreigners' population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: regional rates of access to at least a nasal swab, separately by country of origin. RESULTS: across all the periods, a lower rate in the foreigners' group was observed, with the only exception of the period May-June 2021. Considering separately High Migratory Pressure Countries (HMPCs) and Highly Developed Countries (HDCs), a higher proportion of nasal swabs performed in people coming from HDC with respect to HMPCs and natives was noticed. This observation is consistent in males and females. CONCLUSIONS: during the first wave of the pandemic, Italians have had a higher proportion of nasal swabs compared to migrants across all Regions. This difference disappeared in the following periods, probably due to a major availability of diagnostic tests.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emigrants and Immigrants , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 41-48, 2022.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862559

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to describe differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections between Italians and foreigners residing in seven Italian Regions during the different phases of the pandemic and by gender. DESIGN: retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections from 02.02. 2020 to 16.07.2021 in the seven Regions under study were included. Italian resident population calculated by the National Institute of Statistics as of 01.01.2020 was used to calculate the rates. The considered period is divided into 5 sub-periods (phases). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: number of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in the five phases of the pandemic and crude rates by citizenship (Italian vs foreign). Distribution of infections by age group and by week. Crude and age-adjusted incidence rates ratios (IRR) were calculated, by Region, gender, and phase of the pandemic. RESULTS: an epidemic curve delay was observed in foreigners in the first phase of the epidemic, in particular in the northern Regions, the most affected in that phase. The first phase of the epidemic was characterized by a greater proportion of cases occurred in people aged over 60 years than the other phases, both in Italians and in foreigners. The incidence among foreigners is higher during the summer of 2020 (intermediate period: June-September 2020) and during the last period (May-July 2021) in all Regions. The overall figure shows a lower incidence among foreigners than Italians, except for males in Tuscany. CONCLUSIONS: the lower incidence rates among foreigners should be interpreted with caution as the available data suggest that it is at least partly attributable to less access to diagnostic tests. Regional differences found in the study deserve further research together with the effect of gender and country of origin.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emigrants and Immigrants , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 49-58, 2022.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862560

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to describe trends of overall and intensive care hospitalization for COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic in Italy until June 2021, and to compare the results between foreign and Italian population. DESIGN: retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: hospital discharges of 28 million people living in Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Toscana and Lazio (Central Italy) occurred between 22.02.2020 and 02.07.2021 in the hospitals located in each considered Region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: two weekly outcomes were examined: 1. the overall number of COVID-19 hospitalizations; 2. the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations in intensive care units. RESULTS: a higher COVID-19 overall and intensive care unit hospitalization was found among the foreign population compared to Italians. The association emerged only after the adjustment for age, and it was consistent among all Regions, though less marked in Lombardy. The association varied across epidemic phases. CONCLUSIONS: the issue of vulnerability of migrants to the risk of severe COVID-19 calls for a diversity-sensitive approach in prevention. The specific country of origin and the prevalence of preventable co-morbidities that are often underestimated in the migrant populations, and related to COVID-19 complications, should be taken into consideration in future analyses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control
8.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 59-69, 2022.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35862561

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to quantify the variability of COVID-19 mortality from the beginning of the pandemic to mid-July 2021, in relation to the immigrant status and by Region and period. DESIGN: observational incidence study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study population consists of the residents at the beginning of 2020 in seven Regions (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, Sicily) aged <=74 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: absolute frequency of deaths occurred in subjects who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, crude and standardized rates (standard: Italian population at the beginning of 2020), and mortality rates ratios (obtained using Poisson models), by immigrant status and stratified by gender, Region of residence, and period. The study period was divided into 5 subperiods: 22.02.2020-25.05.2020, 26.05.2020-02.10.2020, 03.10.2020-26.02.2021, 27.02.2021-16.07.2021. RESULTS: the study includes more than one half of the Italian population and most of the immigrants residing in the country, who are younger than Italians and experienced fewer COVID-19 deaths. Deaths among those who tested positive varied greatly between Regions and periods; standardized rates showed considerable increases over time among immigrants. In terms of rate ratios, there were excesses among immigrant males in the third period (MRR: 1.46; 95%CI 1.30-1.65) and in the fourth period (MRR: 1.55; 95%CI 1, 34-1.81). Among immigrant females, there is an indication of lower risk in the third period (MRR: 0.79; 95%CI 0.65-0.97) and of greater risk in the fourth period (MRR: 1. 46; 95%CI 1.21-1.77). Finally, the effect is modified by the Region of residence, both in the third and in the fourth period for males and only in the fourth period for females. CONCLUSIONS: the risk of premature mortality due to COVID-19 is linked to immigrant status and with an intensity that varies by gender, Region, and period. More accessible tools for prevention, diagnosis and early healthcare can support immigrant communities in managing the risk factors linked to the spread of infections and, in particular, counteract their evolution into more severe disease outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emigrants and Immigrants , Citizenship , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sicily
9.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 180, 2021 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefits of chronic polytherapy in reducing readmissions and death after myocardial infarction (MI) have been clearly shown. However, real-world evidence shows poor medication adherence and large geographic variation, suggesting critical issues in access to optimal care. Our objectives were to measure adherence to polytherapy, to compare the amount of variation attributable to hospitals of discharge and to community-based providers, and to identify determinants of adherence to medications. METHODS: This is a population-based study. Data were obtained from the information systems of the Lazio and Tuscany Regions, Italy (9.5 million inhabitants). Patients hospitalized with incident MI in 2010-2014 were analyzed. The outcome measure was medication adherence, defined as a Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) ≥ 0.75 for at least 3 of the following drugs: antiplatelets, ß-blockers, ACEI/ARBs, statins. A 2-year cohort-study was performed. Cross-classified multilevel models were applied to analyze geographic variation. The variance components attributable to hospitals of discharge and community-based providers were expressed as Median Odds Ratio (MOR). RESULTS: A total of 32,962 patients were enrolled. About 63% of patients in the Lazio cohort and 59% of the Tuscan cohort were adherent to chronic polytherapy. Women and patients aged 85 years and over were most at risk of non-adherence. In both regions, adherence was higher for patients discharged from cardiology wards (Lazio: OR = 1.58, p < 0.001, Tuscany: OR = 1.59, p < 0.001) and for patients with a percutaneous coronary intervention during the index admission. Relevant variation between community-based providers was observed, though when the hospital of discharge was included as a cross-classified level, in both Lazio and Tuscany regions the variation attributable to hospitals of discharge was the only significant component (Lazio: MOR = 1.30, p = 0.001; Tuscany: MOR = 1.31, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adherence to best practice treatments after MI is not consistent with clinical guidelines, and varies between patient groups as well as within and between regions. The variation attributable to providers is affected by the hospital of discharge, up to two years from the acute episode. This variation is likely to be attributable to hospital discharge processes, and could be reduced through appropriate policy levers.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Community Health Services/trends , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Patient Discharge/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Female , Guideline Adherence/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Polypharmacy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Secondary Prevention/trends , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 31(3): 769-773, 2021 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Aim of the present study is to determine the role of obesity as a risk factor for COronaVirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study was performed using Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) Tuscany COVID-19 database by the Agenzia Regionale Sanità (ARS), including all COVID-19 cases registered until April 30th, 2020, with reported information on chronic diseases. The principal outcome was hospitalization. An age and gender-adjusted logistic regression model was used to assess the association of clinical and demographic characteristics with hospitalization. Further multivariate models were applied. Of 4481 included subjects (36.9% aged over 70 years), 1907 (42.6%) were admitted to hospital. Obesity was associated with hospitalization after adjusting for age and gender. The association of obesity with hospitalization retained statistical significance in a fully adjusted model, including possible confounders (OR: 2.99 [IC 95% 2.04-4.37]). The effect of obesity was more evident in younger (<70 years) than in older (≥70 years) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The present data confirm that obesity is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization in patients with COVID-19. Interestingly, the association of obesity with hospitalization was greater in younger (<70 years) patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/epidemiology , Aged , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(5-6): 385-393, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: chronic diseases and multimorbidity are on the rise and have a great impact on health and services. OBJECTIVES: to assess the prevalence and patterns of chronic diseases. DESIGN: cross-sectional population-based study on administrative data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study includes 3,234,276 Tuscany (Central Italy) inhabitants aged over 15, observed as at 01.01.2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: subjects were classified as affected or not affected by one of the 17 chronic diseases considered, according to administrative data algorithms. Population prevalence was estimated overall and stratified by gender, age range, and socioeconomic level. A factor analysis was performed in order to evaluate multimorbidity. RESULTS: in Tuscany, 444.8 per 1,000 inhabitants aged over 15 have a chronic disease. The prevalence is 463.5 per 1,000 among females and 424.5 per 1,000 among males, but the two age-adjusted prevalences are equal. The prevalence of chronic patients increases with the level of socioeconomic disadvantage. The most frequent disease is hypertension (308.7 per 1,000), followed by dyslipidaemia (251 per 1,000) and diabetes (75.7 per 1,000). Inflammatory rheumatic diseases and neurological diseases are more prevalent among females than males. The prevalence identified among males almost doubles in comparison to females for all other diseases, in particular for circulatory system diseases. Chronic patients suffer from at least two pathologies in 53.2% of cases. On average, males have more diseases than females. The cardiovascular factor (circulatory system diseases and related) and the neurological factor (neurological diseases and mental disorders) emerged from the factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: this study quantifies the burden of chronic diseases in the population, which is useful information in epidemiology, in clinical practice, and in services management.


Subject(s)
Data Warehousing , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cluster Analysis , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence
12.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(5-6 Suppl 2): 308-314, 2020.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33412823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: the COVID-19 pandemic represents a challenge for health systems around the world, with just under 10,000 cases in Tuscany Region (Central Italy) and about 4,500 in the Local Health Unit (LHU) 'Toscana Centro', updated on 11 May 2020. The risk factors reported are several, including age, being male, and some chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. However, the relative importance of chronic diseases is still to be explored. OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the role of chronic diseases on the risk to develop clinically evident (at least mild symptomatic) forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population of the LHU Toscana Centro. DESIGN: case-population study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 'case' is a subject with SARS-CoV-2 positive swab with at least mild clinical status, who lives in the LHU Toscana Centro area; 'controls' are all people residing in the LHU Toscana Centro area at 1 January 2020. People aged under 30 and patients living in nursing care homes are excluded from the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the analysis assesses the effect of gender, age, neoplasm, and the main chronic diseases on the onset of an infection with at least mild symptoms by calculating odds ratios (OR) by multivariate logistic regression models (to produce adjusted OR by potential confounders). RESULTS: among the 1,840 cases, compared to the general population, the presence of males and over-60-year-old people is greater. Almost all the considered chronic diseases are more frequent among the cases, compared to the general population. A chronic patient has a 68% greater risk to be positive with at least mild symptoms. Many of the considered diseases show an effect on the risk of getting COVID-19 in a symptomatic form, which remains even adjusting by other comorbidities. The main ones include heart failure, psychiatric disorders, Parkinson's disease, and rheumatic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: these results confirm evidence already shown in other studies on COVID-19 patients and add information on the chronic diseases attributable risk in the population, referred to the symptomatic forms and adjusted by age, gender or the possible copresence of more diseases. These risk estimates should guide prevention interventions by health services in order to protect the chronic patients affected by the pathologies most at risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Sex Distribution
13.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 91(8): 971-979, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30006749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on low-level As exposure have not found an association with cancer, while increased risks were reported for skin lesions, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and reproductive outcomes. Prospective observational studies with individual exposure measures are needed to study low-level As exposure effects. In a geothermal area in Southern Tuscany (Italy), characterized by a natural presence of As in drinking water (< 50 µg/l), As urinary concentrations were measured in a survey in 1998 and cohort members were followed to evaluate the effects on health. METHODS: Around 900 subjects (20-55 years old) randomly sampled in 4 municipalities of the area (Monte Amiata), have been followed from 1999 to 2015, by hospitalisation and mortality registries. Standardized Hospitalisation Ratios (SHRs) were performed, compared to a reference area. Competing-risks regression models were performed to test the association between As urinary concentration and risk of first hospitalisation. RESULTS: SHRs show various increased risks, more frequently among males. Internal analyses show a positive association between As and skin diseases in the general population, the Hazard Ratio (HR) for 1 µg/l increase of As urinary concentration is 1.06 (90%CI 1.01-1.11) and in males, HR 1.08 (90%CI 1.02-1.14), between As and circulatory system diseases in males, HR 1.03 (90%CI 1.01-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest an effect on skin diseases and circulatory system diseases and, considering the relative young age of cohort members, they could be considered also as predictive of future severer diseases.


Subject(s)
Arsenic/adverse effects , Arsenic/urine , Drinking Water/chemistry , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Water Pollution, Chemical/adverse effects , Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Skin Diseases/epidemiology
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 388, 2018 05 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29848317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The chronic care model (CCM) is an established framework for the management of patients with chronic illness at the individual and population level. Its application has been previously shown to improve clinical outcome in several conditions, but the prognostic impact of CCM-based programs for the management of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) in primary care is still to be elucidated. METHODS: We assessed the prognostic impact of a primary-care, CCM-based project applied in Tuscany, Italy, in 1761 patients with chronic HF enrolled in a retrospective matched cohort study. The project was based on predefined working teams including general practitioners and nurses, proactively scheduled regular follow-up visitations for each patient, counseling for therapy adherence and lifestyle modifications, appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways according to international guidelines, and a key supporting role of the nurses, who were responsible for the practical coordination of the follow-up. A matched group of 3522 HF subjects assisted by general practitioners not involved in the project was considered as control group. The endpoints of this study were HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Over a 4-year follow-up period, HF hospitalization rate was higher in the CCM group than the controls (12.1 vs 10.3 events/100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 1.15[1.05-1.27], p = 0.0030). Mortality was lower in the CCM group than the controls (10.8 vs 12.6 events/100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 0.82[0.75-0.91], p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, the CCM status was associated with a 34% higher risk of HF hospitalization and 18% lower risk of death (p < 0.0001 for both). The effect on HF hospitalization was mostly driven by a 50% higher rate of planned HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a CCM-based program for the management of HF patients in primary care led to reduced mortality and increased HF hospitalization. These findings support the hypothesis that the beneficial effects of CCM on survival might be extended to patients with chronic HF followed in primary care, but also support the need for further strategies aimed at improving the management of these patients in terms of hospitalizations.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Hospitalization/trends , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Long-Term Care/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Primary Health Care/trends , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
15.
Neurol Sci ; 38(12): 2183-2187, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29019004

ABSTRACT

Tuscany (Central Italy) is a high-risk area for multiple sclerosis (MS) with a prevalence of 188 cases per 100,000 at 2011, and it is characterized by a heterogeneous geographic distribution of this disease. Our objective was to update prevalence at 2013 and to evaluate the presence of spatial clusters in Tuscany. The MS prevalence was evaluated on 31 December 2013 using a validated case-finding algorithm, based on administrative data. To identify spatial clusters, we calculated standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs) for each Tuscan administrative municipality. In addition to the classical approach, we applied the hierarchical Bayesian model to overcome random variability due to the presence of small number of cases per municipality. We identified 7330 MS patients (2251 males and 5079 females) with an overall prevalence of 195.4/100,000. The SMR for each Tuscan municipality ranged from 0 to 271.4, but this approach produced an extremely non-homogeneous map. On the contrary, the Bayesian map was much smoother than the classical one. The posterior probability (PP) map showed prevalence clusters in some areas in the province of Massa-Carrara, Pistoia, and Arezzo, and in the municipalities of Siena, Florence, and Barberino Val d'Elsa. Our prevalence data confirmed that Tuscany is a high-risk area, and we observed an increasing trend during the time. Using the Bayesian method, we estimated area-specific prevalence in each municipality reducing the random variation and the effect of extreme prevalence values in small areas that affected the classical approach.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Bayes Theorem , Child , Child, Preschool , Cluster Analysis , Female , Geography, Medical , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Young Adult
16.
Eur J Public Health ; 27(1): 14-19, 2017 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28177441

ABSTRACT

Background: In 2010, Tuscany (Italy) implemented a Chronic Care Model (CCM)-based programme for the management of chronic diseases. The study's objective was to evaluate its impact on the care of patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A population-based cohort study was performed on patients with diabetes, identified by an administrative data algorithm, exposed to a CCM-based programme versus patients not exposed (8486 patients in each group). The groups were matched using a propensity score approach and observed from 2011 to 2014. The outcomes measured were: mortality rate and hazard ratio (HR), hospitalisation incidence rate (IR) (all causes and diabetes-related diseases) and incidence rate ratio (IRR), and Guideline Composite Indicator (GCI) as proxy of adherence to guidelines (IR and IRR). Stratified Cox regression analysis and conditional fixed effect Poisson regression analyses were performed to compute HR and IRR. Results: A significant improvement was observed for GCI (IRR 1.58; 95% CI 1.53­1.62) and for cardiovascular long-term complications (IRR 1.11; 95% CI 1.04­1.18). A protective effect was observed for neurological long-term complications (IRR 0.85; 95% CI 0.76­0.95), acute cardio-cerebrovascular long-term complications­stroke and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction­(IRR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71­0.92) and mortality (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81­0.96). Conclusion: The implementation of a CCM-based programme was followed by better management and benefits for the health status of patients. The increase in hospitalisations for cardiovascular long-term complications could engender cost-efficacy issues, but a better integrated care (GPs and specialists) and a more appropriate specialist outpatient services organisation could avoid a part of these, while still maintaining the benefits seen.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Models, Theoretical , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Disease Management , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Stroke/complications , Stroke/epidemiology
17.
Neuroepidemiology ; 46(1): 37-42, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26618996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) epidemiology in Italy is mainly based on population-based prevalence studies. Administrative data are an additional source of information, when available, in prevalence studies of chronic diseases such as MS. The aim of our study is to update the prevalence rate of MS in Tuscany (central Italy) as at 2011 using a validated case-finding algorithm based on administrative data. METHODS: The prevalence was calculated using an algorithm based on the following administrative data: hospital discharge records, drug-dispensing records, disease-specific exemptions from copayment to health care, home and residential long-term care and inhabitant registry. To test algorithm sensitivity, we used a true-positive reference cohort of MS patients from the Tuscan MS register. To test algorithm specificity, we used another cohort of individuals who were presumably not affected by MS. RESULTS: As at December 31, 2011, we identified 6,890 cases (4,738 females and 2,152 males) with a prevalence of 187.9 per 100,000. The sensitivity of algorithm was 98% and the specificity was 99.99%. CONCLUSIONS: We found a prevalence higher than the rates present in literature. Our algorithm, based on administrative data, can accurately identify MS patients; moreover, the resulting cohort is suitable to monitor disease care pathways.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Registries , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
18.
Age Ageing ; 45(4): 469-74, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27013497

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: identification of older individuals at risk for health-related adverse outcomes (HRAO) is necessary for population-based preventive interventions. Aim of this study was to improve a previously validated postal screening questionnaire for frailty in non-disabled older subjects and to test its prognostic validity in a vast sample of older community-dwellers. METHODS: individuals aged 70+ underwent a mass postal screening. Physical frailty phenotype (PFP) was assessed in the unselected subsample of the first responders. After a 1-year follow-up, HRAO were recorded in the whole sample, including survival, access to Emergency Department, hospitalisation and Long-Term Care admission. RESULTS: the questionnaire was mailed to 17,273 subjects, whose response rate was 55%. Among the first 1,037 responders without overt disability, the revised questionnaire was 75% sensitive and 69% specific for PFP (ROC 0.772). Non-disabled subjects who screened positive had a higher risk of HRAO in comparison with those who screened negative and similar to non-responders. Risk of adverse outcome was highest among disabled subjects. CONCLUSIONS: a simple questionnaire delivered by mail has good accuracy in detecting PFP in non-disabled older subjects and is able to predict HRAO.


Subject(s)
Aging , Frail Elderly , Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Postal Service , Surveys and Questionnaires , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/therapy , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Patient Admission , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors
19.
Epidemiol Prev ; 39(3): 167-75, 2015.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26668916

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to describe trends in attack rate, treatment, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Tuscany Region (Central Italy). DESIGN: population-based epidemiological study using the Tuscany Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: cases have been identified by record linkage between the hospital discharge database and the mortality registry, and divided into hospitalised AMI (1997-2012) and out-of-hospital coronary deaths (1997-2010). Details on hospitalised cases based on the presence/absence of ST-segment elevation (STEMI / NSTEMI) can be detected for the period 2001-2012. MAIN OUTCOMEMEASURES: distribution by calendar time, gender, and type of event of absolute frequencies, age-standardised attack rates (per 100,000; standard Tuscany population, 2001) and percentages (standard: total hospitalised cases in 2011) of invasive cardiac procedures and 28-day case fatality in hospitalised cases. RESULTS: a reduction in both out-of-hospital coronary deaths and STEMI hospitalisations (attack rates, respectively, - 2.3% and -3.9% in males, -3.3% and -4.1% in females) and an increase in NSTEMI hospitalisations (+13.1% in males and +13.3% in females) were shown. The use of invasive cardiac procedures (PCI, coronary angiography) in hospitalised cases shows a considerable increase over time both in STEMI and in NSTEMI. The proportion, however, always remains lower in the whole period after the age of 70 and in women. The short term prognosis in hospitalised AMI cases shows an improvement over time, which, however, disappears when stratified by type of AMI. This trend is mainly related to the different weight that STEMI and NSTEMI have on incidence over time (increase in attack rates for NSTEMI and reduction for STEMI, with worst prognosis). CONCLUSIONS: results confirm the important changes in epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of acute coronary disease in Tuscany, previously identified in the international literature. Differences in coronary reperfusion treatment of hospitalised cases still persist by age and gender. Additional efforts are needed to ensure equity in access to the best treatment for AMI.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Patient Discharge/trends , Prognosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Time Factors
20.
World J Exp Med ; 14(1): 87551, 2024 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prisons can be a reservoir for infectious diseases, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), due to the very intimate nature of the living spaces and the large number of people forced to share them. AIM: To investigate the SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology in prisons, this study evaluated the infection incidence rate in prisoners who underwent nasopharyngeal swabs. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study. Data collection included information on prisoners who underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing for SARS-CoV-2 and the results. Nasopharyngeal swab tests for SARS-CoV-2 were performed between 15 February 2021 and 31 May 2021 for prisoners with symptoms and all new arrivals to the facility. Another section included information on the diagnosis of the disease according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Clinical Modification. RESULTS: Up until the 31 May 2021, 79.2% of the prisoner cohort (n = 1744) agreed to a nasopharyngeal swab test (n = 1381). Of these, 1288 were negative (93.3%) and 85 were positive (6.2%). A significant association [relative risk (RR)] was found only for the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among foreigners compared to Italians [RR = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-4.8]. A positive association with SARS-CoV-2 infection was also found for inmates with at least one nervous system disorder (RR = 4, 95%CI: 1.8-9.1). The SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate among prisoners is significantly lower than in the general population in Tuscany (standardized incidence ratio 0.7, 95%CI: 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSION: In the prisoner cohort, screening and rapid access to health care for the immigrant population were critical to limiting virus transmission and subsequent morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL