Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 51
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Brain Behav Immun ; 122: 456-462, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39182589

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Positive effects of RNS60 on respiratory and bulbar function were observed in a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). OBJECTIVE: to investigate the long-term survival of trial participants and its association with respiratory status and biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A randomized, double blind, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted. Trial participants were enrolled at 22 Italian Expert ALS Centres from May 2017 to January 2020. Vital status of all participants was ascertained thirty-three months after the trial's last patient last visit (LPLV). Participants were patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, classified as slow or fast progressors based on forced vital capacity (FVC) slope during trial treatment. Demographic, clinical, and biomarker levels and their association with survival were also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 2.8 years. Long-term median survival was six months longer in the RNS60 group (p = 0.0519). Baseline FVC, and rates of FVC decline during the first 4 weeks of trial participation, were balanced between the active and placebo treatment arms. After 6 months of randomized, placebo-controlled treatment, FVC decline was significantly slower in the RNS60 group compared to the placebo group. Rates of FVC progression during the treatment were strongly associated with long-term survival (median survival: 3.7 years in slow FVC progressors; 1.6 years in fast FVC progressors). The effect of RNS60 in prolonging long-term survival was higher in participants with low neurofilament light chain (NfL) (median survival: >4 years in low NfL - RNS60 group; 3.3 years in low NfL - placebo group; 1.9 years in high NfL - RNS60 group; 1.8 years in high NfL - placebo group) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) (median survival: 3.7 years in low MCP-1 - RNS60 group; 2.3 years in low MCP-1 - placebo group; 2.8 years in high MCP-1 - RNS60 group; 2.6 years in high MCP-1 - placebo group) levels at baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this post-hoc analysis, long term survival was longer in participants randomized to RNS60 compared with those randomized to placebo and was correlated with slower FVC progression rates, suggesting that longer survival may be mediated by the drug's effect on respiratory function. In these post-hoc analyses, the beneficial effect of RNS60 on survival was most pronounced in participants with low NfL and MCP-1 levels at study entry, suggesting that this could be a subgroup to target in future studies investigating the effects of RNS60 on survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study preregistered on 13/Jan/2017 in EUDRA-CT (2016-002382-62). The study was also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03456882.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Disease Progression , Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/mortality , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/physiopathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Vital Capacity , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Neurofilament Proteins
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 30(1): 69-86, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36148821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease with limited treatment options. RNS60 is an immunomodulatory and neuroprotective investigational product that has shown efficacy in animal models of ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases. Its administration has been safe and well tolerated in ALS subjects in previous early phase trials. METHODS: This was a phase II, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Participants diagnosed with definite, probable or probable laboratory-supported ALS were assigned to receive RNS60 or placebo administered for 24 weeks intravenously (375 ml) once a week and via nebulization (4 ml/day) on non-infusion days, followed by an additional 24 weeks off-treatment. The primary objective was to measure the effects of RNS60 treatment on selected biomarkers of inflammation and neurodegeneration in peripheral blood. Secondary objectives were to measure the effect of RNS60 on functional impairment (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised), a measure of self-sufficiency, respiratory function (forced vital capacity, FVC), quality of life (ALS Assessment Questionnaire-40, ALSAQ-40) and survival. Tolerability and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-four participants were assigned to RNS60 and 73 to placebo. Assessed biomarkers did not differ between arms. The mean rate of decline in FVC and the eating and drinking domain of ALSAQ-40 was slower in the RNS60 arm (FVC, difference 0.41 per week, standard error 0.16, p = 0.0101; ALSAQ-40, difference -0.19 per week, standard error 0.10, p = 0.0319). Adverse events were similar in the two arms. In a post hoc analysis, neurofilament light chain increased over time in bulbar onset placebo participants whilst remaining stable in those treated with RNS60. CONCLUSIONS: The positive effects of RNS60 on selected measures of respiratory and bulbar function warrant further investigation.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Double-Blind Method , Biomarkers , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurol Sci ; 43(8): 5133-5141, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35648267

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To establish whether a slow or a rapid withdrawal of antiepileptic monotherapy influences relapse rate in seizure-free adults with epilepsy and calculates compliance and differences in the severity of relapses, based on the occurrence of status epilepticus, seizure-related injuries, and death. METHODS: This is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial in people aged 16 + years who were seizure-free for more than 2 years. Patients were randomized to slow withdrawal (160 days) or rapid withdrawal (60 days) and were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was the probability of a first seizure relapse within the 12-months follow-up. The secondary outcomes included the cumulative probability of relapse at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. A non-inferiority analysis was performed with non-inferiority margin of - 0.15 for the difference between the probabilities of seizure recurrence in slow versus rapid withdrawal. RESULTS: The sample comprised 48 patients, 25 randomized to slow withdrawal and 23 to rapid withdrawal. Median follow-up was 11.9 months. In the intention-to-treat population, 3 patients in the slow-withdrawal group and 1 in the rapid withdrawal group experienced seizure relapses. The corresponding probabilities of seizure recurrence were 0.12 for slow withdrawal and 0.04 for rapid withdrawal, giving a difference of 0.08 (95% CI - 0.12; 0.27), which is entirely above the non-inferiority margin. No patients developed status epilepticus and seizure-related injuries or died. Risks were similar in the Per-Protocol population. CONCLUSIONS: Seizure-relapse rate after drug discontinuation is lower than in other reports, without complications and unrelated to the duration of tapering.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Status Epilepticus , Adult , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Seizures/drug therapy , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy
4.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 91(1): 33-39, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31434759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the association between cigarette smoking and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a pooled analysis of population-based case-control studies and explored the independent effects of intensity, duration and time-since-quitting. METHODS: ALS cases and controls, matched by age, sex and region, were recruited in the Netherlands, Italy and Ireland (*Euro-MOTOR project). Demographics and detailed lifetime smoking histories were collected through questionnaires. Effects of smoking status, intensity (cigarettes/day), duration (years), pack-years and time-since-quitting (years) on ALS risk were estimated using logistic regression models, adjusting for age, sex, alcohol, education and centre. We further investigated effect modification of the linear effects of pack-years by intensity, duration and time-since-quitting using excess OR (eOR) models. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on 1410 cases and 2616 controls. Pack-years were positively associated with ALS risk; OR=1.26 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.54) for the highest quartile compared with never smokers. This association appeared to be predominantly driven by smoking duration (ptrend=0.001) rather than intensity (ptrend=0.86), although the trend for duration disappeared after adjustment for time-since-quitting. Time-since-quitting was inversely related to ALS (ptrend<0.0001). The eOR decreased with time-since-quitting smoking, until about 10 years prior to disease onset. High intensity smoking with shorter duration appeared more deleterious than lower intensity for a longer duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide further support for the association between smoking and ALS. Pack-years alone may be insufficient to capture effects of different smoking patterns. Time-since-quitting appeared to be an important factor, suggesting that smoking may be an early disease trigger.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation , Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cigarette Smoking , Female , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
5.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(4): 641-651, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102438

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of falls and fall predictors in patients with Parkinson disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and stroke using the same study design. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study. SETTING: Institutions for physical therapy and rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=299) with PD (n=94), MS (n=111), and stroke (n=94) seen for rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional scales were applied to investigate balance, disability, daily performance, self-confidence with balance, and social integration. Patients were followed for 6 months. Telephone interviews were organized at 2, 4, and 6 months to record falls and fall-related injuries. Incidence ratios, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: Of the 299 patients enrolled, 259 had complete follow-up. One hundred and twenty-two patients (47.1%) fell at least once; 82 (31.7%) were recurrent fallers and 44 (17.0%) suffered injuries; and 16%, 32%, and 40% fell at 2, 4, and 6 months. Risk of falls was associated with disease type (PD, MS, and stroke in decreasing order) and confidence with balance (Activities-specific Balance Confidence [ABC] scale). Recurrent fallers were 7%, 15%, and 24% at 2, 4, and 6 months. The risk of recurrent falls was associated with disease type, high educational level, and ABC score. Injured fallers were 3%, 8%, and 12% at 2, 4, and 6 months. The only predictor of falls with injuries was disease type (PD). CONCLUSIONS: PD, MS, and stroke carry a high risk of falls. Other predictors include perceived balance confidence and high educational level.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Parkinson Disease/complications , Stroke/complications , Aged , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Postural Balance , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Stroke/physiopathology
6.
Neuroepidemiology ; 47(1): 38-45, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27504888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are no studies on prevalence, incidence and comorbidities of Parkinson's disease (PD) in the Italian population. METHODS: The database of 700 Italian general practitioners (population, 923,356) was investigated. All patients with International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision - Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of PD during the period 2002-2012 were included. Parkinsonisms were excluded. Clinical conditions preceding PD were identified through ICD-9-CM codes. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used. PD crude and standardized prevalence and annual incidence were calculated. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios were calculated for comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 2,204 patients (1,140 men, 1,064 women, age 22-95 years) were included. The crude prevalence of PD was 239/100,000. Prevalence increased exponentially with age. Standardized prevalence was 233 (95% CI 232-235). One hundred ninety-four patients were newly diagnosed, giving a crude incidence of 22/100,000 and a standardized incidence of 23.1/100,000 (95% CI 22.9-23.2). Incidence increased steadily until age 75-84 years and then decreased. Older age, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders, diabetes, and restless-legs syndrome were associated with increased PD risk and smoking and hypersomnia with decreased PD risk. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with PD risk with a documented gradient. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence and incidence of PD in Italy are in line with studies with the highest case ascertainment. PD risk varies with the number and type of comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
7.
Ann Neurol ; 75(2): 287-97, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24382602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and identify predictors of prolonged survival in a population-based cohort of newly diagnosed patients. METHODS: An incident cohort from a population-based registry during the years 1998 through 2002 in Lombardy, Italy was followed until death or to February 28, 2013. Age, sex, date of onset of symptoms, site of onset, date of diagnosis, and El Escorial diagnostic category were collected. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards function was used to identify independent prognostic predictors. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were used to assess the 5-year and 10-year excess mortality of ALS patients. RESULTS: Included were 280 men and 203 women aged 18 to 93 years. Spinal onset ALS was present in 312 cases (64.6%). Definite ALS was diagnosed in 213 cases (44.1%), probable ALS in 130 (26.9%), possible ALS in 93 (19.3%), and suspected ALS in 47 (9.7%). The cumulative time-dependent survival at 1, 5, and 10 years from diagnosis was 76.2%, 23.4%, and 11.8%, respectively. Independent predictors included younger age, the diagnosis of possible/suspected ALS, spinal onset, and symptoms having started >12 months previously at diagnosis. SMR was 9.4 at 5 years and 5.4 at 10 years. SMR at 10 years was higher until age 75 year, predominating in women, and became nonsignificant for males thereafter. INTERPRETATION: The outcome in ALS varies with phenotype. Longer survival is predicted by younger age, spinal onset, male gender, and suspected ALS. After age 75 years, 10-year survival in men with ALS is similar to the general population.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/mortality , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Community Health Planning , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
8.
Ann Neurol ; 75(5): 708-16, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24706338

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physical activity is a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: From February 2008 to April 2012, 652 patients with ALS from European population-based registries (France, Ireland, Italy, United Kingdom, Serbia) and 1,166 population controls (matched for age, sex, and residency) were assessed. Upon direct interview, data were collected on occupation and history of sport and leisure activities, physical activity, and accidental injuries. Physical exercise was defined as having spent time doing activities that caused an individual to breath hard at least once per month and was coded as none, job-related, and/or sport-related. Sport-related and work-related physical exercise were quantified using metabolic equivalents (METs). Risks were calculated using conditional logistic regression models (adjusting for age, country, trauma, and job-related physical activity) and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs (Adj ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Overall physical activity was associated with reduced odds of having ALS (Adj OR=0.65, 95% CI=0.48-0.89) as were work-related physical activity (Adj OR=0.56, 95% CI=0.36-0.87) and organized sports (Adj OR=0.49, 95% CI=0.32-0.75). An inverse correlation was observed between ALS, the duration of physical activity (p=0.0041), and the cumulative MET scores, which became significant for the highest exposure (Adj OR=0.34, 95% CI=0.21-0.54). An inverse correlation between ALS and sport was found in women but not in men, and in subjects with repeated traumatic events. INTERPRETATION: Physical activity is not a risk factor for ALS and may eventually be protective against the disease.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/prevention & control , Exercise/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Population Surveillance , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance/methods
9.
Neurol Sci ; 36(9): 1567-74, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25820146

ABSTRACT

The only available treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) administered acutely after injury. However, as the efficacy of MP is controversial, we assessed the superiority of erythropoietin (EPO) versus MP in improving clinical outcome of acute TSCI. Patients aged 18 to 65 years after C5-T12 injury, and grade A or B of the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), admitted within 8 h, hemodynamically stable, were randomized to MP according to the NASCIS III protocol or EPO iv (500 UI/kg, repeated at 24 and 48 h). Patients were assessed by an investigator blind to treatment assignment at baseline and at day 3, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90. Primary end point: number of responders (reduction of at least one AIS grade). Secondary end points: treatment safety and the effects of drugs on a number of disability measures. Frequentistic and post hoc Bayesian analyses were performed. Eight patients were randomized to MP and 11 to EPO. Three patients (27.3 %) on EPO and no patients on MP reached the primary end point (p = 0.17). No significant differences were found for the other disability measures. No adverse events or serious adverse events were reported in both groups. The Bayesian analysis detected a 91.8 % chance of achieving higher success rates on the primary end point with EPO in the intention-to-treat population with a 95 % chance the difference between EPO and MP falling in the range (-0.10, 0.51) and a median value of 0.2. The results of Bayesian analysis favored the experimental treatment.


Subject(s)
Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Spinal Cord Injuries/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bayes Theorem , Cervical Vertebrae , Computer Simulation , Erythropoietin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Methylprednisolone/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neuroprotective Agents/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method , Thoracic Vertebrae , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
Epilepsy Behav ; 34: 42-6, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24681384

ABSTRACT

Misconception and stigma towards epilepsy have a profound impact on this disease in Africa. An unselected sample of Zambian people was interviewed to investigate their knowledge and attitudes towards epilepsy. Proper/improper answers were scored, and a composite score was developed with negative values for unsatisfactory awareness and high stigma levels. The sample comprised 231 people residing in urban (107) or in rural (124) areas. The median and interquartile range of scores for epilepsy awareness and stigma were, respectively, -1 (-3; +1) and +1 (-1; +6). Poor education was the only significant predictor of unsatisfactory awareness (p=0.0131), while education and residency were significantly associated with stigma (p<0.0001 and p=0.0004). Rural people were mostly in the highest stigma level (44.2%) and urban people in the lowest stigma level (60.4%). Misconception and negative attitudes towards epilepsy among Zambian people reflect poor education and rural residency.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Prejudice , Social Stigma , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population , Young Adult , Zambia
11.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 87: 105638, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic scenario in multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved over recent years with the progressive introduction of new drugs focused to better balance efficacy, safety and management requirements. The objective of this study was to examine the prescribing patterns of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) over time and across different geographic areas, and the latency between disease onset, first Register center visit, disease diagnosis, and the start of treatment in a large cohort of persons with MS from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Register. METHODS: Up to 2022, the Register collected data from 124 centers on more than 78,000 persons, of whom 56,872 received at least one DMT prescription. Beside baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, we focused on DMT according to their efficacy distinguishing between moderate-efficacy (ME), or high-efficacy (HE). RESULTS: There was a higher probability of prescribing HE-DMT for increasing calendar years (multivariable odds ratio, OR=11.51 in 2021 or thereafter vs before 2000), in males (OR=1.08 vs females), patients with primary progressive with or without relapse (OR=3.00 vs clinically isolated syndrome), those with a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score (OR=3.85 for >4 versus 0-1), and those from larger referral centers (OR=1.89 vs smaller ones). Conversely, higher age at onset was associated to a lower probability of prescribing HE-DMT (OR=0.74 at 40 or more vs <20 years). A trend to shorter times was observed in subsequent calendar years for disease onset, first center visit, diagnosis and first DMT prescription. No trend was detected based on the location of the geographic referral centers. The times between disease onset, first center visit, and diagnosis and the first DMT prescription showed significant decreases according to the year, while differences were less evident for the geographic areas. CONCLUSION: This study highlights some factors influencing the choice of HE-DMT, including aspects of both healthcare and clinical phenotype. The absence of a geographic pattern may indicate some homogeneity in DMT prescriptions across different Italian MS centers.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Registries , Humans , Male , Female , Italy , Adult , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/pharmacology , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
12.
J Neuromuscul Dis ; 11(4): 749-765, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759021

ABSTRACT

Background: More than 200 clinical trials have been performed worldwide in ALS so far, but no agents with substantial efficacy on disease progression have been found. Objective: To describe the methodological quality of all clinical trials performed in ALS and published before December 31, 2022. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses. Results: 213 trials were included. 47.4% manuscripts described preclinical study evaluation, with a positive effect in all. 67.6% of trials were conducted with a parallel-arm design, while 12.7% were cross-over studies; 77% were randomized, while in 5.6% historical-controls were used for comparison. 70% of trials were double blind. Participant inclusion allowed forced vital capacity (or corresponding slow vital capacity)<50% in 15% cases, between 55-65% in 21.6%, between 70-80% in 14.1% reports, and 49.3% of the evaluated manuscripts did not provide a minimum value for respiratory capacity at inclusion. Disease duration was < 6-months in 6 studies, 7-36 months in 68, 37-60 months in 24, 8 trials requested more than 1-month of disease duration, while in 107 reports a disease duration was not described. Dropout rate was ≥20% in 30.5% trials, while it was not reported for 8.5%. Conclusion: The methodological quality of the included studies was highly variable. Major issues to be addressed in future ALS clinical trials include: the requirement for standard animal toxicology and phase I studies, the resource-intensive nature of phase II-III studies, adequate study methodology and design, a good results reporting.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Clinical Trials as Topic , Research Design , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/therapy , Humans , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards
13.
Methods Protoc ; 7(5)2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39311371

ABSTRACT

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and insomnia (IN) complaints represent the most common sleep/wake disorders. Currently, the specific needs of these patients and their relatives, as well as the overall socio-economic burden of IN and EDS remains widely unexplored. This pilot study to be carried out in Switzerland is a retro- and prospective, national, one-center cohort observational study for the systematic evaluation of the burden of EDS and IN and its evolution 12 months after the first assessment. Patient recruitment will be organized through 7-8 primary care providers (primary/general care practitioners and pharmacies). Primary outcomes are the prevalence of EDS/IN in the primary care setting and the association between EDS/IN with health-related quality of life (QOL) as assessed with the established instruments. Secondary outcomes are the association between EDS/IN with the presence of comorbidities, number of injuries/accidents, and number of sick/leave days for the subgroup of working subjects. Calculation of direct per-patient costs will be undertaken to analyze the economic implications of sleep/wake disorders, providing valuable insights into the financial burden experienced by affected individuals within the healthcare system. This research will provide information on the feasibility of such a study and inform on aspects of the QOL most associated with EDS/IN. Based on this pilot project, a European multicenter study on the burden of sleep/wake disorders will be conducted by the European Academy of Neurology.

14.
Epilepsy Behav ; 29(1): 112-20, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23939035

ABSTRACT

Epilepsy surgery (ES) in pediatrics is safe and effective but can be underutilized. Possible barriers could be parental resistance and doctor inertia. We surveyed 138 parents of pediatric patients with epilepsy and found that 25.2% were opposed to this treatment. However, upon completing the questionnaire that contained factual information about ES, 50.4% of the responders stated that they had become more favorable vs. 3.3% more contrary and 46.3% unchanged. Parents of prepubescent patients were most receptive (p=0.0343) and more likely to shift to a more favorable attitude. Thus, pediatric neurologists should not hesitate to discuss ES as soon as indicated, providing all necessary information to increase acceptance. However, among 60 child neurologists surveyed, 60% did not fully comply with guidelines or follow accepted standards of practice, indicating that they may not be apt to provide proper parental guidance. We conclude that education of both practicing neurologists and parents is needed to facilitate the process.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Epilepsy/psychology , Epilepsy/surgery , Neurosurgery/methods , Physicians/psychology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Neurosurgery/psychology , Parents/psychology , Pediatrics , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
J Neurol ; 270(11): 5344-5357, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378756

ABSTRACT

ALCAR (Acetyl-L-carnitine) is a donor of acetyl groups and increases the intracellular levels of carnitine, the primary transporter of fatty acids across the mitochondrial membranes. In vivo studies showed that ALCAR decrease oxidative stress markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines. In a previous double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial showed positive effects on self-sufficiency (defined as a score of 3+ on the ALSFRS-R items for swallowing, cutting food and handling utensils, and walking) ALSFRS-R total score and FVC. We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentre, case-control study to provide additional data on the effects of ALCAR in subjects with ALS in Italy. Subjects treated with ALCAR 1.5 g/day or 3 g/day were included and matched with not treated subjects by sex, age at diagnosis, site of onset, and time from diagnosis to baseline, (45 subjects per group). ALCAR 3 g/day vs not treated: 22 not treated subjects (48.9%) were still alive at 24 months after baseline, compared to 23 (51.1%) treated subjects (adj. OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.46-3.02). No statistically significant differences were detected in ALSFRS nor FVC nor self-sufficiency. ALCAR 1.5 g/day vs not treated: 22 not treated subjects (48.9%) were still alive at 24 months after baseline, compared to 32 (71.1%) treated subjects (adj. OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.71). For ALSFRS-R, a mean slope of - 1.0 was observed in treated subjects compared to - 1.4 in those not treated (p = 0.0575). No statistically significant difference was detected in the FVC nor self-sufficiency. Additional evidence should be provided to confirm the efficacy of the drug and provide a rationale for the dosage.


Subject(s)
Acetylcarnitine , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Humans , Acetylcarnitine/therapeutic use , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Double-Blind Method
17.
Epilepsia ; 53(1): 35-43, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21973118

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Guidelines for refractory epilepsy recommend timely referral of potential surgical candidates to an epilepsy center for evaluation. However, this approach is seldom a priority for treating neurologists, possibly because of inertia of previous practice and personal attitudes, leading to a buildup of psychosocial disabilities and increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery among practicing neurologists and identify the barriers that delay the treatment. METHODS: We surveyed 183 Italian adult and child neurologists with an ad hoc questionnaire exploring physicians' willingness to refer patients for epilepsy surgery when such treatment may be indicated. Thirteen of 14 questions had graded answers ranging from 1 (unfavorable to surgery) to 10 (favorable). We compared the overall scores and per-question scores of the neurologists versus a group of academic and clinical leaders in the field. KEY FINDINGS: The neurologists gave responses characterized by extreme variability (i.e., wide response interquartile range) around intermediate scores. Experts had higher and less variable scores favoring surgery. The two groups differed significantly on issues such as how long to pursue pharmacologic treatment and information about indications and outcome of surgery. Multivariate analysis indicated that neurologists' attitudes correlated with the number of patients referred for surgery (p < 0.01) and the geographical region where specialty was attained (p < 0.01). Other variables such as years in practice, number of patients treated for epilepsy, or type of specialty had no predictive value on physicians' behavior. SIGNIFICANCE: The majority of Italian neurologists have highly variable attitudes toward epilepsy surgery, reflecting ambivalence and uncertainty toward this type of treatment. About two thirds of responders are nonaligned with the opinion leaders, mainly due to differences in handling pharmacologic treatment and information regarding epilepsy surgery, which affect their attitudes and ultimately patient management. Strategies that may solve the lack of agreement include reinforcing the concept of pharmacoresistance and associated risks, as opposed to the safety and potential benefits of surgery, the use of epilepsy quality measures during follow-up, and the adoption of structured referral sheets and greater involvement of patients in decision making. These measures should facilitate the referral of potential candidates for surgical evaluation and improve overall quality of care.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy/surgery , Neurology/methods , Physicians/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
18.
Epilepsy Behav ; 24(3): 352-8, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22658431

ABSTRACT

Physician inertia is usually blamed for the underutilization of epilepsy surgery (ES) at the cost of increased patient disability and risk of mortality. Investigations on selected groups of patients with intractable TLE and minorities suggested that patient beliefs may also limit access to ES. To assess acceptance of ES among "mainstream" patients, we distributed an ad hoc questionnaire to 228 adults attending epilepsy clinics and found widespread fears and misconceptions leading to unfavorable perception of ES, irrespective of diagnosis, seizure type, and degree of intractability. Moreover, while a group firmly rejected ES, the majority became more favorable when given further information about modality, rationale, and expected outcome of ES. Attitude changes correlated with patient's social profile. Neurologists are responsible for providing all pertinent information to potential surgical candidates as soon as indicated. Therefore, an untimely or inadequate intervention of the treating physician constitutes an additional barrier to optimal utilization of ES.


Subject(s)
Brain/surgery , Epilepsy/surgery , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34338107

ABSTRACT

Objective: Data on and increase of the incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are conflicting and reflect the use of differing populations and designs. We investigated the incidence of ALS using data from a large population-based registry (SLALOM) in two three-year periods using the same diagnostic criteria and equal methods of case ascertainment. Methods: The registry is based in Lombardy, a 10 million population area of Northern Italy. Using different sources of cases (hospital discharge and ambulatory records, regional claims and prescription records) from nine Lombardy provinces (population, 5,485,163), all patients with newly diagnosed ALS during the periods 1998-2000 and 2008-2010 were included. Results: A total of 235 and 440 newly diagnosed patients were traced during the two study periods. The corresponding incidence rates were, respectively, 1.61 and 2.72 per 100,000 person-years. Data varied with age, sex and province by a significant increase was found only in men aged 65 through 74 years. Conclusions: Based on our findings, the increased incidence of ALS with time is real and can be largely interpreted as a reflection of the advancing age of the general population.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Aged , Aging , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Registries
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34818115

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess survival of ALS patients in general and in selected demographic and clinical subgroups comparing two periods (1998-2000 vs. 2008-2010). Methods: Newly diagnosed adults resident of Lombardy, Northern Italy from a population-based registry were included. Data were collected on age at diagnosis, sex, site of onset, diagnostic delay, and El-Escorial diagnostic category. Patients were followed until death or last observation. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox's proportional hazards models. Results: In 2008-2010 (267 patients), median survival was 2.4 years and 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 79%, 56%, 41% and 24%. Longer survival was associated with male sex, younger age, spinal onset, and longer diagnostic delay. Multivariable analysis confirmed higher death in 65-69yr (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.4-5.6), 70-74yr (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.6-6.3) and 75 + yr (HR 6.9; 95% CI 3.5-13.8) categories, compared to ≤49yr, in females (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.02-1.8), compared to males, and in patients diagnosed after 6-12 months (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.7), compared with longer diagnostic delay. In 1998-2000 (235 patients), median survival was 2.2 years. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 77%, 53%, 38% and 20%. When adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, the HR for death in 2008-2010 versus 1998-2000 was 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.98). A significant increase of survival in 2008-2010 was found only in patients aged 50-59yr and 70-74yr at diagnosis. Conclusions: Survival of ALS has increased over time in the last decades, especially in middle aged and elderly patients. The benefits of comprehensive care in selected age groups might explain our findings.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Adult , Aged , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/epidemiology , Delayed Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL