Second-Line Tisagenlecleucel or Standard Care in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Patient outcomes are poor for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas not responding to or progressing within 12 months after first-line therapy. Tisagenlecleucel is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after at least two treatment lines. METHODS: We conducted an international phase 3 trial involving patients with aggressive lymphoma that was refractory to or progressing within 12 months after first-line therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tisagenlecleucel with optional bridging therapy (tisagenlecleucel group) or salvage chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) (standard-care group). The primary end point was event-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to stable or progressive disease at or after the week 12 assessment or death. Crossover to receive tisagenlecleucel was allowed if a defined event occurred at or after the week 12 assessment. Other end points included response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients underwent randomization. At baseline, the percentage of patients with high-grade lymphomas was higher in the tisagenlecleucel group than in the standard-care group (24.1% vs. 16.9%), as was the percentage with an International Prognostic Index score (range, 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis) of 2 or higher (65.4% vs. 57.5%). A total of 95.7% of the patients in the tisagenlecleucel group received tisagenlecleucel; 32.5% of the patients in the standard-care group received autologous HSCT. The median time from leukapheresis to tisagenlecleucel infusion was 52 days. A total of 25.9% of the patients in the tisagenlecleucel group had lymphoma progression at week 6, as compared with 13.8% of those in the standard-care group. The median event-free survival in both groups was 3.0 months (hazard ratio for event or death in the tisagenlecleucel group, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.40; P = 0.61). A response occurred in 46.3% of the patients in the tisagenlecleucel group and in 42.5% in the standard-care group. Ten patients in the tisagenlecleucel group and 13 in the standard-care group died from adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Tisagenlecleucel was not superior to standard salvage therapy in this trial. Additional studies are needed to assess which patients may obtain the most benefit from each approach. (Funded by Novartis; BELINDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03570892.).

Continuous and differential improvement in worldwide access to hematopoietic cell transplantation: activity has doubled in a decade with a notable increase in unrelated and non-identical related donors.

Promoting access to and excellence in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) by collecting and disseminating data on global HCT activities is one of the principal activities of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, a non-Governmental organization in working relations with the World Health Organization. HCT activities are recorded annually by member societies, national registries and individual centers including indication, donor type (allogeneic/autologous), donor match and stem cell source (bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cells/cord blood). In 2018, 1,768 HCT teams in 89 countries (six WHO regions) reported 93,105 (48,680 autologous and 44,425 allogeneic) HCT. Major indications were plasma cell disorders and lymphoma for autologous, and acute leukemias and MDS/MPN for allogeneic HCT. HCT number increased from 48,709 in 2007. Notable increases were seen for autoimmune diseases in autologous and hemoglobinopathies in allogeneic HCT. The number of allogeneic HCT more than doubled with significant changes in donor match. While HCT from HLA identical siblings has seen only limited growth, HCT from non-identical related donors showed significant increase worldwide. Strongest correlation between economic growth indicator of gross national income/capita and HCT activity/ten million population was observed for autologous HCT (r=0.79). HCT from unrelated donors showed strong correlation (r=0.68), but only moderate correlation (r=0.51) was detected from related donors. The use of HCT doubled in about a decade worldwide at different speed and with significant changes regarding donor match as a sign of improved access to HCT worldwide. Although narrowing, significant gaps remain between developing and non-developing countries.

International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee report on the current state of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell-based genomic therapies and the challenges faced.

Genetic manipulation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is being developed as a therapeutic strategy for several inherited disorders. This field is rapidly evolving with several novel tools and techniques being employed to achieve desired genetic changes. While commercial products are now available for sickle cell disease, transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia, metachromatic leukodystrophy and adrenoleukodystrophy, several challenges remain in patient selection, HSC mobilization and collection, genetic manipulation of stem cells, conditioning, hematologic recovery and post-transplant complications, financial issues, equity of access and institutional and global preparedness. In this report, we explore the current state of development of these therapies and provide a comprehensive assessment of the challenges these therapies face as well as potential solutions.

The role of the conditioning regimen for autologous and ex vivo genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell-based therapies: recommendations from the ISCT stem cell engineering committee.

BACKGROUND: The advent of autologous gene modified cell therapies to treat monogenic disorders has been a major step forward for the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapies. The need for disease-specific conditioning to enable these products to provide a potential cure has required extrapolation from experience in myeloablative and non-myeloablative HCT for these disorders. METHODS: In this manuscript, we review the current datasets and clinical experience using different conditioning regimens for autologous gene therapies in hemoglobinopathies, metabolic and lysosomal disorders, inborn errors of immunity (IEI) and bone marrow failure (BMF) syndromes. RESULTS: The disease specific and unique conditioning requirements of each disorder are considered in order to achieve maximal benefit while minimizing associated toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized recommendations based on these data are made for each set of disorders to harmonize treatment. Future directions and the possibility of non-genotoxic conditioning regimens for autologous gene therapies are also discussed. Ethical Statement: The authors followed all relevant ethical considerations in writing this manuscript.

Strategic infection prevention after genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell therapies: recommendations from the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee.

There is lack of guidance for immune monitoring and infection prevention after administration of ex vivo genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell therapies (GMHSCT). We reviewed current infection prevention practices as reported by providers experienced with GMHSCTs across North America and Europe, and assessed potential immunologic compromise associated with the therapeutic process of GMHSCTs described to date. Based on these assessments, and with consensus from members of the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT) Stem Cell Engineering Committee, we propose risk-adapted recommendations for immune monitoring, infection surveillance and prophylaxis, and revaccination after receipt of GMHSCTs. Disease-specific and GMHSCT-specific considerations should guide decision making for each therapy.

COVID-19 outcomes in haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in Western Australia: the value of vaccination and antiviral therapy.

Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) mortality rates among haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients are high, ranging between 20% and 40%. We prospectively evaluated the mortality outcomes of COVID-19 in Western Australian HSCT patients. A total of 32/492 (6.5%) HSCT recipients contracted COVID-19 during the study, of whom 30/32 (94%) developed mild or asymptomatic disease. Two allogeneic HSCT patients were hospitalised for severe COVID-19; one patient died. Stringent healthcare, social isolation practices, aggressive vaccination programmes and rapid access to COVID-19 antivirals may have promoted mild COVID-19 illness in Western Australian HSCT patients, resulting in one of the lowest COVID-19 mortality rates in HSCT recipients worldwide.

Safety of intramuscular tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Evusheld®) administration in patients at risk of iatrogenic haematoma due to haematological disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, intramuscular (IM) injections have been avoided in patients with haematological diseases due to the risk of iatrogenic haematoma. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Evusheld®) is a novel monoclonal antibody combination used as preexposure prophylaxis against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), for those at highest risk of severe infections. It is delivered as two separate IM injections (1.5 mL each). Patients with haematological disease are at higher risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infections, which may be partially abrogated by the prophylactic inoculation of tixagevimab-cilgavimab. METHODS: A combined retrospective and prospective study of patients under the haematology service at a large metropolitan hospital receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab was conducted. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab was administered IM to all patients, with platelet and factor replacement provided according to local protocols. Patients completed a numerical pain score daily for seven days following the injection, with scores ≥4/10 prompting an ultrasound to identify iatrogenic gluteal haematomas. RESULTS: The study recruited 131 patients; 66 patients were thrombocytopenic, including 10 patients with a platelet count <30 × 109/L. Fourteen patients (10.7%) received a single platelet transfusion prior to tixagevimab-cilgavimab administration, while two patients received fresh frozen plasma. No gluteal haematomas were identified, and only two patients reported an initial pain score of ≥4/10. CONCLUSIONS: The intramuscular administration of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in patients with haematological diseases was well tolerated and was not associated with iatrogenic haematoma.

Engineering the best transplant outcome for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: the donor, the graft and beyond.

Allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation remains the goal of therapy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, treatment failure in the form of leukemia relapse or severe graft-versus-host disease remains a critical area of unmet need. Recently, significant progress has been made in the cell therapy-based interventions both before and after transplant. In this review, the Stem Cell Engineering Committee of the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy summarizes the literature regarding the identification of high risk in AML, treatment approaches before transplant, optimal transplant platforms and measures that may be taken after transplant to ideally prevent, or, if need be, treat AML relapse. Although some strategies remain in the early phases of clinical investigation, they are built on progress in pre-clinical research and cellular engineering techniques that are already improving outcomes for children and adults with high-risk malignancies.

Transplant for non-malignant disorders: an International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee report on the role of alternative donors, stem cell sources and graft engineering.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative for many non-malignant disorders. As HSCT and supportive care technologies improve, this life-saving treatment may be offered to more and more patients. With the development of new preparative regimens, expanded alternative donor availability, and graft manipulation techniques, there are many options when choosing the best regimen for patients. Herein the authors review transplant considerations, transplant goals, conditioning regimens, donor choice, and graft manipulation strategies for patients with non-malignant disorders undergoing HSCT.

International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee: Cellular therapies for the treatment of graft-versus-host-disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is a curative approach for many malignant and non-malignant hematologic conditions. Despite advances in its prevention and treatment, the morbidity and mortality related to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains. The mechanisms by which currently used pharmacologic agents impair the activation and proliferation of potentially alloreactive T cells reveal pathways essential for the detrimental activities of these cell populations. Importantly, these same pathways can be important in mediating the graft-versus-leukemia effect in recipients transplanted for malignant disease. This knowledge informs potential roles for cellular therapies such as mesenchymal stromal cells and regulatory T cells in preventing or treating GVHD. This article reviews the current state of adoptive cellular therapies focused on GVHD treatment. METHODS: We conducted a search for scientific literature in PubMed® and ongoing clinical trials in clinicaltrial.gov with the keywords "Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD)," "Cellular Therapies," "Regulatory T cells (Tregs)," "Mesenchymal Stromal (Stem) Cells (MSCs)," "Natural Killer (NK) Cells," "Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)," and "Regulatory B-Cells (B-regs)." All the published and available clinical studies were included. RESULTS: Although most of the existing clinical data focus on cellular therapies for GVHD prevention, there are observational and interventional clinical studies that explore the potential for cellular therapies to be safe modalities for GVHD treatment while maintaining the graft-versus-leukemia effect in the context of malignant diseases. However, there are multiple challenges that limit the broader use of these approaches in the clinical scenario. CONCLUSIONS: There are many ongoing clinical trials to date with the promise to expand our actual knowledge on the role of cellular therapies for GVHD treatment in an attempt to improve GVHD-related outcomes in the near future.

Letermovir for pre-emptive cytomegalovirus therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Pre-emptive therapy (PET) with valganciclovir (VGC) is associated with haematological toxicity. METHODS: We included alloHCT patients from 2018 to 2021 where letermovir (LTV) was used for CMV PET because of cytopenias. RESULTS: Ten patients were included. Six received VGC prior to LTV. VGC was commenced at median d42, given for median 40 days. LTV was commenced at median d90, given for median 54 days. At commencement of antiviral, CMV viral load was higher for VGC at 3.7 log10 IU/mL, compared to LTV at 2.9 log10 IU/mL. Viral load reduction occurred at 0.18 log10 IU/mL per week for VGC, compared to 0.17 log10 IU/mL per week for LTV. There was no clinically significant CMV viremia after stopping LTV. Cytopenias improved on LTV. CONCLUSION: LTV was effective in controlling CMV viremia when it was given at a lower starting CMV viral load and later post alloHCT than VGC. Further study is required of LTV as upfront PET following alloHCT.

Allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplant services in Australia and New Zealand in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a report from Australia and New Zealand transplant and cellular therapies.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruption to health systems, with allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) services a particularly vulnerable area. Ongoing provision of alloHCT has required dynamic responses at national and local levels. In Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), a high reliance on unrelated donors from overseas registries has posed an additional challenge. AIMS: To describe the impact of COVID-19 on alloHCT services in ANZ in the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: Data from the national alloHCT patient and unrelated donor registries were extracted for a 2-year time frame. Comparisons were made between a pre-pandemic period of 1 March 2019 to 29 February 2020 and the corresponding dates during the pandemic, 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021. RESULTS: There was a 13% decrease in the number of allogeneic transplants, a reversal of steady increases in previous years, with the largest decrease in unrelated donor transplants. Local donors supplied a greater proportion of unrelated stem cell products. With a switch to universal cryopreservation, the time from request of a product to infusion increased by a median of 25.5 days for overseas products and 14 days for local products. There was a significant increase in the number of products collected but not used. CONCLUSIONS: A strong public health response and coordinated transplant community activities allowed for safe provision of alloHCT in ANZ; however, our data suggest that the timely delivery of allogeneic transplants was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Continued dedicated efforts are required to minimise further impacts.

ANZTCT consensus position statement on ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease.

This position paper provides an overview of the assessment and management of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). There is a focus on the use of ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory and corticosteroid-dependent GvHD.

Australia and New Zealand Transplant and Cellular Therapies (ANZTCT) position statement: COVID-19 management in patients with haemopoietic stem cell transplant and chimeric antigen receptor T cell.

Patients with post-haemopoietic stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T -cell (CAR-T) therapy face a significant risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 because of their immunosuppressed state. As case numbers in Australia and New Zealand continue to rise, guidance on management in this high-risk population is needed. Whilst we have learned much from international colleagues who faced high infection rates early in the pandemic, guidance relevant to local health system structures, medication availability and emerging therapies is essential to equip physicians to manage our patients optimally.

An ISCT Stem Cell Engineering Committee Position Statement on Immune Reconstitution: the importance of predictable and modifiable milestones of immune reconstitution to transplant outcomes.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for some malignant and non-malignant disease. There have been substantial advances since the approaches first introduced in the 1970s, and the development of approaches to transplant with HLA incompatible or alternative donors has improved access to transplant for those without a fully matched donor. However, success is still limited by morbidity and mortality from toxicity and imperfect disease control. Here we review our emerging understanding of how reconstitution of effective immunity after allogeneic transplant can protect from these events and improve outcomes. We provide perspective on milestones of immune reconstitution that are easily measured and modifiable.

Curative therapy for hemoglobinopathies: an International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee review comparing outcomes, accessibility and cost of ex vivo stem cell gene therapy versus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Thalassemia and sickle cell disease (SCD) are the most common monogenic diseases in the world and represent a growing global health burden. Management is limited by a paucity of disease-modifying therapies; however, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and autologous HSCT after genetic modification offer patients a curative option. Allogeneic HSCT is limited by donor selection, morbidity and mortality from transplant conditioning, graft-versus-host disease and graft rejection, whereas significant concerns regarding long-term safety, efficacy and cost limit the broad applicability of gene therapy. Here the authors review current outcomes in allogeneic and autologous HSCT for transfusion-dependent thalassemia and SCD and provide our perspective on issues surrounding accessibility and costs as barriers to offering curative therapy to patients with hereditary hemoglobinopathies.

Viral infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee review on the role of cellular therapy in prevention and treatment.

Despite recent advances in the field of HSCT, viral infections remain a frequent causeof morbidity and mortality among HSCT recipients. Adoptive transfer of viral specific T cells has been successfully used both as prophylaxis and treatment of viral infections in immunocompromised HSCT recipients. Increasingly, precise risk stratification of HSCT recipients with infectious complications should incorporate not only pretransplant clinical criteria, but milestones of immune reconstitution as well. These factors can better identify those at highest risk of morbidity and mortality and identify a population of HSCT recipients in whom adoptive therapy with viral specific T cells should be considered for either prophylaxis or second line treatment early after inadequate response to first line antiviral therapy. Broadening these approaches to improve outcomes for transplant recipients in countries with limited resources is a major challenge. While the principles of risk stratification can be applied, early detection of viral reactivation as well as treatment is challenging in regions where commercial PCR assays and antiviral agents are not readily available.

QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus to predict clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Controlling cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection through prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy remains an important contributor to outcomes after allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplant (alloHCT). Predicting clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) after day 100 remains a challenge. METHODS: We examined the abilty of the QuantiFERON-CMV assay (QFN-CMV) at day 100 (d100) and day 150 (d150) after alloHCT to predict csCMVi after these time points, with median follow-up of 3.1 years (range 1.3-4.3 years). RESULTS: In 46 transplants (donor seropositive (D+) recipient seronegative (R-) = 12, D+R+ = 25, D-R+ = 9; matched related = 13, unrelated donor = 32, haploidentical = 1), for the prediction of freedom from csCMVi >d100, QFN-CMVd100 (positive compared to negative/indeterminate) had sensitivity 62% (23/37), specificity 100% (9/9), positive predictive value 100% (23/23), and negative predictive value 39% (9/23). For the prediction of freedom from csCMVi >d150, QFN-CMVd150 (positive compared to negative/indeterminate) had sensitivity 62% (18/29), specificity 83% (5/6), positive predictive value 95% (18/19), and negative predictive value 31% (5/16). CONCLUSION: Positive QFN-CMV at d100 and d150 strongly predicted freedom from csCMVi after these time points. QFN-CMV could be utilized to predict the need for pre-emptive therapy and CMV viral load monitoring after day 100 post-alloHCT.

Effect of donor age on adult unrelated donor haemopoietic cell transplant outcome: the Australian experience.

BACKGROUND: Results have been varied regarding the effect of donor age on the outcome of unrelated donor haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). AIMS: To determine the influence of donor age on adult unrelated donor HCT outcome in Australia. METHODS: Patients were included in the study if they were aged 16 years or above and underwent first allogeneic unrelated donor HCT in Australia for the indications of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) between the years of 2001 and 2014 inclusive. The main outcome measure was overall survival (OS), which was tested against independent variables using univariate Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 1158 unrelated donor HCT were represented in the data. Cumulative incidences of engraftment, transplant related mortality (TRM), acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), chronic GvHD and relapse were not significantly affected by donor age. OS probability at 5 years post-transplant was 48.3%. In multivariate analysis of OS, year of transplant 2001-2007, recipient age 40 years or greater, poor risk disease, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match less than 6/6 and poor performance status at transplant (Karnofsky scale) were independently significant adverse OS risk factors. Donor age was not a significant risk factor for OS in univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion from this study was that donor age (up to 59 years) did not influence post-transplant outcome among adult unrelated donor HCT performed in Australia for haematologic malignancies.

Diagnosis, management and follow up of peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a consensus practice statement from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous disease group accounting for 10% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. PTCL patients have typically poorer outcomes compared with aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, such outcomes are heavily dependent on subtype. Although anthracycline-based regimens such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone remain the standard first-line treatment for most aggressive PTCL, there are important variations including incorporation of novel agents, use of radiotherapy and judicious consideration of stem cell transplantation. Relapsed or refractory disease represents a significant area of unmet need where chemotherapy intensification has limited efficacy and novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin and pralatrexate provide additional opportunities for attainment of remission and potential stem cell transplant. In the future, pre-therapy prognostic biomarkers including genomic characterisation, may aid in risk stratification and help guide initial patient management to improve survival. There is an urgent need to understand better the pathogenesis of PTCL to facilitate novel drug combinatorial approaches to improve survival. This position statement represents an evidence-based synthesis of the literature for application in Australian and New Zealand practice.