Words are just Noise, let your Actions Speak: Impact of Nonverbal Communication on Undergraduate Medical Education.

OBJECTIVE: To explore student's perceptions regarding impact of kinesics (facial expressions, gestures, head movements and postures) on undergraduate medical education. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory online survey was conducted from July-Sept 2020 among purposively chosen final year BDS students (n=150) of three dental colleges of Islamabad during COVID-19 lockdown phase. Semi-structured survey questions were validated and piloted before execution. Thematic analysis was performed, and consensus was built among all authors regarding findings, hence ensuring analytical triangulation. RESULTS: Response rate was 46% (69/150). Twenty sub-themes emerged under three domains of kinesics. Participants told that 'neutral expressions' frequently used by teachers create 'boring learning environment' and 'hesitation among students to ask questions.' A smile of teacher imparts 'new degree of interest in the subject' and gives 'freedom of expression' to the students. On contrary, anger 'demotivate' students, instills 'fear among them', make them anxious therefore, they are 'unable to understand lectures' which ultimately leads to 'loss interest in the subject'. Use of gestures by teachers creates 'enjoyable teaching-learning process' but movements such as clearing throat or shaky legs produce 'constant split-second interruption'. Moreover, standing posture of teachers bring 'interest and alertness among students'. CONCLUSION: Nonverbal communication can have positive or negative impact on undergraduate medical education. Therefore, teachers may start lecture with a smile and anger should be avoided to produce friendly and healthy learning environment. Faculty training is required for the effective use of nonverbal communication strategies to create an optimal learning environment for the students.

Professionalism Program Evaluation and Its Impact on Undergraduate Medical Students.

Objective The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a professionalism program by conducting focus group discussions (FGDs). The research focuses on understanding how the program influences the development of professionalism skills among medical students, as well as their perceptions and experiences regarding the program. The study's objectives revolve around identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the program from the perspective of the students. Methods This was a qualitative study done after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Committee, Islamic International Medical College. Students of 4th year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS; 56 students) were selected for the study. A convenience sampling technique was used to select the participants for FGDs. Seven separate FGDs were conducted, with eight participants in each group. All the FGDs were audiotaped. Data were transcribed and translated. Data were analyzed using the thematic analysis on Atlas. Both obvious and hidden content were analyzed. Codes and themes were identified, which were then finalized with consensus. Codes were then categorized into sub-themes, and finally, themes were generated. Results Participants identified the problems associated with applying professionalism during FGDs. These challenges encompassed hefty workloads and a perceived disparity between theoretical knowledge and practical implementation. The students highlighted the importance of practical teaching methods, the cultivation of role models, the alignment of curriculum with real-world experiences, and the revision of assessment methods. This study analyzes the obstacles and potential advantages associated with professionalism education and presents significant perspectives on improving it for upcoming healthcare practitioners. Conclusion Professionalism is a crucial component, and each graduate of a medical school should be fully qualified as a professional after graduation. As we want our future doctors to be skilled at both professional qualities and diagnosis, it is crucial that medical institutions teach professionalism.

Barriers And Facilitators To Write Good Quality MCQS For Dental Assessments: A Qualitative Case Study.

BACKGROUND: To explore barriers and facilitators to write good quality items for undergraduate dental assessments. METHODS: A qualitative case study was conducted from Feb-April 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of eighteen item writers from a public-sector dental institute of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed to extract themes regarding barriers and facilitators to write good quality items. All quality assurance procedures of qualitative research were ensured during the research process.. RESULTS: Five themes related to barriers and three themes related to facilitators to write good quality items emerged from the data. The participants reported more barriers such as lack of frequent training and lack of peer review and feedback. Other barriers were demotivation due to lack of acknowledgement or monetary incentives, lack of content and construct expertise, clinical workload, and contextual barriers such as lack of internet facility, outdated library, and lack of place and time allocation for item construction. Facilitators were availability of peer review, feedback from post-hoc analysis, motivation due to the senior designation, clinical experience, and ample time for basic sciences faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent item writing training, strong peer review process, pre-exam item vetting by the dental education department, and institutional improvements such as striving for content experts, time and place allocation for item construction, internet facility, updated library, and equal distribution of workload among faculty could enhance the quality of items. Moreover, ways to inculcate motivation among item writers such as appreciation or monetary incentives could be used to improve the quality of undergraduate assessments.