Hematocrit control and thrombotic risk in patients with polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib in clinical practice.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by unregulated red blood cell production resulting in elevated hemoglobin and/or hematocrit levels. Patients often have symptoms such as fatigue, pruritus, and painful splenomegaly, but are also at risk of thrombosis, both venous and arterial. Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as second-line cytoreductive treatment after intolerance or inadequate response to hydroxyurea. Although ruxolitinib has been widely used in this setting, limited data exist in the literature on ruxolitinib treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with PV in routine clinical practice. We report a retrospective, observational, cohort study of patients treated for PV with ruxolitinib across three US centers (academic and regional practice) from December 2014-December 2019. The study included 69 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 3.7 years (95% CI, 2.9-4.4). Our data demonstrate very high rates of hematocrit control (88% of patients by three months and 89% by six months); few patients required dose adjustments or suspension. No arterial thromboses were observed; however, the follow-up duration does not allow for the generation of meaningful conclusions from this. Three patients had thrombotic events; one was in the setting of a second malignancy, one post-operative, and a third related to prolonged immobility. We also found that 28% of patients initiated ruxolitinib as a result of poorly controlled platelet counts, second only to hydroxyurea intolerance (46%) as a reason to start therapy. In clinical practice, ruxolitinib continues to be effective in controlling hematocrit levels after three and six months of treatment in patients and is associated with low thrombotic risk.

The Art of Transplantation: Conditioning Intensity for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

The search for the optimal conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been ongoing for decades. In this issue, Solh et al present an original analysis evaluating the impact of conditioning intensity on different disease risk index (DRI) groups of patients with AML and MDS. An impressive difference was observed in outcomes between reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in the low/intermediate-risk disease groups, supporting the use of MAC in this population. Further prospective trials in this population are encouraged.

Minimal residual disease eradication with epigenetic therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Recurrent translocations, t(8;21) or inv(16), in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) are amenable to monitoring for minimal residual disease (MRD) with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). Despite a favorable prognosis, disease relapse remains the single cause of treatment failure in CBF-AML. Fusion products of these translocations recruit epigenetic silencing complexes resulting in hematopoietic maturation arrest. We hypothesized that maintenance therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMA), including decitabine (DAC) and azacitidine (AZA) after induction/consolidation, can be used for MRD elimination to ultimately prolong relapse free survival. Real-time quantitative (RTPCR) trends were reviewed in 23 patients (median age 53 years) with CBF-AML that received HMA therapy following induction/consolidation with fludarabine, cytarabine, and G-CSF (FLAG) with low dose gemtuzumab or idarubicin (NCT00801489). Of the 23 patients evaluated, 17 had a detectable RTPCR at HMA initiation. Five patients had progressive disease and a notable increase in RTPCR values over 1-2 cycles of HMA therapy. Twelve patients did not fail HMA and had a median RTPCR at HMA initiation of 0.06 (range, 0.01-0.91). Unlike the HMA failure subset, 11 of these patients had a reduction in RTPCR after the first or second cycle of HMA. Our data suggests that CBF-AML patients with low levels of RTPCR (between 0.01 and 0.05) at the conclusion of induction/consolidation chemotherapy benefit most from maintenance HMA, particularly those that have a reduction in the RTPCR within the first two cycles of HMA therapy.

Buparlisib, a PI3K inhibitor, demonstrates acceptable tolerability and preliminary activity in a phase I trial of patients with advanced leukemias.

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling plays a crucial role in oncogene-mediated tumor growth and proliferation. Buparlisib (BKM120) is an oral pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. This phase I study was conducted to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BKM120 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory acute leukemias. Fourteen pts (12 acute myeloid leukemia, 1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 1 mixed phenotype leukemia) were enrolled. Twelve pts received BKM-120 80 mg/day and two 100 mg/day. The MTD was 80 mg/day. Of the 14 patients treated, the best response was stable disease in one patient that lasted 82 days. The median survival for all patients was 75 days (range 10-568). Three patients with a 3q26 chromosome abnormality had a significantly improved median survival of 360 days (range 278-568) as compared to a median survival of 57 days (range, 10-125) among the 11 other patients. The most frequent drug-related toxicities included confusion, mucositis, dysphagia, and fatigue. Western blot profiling revealed a decrease in p-pS6K/total pS6K in 5/7 (71%) available patient samples with a mean quantitative inhibition of 65% (range, 32-100%) and a decrease in p-FOXO3/total FOXO3 in 4/6 (67%) samples with a mean quantitative inhibition of 93% (range, 89-100%). BKM120 administered at 80 mg/day showed modest efficacy and was tolerable in advanced acute leukemias. Am. J. Hematol. 92:7-11, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Geographic distance is not associated with inferior outcome when using long-term transplant clinic strategy.

The optimal healthcare model for follow-up of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients after day 100 is not clear. We previously demonstrated that longitudinal follow-up at the transplant center using a multidisciplinary approach is associated with superior survival. Recent data suggest that increased distance from the transplant center is associated with inferior survival. A dedicated long-term transplant clinic (LTTC) was established in 2006 at our center. We hypothesized that geographic distance would not be associated with inferior outcome if patients are followed in the LTTC. We studied 299 consecutive patients who underwent HSCT and established care in an LTTC. The median distance from the transplant center was 118 miles (range, 1 to 1591). The 75th percentile (170 miles) was used as the cut-off to analyze the impact of distance from the center on outcome (219 patients ≤ 75th percentile; 80 patients >75th percentile). The 2 groups were balanced for pretransplant characteristics. In multivariate analyses adjusted for donor type, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research risk, and transplant regimen intensity, distance from transplant center did not impact outcome. Our study suggests that geographic distance from the transplant center is not associated with inferior outcome when follow-up care is delivered via a dedicated LTTC incorporating well-coordinated multidisciplinary care.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative treatment modality for select patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), functioning as a restorative agent following intensified chemo- and/or radiotherapy and also engendering the disease-directed immunologic threat of graft-versus-leukemia effect. Advancements in conditioning regimen intensity, donor availability, and supportive care have broadened the eligibility for allogeneic HCT, reduced rates of transplant related mortality, and improved outcomes over time. There are still obstacles to transplant in AML, offering opportunities for ongoing discovery, including poor recipient fitness, insufficient donor availability for certain populations, and limited access to care. Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure and a high priority area of investigative efforts. Post-transplant maintenance and novel applications of cellular therapeutics are expected to usher in a new era of promise for successful HCT in AML and will aim to overcome the remaining barriers impeding favorable outcomes for these patients.

Impact of second primary malignancy post-autologous transplantation on outcomes of multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis.

The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P < .001 and HR 5.01, P < .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P < .001 and HR 8.13, P < .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post-auto-HSCT.

Oral MEK 1/2 Inhibitor Trametinib in Combination With AKT Inhibitor GSK2141795 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With RAS Mutations: A Phase II Study.

BACKGROUND: With proven single-agent activity and favorable toxicity profile of MEK-1/2 inhibition in advanced leukemia, investigation into combination strategies to overcome proposed resistance pathways is warranted. Resistance to MEK inhibition is secondary to upstream hyperactivation of RAS/RAF or activation of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway. This phase II multi-institution Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored study was conducted to determine efficacy and safety of the combination of the ATP-competitive pan-AKT inhibitor GSK2141795, targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway, and the MEK inhibitor trametinib in RAS-mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients achieving a complete remission. Secondary objectives included assessment of toxicity profile and biologic effects of this combination. Twenty-three patients with RAS-mutated AML received the combination. Two dose levels were explored (dose level 1: 2 mg trametinib, 25 mg GSK2141795 and dose level 2: 1.5 mg trametinib, 50 mg GSK2141795). RESULTS: Dose level 1 was identified as the recommended phase II dose. No complete remissions were identified in either cohort. Minor responses were recognized in 5 (22%) patients. The most common drug-related toxicities included rash and diarrhea, with dose-limiting toxicities of mucositis and colitis. Longitudinal correlative assessment of the modulation of MEK and AKT pathways using reverse phase protein array and phospho-flow analysis revealed significant and near significant down-modulation of pERK and pS6, respectively. Combined MEK and AKT inhibition had no clinical activity in patients with RAS-mutated AML. CONCLUSION: Further investigation is required to explore the discrepancy between the activity of this combination on leukemia cells and the lack of clinical efficacy.

Pentostatin therapy for steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease: identifying those who may benefit.

We report outcomes of 60 patients with steroid-refractory (SR)-aGVHD treated with pentostatin. Almost half (47%) of patients had grade 4 GVHD-22% had stage 3-4 liver GVHD and 51% had stage 3-4 lower gastrointestinal tract (LGI) GVHD. Patients received a median of 3 courses (range, 1-9) of pentostatin. Day 28 overall response rate (ORR) was 33% (n = 20) (complete response 18% (n = 11), partial response 15% (n = 9)). Non-relapse mortality was 72% (95% confidence interval (CI) 61-84%) and overall survival (OS) was 21% (95% CI 12-32%) at 18 months. On univariate analysis, age >60 years (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.01-3.7, p = 0.045) and presence of liver GVHD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-3.3, p = 0.03) were significant predictors of poor OS while patients with LGI GVHD had superior OS than those without (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8, p = 0.01). On stratified analysis, patients <60 years with isolated LGI GVHD had the best outcomes with an ORR of 48% and OS of 42% at 18 months. Among older patients, OS was 14% in those with isolated LGI aGVHD and 0% in others. Pentostatin remains a viable treatment option for SR-aGVHD, especially in patients 60 years or younger with isolated LGI involvement.

The Challenge of Treating Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) comprise a spectrum of myeloid disorders with both dysplastic and proliferative features, arising from hematopoietic stem cells. MDS/MPN are neither MDS nor MPN but a distinct World Health Organization-defined subclassification of diseases that, by definition, do not arise from a pre-existing MDS or MPN, inherently creating diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Appropriately recognizing and classifying MDS/MPN is paramount for appropriately formulating treatment strategies and accurate prognostication. Highlighting the unique molecular, morphologic, and clinical characteristics among the subclassifications of MDS/MPN can assist in the appropriate diagnosis and aid in choice of therapeutic strategies. We describe the challenges of the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of MDS/MPN.

Targeting IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past decade, the pathogenic role of mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDH) 1 and 2, affecting approximately 20% of patients with AML, has been defined, allowing for the development of specific therapeutic strategies for IDH-mutant AML. In this review, the landscape and progress of targeted therapeutics aimed at IDH mutations in AML and related myeloid malignancies will be described. RECENT FINDINGS: Since 2013, several mutant IDH-targeted inhibitors have been developed, and nearly a dozen clinical trials have opened specifically for IDH-mutant hematologic malignancies. Preliminary results for several of these investigations have shown evidence of safety, tolerability, and encouraging evidence of efficacy. Targeting IDH mutations in AML is a biologically informed and rational strategy to promote clinical responses, primarily through differentiation and maturation of the malignant clone. The use of IDH targeted therapy is expected to soon become part of a genomically defined and individualized AML treatment strategy.