Pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: Pericarditis is an important diagnosis to consider, along with various other differential diagnoses, in a patient who presents with chest pain. OBJECTIVE: This article describes in detail the common features, management and complications of pericarditis in the general practice setting. DISCUSSION: Characteristic clinical findings in pericarditis include pleuritic chest pain and pericardial friction rub on auscultation of the left lower sternal border. Electrocardiography may reveal diffuse PR-segment depressions and diffuse ST-segment elevations with upward concavity. The most common aetiologies of pericarditis are idiopathic and viral, and the most common treatment for these are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colchicine. The complications of pericarditis include pericardial effusion, tamponade and myopericarditis. The presence of effusion, constriction or tamponade can be confirmed on echocardiography. Tamponade is potentially life-threatening and is diagnosed by the clinical findings of decreased blood pressure, elevated jugular venous pressure, muffled heart sounds on auscultation and pulsus paradoxus.

New oral anticoagulants and perioperative management of anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents.

BACKGROUND: The strategy of whether to continue anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents during surgery depends on an evaluation of the thromboembolic risk and haemorrhagic risk of the individual patients. Procedures that carry a significant risk of bleeding may require temporary cessation of the medication. OBJECTIVE: We briefly review the use of common oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, including clinical indications and limitations associated with those agents. We also discuss the risks of thromboembolism, and balancing bleeding risk in patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy, temporary interruption of such therapy and management of such patients undergoing an elective surgical procedure. DISCUSSION: Generally, patients at high risk of thromboembolism should be considered for a more aggressive perioperative management strategy with bridging therapy. Current recommendations for dual antiplatelet treatment range from 4 weeks in patients undergoing elective stenting with bare metal stents, up to 12 months in patients with drug-eluting stents or patients undergoing coronary stenting for acute coronary syndrome. If a patient is to undergo high-bleeding-risk surgery and an antiplatelet effect is not desired, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor should be discontinued 5-7 days before the procedure. Early, effective communication between general practitioners and specialists is useful in managing high-risk patients on anticoagulation/antiplatelet agents during the perioperative periods.

Chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a common symptom in the community, with underlying causes ranging from benign musculoskeletal pain to life-threatening cardiac events. It is a challenging presentation for healthcare providers, because the aetiology is not always immediately apparent. Chest pain can also cause significant anxiety for patients, leading to increased healthcare utilisation and costs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this discussion is to emphasise the importance of accurately describing the nature of chest discomfort and using appropriate terminology to facilitate an appropriate diagnostic work-up. The discussion also highlights the differences between typical and atypical chest pain and provides information about the aetiology of chest pain and management in the community. DISCUSSION: Accurately describing the nature of chest discomfort by using appropriate terminology is crucial in identifying the underlying cause of the symptom. Healthcare providers should be aware of the different terms patients might use to describe their chest discomfort and use precise and informative terms to describe the potential underlying cause of the chest pain. Atypical chest pain is often used to describe non-cardiac chest pain, but it lacks specificity. Using the terms 'cardiac,' 'possibly cardiac' or 'non-cardiac' is the preferred terminology.

Cardiac murmurs in children.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of children experience a cardiac murmur at some point in their lives; <1% of these murmurs are attributed to congenital heart disease (CHD). Cardiac murmur might be the first clinical sign of a significant CHD in children. Despite careful routine medical examinations at birth, approximately 50% of CHD cases could remain unrecognised. OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular symptoms and signs could be specific or non-specific in neonates and children with heart murmurs. Knowledge about red flags in history and physical examinations, and syndromic associations of common CHDs are important. Auscultatory skills to identify systolic, diastolic and continuous murmurs and heart sounds are essential. Differential diagnosis should be formulated based on the location of maximum intensity of murmurs. Younger infants and children with pathological murmurs and red-flag signs should be promptly referred to local paediatric cardiology services for further investigations. DISCUSSION: Significant skill and knowledge are required for the identification of critical murmurs and associated cardiovascular problems. This review provides a simplified comprehensive update on cardiac murmurs and associated conditions in neonates and children.

Genetics in relation to cardiac diseases: Implications for general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) pose significant global health challenges, with genetics increasingly recognised as a key factor alongside traditional risk factors. This presents an opportunity for general practitioners (GPs) to refine their approaches. OBJECTIVE: This article explores the impact of genetics on CVDs and its implications for GPs. It discusses monogenic disorders like inherited cardiomyopathies and polygenic risks, as well as pharmacogenetics, aiming to enhance risk assessment and personalised care. DISCUSSION: Monogenic disorders, driven by single gene mutations, exhibit predictable inheritance patterns, including inherited cardiomyopathies and channelopathies such as Long QT syndrome. Polygenic risks involve multiple genetic variants influencing CVD susceptibility, addressed through polygenic risk scores for precise risk assessment. Pharmacogenetics tailor drug interventions based on genetic profiles, though challenges like accessibility and ethical considerations persist. Integrating genetics into cardiovascular care holds promise for alleviating the global CVD burden and improving patient outcomes.

Aortic stenosis: Update in monitoring and management.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) remains one of the most commonly encountered valvular pathologies. Medical management does not alter the progression of the disease, making assessment of severity and timing of referral for valve replacement the most important aspects of caring for patients with AS. OBJECTIVE: To review the contemporary management of AS, including signs and symptoms, echocardiography and decision making in management. DISCUSSION: Severe symptomatic AS is frequently accompanied by dyspnoea, chest pain or syncope and a physical examination might reveal the presence of an ejection systolic murmur. Echocardiography is the first and most useful investigation to stratify risk and determine requirement for valve replacement by assessing valve gradients and left ventricular function. Surgical and transcatheter options now exist for treatment of AS and decision making is usually multidisciplinary and based on individual patient parameters.

Myocarditis and related complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Myocarditis and pericarditis are associated with a wide range of presentations and have received renewed interest because of the association with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Some of these complications have also been reported with the mRNA vaccines used for preventing the infection, which has caused widespread anxiety and uncertainty in the community. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to summarise an approach to the clinical problem of myocarditis and treatment/management of patients with myocarditis in the community. This article also discusses SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines. DISCUSSION: Myocarditis and pericarditis need to be considered as a differential, especially in all adolescents or young adults presenting with acute chest pain, shortness of breath or palpitations. Other serious causes of chest pain - such as acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection and pneumothorax - also need to be excluded. Initial electrocardiography, troponin and C-reactive protein tests are recommended, and cardiology advice should be sought for all suspected cases.

Pericarditis - clinical features and management.

BACKGROUND: Pericarditis is an important diagnosis to consider in a patient presenting with chest pain. It is diagnosed in 5% of patients presenting to hospital emergency departments with chest pain in the absence of a myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: This article describes the common features and management of pericarditis in the general practice setting. DISCUSSION: Characteristic clinical findings in pericarditis include pleuritic chest pain and a pericardial friction rub on auscultation of the left lower sternal border. Electrocardiography may reveal diffuse PR depressions and diffuse ST segment elevations with upward concavity. The most common aetiologies of pericarditis are idiopathic and viral, and the most common treatment for these is nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and colchicine. The complications of pericarditis include effusion, tamponade and myopericarditis. Pericardial effusion may present as a globular heart shadow on chest X-ray. The presence of effusion, constriction or tamponade can be confirmed on echocardiography. Tamponade is potentially life threatening and is diagnosed by the clinical findings of decreased blood pressure, elevated jugular venous pressure, muffled heart sounds on auscultation and pulsus paradoxus.

SARS-CoV-2 and the kidney.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been at the forefront of public and scientific attention since the initial report in December 2019. The kidney is one of the target organs of the causative SARS-CoV-2 virus. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to discuss the current understanding of COVID-19 renal disease from a primary care perspective, with the caveat that our knowledge of the pathogenesis, clinical course and outcome of the disease is still rapidly evolving. DISCUSSION: The kidney is one of the target organs of the causative SARS-CoV-2 virus, affecting the endothelium, podocytes and renal tubular epithelial cells. Clinical presentation ranges from isolated proteinuria, haematuria to severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy. Renal dysfunction associated with COVID-19 has a worse prognosis whether it be in the form of AKI or worsening of pre-existing chronic kidney disease, or in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.

Cardiovascular conditions and COVID-19.

Although COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, cardiovascular involvement is common, especially in individuals who are severely ill.

A Unique Case Report of Complete Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion in a 24-Year-Old Male.

A 24-year-old male presented to hospital following syncope with electrocardiographic changes and was found to have left main coronary artery occlusion requiring emergent coronary artery bypass grafting.

An unusual case of stent thrombosis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. It often presents dramatically, typically resulting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction which is associated with a high mortality rate. Premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in the initial 30 days after stenting is arguably the most important predictor of stent thrombosis. In some cases, discontinuation of therapy is unintentional, such as in patients with short-bowel length or malabsorption syndromes. CASE SUMMARY: A 70-year-old man presented to our hospital with stent thrombosis due to non-absorption of antiplatelet agents, 3 days after an elective percutaneous intervention to the right coronary artery. The patient, who had had a laparoscopic high anterior resection due to previous colorectal cancer, had noticed tablets passing whole into his colostomy bag. Repeat balloon angioplasty and stenting were performed and the patient received further antiplatelet therapy in a crushed form. DISCUSSION: Drug absorption in the gastrointestinal tract is altered when a significant length of the gut has been resected. Reduced intestinal luminal transit time and insufficient contact time with intestinal mucosa leads to reduced bioavailability of drugs and increased risk of stent thrombosis. The aetiology of stent thrombosis can be investigated with intravascular imaging techniques and platelet function testing. Management includes using different drug formulations and doses and monitoring the outcomes of therapy. In some cases, it may also be appropriate to involve a gastroenterology team, preferably in the multidisciplinary environment of an intestinal rehabilitation centre.

Simultaneous multiple organ emboli in a patient with solid organ malignancy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis is a dangerous complication of cancer. At least 20% of cancer patients are diagnosed with a venous thrombotic event and 1% with an intra-arterial thrombotic event. Here, we present a patient that developed separate thrombi that occurred simultaneously in both the venous and arterial circulation. CASE SUMMARY: An 80-year-old woman with a history of recently diagnosed squamous cell lung cancer presented to our institution with an out of hospital cardiac arrest. On arrival, she was found to have an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiogram and on examination was found to have right-sided neurological deficits. Computed tomography head and aortogram showed an acute ischaemic stroke and bilateral segmental pulmonary emboli. Coronary angiogram showed thrombotic occlusion distal to the right coronary artery, and the patient underwent aspiration thrombectomy with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow established at the end of the procedure. The patient was then transferred to interventional radiology where she had successful clot retrieval of the cerebral thrombus. The patient progressed well and had full neurological recovery 72 h post-presentation. Subsequent transoesophageal echocardiography showed no evidence of a patent foramen ovale or other intracardiac shunt. The patient was prescribed long-term anticoagulant with Clexane. DISCUSSION: There was suspicion for a deep vein thrombosis with subsequent embolization to the lungs and paradoxical embolization through an intracardiac shunt. However, no such defect was detected and it appears that the patient did develop thrombi in the arterial and venous system separately. This case highlights the prothrombotic state of malignancy, with the patient suffering from multiple separate life-threatening thrombi.

An Invasive vs a Conservative Approach in Elderly Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Elderly (≥ 75 years) patients form a large sub-group of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) population but are vastly under-represented in trials. Thus, the benefits of an early angiography in the elderly remain unclear. In this systematic review, we compared outcomes of "invasive" and "conservative" strategies of NSTEMI management in elderly patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search of major databases was performed. We included comparative studies of any design that enrolled patients ≥ 75 years, and where outcomes of both strategies of NSTEMI management were available. RESULTS: Among the included studies (3 randomized and 6 observational), there were 6340 patients in the "invasive" group and 13,358 patients in the "conservative" group. The 12-month mortality rate (odds ration [OR], 0.45; p < 0.00001), the 30-day mortality (OR, 0.50; p = 0.0009), and events of stroke (OR, 0.42; p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the invasive group. Major bleeding was higher in the invasive cohort (OR, 1.63; p = 0.03). Analysis of randomised studies showed lower reinfarction with invasive approach at 12 months (p = 0.0001). Significant heterogeneity was noted among studies according to study design. CONCLUSION: The overall benefit with invasive strategy comes from the data of observational studies that are prone to selection bias. We believe that there is a need for a large randomized study in the elderly patients regarding management of NSTEMI.

Intracoronary Administration of Thrombolysis for Severe Coronary Artery Ectasia Presenting as an Acute Inferior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

We present a 75-year-old male with acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction, severe coronary artery ectasia, and large thrombus burden in the right coronary artery to support the use of intracoronary thrombolysis as a second-line therapy for a large thrombus burden in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.