Anaesthesia and cancer recurrence: the influence of perioperative anaesthetic technique on cancer recurrence after surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, and incidence is increasing. Excisional surgery is essential in approximately 70% of solid organ tumours. Emerging research in onco-anaesthesiology suggests that perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic techniques might influence long-term oncologic outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Prospective, randomized control trials (RCTs) demonstrate that perioperative regional and neuraxial anaesthetic techniques do not affect cancer recurrence. Ongoing trials are investigating the potential outcome benefits of systemic lidocaine. Retrospective studies indicate improved postoperative oncologic outcomes for certain types of breast cancer with higher intraoperative opioid dosage, nuancing available evidence on the effect of opioids. RCT evidence suggests that propofol has no beneficial effect compared with volatiles on breast cancer recurrence, although it remains unclear whether this applies to other cancer types. SUMMARY: Although regional anaesthesia definitively does not affect cancer recurrence, ongoing prospective RCTs with oncological outcomes as primary endpoints are awaited to establish if other anaesthetic or analgesic techniques influence cancer recurrence. Until such trials conclusively identify a causal relationship, insufficient evidence exists to recommend specific anaesthetic or analgesic techniques for tumour resection surgery based on altering the patient's risk of recurrence.

Tracheal intubation in the critically ill patient.

Tracheal intubation is among the most commonly performed and high-risk procedures in critical care. Indeed, 45% of patients undergoing intubation experience at least one major peri-intubation adverse event, with cardiovascular instability being the most common event reported in 43%, followed by severe hypoxemia in 9% and cardiac arrest in 3% of cases. These peri-intubation adverse events may expose patients to a higher risk of 28-day mortality, and they are more frequently observed with an increasing number of attempts to secure the airway. The higher risk of peri-intubation complications in critically ill patients, compared with the anaesthesia setting, is the consequence of their deranged physiology (e.g. underlying respiratory failure, shock and/or acidosis) and, in this regard, airway management in critical care has been defined as "physiologically difficult". In recent years, several randomised studies have investigated the most effective preoxy-genation strategies, and evidence for the use of positive pressure ventilation in moderate-to-severe hypoxemic patients is established. On the other hand, evidence on interventions to mitigate haemodynamic collapse after intubation has been elusive. Airway management in COVID-19 patients is even more challenging because of the additional risk of infection for healthcare workers, which has influenced clinical choices in this patient group. The aim of this review is to provide an update of the evidence for intubation in critically ill patients with a focus on understanding peri-intubation risks and evaluating interventions to prevent or mitigate adverse events.