ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, the effect of adding autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to triplet therapy (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [RVD]), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until disease progression, is unknown. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, adults (18 to 65 years of age) with symptomatic myeloma received one cycle of RVD. We randomly assigned these patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive two additional RVD cycles plus stem-cell mobilization, followed by either five additional RVD cycles (the RVD-alone group) or high-dose melphalan plus ASCT followed by two additional RVD cycles (the transplantation group). Both groups received lenalidomide until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or both. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Among 357 patients in the RVD-alone group and 365 in the transplantation group, at a median follow-up of 76.0 months, 328 events of disease progression or death occurred; the risk was 53% higher in the RVD-alone group than in the transplantation group (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.91; P<0.001); median progression-free survival was 46.2 months and 67.5 months. The percentage of patients with a partial response or better was 95.0% in the RVD-alone group and 97.5% in the transplantation group (P = 0.55); 42.0% and 46.8%, respectively, had a complete response or better (P = 0.99). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 78.2% and 94.2%, respectively; 5-year survival was 79.2% and 80.7% (hazard ratio for death, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD plus ASCT was associated with longer progression-free survival than RVD alone. No overall survival benefit was observed. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; DETERMINATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01208662.).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Multiple Myeloma , Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Lenalidomide/administration & dosage , Lenalidomide/adverse effects , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/surgery , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease, despite the development of numerous drug classes and combinations that have contributed to improved overall survival. Immunotherapies directed against cancer cell-surface antigens, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies, have recently received regulatory approvals and shown unprecedented efficacy. However, these immunotherapies have unique mechanisms of action and toxicities that are different to previous treatments for myeloma, so experiences from clinical trials and early access programmes are essential for providing specific recommendations for management of patients, especially as these agents become available across many parts of the world. Here, we provide expert consensus clinical practice guidelines for the use of bispecific antibodies for the treatment of myeloma. The International Myeloma Working Group is also involved in the collection of prospective real-time data of patients treated with such immunotherapies, with the aim of learning continuously and adapting clinical practices to optimise the management of patients receiving immunotherapies.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Consensus , Multiple Myeloma , T-Lymphocytes , Humans , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , Immunotherapy/methods , Immunotherapy/standards , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy requiring long-term, continuous therapy. Despite its chronic and unrelenting course, studies examining quality of life (QOL), psychological distress, and perceptions of prognosis by line of therapy are lacking. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional, multisite study of patients undergoing treatment for MM (excluding maintenance) between June 2020 and January 2021. The authors conducted purposeful sampling and recruited patients to 3 cohorts based on lines of therapy: 1) newly diagnosed receiving first-line therapy; 2) 2 to 3 lines; and 3) 4 or more lines. Patients completed validated questionnaires to assess their QOL, fatigue, psychological distress, and perceptions of prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients with MM were enrolled (newly diagnosed [n = 60], 2 to 3 lines [n = 60], and ≥4 lines of therapy [n = 60]). QOL, symptom burden, and fatigue scores did not differ by lines of therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in psychological distress by line of therapy. The rates of clinically significant depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms were 23.9% (43 of 180), 23.9% (43 of 180), and 24.4% (44 of 180), respectively. Most patients (84.7%, 149 of 176) reported that their oncologist told them their cancer was incurable, but only 30.6% (53 of 173) acknowledged that they were terminally ill, and 42.0% (73 of 174) reported that they thought their cancer was incurable. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MM undergoing treatment experience impaired QOL and elevated psychological distress across the disease continuum, regardless of line of therapy. A substantial proportion of patients with MM have significant misperceptions about their prognosis and the curability of their illness despite reporting being informed of the prognosis by their oncologist. LAY SUMMARY: This study discusses 180 patients with MM (newly diagnosed [n = 60], 2-3 lines [n = 60], and ≥4 lines of therapy [n = 60]). Quality of life, symptom burden, and fatigue scores do not differ by lines of therapy. There are also no statistically significant differences in psychological distress by line of therapy. The rates of clinically significant depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms are 23.9%, 23.9%, and 24.4%, respectively. Most patients (84.7%) report that their oncologist told them their cancer was incurable, but only 30.6% acknowledge that they are terminally ill, and 42.0% report that they thought their cancer was incurable.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Psychological Distress , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/psychology , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Prognosis , Quality of Life/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of low-dose whole-body CT (WBCT) in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and precursor states. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 116 patients (mean age: 68 ± 11 years, 48% women) who underwent WBCT for the work-up or surveillance of MM or MM precursor disease. WBCTs were reviewed for the presence of MM-related bone disease and incidental findings requiring therapy. The medical records, results from bone marrow aspirations and biopsies and follow-up imaging studies were reviewed to assess the influence of WBCT on patient management. RESULTS: Whole-body CT led to a change in management in 32 patients (28%). Of those, 17 patients with MM precursor disease were found to have MM-related bone disease, 13 patients had progression of MM, requiring a change in treatment, in one patient hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed, requiring a change in therapy, and one patient had a rib lesion requiring intervention. In 65 patients (56%), WBCT was performed for surveillance of MM precursor disease or stable treated MM, and did not detect new lesions, thereby providing reassurance to the hematologist on disease status and management. In 15 patients (13%) WBCT was performed as a new baseline before a change or new therapy. In 4 patients (3%), WBCT was performed for a change in symptoms, but did not detect lesions that would lead to a change in management. CONCLUSION: Whole-body CT provides important information for disease monitoring and detection of incidental findings, thereby improving the management of patients with MM.
Subject(s)
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnostic imaging , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Whole Body Imaging , Aged , Biopsy , Female , Humans , Male , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Radiation DosageABSTRACT
We sought a regimen that incorporates optimal novel agents and balances efficacy with toxicity in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our study evaluated modified lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD lite) in this population and was administered over a 35-day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally on days 1-21; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 weekly subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally was given on the day of and day after bortezomib for 9 cycles followed by 6 cycles of consolidation with lenalidomide and bortezomib. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fifty-three eligible patients were screened between April 2013 and May 2015; 50 received at least one dose of therapy. Median age at study entry was 73 years (range 65-91). The ORR was 86% and 66% of patients achieved a very good partial response or better. Median PFS was 35·1 months (95% confidence interval 30·9-not reached) and median OS was not reached at a median follow-up of 30 months. Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 31 (62%) patients with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 symptoms. RVD lite is a well-tolerated and highly effective regimen, with robust PFS and OS, in the transplant-ineligible MM population.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/pharmacokinetics , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/pharmacokinetics , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lenalidomide/administration & dosage , Lenalidomide/pharmacokinetics , Male , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: BRAF V600 mutations occur in various nonmelanoma cancers. We undertook a histology-independent phase 2 "basket" study of vemurafenib in BRAF V600 mutation-positive nonmelanoma cancers. METHODS: We enrolled patients in six prespecified cancer cohorts; patients with all other tumor types were enrolled in a seventh cohort. A total of 122 patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive cancer were treated, including 27 patients with colorectal cancer who received vemurafenib and cetuximab. The primary end point was the response rate; secondary end points included progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: In the cohort with non-small-cell lung cancer, the response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20 to 67) and median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 10.8). In the cohort with Erdheim-Chester disease or Langerhans'-cell histiocytosis, the response rate was 43% (95% CI, 18 to 71); the median treatment duration was 5.9 months (range, 0.6 to 18.6), and no patients had disease progression during therapy. There were anecdotal responses among patients with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, anaplastic thyroid cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, salivary-duct cancer, ovarian cancer, and clear-cell sarcoma and among patients with colorectal cancer who received vemurafenib and cetuximab. Safety was similar to that in prior studies of vemurafenib for melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF V600 appears to be a targetable oncogene in some, but not all, nonmelanoma cancers. Preliminary vemurafenib activity was observed in non-small-cell lung cancer and in Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans'-cell histiocytosis. The histologic context is an important determinant of response in BRAF V600-mutated cancers. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01524978.).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Histiocytosis/drug therapy , Indoles/therapeutic use , Mutation , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Histiocytosis/genetics , Humans , Indoles/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/genetics , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , VemurafenibABSTRACT
Bone is a common site for malignant involvement, either as a site of metastasis, especially in breast or prostate cancer, or as a defining characteristic of the disease, as in multiple myeloma. Bone disease is a major source of morbidity, and half of patients with bone involvement develop skeletal-related events such as pathological fractures or cord compression requiring surgery and/or radiation. Skeletal involvement also increases mortality, as pathologic fractures increase the risk of dying by 20-40%. Osteoclast inhibition with bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid and recently denosumab has been a significant improvement for bone disease. This review will focus on denosumab in the treatment of bone metastases and highlight the recent findings in multiple myeloma.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Diseases/drug therapy , Bone Diseases/etiology , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Diseases/metabolism , Bone Diseases/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/metabolism , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Clinical Trials as Topic , Denosumab/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Humans , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Osteoclasts/drug effects , Osteoclasts/metabolism , RANK Ligand/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Zoledronic AcidABSTRACT
In this double-blind, Phase 2 study, 220 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive placebo (N = 72), tabalumab 100 mg (N = 74), or tabalumab 300 mg (N = 74), each in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg and subcutaneous bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 on a 21-day cycle. No significant intergroup differences were observed among primary (median progression-free survival [mPFS]) or secondary efficacy outcomes. The mPFS was 6·6, 7·5 and 7·6 months for the tabalumab 100, 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively (tabalumab 100 mg vs. placebo Hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1·13 [0·80-1·59], P = 0·480; tabalumab 300 mg vs. placebo HR [95% CI] = 1·03 [0·72-1·45], P = 0·884). The most commonly-reported treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (37%), fatigue (37%), diarrhoea (35%) and constipation (32%). Across treatments, patients with low baseline BAFF (also termed TNFSF13B) expression (n = 162) had significantly longer mPFS than those with high BAFF expression (n = 55), using the 75th percentile cut-off point (mPFS [95% CI] = 8·3 [7·0-9·3] months vs. 5·8 [3·7-6·6] months; HR [95% CI] = 1·59 [1·11-2·29], P = 0·015). Although generally well tolerated, PFS was not improved during treatment with tabalumab compared to placebo. A higher dose of 300 mg tabalumab did not improve efficacy compared to the 100 mg dose. Nonetheless, BAFF appears to have some prognostic value in patients with multiple myeloma.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Salvage Therapy/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bone disease is a defining characteristic of multiple myeloma (MM) and the major cause of morbidity. It manifests as lytic lesions or osteopenia and is often associated with severe pain, pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, vertebral collapse, and hypercalcemia. Here, we have reviewed recent data on understanding its biology and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: The imbalance between bone regeneration and bone resorption underlies the pathogenesis of osteolytic bone disease. Increased osteoclast proliferation and activity accompanied by inhibition of bone-forming osteoblasts leads to progressive bone loss and lytic lesions. Although tremendous progress has been made, MM remains an incurable disease. Novel agents targeting bone disease are under investigation with the goal of not only preventing bone loss and improving bone quality but also harnessing MM tumor growth. Current data illustrate that the interactions between MM cells and the tumor-bone microenvironment contribute to the bone disease and continued MM progression. A better understanding of this microenvironment is critical for novel therapeutic treatments of both MM and associated bone disease.
Subject(s)
Bone Diseases, Metabolic/metabolism , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Hypercalcemia/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Osteolysis/metabolism , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/drug therapy , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/etiology , Cancer Pain/etiology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Fractures, Spontaneous/etiology , Humans , Hypercalcemia/etiology , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Osteoblasts/cytology , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteoclasts/cytology , Osteoclasts/metabolism , Osteolysis/drug therapy , Osteolysis/etiology , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
Bone involvement manifesting as osteolytic bone disease (OBD) or osteopenia is one of the defining features of multiple myeloma (MM). Osteolytic lesions develop in nearly 90% of patients with MM, and these are frequently complicated by skeleton-related events (SREs) such as severe bone pain, pathologic fractures, vertebral collapse, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression. SREs have a negative effect on patients' quality of life and affect their long-term outcomes, including survival. In MM, the delicate balance between bone formation and bone destruction is perturbed. OBD is a consequence of increased osteoclast activation along with osteoblast inhibition, which alter bone remodeling. Although MM remains incurable, tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of the disease. As such, there is a need to address the symptoms of the disease that affect quality of life and, ultimately, overall survival. Novel agents targeting OBD are promising therapeutic strategies not only for the treatment of MM OBD but also for the treatment of MM itself. In addition to bisphosphonates, several novel agents are currently under investigation for their positive effect on bone remodeling via osteoclast inhibition or osteoblast stimulation. Future studies will look to combine or sequence all of these agents to improve quality of life, decrease the symptoms of MM OBD, and enhance antitumor activity.
Subject(s)
Bone Diseases/etiology , Bone Diseases/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Animals , Biomarkers , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Diseases/diagnosis , Bone Diseases/metabolism , Diagnostic Imaging , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Osteoblasts/metabolism , Osteoclasts/metabolism , Osteocytes/metabolism , Osteolysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are an important new class of therapeutics for treating multiple myeloma. Ricolinostat (ACY-1215) is the first oral selective HDAC6 inhibitor with reduced class I HDAC activity to be studied clinically. Motivated by findings from preclinical studies showing potent synergistic activity with ricolinostat and lenalidomide, our goal was to assess the safety and preliminary activity of the combination of ricolinostat with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this multicentre phase 1b trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with previously treated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma from five cancer centres in the USA. Inclusion criteria included a Karnofsky Performance Status score of at least 70, measureable disease, adequate bone marrow reserve, adequate hepatic function, and a creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL per min. Exclusion criteria included previous exposure to HDAC inhibitors; previous allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; previous autologous stem-cell transplantation within 12 weeks of baseline; active systemic infection; malignancy within the last 5 years; known or suspected HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection; a QTc Fridericia of more than 480 ms; and substantial cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, or other medical disorders. We gave escalating doses (from 40-240 mg once daily to 160 mg twice daily) of oral ricolinostat according to a standard 3â+â3 design according to three different regimens on days 1-21 with a conventional 28 day schedule of oral lenalidomide (from 15 mg [in one cohort] to 25 mg [in all other cohorts] once daily) and oral dexamethasone (40 mg weekly). Primary outcomes were dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose of ricolinostat in this combination, and the dose and schedule of ricolinostat recommended for further phase 2 investigation. Secondary outcomes were the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ricolinostat in this combination and the preliminary anti-tumour activity of this treatment. The trial is closed to accrual and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01583283. FINDINGS: Between July 12, 2012, and Aug 20, 2015, we enrolled 38 patients. We observed two dose-limiting toxicities with ricolinostat 160 mg twice daily: one (2%) grade 3 syncope and one (2%) grade 3 myalgia event in different cohorts. A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. We chose ricolinostat 160 mg once daily on days 1-21 of a 28 day cycle as the recommended dose for future phase 2 studies in combination with lenalidomide 25 mg and dexamethasone 40 mg. The most common adverse events were fatigue (grade 1-2 in 14 [37%] patients; grade 3 in seven [18%]) and diarrhoea (grade 1-2 in 15 [39%] patients; grade 3 in two [5%]). Our pharmacodynamic studies showed that at clinically relevant doses, ricolinostat selectively inhibits HDAC6 while retaining a low and tolerable level of class I HDAC inhibition. The pharmacokinetics of ricolinostat and lenalidomide were not affected by co-administration. In a preliminary assessment of antitumour activity, 21 (55% [95% CI 38-71]) of 38 patients had an overall response. INTERPRETATION: The findings from this study provide preliminary evidence that ricolinostat is a safe and well tolerated selective HDAC6 inhibitor, which might partner well with lenalidomide and dexamethasone to enhance their efficacy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. FUNDING: Acetylon Pharmaceuticals.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Aged , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Female , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Humans , Hydroxamic Acids/administration & dosage , Hydroxamic Acids/adverse effects , Lenalidomide , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/adverse effects , Thalidomide/analogs & derivativesABSTRACT
In this prospective, multicenter, phase 2 study, 64 patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) received up to 8 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), lenalidomide 15 mg/day (days 1-14), and dexamethasone 40/20 mg/day (cycles 1-4) and 20/10 mg/day (cycles 5-8) (days of/after bortezomib dosing). Responding patients could receive maintenance therapy. Median age was 65 years; 66% were male, 58% had relapsed and 42% had relapsed and refractory MM, and 53%, 75%, and 6% had received prior bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide, respectively. Forty-eight of 64 patients (75%; 90% confidence interval, 65-84) were alive without progressive disease at 6 months (primary end point). The rate of partial response or better was 64%; median duration of response was 8.7 months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 9.5 and 30 months, respectively (median follow-up: 44 months). Common treatment-related toxicities included sensory neuropathy (53%), fatigue (50%), and neutropenia (42%); common grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and lymphopenia (11%). Grade 3 motor neuropathy was reported in 2 patients. Lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone appears effective and tolerable in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM, demonstrating substantial activity among patients with diverse prior therapies and adverse prognostic characteristics. This trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00378209.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Boronic Acids/administration & dosage , Bortezomib , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Lenalidomide , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Recurrence , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antigens, CD19/immunology , Antigens, CD19/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Lymphoma, B-Cell/therapy , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Biological Products , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell/immunology , Lymphoma, B-Cell/pathology , Male , Neoplasm Grading , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Everolimus, an oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has been studied in multiple myeloma (MM) but lacks significant single agent activity. Based on preclinical studies showing synergistic activity of mTOR inhibitors with lenalidomide, we studied the combination of lenalidomide and everolimus in relapsed or refractory MM in a phase I clinical trial. We assessed patient samples using gene expression, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry to probe the mTOR pathway. Twenty-six patients were evaluable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The maximum tolerated dose was lenalidomide 15 mg and everolimus 5 mg for 21 d with a 7 d rest period. Grade 3/4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (35%) and neutropenia (42%). The overall response rate was 65% (1 complete response + 4 partial response + 10 minimal response). The median progression-free survival was 5·5 months and median overall survival was 29·5 months. Biomarker data demonstrated downregulation of phosphorylated p70S6K. Gene expression profiling suggested activation of mTOR in responders versus non-responders. The combination of lenalidomide and everolimus was well tolerated with predictable toxicities and showed responses in a heavily pretreated population. When confirmed with larger patient numbers, this analysis may guide patient selection for future clinical trials of mTOR inhibition in MM.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Everolimus , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lenalidomide , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Recurrence , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
As patients with multiple myeloma live longer, helping them live better through improvements in supportive care is equally as vital. Intrinsic to the disease are bone-related complications at presentation and over the course of illness. Bisphosphonates have been an important therapy for ameliorating the risk of skeletal-related events, and work is ongoing to determine their optimal schedule. Patients with multiple myeloma also encounter several challenges related to their treatment, including peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic complications, and infections. These challenges are being addressed through a better understanding of the risk factors for developing these complications and by mitigating these risks through better dosing schemas and prophylaxis.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , HumansABSTRACT
Immunotherapeutic strategies, specifically T-cell-redirected therapies, have been transformative in the context of multiple myeloma (MM). With the approval of two chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) drug products and three bispecific antibodies/T-cell engagers (bsAbs/TCEs) in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), the 20th annual IMS meeting dedicated a session to the practical aspects of these therapies. Here, we highlight the discussion during this session, including the role of CAR-T and bsAb therapies in frontline MM treatment, management of acute toxicities, prevention and management of infections, and finally treatment sequencing of T-cell redirected therapies.
Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Bispecific/pharmacologyABSTRACT
This phase 1/2 trial evaluated combination lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (RVDD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients received RVDD at 4 dose levels, including the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Patients with a very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) after cycle 4 proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation or continued treatment. The primary objectives were MTD evaluation and response to RVDD after 4 and 8 cycles. Seventy-two patients received a median of 4.5 cycles. The MTDs were lenalidomide 25 mg, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2), and dexamethasone 20/10 mg, as established with 3-week cycles. The most common adverse events were fatigue, constipation, sensory neuropathy, and infection; there was no treatment-related mortality. Response rates after 4 and 8 cycles were 96% and 95% partial response or better, 57% and 65% ≥ VGPR, and 29% and 35% complete or near-complete response, respectively. After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The estimated 18-month PFS and OS were 80.8% and 98.6%, respectively. RVDD was generally well tolerated and highly active, warranting further study in newly diagnosed MM patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00724568.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Boronic Acids/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Boronic Acids/adverse effects , Bortezomib , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lenalidomide , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Pyrazines/adverse effects , Survival Rate , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Radiation therapy (RT) may play an important role prior to and following BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma (MM). We report a series of 13 patients: 5 patients received bridging RT pre-CAR T, 4 patients received salvage RT post-CAR T failure, and 4 patients received both. There was no worsening of CAR-T- or RT-related toxicities. The RT in-field local control rate was 100%, with a median follow-up after each RT course of 7.3 months. RT as a bridging and salvage strategy is safe, feasible, and offers excellent local control in MM patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy.