Stromal lymphocytes are associated with upgrade of B3 breast lesions.

Various histopathological, clinical and imaging parameters have been evaluated to identify a subset of women diagnosed with lesions with uncertain malignant potential (B3 or BIRADS 3/4A lesions) who could safely be observed rather than being treated with surgical excision, with little impact on clinical practice. The primary reason for surgery is to rule out an upgrade to either ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer, which occurs in up to 30% of patients. We hypothesised that the stromal immune microenvironment could indicate the presence of carcinoma associated with a ductal B3 lesion and that this could be detected in biopsies by counting lymphocytes as a predictive biomarker for upgrade. A higher number of lymphocytes in the surrounding specialised stroma was observed in upgraded ductal and papillary B3 lesions than non-upgraded (p < 0.01, negative binomial model, n = 307). We developed a model using lymphocytes combined with age and the type of lesion, which was predictive of upgrade with an area under the curve of 0.82 [95% confidence interval 0.77-0.87]. The model can identify some patients at risk of upgrade with high sensitivity, but with limited specificity. Assessing the tumour microenvironment including stromal lymphocytes may contribute to reducing unnecessary surgeries in the clinic, but additional predictive features are needed.

Novel 2 Gene Signatures Associated With Breast Cancer Proliferation: Insights From Predictive Differential Gene Expression Analysis.

The use of proliferation markers provides valuable information about the rate of tumor growth, which can guide treatment decisions. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the optimal molecular markers or tests to use in clinical practice. Integrating gene expression data with clinical and histopathologic parameters enhances our understanding of disease processes, facilitates the identification of precise prognostic predictors, and supports the development of effective therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this study was to apply an integrated approach that combines morphologic, clinical, and bioinformatic data to reveal effective regulators of proliferation. Whole-slide images generated from hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer (BC) database (n = 1053) alongside their transcriptomic and clinical data were used to identify genes differentially expressed between tumors with high and low mitotic scores. Genes enriched in the cell-cycle pathway were used to predict the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Ten hub genes (ORC6, SKP2, SMC1B, CDKN2A, CDC25B, E2F1, E2F2, ORC1, PTTG1, and CDC25A) were identified using CytoHubba a Cytoscape plugin. In a multivariate Cox regression model, ORC6 and SKP2 were predictors of survival independent of existing methods of proliferation assessment including mitotic score and Ki67. The prognostic ability of these genes was validated using the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium, Nottingham cohort, Uppsala cohort, and a combined multicentric cohort. The protein expression of these 2 genes was investigated on a large cohort of BC cases, and they were significantly associated with poor prognosis and patient outcome. A positive correlation between ORC6 and SKP2 mRNA and protein expression was observed. Our study has identified 2 gene signatures, ORC6 and SKP2, which play a significant role in BC proliferation. These genes surpassed both mitotic scores and Ki67 in multivariate analysis. Their identification provides potential opportunities for the development of targeted treatments for patients with BC.

Tumour 63 protein (p63) in breast pathology: biology, immunohistochemistry, diagnostic applications, and pitfalls.

Tumour protein 63 (p63) is a transcription factor of the p53 gene family, encoded by the TP63 gene located at chromosome 3q28, which regulates the activity of genes involved in growth and development of the ectoderm and derived tissues. p63 protein is normally expressed in the nuclei of the basal cell layer of glandular organs, including breast, in squamous epithelium and in urothelium. p63 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining has several applications in diagnostic breast pathology. It is commonly used to demonstrate myoepithelial cells at the epithelial stromal interface to differentiate benign and in situ lesions from invasive carcinoma and to characterize and classify papillary lesions including the distinction of breast intraduct papilloma from skin hidradenoma. p63 IHC is also used to identify and profile lesions showing myoepithelial cell and/or squamous differentiation, e.g. adenomyoepithelioma, salivary gland-like tumours including adenoid cystic carcinoma, and metaplastic breast carcinoma including low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma. This article reviews the applications of p63 IHC in diagnostic breast pathology and outlines a practical approach to the diagnosis and characterization of breast lesions through the identification of normal and abnormal p63 protein expression. The biology of p63, the range of available antibodies with emphasis on staining specificity and sensitivity, and pitfalls in interpretation are also discussed. The TP63 gene in humans, which shows a specific genomic structure, resulting in either TAp63 (p63) isoform or ΔNp63 (p40) isoform. As illustrated in the figure, both isoforms contain a DNA-binding domain (Orange box) and an oligomerization domain (Grey box). TAp63 contains an N-terminal transactivation (TA) domain (Green box), while ΔNp63 has an alternative terminus (Yellow box). Antibodies against conventional pan-p63 (TP63) bind to the DNA binding domain common to both isoforms (TAp63 and p40) and does not distinguish between them. Antibodies against TAp63 bind to the N-terminal TA domain, while antibodies specific to ΔNp63 (p40) bind to the alternative terminus. Each isoform has variant isotypes (α, ß, γ, δ, and ε).

Nottingham prognostic x (NPx): a risk stratification tool in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: a validation study.

AIMS: In this study, we validate the use of Nottingham Prognostic x (NPx), consisting of tumour size, tumour grade, progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki67 in luminal BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two large cohorts of luminal early-stage BC (n = 2864) were included. PR and Ki67 expression were assessed using full-face resection samples using immunohistochemistry. NPx was calculated and correlated with clinical variables and outcome, together with Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS), that is frequently used as a risk stratifier in luminal BC. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, 38% of patients were classified as high risk using NPx which showed significant association with parameters characteristics of aggressive tumour behaviour and shorter survival (P < 0.0001). NPx classified the moderate Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) risk group (n = 1812) into two distinct prognostic subgroups. Of the 82% low-risk group, only 3.8% developed events. Contrasting this, 14% of the high-risk patients developed events during follow-up. A strong association was observed between NPx and Oncotype Dx RS (P < 0.0001), where 66% of patients with intermediate risk RS who had subsequent distant metastases also had a high-risk NPx. CONCLUSION: NPx is a reliable prognostic index in patients with luminal early-stage BC, and in selected patients may be used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations.

ATF4 as a Prognostic Marker and Modulator of Glutamine Metabolism in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: ATF4, a stress-responsive transcription factor that upregulates adaptive genes, is a potential prognostic marker and modulator of glutamine metabolism in breast cancer. However, its exact role remains to be elucidated. METHODS: ATF4 expression was evaluated at genomic and transcriptomic levels using METABRIC (n=1980), GeneMiner (n=4712) and KM-Plotter datasets. Proteomic expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry (n=2225) in the Nottingham Primary Breast Carcinoma Series. ATF4 genomic copy number (CN) variation and mRNA/protein in association with clinicopathological parameters, amino acid transporters (AATs), and patient outcome was investigated. RESULTS: Genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic overexpression of ATF4 was associated with more aggressive ER-negative tumours. ATF4 mRNA and protein expression were significantly associated with increased expression of glutamine related AATs including SLC1A5 (p<0.01) and SLC7A11 (p<0.02). High ATF4 and SLC1A5 protein expression was significantly associated with shorter breast cancer-specific survival (p<0.01), especially in ER+ tumours (p<0.01), while high ATF4 and SLC7A11 protein expression was associated with shorter survival (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a complex interplay between ATF4 and AATs in breast cancer biology and underscore the potential role for ATF4 as a prognostic marker in ER+ breast cancer, offering a unique opportunity for risk stratification and personalised treatment strategies.

Current status and prospects of artificial intelligence in breast cancer pathology: convolutional neural networks to prospective Vision Transformers.

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women, and its diagnosis requires the accurate identification and classification of histological features for effective patient management. Artificial intelligence, particularly through deep learning, represents the next frontier in cancer diagnosis and management. Notably, the use of convolutional neural networks and emerging Vision Transformers (ViT) has been reported to automate pathologists' tasks, including tumor detection and classification, in addition to improving the efficiency of pathology services. Deep learning applications have also been extended to the prediction of protein expression, molecular subtype, mutation status, therapeutic efficacy, and outcome prediction directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, bypassing the need for immunohistochemistry or genetic testing. This review explores the current status and prospects of deep learning in breast cancer diagnosis with a focus on whole-slide image analysis. Artificial intelligence applications are increasingly applied to many tasks in breast pathology ranging from disease diagnosis to outcome prediction, thus serving as valuable tools for assisting pathologists and supporting breast cancer management.

The Clinicopathological Significance of the Cyclin D1/E1-Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK2/4/6)-Retinoblastoma (RB1/pRB1) Pathway in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers.

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK2, CDK4, CDK6), cyclin D1, cyclin E1 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma (pRB1) are key regulators of the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint and may influence platinum response in ovarian cancers. CDK2/4/6 inhibitors are emerging targets in ovarian cancer therapeutics. In the current study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of the CDK2/4/6-cyclin D1/E1-pRB1 axis in clinical ovarian cancers (OC). The CDK2/4/6, cyclin D1/E1 and RB1/pRB1 protein expression were investigated in 300 ovarian cancers and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes. CDK2/4/6, cyclin D1/E1 and RB1 mRNA expression were evaluated in the publicly available ovarian TCGA dataset. We observed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for CDK2/4/6, cyclins D1/E1 and RB1/pRB1 in OCs with varying percentages. Increased nuclear CDK2 and nuclear cyclin E1 expression was linked with poor progression-free survival (PFS) and a shorter overall survival (OS). Nuclear CDK6 was associated with poor OS. The cytoplasmic expression of CDK4, cyclin D1 and cyclin E1 also has predictive and/or prognostic significance in OCs. In the multivariate analysis, nuclear cyclin E1 was an independent predictor of poor PFS. Tumours with high nuclear cyclin E1/high nuclear CDK2 have a worse PFS and OS. Detailed bioinformatics in the TCGA cohort showed a positive correlation between cyclin E1 and CDK2. We also showed that cyclin-E1-overexpressing tumours are enriched for genes involved in insulin signalling and release. Our data not only identified the prognostic/predictive significance of these key cell cycle regulators but also demonstrate the importance of sub-cellular localisation. CDK2 targeting in cyclin-E1-amplified OCs could be a rational approach.

Clinicopathological Significance of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 (CDK2) in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancers.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is a key cell cycle regulator, with essential roles during G1/S transition. The clinicopathological significance of CDK2 in ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and early-stage invasive breast cancers (BCs) remains largely unknown. Here, we evaluated CDK2's protein expression in 479 BC samples and 216 DCIS specimens. Analysis of CDK2 transcripts was completed in the METABRIC cohort (n = 1980) and TCGA cohort (n = 1090), respectively. A high nuclear CDK2 protein expression was significantly associated with aggressive phenotypes, including a high tumour grade, lymph vascular invasion, a poor Nottingham prognostic index (all p-values < 0.0001), and shorter survival (p = 0.006), especially in luminal BC (p = 0.009). In p53-mutant BC, high nuclear CDK2 remained linked with worse survival (p = 0.01). In DCIS, high nuclear/low cytoplasmic co-expression showed significant association with a high tumour grade (p = 0.043), triple-negative and HER2-enriched molecular subtypes (p = 0.01), Comedo necrosis (p = 0.024), negative ER status (p = 0.004), negative PR status (p < 0.0001), and a high proliferation index (p < 0.0001). Tumours with high CDK2 transcripts were more likely to have higher expressions of genes involved in the cell cycle, homologous recombination, and p53 signaling. We provide compelling evidence that high CDK2 is a feature of aggressive breast cancers. The clinical evaluation of CDK2 inhibitors in early-stage BC patients will have a clinical impact.

Pathological Changes Following Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy (NAET): A Multicentre Study of 391 Breast Cancers.

Oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is generally well responsive to endocrine therapy. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) is increasingly being used for downstaging ER-positive tumours. This study aims to analyse the effect of NAET on a well-characterised cohort of ER-positive BC with particular emphasis on receptor expression. This is a retrospective United Kingdom (UK) multicentre study of 391 patients who received NAET between October 2012 and October 2020. Detailed analyses of the paired pre- and post-NAET morphological changes and hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were performed. The median duration of NAET was 86 days, with median survival and overall survival rates of 380 days and 93.4%, respectively. A total of 90.3% of cases achieved a pathological partial response, with a significantly higher rate of response in the HER2-low cancers. Following NAET, BC displayed some pathological changes involving the tumour stroma including central scarring and an increase in tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumour cell morphology. Significant changes associated with the duration of NAET were observed in tumour grade (30.6% of cases), with downgrading identified in 19.3% of tumours (p < 0.001). The conversion of ER status from positive to low or negative was insignificant. The conversion of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status to negative status was observed in 31.3% and 38.1% of cases, respectively (p < 0.001). HER2-low breast cancer decreased from 63% to 37% following NAET in the paired samples. Significant morphological and biomarker changes involving PR and HER2 expression occurred following NAET. The findings support biomarker testing on pre-treatment core biopsies and post-treatment residual carcinoma.

The clinical value of progesterone receptor expression in luminal breast cancer: A study of a large cohort with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The routine assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) expression in breast cancer (BC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of PR expression in luminal BC, with emphasis on the definition of positivity and its prognostic significance as compared to Ki67 expression. METHODS: A large cohort (n = 1924) of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative BC was included. PR was immunohistochemically (IHC) stained on full face sections and core needle biopsies (CNB) where the optimal scoring cutoff was evaluated. In addition, the association of PR with other clinicopathological factors, cellular proliferation, disease outcome, and response to adjuvant therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Although several cutoffs showed prognostic significance, the optimal cutoff to categorize PR expression into two clinically distinct prognostic groups on CNB was 10%. PR negativity showed a significant association with features of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Multivariate analyses indicated that the association between PR negativity and poor outcome was independent of tumor grade, size, node stage, and Ki67. PR negativity showed independent association with shorter survival in patients who received endocrine therapy whereas Ki67did not. CONCLUSION: PR IHC expression provides independent prognostic value superior to Ki67. Routine assessment of PR expression in BC using 10% cutoff in the clinical setting is recommended. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, we have established an optimal approach to determine the prognostic value of progesterone receptor expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. To do this, the levels of progesterone receptor were measured in a large cohort of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. We have refined the definition of progesterone receptor positivity in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. We show that progesterone receptor expression adds prognostic and predictive value of endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients, and our results show that the absence of progesterone receptor is associated with poorer outcomes independent of tumor grade, size, node stage, and Ki67 expression.

The clinical significance of cyclin B1 (CCNB1) in invasive breast cancer with emphasis on its contribution to lymphovascular invasion development.

BACKGROUND: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is regulated through complex molecular mechanisms. Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) was previously determined as being associated with LVI using large cohorts of breast cancer (BC) and artificial neural network (ANN) technique. In this study, we aimed to assess the association between CCNB1 and LVI, other clinicopathological and other LVI-related biomarkers at the molecular (RNA transcriptomic) and proteomic levels in BC. METHODS: Two transcriptomic BC cohorts (n = 2834) were used to assess the association between the expression of CCNB1 at the mRNA level and clinicopathological characteristics and patient outcome. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) from a well-characterised BC cohort (n = 2480) with long-term outcome were also used to assess the clinical significance of CCNB1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: High CCNB1 mRNA expression was associated with aggressive tumour behaviour, including LVI, larger size, higher tumour grade, high lymph nodal stage, hormonal receptor negativity, HER2 positivity and poor clinical outcome (all p < 0.0001). Similarly, high CCNB1 protein expression was associated with higher tumour grade, hormonal receptor negativity and HER2 positivity (all p < 0.0001). Additionally, there was a significant association between CCNB1- and LVI-related biomarkers including N-cadherin, P-cadherin and TWIST2 at the transcriptomic and proteomic level. Multivariate analysis revealed that CCNB1 was an independent predictor of shorter BC-specific survival (HR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.5; p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: CCNB1 is a key gene associated with LVI in BC and has prognostic value. More functional studies are warranted to unravel the mechanistic role of CCNB1 in the development of LVI.

Prognostic significance of microinvasion with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with invasive carcinoma ≤ 1 mm in size is defined as DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS/microinvasion) rather than as invasive breast carcinoma. The number of patients with microinvasion accounts for < 1% of all breast cancer in published studies. As the numbers are limited, the prognostic significance of DCIS/microinvasion has not been clearly elucidated. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the survival differences between patients with DCIS/microinvasion and those with pure DCIS. METHODS: A meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was performed. We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) and included observational studies published in English that contained survival details of patients with either DCIS or DCIS/microinvasion. RESULTS: This study identified 26 studies that described the clinicopathological characteristics of patients in both the DCIS and DCIS/microinvasion groups. Survival differences were evaluated in 10 of 26 studies. Disease-free survival and loco-regional recurrence-free survival were significantly shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in those with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.08; p = 0.01 and hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-4.41; p = 0.001, respectively). Both overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival tended to be shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in patients with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.63-4.23; p = 0.31 and hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-4.66; p = 0.19, respectively) but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that DCIS/microinvasion may display more aggressive biological and clinical behavior than pure DCIS, highlighting the potential need for closer follow-up and consideration of adjuvant treatment strategies in DCIS patients with microinvasive disease.

The Clinical and Biological Significance of Estrogen Receptor-Low Positive Breast Cancer.

Estrogen receptor (ER) status in breast cancer (BC) is determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) with nuclear expression in ≥1% of cells defined as ER-positive. BC with 1%-9% expression (ER-low-positive), is a clinically and biologically unique subgroup. In this study, we hypothesized that ER-low-positive BC represents a heterogeneous group with a mixture of ER-positive and ER-negative tumor, which may explain their divergent clinical behavior. A large BC cohort (n = 8171) was investigated and categorized into 3 groups: ER-low-positive (1%-9%), ER-positive (≥10%), and ER-negative (<1%) where clinicopathological and outcome characteristics were compared. A subset of ER-low-positive cases was further evaluated using IHC, RNAscope, and RT-qPCR. PAM50 subtyping and ESR1 mRNA expression levels were assessed in ER-low-positive cases within The Cancer Genome Atlas data set. The reliability of image analysis software in assessment of ER expression in the ER-low-positive category was also assessed. ER-low-positive tumors constituted <2% of BC cases examined and showed significant clinicopathological similarity to ER-negative tumors. Most of these tumors were nonluminal types showing low ESR1 mRNA expression. Further validation of ER status revealed that 45% of these tumors were ER-negative with repeated IHC staining and confirmed by RNAscope and RT-qPCR. ER-low-positive tumors diagnosed on needle core biopsy were enriched with false-positive ER staining. BCs with 10% ER behaved similar to ER-positive, rather than ER-negative or low-positive BCs. Moderate concordance was found in assessment of ER-low-positive tumors, and this was not improved by image analysis. Routinely diagnosed ER-low-positive BC includes a proportion of ER-negative cases. We recommend repeat testing of BC showing 1%-9% ER expression and using a cutoff ≥10% expression to define ER positivity to help better inform treatment decisions.

An update on the pathological classification of breast cancer.

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease, encompassing a diverse spectrum of tumours with varying morphological, biological, and clinical phenotypes. Although tumours may show phenotypic overlap, they often display different biological behaviour and response to therapy. Advances in high-throughput molecular techniques and bioinformatics have contributed to improved understanding of BC biology and refinement of molecular taxonomy with the identification of specific molecular subclasses. Although the traditional pathological morphological classification of BC is of paramount importance and provides diagnostic and prognostic information, current interest focusses on the use of a single gene and multigene assays to stratify BC into distinct groups to guide decisions on systemic therapy. This review considers approaches to the classification of BC, including their limitations, and with particular emphasis on the fundamental role of morphology in establishing an accurate diagnosis of primary invasive carcinoma of breast origin. This forms the basis for further morphological characterization and for all other approaches to BC classification that are used to provide prognostic and therapeutic predictive information.

An international unified approach to reporting and grading invasive breast cancer. An overview of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) initiative.

Standardised reporting of breast cancer key pathology data has become the norm in some parts of the world, but are based on national or regional guidelines that differ in certain aspects, resulting in divergent reporting practices and a lack of comparability of data internationally. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR), a global alliance of major (inter-)national pathology and cancer organizations, have recently produced a new international dataset for the pathology reporting of breast cancer, including resection specimens with invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. This initiative aims at providing an international unified approach to reporting cancer. The guidance was prepared by an international expert panel consisting of experienced breast pathologists, a surgeon, and an oncologist. The dataset includes core (essential) and noncore (optional) data items based on a critical review and discussion of current evidence. Commentary is provided for each data item to explain the rationale for selection, its clinical relevance, and to highlight potential areas of disagreement or lack of evidence, in which case a consensus position was formulated. The process concludes with international public consultation, before ratification and publication on the free open access ICCR website, with a synoptic reporting guide. The key aim is to promote high-quality, standardised pathology reporting that can be used worldwide. Histological grade, tumour size, and oestrogen receptor status are used in this article to illustrate this process and the detail provided to support its inclusion.

Combined proliferation and apoptosis index provides better risk stratification in breast cancer.

AIMS: Breast cancer (BC) risk stratification is critical for predicting behaviour and guiding management decision-making. Despite the well-established prognostic value of cellular proliferation in BC, the interplay between proliferation and apoptosis remains to be defined. In this study, we hypothesised that the combined proliferation and apoptosis indices can provide a more accurate in-vivo growth rate measure and a precise prognostic predictor. METHODS AND RESULTS: Apoptotic and mitotic figures were counted in whole slide images (WSI) generated from haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of 1545 BC cases derived from two well-defined BC cohorts. Counts were carried out visually within defined areas. There was a significant correlation between mitosis and apoptosis scores. High apoptotic counts were associated with features of aggressive behaviour, including high grade, high pleomorphism score and hormonal receptor negativity. Although the mitotic index (MI) and apoptotic index (AI) were independent prognostic indicators, the prognostic value was synergistically higher when combined. BC patients with a high combined AI and MI had the shortest survival. Replacing the mitosis score with the mitosis-apoptosis index in the Nottingham grading system revealed that the modified grade with the new score had a higher significant association with BC-specific survival with a higher hazard ratio. CONCLUSION: Apoptotic figures count provides additional prognostic value in BC when combined with MI; such a combination can be implemented to assess the behaviour of BC and provides an accurate prognostic indicator. This can be considered when using artificial intelligence algorithms to assess proliferation in BC.

Improving mitotic cell counting accuracy and efficiency using phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3) antibody counterstained with haematoxylin and eosin as part of breast cancer grading.

BACKGROUND: Mitotic count in breast cancer is an important prognostic marker. Unfortunately, substantial inter- and intraobserver variation exists when pathologists manually count mitotic figures. To alleviate this problem, we developed a new technique incorporating both haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and phosphorylated histone H3 (PHH3), a marker highly specific to mitotic figures, and compared it to visual scoring of mitotic figures using H&E only. METHODS: Two full-face sections from 97 cases were cut, one stained with H&E only, and the other was stained with PHH3 and counterstained with H&E (PHH3-H&E). Counting mitoses using PHH3-H&E was compared to traditional mitoses scoring using H&E in terms of reproducibility, scoring time, and the ability to detect mitosis hotspots. We assessed the agreement between manual and image analysis-assisted scoring of mitotic figures using H&E and PHH3-H&E-stained cells. The diagnostic performance of PHH3 in detecting mitotic figures in terms of sensitivity and specificity was measured. Finally, PHH3 replaced the mitosis score in a multivariate analysis to assess its significance. RESULTS: Pathologists detected significantly higher mitotic figures using the PHH3-H&E (median ± SD, 20 ± 33) compared with H&E alone (median ± SD, 16 ± 25), P < 0.001. The concordance between pathologists in identifying mitotic figures was highest when using the dual PHH3-H&E technique; in addition, it highlighted mitotic figures at low power, allowing better agreement on choosing the hotspot area (k = 0.842) in comparison with standard H&E (k = 0.625). A better agreement between image analysis-assisted software and the human eye was observed for PHH3-stained mitotic figures. When the mitosis score was replaced with PHH3 in a Cox regression model with other grade components, PHH3 was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio [HR] 5.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92-16.69; P = 0.002), and even showed a more significant association with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) than mitosis (HR 3.63, 95% CI 1.49-8.86; P = 0.005) and Ki67 (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Using PHH3-H&E-stained slides can reliably be used in routine scoring of mitotic figures and integrating both techniques will compensate for each other's limitations and improve diagnostic accuracy, quality, and precision.

Second opinion (external specialist referral) practice of breast pathology: the Nottingham experience.

AIMS: Breast pathology is a challenging field, and discrepancies in diagnoses exist and can affect patient management. This study aims to review a breast referral practice and assess the pattern and frequency of breast lesions sent for an external expert review and evaluate potential impacts on patients' care. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty cases that were referred to Nottingham City Hospital for a second opinion between 2019 and 2022 which have slides and reports were retrieved and reviewed. Reasons for referral, initial diagnosis, proffered specialist opinion and any discrepancy or potential impacts of management were assessed. The most frequent entities were papillary lesions (19%), fibroepithelial lesions (17%), invasive carcinomas that were sent for confirmation of the invasive diagnosis or subtyping of the invasive tumour (17%), intraductal epithelial proliferation with atypia (9%) and spindle cell lesions (8%). Other entities included biphasic tumours such as adenomyoepithelioma, as well as vascular and nipple lesions. Few cases were sent for prognostic classification or comments on the management, and in occasional cases no initial diagnosis was offered. After reviewing the cases by the expert pathologists, the initial diagnosis was confirmed or one of the suggested diagnoses was preferred in 79% of cases, including 129 cases (17%) in which the opinion resulted minor changes in the management. Significant changes in the classification of lesions were made in 132 cases (18%) which resulted in significant change in the patient management recommendation. In 14 cases (2%) a final classification was not possible, and further specialist opinion was obtained. Comments on the differential diagnosis and advice on further patient management were provided in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the value of external referral of challenging, rare and difficult to classify breast lesions. It also highlights the most common breast lesions that are likely to be challenging, and specialist opinion can refine their classification to improve patient care.

Preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast over a 24-year period.

AIMS: The method of diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has changed since the 1980s. The aim of this audit was to assess changes in the preoperative diagnosis of DCIS since the introduction of needle core biopsy, particularly the proportion with a preoperative biopsy diagnosis of DCIS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The preoperative diagnoses of patients with a final diagnosis of DCIS in the surgical specimen were reviewed (i) in 809 patients who presented through breast screening from 1997 to 2021, and (ii) in all patients in 5 individual years at 5-year intervals from 2000 to 2020 (254 in total). For screening-detected DCIS the proportion with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS increased from 75% to 98% over the study period. In a detailed analysis of all cases of DCIS in 5 separate years the proportion with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS increased from 68% in 2000 to 96% in 2020. For high-grade DCIS the proportion increased from 87% to 97%, and for low- or intermediate-grade DCIS from 48% to 93%. The proportion of women who had vacuum-assisted biopsy increased from 7% in 2000 to 58% in 2015. There was a small increase in the number of biopsies that had basal cytokeratin and oestrogen receptor immunohistochemistry to aid diagnosis. CONCLUSION: There has been an increase in the preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, particularly of low- or intermediate-grade, over the last two decades. The increasing use of vacuum-assisted biopsy is likely to be a major contributory factor to this increase.

High Inner Centromere Protein Expression Correlates with Aggressive Features and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Inner centromere protein (INCENP) is a member of the chromosomal passenger complex and plays a key role in mitosis and cell proliferation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and prognostic significance of INCENP in invasive breast cancer (BC). METHODS: INCENP expression was evaluated on a tissue microarray of a large BC cohort (n = 1,295) using immunohistochemistry. At the mRNA level, INCENP expression was assessed using the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) (n = 1,980) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BC cohorts (n = 854). The correlations between INCENP expression, clinicopathological parameters, and patient outcome were investigated. RESULTS: INCENP expression was detected in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the tumour cells. Its expression was significantly associated with features characteristic of aggressive BC behaviour including high tumour grade, larger tumour size, and high Nottingham prognostic index scores. High INCENP nuclear expression was a predictor of shorter BC-specific survival in the whole cohort, as well as in the luminal subtype (p < 0.001). High INCENP nuclear expression was predictive of poor prognosis in BC patients who received hormone treatment or chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: High INCENP expression is a poor prognostic biomarker in BC with potential therapeutic benefits.