ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the incremental diagnostic value of fusion images of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) over MPI alone or MPI and CTA side-by-side to identify obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD > 50% stenosis) using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the gold standard. METHODS: 50 subjects (36 men; 56 +/- 11 years old) underwent rest-stress MPI and CTA within 12-26 days of each other. CTAs were performed with multi-detector CT-scanners (31 on 64-slice; and 19 on 16-slice). 37 patients underwent ICA while 13 subjects did not because of low (<5%) pre-test likelihood (LLK) of disease. Three blinded readers scored the images in sequential sessions using (1) MPI alone (2) MPI and CTA side-by-side, (3) fused CTA/MPI images. RESULTS: One or more critical stenoses during ICA were found in 28 patients and non-critical stenoses were found in 9 patients. MPI, side-by-side MPI-CTA, and fused CTA/MPI showed the same normalcy rate (NR:13/13) in LLK subjects. The fusion technique performed better than MPI and MPI and CTA side-by-side for the presence of CAD in any vessel (overall area under the curve (AUC) for fused images: 0.89; P = .005 vs MPI, P = .04 vs side-by-side MPI-CTA) and for localization of CAD to the left anterior descending coronary artery (AUC: 0.82, P < .001 vs MPI; P = .007 vs side-by-side MPI-CTA). There was a non-significant trend for better detection of multi-vessel disease with fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Using ICA as the gold standard, fusion imaging provided incremental diagnostic information compared to MPI alone or side-by-side MPI-CTA for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD and for localization of CAD to the left anterior descending coronary artery.
Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Subtraction Technique , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiologyABSTRACT
Technological advances have made cardiac computed tomography (CT) an important player in cardiac imaging. Cardiac CT has become a powerful tool in the armamentarium of cardiac risk stratification assessment of intermediate-risk patients, bypass grafts, stents, and anomalous coronary arteries. With advancement in accuracy and reliability, cardiac CT is becoming mainstream in everyday clinical cardiology. It is up to the clinician to use the technology effectively and appropriately. It is certain that cardiac CT technology will continue to improve.
Subject(s)
Heart/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Calcium/metabolism , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Vessels/metabolism , Electrocardiography/methods , Heart/physiopathology , Humans , StentsABSTRACT
Cocaine use is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and can promote acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Use of beta-blockers is controversial in patients who use cocaine, and the safety and efficacy of these medications in ACS in patients actively using cocaine is unknown. We enrolled 90 patients with ACS and positive urine drug screen for cocaine. Patients received standard ACS therapy plus either labetalol (n = 60) or diltiazem (n = 30). Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and 48 hours. Levels of serum CD40 ligand, interleukin (IL)-6, and choline at baseline and 48 hours were determined. There were no baseline differences in hemodynamics or serum levels of inflammatory markers between the labetalol and diltiazem groups. Both groups experienced a significant and equivalent decrease in BP and HR at 48 hours compared with baseline. At 48 hours of treatment, there were significant decreases of 17% in CD40 ligand (P < .005) and 16% in IL-6 (P < .005) but no change in choline in the diltiazem group. Furthermore, in the labetalol group, there were significant differences of 30% in CD40 ligand (P < .005 time and group comparison), 22% in IL-6 (P < .005 time and group comparison), and 18% in choline (P < .005 time and group comparison). There were no adverse events during hospitalization in any patients who received labetalol. In conclusion, labetalol appears to be safe in cocaine-associated ACS. Furthermore, labetalol provides a beneficial hemodynamic response and, in comparison to diltiazem, potentiates an anti-inflammatory vascular response in this setting.