Bronchoscopic delivery of aminocaproic acid as a treatment for pulmonary bleeding: A case series.

OBJECTIVE: Bronchoscopy is an essential therapeutic modality in the treatment of pulmonary bleeding. Although numerous endoscopic treatments exist, topical ε-aminocaproic acid has not been described in the literature. This study documents the use of this novel treatment for pulmonary bleeding and compares it to available evidence for tranexamic acid, a similar anti-fibrinolytic agent. DESIGN: Case-series study. SETTING: ICU and general inpatient floors of a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Forty-six patients receiving endobronchial ε-aminocaproic acid for the treatment or prevention of pulmonary bleeding. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 46 patients included in the study, 41.6% and 13% presented with non-massive and massive hemoptysis, respectively. In patients with active pulmonary bleeding, endobronchial application of ε-aminocaproic acid and accompanying therapies resulted in cessation of bleeding in 94.7% of cases. A total of six patients received ε-aminocaproic acid monotherapy; in three patients with active bleeding, 100% achieved hemostasis after treatment. Of the 36 patients successfully treated for active pulmonary bleeding, 27.8% had recurrent bleeding within 30 days. Thirty-day adverse events were as follows: death (10 patients), deep vein thrombosis (2 patients), renal failure (2 patients), and stroke (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Endobronchial administration of ε-aminocaproic acid during bronchoscopy may be a safe and efficacious option in the treatment and prevention of pulmonary bleeding. Further studies are necessary to better define ε-aminocaproic acid's safety profile, optimal routes of administration, and comparative effectiveness to tranexamic acid.

Drug-Induced QT Prolongation And Torsades de Pointes.

Torsades de pointes (TdP)-an uncommon but life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia-is almost always drug induced. The authors describe the causes, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of TdP.

Rethinking the Drug Distribution and Medication Management Model: How a New York City Hospital Pharmacy Department Responded to COVID-19.

Beginning in March 2020, New York City began the fight against coronavirus disease 2019. Health care workers were faced with a disease that led to significant morbidity and mortality with no proven therapies. As hospitals became inundated with patients and underwent rapid expansion of capacity, resources such as drugs, protective and medical equipment, and hospital staff became limited. Pharmacists played a critical role in the management of clinical care and drug delivery during the pandemic. As members of the department of pharmacy within NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, we describe our experiences and processes to overcome challenges faced during the pandemic. Strict inventory management through the use of daily usage reports, frequent communication, and minimization of waste was critical for the management of drug shortages. The creation of guidelines, protocols, and restrictions were not only used to mitigate drug shortages, but also helped educate health care providers and guided medication use. Managing technology through setting up new automatic dispensing cabinets to address hospital expansions and modifying the electronic order entry system to include new protocols and drug shortage information were also vital. Additional key pharmacist functions included provision of investigational drug service support and training of pharmacists, prescribers, nurses, and respiratory therapists to educate and standardize medication use. Through implementation of operational and clinical processes, pharmacists managed critical drug inventory and guided patient treatment. As the pandemic continues, pharmacists will remain vital members of the multidisciplinary team dedicated to the fight against the virus.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship Among Prescribers at Acute-Care Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE To assess antimicrobial prescriber knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) and associated barriers to optimal prescribing. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Online survey. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 2,900 US antimicrobial prescribers at 5 acute-care hospitals within a hospital network. INTERVENTION The following characteristics were assessed with an anonymous, online survey in February 2015: attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial resistance, AS programs, and institutional AS resources; antimicrobial prescribing and AS knowledge; and practices and confidence related to antimicrobial prescribing. RESULTS In total, 402 respondents completed the survey. Knowledge gaps were identified through case-based questions. Some respondents sometimes selected overly broad therapy for the susceptibilities given (29%) and some "usually" or "always" preferred using the most broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials possible (32%). Nearly all (99%) reported reviewing antimicrobial appropriateness at 48-72 hours, but only 55% reported "always" doing so. Furthermore, 45% of respondents felt that they had not received adequate training regarding antimicrobial prescribing. Some respondents lacked confidence selecting empiric therapy using antibiograms (30%), interpreting susceptibility results (24%), de-escalating therapy (18%), and determining duration of therapy (31%). Postprescription review and feedback (PPRF) was the most commonly cited AS intervention (79%) with potential to improve patient care. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to appropriate antimicrobial selection and de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy were identified among front-line prescribers in acute-care hospitals. Prescribers desired more AS-related education and identified PPRF as the most helpful AS intervention to improve patient care. Educational interventions should be preceded by and tailored to local assessment of educational needs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:316-322.