ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diversity, equity, and inclusion are increasingly recognized as core values for guiding nursing education, practice, and research. The conceptual framework of cultural humility has been adapted in a variety of health care settings, fostering a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion through openness, supportive interaction, self-awareness, self-reflection, and critique. PROBLEM: Nurse educators have the opportunity, but may find it challenging, to teach students about the changing landscape of health care and the populations we serve. APPROACH: This article describes the integration of the cultural humility framework into nursing curricula to teach principles of diversity, equity, and inclusivity. We provide a practical example of a diversity panel, with student and panelist reflections, exploring the intersectionality of experiences in health care and integration of personal accounts and perspectives. CONCLUSION: Dialogue about diversity, equity, and inclusion is essential for preparing future nurses to deliver culturally competent care and promote health equity.
Subject(s)
Education, Nursing , Students, Nursing , Cultural Competency , Cultural Diversity , Faculty, Nursing , Health Promotion , Humans , Nursing Education ResearchABSTRACT
Combat deployments put health care providers in ethically compromising and morally challenging situations. A sample of recently deployed nurses and physicians provided narratives that were analyzed to better appreciate individual perceptions of moral dilemmas that arise in combat. Specific questions to be answered by this inquiry are: 1) How do combat deployed nurses and physicians make sense of morally injurious traumatic exposures? and 2) What are the possible psychosocial consequences of these and other deployment stressors? This narrative inquiry involves analysis of ten deployed military nurses' and physicians' aversive or traumatic experiences. Burke's dramatist pentad is used for structural narrative analysis of stories that confirm and illuminate the impact of war zone events such as betrayal, disproportionate violence, incidents involving civilians, and within-rank violence on military health care provider narrators. Results indicate cognitive dissonance and psychosocial sequelae related to moral and psychological stressors faced by military medical personnel. Discussion addresses where healing efforts should be focused.
Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Morals , Nurses , Physicians , Stress, Psychological , Violence , Warfare , Adult , Cognitive Dissonance , Female , Humans , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Male , Middle Aged , Narration , Nurses/psychology , Physicians/psychologySubject(s)
Ethics, Nursing , Medical Errors , Nurses , Nursing , Safety Management , Social Perception , Humans , Legislation, Nursing , Nursing/standards , Organizational Culture , WorkforceSubject(s)
Advance Directives , Aged , Hospitals , Information Dissemination , Information Services , Nursing Homes , Organizational Policy , Economics , Education , Empirical Research , Ethics Committees , Ethics Committees, Clinical , Government Regulation , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel , Humans , Legislation as Topic , Medical Records , Mental Competency , Research , Social Control, Formal , Statistics as Topic , United StatesABSTRACT
At least one third of the US population suffers from limited health literacy, which has been linked to poorer health status, higher costs, and individuals who are socioeconomically disadvantaged. However, research and the development of theoretical frameworks to study health literacy have only recently begun to occur. The purpose of this article is to describe theoretical frameworks that have either been used or may be used to guide health literacy research and to identify implications for nursing research and practice related to an adaptation of a health literacy framework developed specifically for conducting research in populations with universal access to healthcare.