Lay health workers perceptions of an anemia control intervention in Karnataka, India: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Lay health workers (LHWs) are increasingly used to complement health services internationally. Their perceptions of the interventions they implement and their experiences in delivering community based interventions in India have been infrequently studied. We developed a novel LHW led intervention to improve anemia cure rates in rural community dwelling children attending village day care centers in South India. Since the intervention is delivered by the village day care center LHW, we sought to understand participating LHWs' acceptance of and perspectives regarding the intervention, particularly in relation to factors affecting daily implementation. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a complex community intervention for childhood anemia control in Karnataka, South India. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with trained LHWs assigned to deliver the educational intervention. These were complemented by non-participant observations of LHWs delivering the intervention. Transcripts of the FGDs were translated and analyzed using the framework analysis method. RESULTS: Several factors made the intervention acceptable to the LHWs and facilitated its implementation including pre-implementation training modules, intervention simplicity, and ability to incorporate the intervention into the routine work schedule. LHWs felt that the intervention impacted negatively on their preexisting workload. Fluctuating relationships with mothers weakened the LHWs position as providers of the intervention and hampered efficient implementation, despite the LHWs' highly valued position in the community. Modifiable barriers to the successful implementation of this intervention were seen at two levels. At a broader contextual level, hindering factors included the LHW being overburdened, inadequately reimbursed, and receiving insufficient employer support. At the health system level, lack of streamlining of LHW duties, inability of LHWs to diagnose anemia and temporary shortfalls in the availability of iron supplements constituted potentially modifiable barriers. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study identified some of the practical challenges as experienced by LHWs while delivering a community health intervention in India. Methodologically, it highlights the value of qualitative research in understanding implementation of complex community interventions. On the contextual level, the results indicate that efficient delivery of community interventions will require streamlining of LHW workloads and improved health system infrastructure support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ISRCTN.com (identifier: ISRCTN68413407 ) on 23 September 2013.

Effect of a Community Health Worker-Delivered Parental Education and Counseling Intervention on Anemia Cure Rates in Rural Indian Children: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Iron deficiency anemia, the largest cause of anemia worldwide, adversely affects cognitive development in children. Moreover, the imperceptible childhood anemia prevalence reduction in response to anemia control measures is associated with tremendous social and economic cost. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of community-based parental education/counseling when combined with usual treatment on children's anemia cure rate. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial in children aged 12 to 59 months from 55 villages from the rural Chamrajnagar district in southern India was conducted between November 2014 and July 2015; 6-month follow-up ended in January 2016. Villages were randomly assigned to either usual treatment (n = 27) or to the intervention (n = 28). Among 1144 participating children, 534 were diagnosed as having anemia (hemoglobin levels <11 g/dL and >7.9 g/dL; to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10) and constituted the study sample in this analysis. Data were analyzed between July 2016 and September 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Iron and folic acid (IFA), 20 mg/d, 5 times daily per week, for 5 months (usual treatment) or health worker-delivered education/counseling combined with usual treatment (intervention). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was anemia cure rate defined as hemoglobin level at or greater than 11 g/dL during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the children included in the study, the mean age was 30 months, with a slightly higher ratio of boys to girls. Of 534 children with anemia (intervention n = 303; usual treatment n = 231), 517 were reassessed after 6 months (intervention n = 298; usual treatment n = 219) while 17 were lost to follow-up (intervention n = 5 and usual treatment n = 12). Anemia cure rate was higher in children in the intervention group compared with children receiving usual treatment (55.7% [n = 166 of 298] vs 41.4% [n = 90 of 219]). The risk ratio derived through multilevel logistic regression was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.04-1.70); the model-estimated risk difference was 15.1% (95% CI, 3.9-26.3). Intervention-group children demonstrated larger mean hemoglobin increments (difference, intervention vs control: 0.25 g/dL; 95% CI, 0.07-0.44 g/dL) and improved IFA adherence (61.7%; 95% CI, 56.2-67.3 vs 48.4%; 95% CI, 41.7-55.1 consumed >75% of tablets provided). Adverse events were mild (intervention: 26.8%; 95% CI, 21.8-31.9 vs usual treatment: 21%; 95% CI, 15.6-26.4). To cure 1 child with anemia, 7 mothers needed to be counseled (number needed to treat: 7; 95% CI, 4-26). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Parental education and counseling by a community health worker achieved perceivable gains in curing childhood anemia. Policy makers should consider this approach to enhance population level anemia control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN identifier: ISRCTN68413407.

Breaking Bad News: Patient Preferences and the Role of Family Members when Delivering a Cancer Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Western physicians tend to favour complete disclosure of a cancer diagnosis to the patient, while non-Western physicians tend to limit disclosure and include families in the process; the latter approach is prevalent in clinical oncology practice in India. Few studies, however, have examined patient preferences with respect to disclosure or the role of family members in the process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted with patients (N=127) in the medical oncology clinic of a tertiary referral hospital in Bangalore, India. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 18-88 (M=52) and were mostly male (59%). Most patients (72%) wanted disclosure of the diagnosis cancer, a preference significantly associated with higher education and English proficiency. A majority wanted their families to be involved in the process. Patients who had wanted and not wanted disclosure differed with respect to their preferences regarding the particulars of disclosure (timing, approach, individuals involved, role of family members). Almost all patients wanted more information concerning their condition, about immediate medical issues such as treatments or side effects, rather than long-term or non-medical issues. CONCLUSIONS: While most cancer patients wanted disclosure of their disease, a smaller group wished that their cancer diagnosis had not been disclosed to them. Regardless of this difference in desire for disclosure, both groups sought similar specific information regarding their cancer and largely favoured involvement of close family in decision making. Additional studies evaluating the influence of factors such as disease stage or family relationships could help guide physicians when breaking bad news.