Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(3): 416-424, 2022 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34849648

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measles elimination (interruption of endemic measles virus transmission) in the United States was declared in 2000; however, the number of cases and outbreaks have increased in recent years. We characterized the epidemiology of measles outbreaks and measles transmission patterns after elimination to identify potential gaps in the US measles control program. METHODS: We analyzed national measles notification data from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2019. We defined measles infection clusters as single cases (isolated cases not linked to additional cases), 2-case clusters, or outbreaks with ≥3 linked cases. We calculated the effective reproduction number (R) to assess changes in transmissibility and reviewed molecular epidemiology data. RESULTS: During 2001-2019, a total of 3873 measles cases, including 747 international importations, were reported in the United States; 29% of importations were associated with outbreaks. Among 871 clusters, 69% were single cases and 72% had no spread. Larger and longer clusters were reported since 2013, including 7 outbreaks with >50 cases lasting >2 months, 5 of which occurred in known underimmunized, close-knit communities. No measles lineage circulated in a single transmission chain for >12 months. Higher estimates of R were noted in recent years, although R remained below the epidemic threshold of 1. CONCLUSIONS: Current epidemiology continues to support the interruption of endemic measles virus transmission in the United States. However, larger and longer outbreaks in recent postelimination years and emerging trends of increased transmission in underimmunized communities emphasize the need for targeted approaches to close existing immunity gaps and maintain measles elimination.


Subject(s)
Epidemics , Measles , Basic Reproduction Number , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Measles Vaccine , Measles virus/genetics , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(40): 893-896, 2019 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600181

ABSTRACT

During January 1-October 1, 2019, a total of 1,249 measles cases and 22 measles outbreaks were reported in the United States. This represents the most U.S. cases reported in a single year since 1992 (1), and the second highest number of reported outbreaks annually since measles was declared eliminated* in the United States in 2000 (2). Measles is an acute febrile rash illness with an attack rate of approximately 90% in susceptible household contacts (3). Domestic outbreaks can occur when travelers contract measles outside the United States and subsequently transmit infection to unvaccinated persons they expose in the United States. Among the 1,249 measles cases reported in 2019, 1,163 (93%) were associated with the 22 outbreaks, 1,107 (89%) were in patients who were unvaccinated or had an unknown vaccination status, and 119 (10%) measles patients were hospitalized. Closely related outbreaks in New York City (NYC) and New York State (NYS; excluding NYC), with ongoing transmission for nearly 1 year in large and close-knit Orthodox Jewish communities, accounted for 934 (75%) cases during 2019 and threatened the elimination status of measles in the United States. Robust responses in NYC and NYS were effective in controlling transmission before the 1-year mark; however, continued vigilance for additional cases within these communities is essential to determine whether elimination has been sustained. Collaboration between public health authorities and undervaccinated communities is important for preventing outbreaks and limiting transmission. The combination of maintenance of high national vaccination coverage with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and rapid implementation of measles control measures remains the cornerstone for preventing widespread measles transmission (4).


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Measles/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
N Engl J Med ; 367(18): 1704-13, 2012 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23113481

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: By 2005, vaccination had reduced the annual incidence of mumps in the United States by more than 99%, with few outbreaks reported. However, in 2006, a large outbreak occurred among highly vaccinated populations in the United States, and similar outbreaks have been reported worldwide. The outbreak described in this report occurred among U.S. Orthodox Jewish communities during 2009 and 2010. METHODS: Cases of salivary-gland swelling and other symptoms clinically compatible with mumps were investigated, and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and vaccination data were evaluated. RESULTS: From June 28, 2009, through June 27, 2010, a total of 3502 outbreak-related cases of mumps were reported in New York City, two upstate New York counties, and one New Jersey county. Of the 1648 cases for which clinical specimens were available, 50% were laboratory-confirmed. Orthodox Jewish persons accounted for 97% of case patients. Adolescents 13 to 17 years of age (27% of all patients) and males (78% of patients in that age group) were disproportionately affected. Among case patients 13 to 17 years of age with documented vaccination status, 89% had previously received two doses of a mumps-containing vaccine, and 8% had received one dose. Transmission was focused within Jewish schools for boys, where students spend many hours daily in intense, face-to-face interaction. Orchitis was the most common complication (120 cases, 7% of male patients ≥12 years of age), with rates significantly higher among unvaccinated persons than among persons who had received two doses of vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiologic features of this outbreak suggest that intense exposures, particularly among boys in schools, facilitated transmission and overcame vaccine-induced protection in these patients. High rates of two-dose coverage reduced the severity of the disease and the transmission to persons in settings of less intense exposure.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Jews , Mumps Vaccine , Mumps/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Mumps/complications , Mumps/transmission , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps Vaccine/immunology , New Jersey/epidemiology , New York/epidemiology , Orchitis/etiology , Schools , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
5.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(8): 753-755, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34250975

ABSTRACT

We describe a premature infant with congenital measles. Laboratory testing confirmed measles in the mother (polymerase chain reaction- and IgM-positive) and congenital measles in the infant (polymerase chain reaction-positive, culture-positive and IgM-positive). The infant never developed a rash, pneumonia, or neurologic complications. This case supports using compatible laboratory findings to diagnose congenital measles in infants without clinical manifestations of measles.


Subject(s)
Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Measles/diagnosis , Measles/transmission , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Measles/therapy , New York/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome
6.
Vaccine ; 36(32 Pt B): 4904-4909, 2018 08 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30037480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Public health authorities have the resources to conduct efficient immunization reminder interventions to improve vaccine uptake. The objective of this initiative was to design and implement a cost-effective centralized HPV vaccine reminder using New York State Immunization Information System data as one of five prespecified activities to increase initiation and completion among 11- to 13-year-old adolescents. METHODS: The New York State Department of Health sent reminder letters to the parents or guardians of eligible adolescents who were due for the first dose of HPV vaccine and observed HPV vaccine administration in the six months after each mailing. Subjects were randomized into an intervention group, mailed on May 14, 2015 and a control group, mailed on December 8, 2015. RESULTS: The analysis consisted of 81,558 eligible letter recipients. Letter recipients were 2 percent more likely to initiate vaccination than control subjects. Significant increases in vaccine uptake were observed for all age and gender strata. The intervention cost was $30.95 for each adolescent who initiated the HPV vaccine series. New York State Department of Health received far less public feedback, including negative feedback, about this intervention that was originally anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: Public health entities can effectively utilize existing resources to conduct large-scale reminder interventions targeting a jurisdiction's entire 11- to 13-year-old population.


Subject(s)
Immunization/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccination/methods , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Reminder Systems , Text Messaging
7.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 7(2): 172-174, 2018 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28510706

ABSTRACT

Rubella was declared eliminated in the United States in 2004. During 2013-2015, 2 infants with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) were born in New York State. Both mothers were foreign born and traveled to Yemen during their pregnancy. Delayed consideration of CRS led to preventable exposures and a substantial public health response.


Subject(s)
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Male , New York , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Rubella/diagnosis , Rubella/transmission , Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/prevention & control , Travel-Related Illness , Yemen
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 10(5): 1373-81, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24633360

ABSTRACT

Studies assessing the economic burden of a mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated population are limited. The Orange County Health Department (OCHD), New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a mumps investigation in an affected village with a highly vaccinated population. To understand the epidemiology, standardized mumps case definition and active surveillance were used to identify mumps cases. In addition, an economic assessment of a combined outbreak investigation and third dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine intervention conducted by OCHD and NYS DOH was performed; estimated by retrospectively evaluating public health response-related activities including use of a third dose of MMR vaccine. From September 24, 2009, through June 15, 2010, 790 mumps cases were reported-64% were male and highest attack rate was among 11-17 year age group (99.1 cases per 1000 individuals). Of the 658 cases with known vaccination history, 83.6% had documentation of 2 doses of mumps containing vaccine. No deaths were reported. The 2 major exposure settings were schools (71.8%) and households (22.5%). Approximately 7736 h of public health personnel time were expended with the total approximate cost of US $463,000, including US $34,392 for MMR vaccine-the estimated cost per household was US $827. Mumps continues to be endemic in many parts of the world, resulting in importations into the United States. Large mumps outbreaks similar to this in highly vaccinated populations may require considerable investigation and control activities.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/economics , Health Care Costs , Mumps Vaccine/economics , Mumps/economics , Mumps/epidemiology , Vaccination/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , New York/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
9.
Pediatrics ; 130(6): e1567-74, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23129075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: During 2009-2010, a northeastern US religious community experienced a large mumps outbreak despite high 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage. A third dose of MMR vaccine was offered to students in an affected community in an effort to control the outbreak. METHODS: Eligible sixth- to 12th-grade students in 3 schools were offered a third dose of MMR vaccine. Baseline and follow-up surveys and physician case reports were used to monitor mumps attack rates (ARs). We calculated ARs for defined 3-week periods before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Of 2265 eligible students, 2178 (96.2%) provided documentation of having received 2 previous doses of MMR vaccine, and a high proportion (1755 or 80.6%) chose to receive an additional vaccine dose. The overall AR for all sixth- to 12th-grade students declined from 4.93% in the prevaccination period to 0.13% after vaccination (P < .001). Villagewide, overall AR declined by 75.6% after the intervention. A decline occurred in all age groups but was significantly greater (96.0%) among 11- to 17-year-olds, the age group targeted for vaccination, than among all other age groups. The proportions of adverse events reported were lower than or within the range of those in previous reports of first- and second-dose MMR vaccine studies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the impact of a third MMR vaccine dose for mumps outbreak control. The decline in incidence shortly after the intervention suggests that a third dose of MMR vaccine may help control mumps outbreaks among populations with preexisting high 2-dose vaccine coverage.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Immunization, Secondary , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Immunization Schedule , Male , Mumps/transmission , New York , Treatment Outcome
10.
Vaccine ; 30(49): 7052-8, 2012 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23041123

ABSTRACT

During a 2009-2010 mumps outbreak in a New York State village, a third dose of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine was administered to children in three schools as a control measure. Information on local and systemic adverse events (AE) was collected by a self-report survey distributed to all children in grades 6-12. A comprehensive search for AE following MMR vaccination was conducted using physician records and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). A literature search was performed for published reports pertaining to AE associated with mumps-containing vaccine, using the Jeryl-Lynn strain, from 1969 to 2011. A total of 1755 individuals received the third dose; 1597 (91.0%) returned the survey. Of those, 115 (7.2%) reported at least one local or systemic AE in the 2 weeks following vaccination. The most commonly reported AE were "pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site" (3.6%) and "joint or muscle aches" (1.8%). No serious AE were reported in the survey, physician records or through VAERS. The proportions of AE found in the present study were lower than or within the range of those reported in prior studies of first- and second-dose MMR vaccine studies. The results of this study suggest that a third dose of MMR vaccine administered in an outbreak setting is safe, with injection site reactions reported more frequently than systemic reactions. However, to assess risk for rare or serious AE after a third dose of MMR vaccine, longer term studies would be required.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Mumps/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , New York/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL