ABSTRACT
Objectives: Almost all patients with SSc have gastrointestinal manifestations. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs in 30-60% of patients and leads to malnutrition and impaired quality of life. Recent systematic reviews have reported efficacy of treatments for SIBO, but these are not specific to patients with SSc. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for all possible SIBO treatments in the SSc population. Methods: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, from database inception to 1 January 2017. All evidence for all possible SIBO treatments including antibiotics, prokinetics, probiotics and alternative treatments was included. Treatment outcomes included symptomatic relief or demonstrated SIBO eradication. Results: Of 5295 articles, five non-randomized studies were reviewed with a total of 78 SSc patients with SIBO. One trial assessed octreotide while the remaining four trials investigated the effectiveness of ciprofloxacin, rifaximin, norfloxacin and metronidazole, and the combination of amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole. Studies were generally of low quality and most were un-controlled. Conclusion: Data indicate that, for some SSc patients, antibiotics can eradicate SIBO. There is a paucity of data reporting the effectiveness of either prokinetics or probiotics in SSc.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Blind Loop Syndrome/drug therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Scleroderma, Systemic/microbiology , Adult , Blind Loop Syndrome/microbiology , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Pregnancy is often viewed as a conflict between the fetus and mother over metabolic resources. Insulin resistance occurs in mothers during pregnancy but does not normally lead to diabetes because of an increase in the number of the mother's pancreatic beta cells. In mice, this increase is dependent on prolactin (Prl) receptor signaling but the source of the ligand has been unclear. Pituitary-derived Prl is produced during the first half of pregnancy in mice but the placenta produces Prl-like hormones from implantation to term. Twenty-two separate mouse genes encode the placenta Prl-related hormones, making it challenging to assess their roles in knockout models. However, because at least four of them are thought to signal through the Prl receptor, we analyzed Prlr mutant mice and compared their phenotypes with those of Prl mutants. We found that whereas Prlr mutants develop hyperglycemia during gestation, Prl mutants do not. Serum metabolome analysis showed that Prlr mutants showed other changes consistent with diabetes. Despite the metabolic changes, fetal growth was normal in Prlr mutants. Of the four placenta-specific, Prl-related hormones that have been shown to interact with the Prlr, their gene expression localizes to different endocrine cell types. The Prl3d1 gene is expressed by trophoblast giant cells both in the labyrinth layer, sitting on the arterial side where maternal blood is highest in oxygen and nutrients, and in the junctional zone as maternal blood leaves the placenta. Expression increases during the night, though the increase in the labyrinth is circadian whereas it occurs only after feeding in the junctional zone. These data suggest that the placenta has a sophisticated endocrine system that regulates maternal glucose metabolism during pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Feeding Behavior , Glucose/metabolism , Hyperglycemia/genetics , Placenta/metabolism , Prolactin/genetics , Receptors, Prolactin/genetics , Animals , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure , Circadian Rhythm , Female , Homeostasis , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mutation/genetics , Placental Lactogen , Pregnancy , Trophoblasts/metabolismABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: We present a case of a 14-year-old girl who had a severe form of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) with extensive dermatological involvement, whose initial presentation was nonspecific leading to diagnostic confusion and initial consideration of infectious and other vasculitis causes. The patient presented with fever, congestion, malaise, and sinus pain. She was diagnosed with bacterial sinusitis and treated with antibiotics. Within weeks, she developed abdominal pain, hematuria, migratory arthritis, and palpable purpura and was diagnosed with Henoch-Schonlein purpura. She went on to develop hemoptysis and progression of the rash into erosive bullae. Investigations revealed that she was ANCA positive and had pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. Given her upper airway, pulmonary and renal involvement, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies positivity, a definitive diagnosis of a severe form of GPA was made. GPA is a chronic relapsing, life threatening vasculitis that predominantly affects small vessels. CONCLUSION: Our case demonstrates that GPA can present initially with nonspecific symptoms, including extensive dermatological involvement, leading to diagnostic confusion, and delays in treatment. In the case of a severe peripheral rash in the juvenile population and/or resistant upper airway symptoms, it is vital to consider a diagnosis of GPA to avoid serious organ or life threatening consequences.
Subject(s)
Blister/etiology , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/complications , Purpura/etiology , Skin/pathology , Adolescent , Biopsy , Blister/diagnosis , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/blood , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/diagnosis , Humans , Purpura/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Prolactin (PRL) hormone gene family shows considerable variation among placental mammals. Whereas there is a single PRL gene in humans that is expressed by the pituitary, there are an additional 22 genes in mice including the placental lactogens (PL) and Prolactin-related proteins (PLPs) whose expression is limited to the placenta. To understand the regulation and potential functions of these genes, we conducted a detailed temporal and spatial expression study in the placenta between embryonic days 7.5 and E18.5 in three genetic strains. RESULTS: Of the 22 PRL/PL genes examined, only minor differences were observed among strains of mice. We found that not one family member has the same expression pattern as another when both temporal and spatial data were examined. There was also no correlation in expression between genes that were most closely related or between adjacent genes in the PRL/PL locus. Bioinformatic analysis of upstream regulatory regions identified conserved combinations (modules) of putative transcription factor binding sites shared by genes expressed in the same trophoblast subtype, supporting the notion that local regulatory elements, rather than locus control regions, specify subtype-specific expression. Further diversification in expression was also detected as splice variants for several genes. CONCLUSION: In the present study, a detailed temporal and spatial placental expression map was generated for all murine PRL/PL family members from E7.5 to E18.5 of gestation in three genetic strains. This detailed analysis uncovered several new markers for some trophoblast cell types that will be useful for future analysis of placental structure in mutant mice with placental phenotypes. More importantly, several main conclusions about regulation of the locus are apparent. First, no two family members have the same expression pattern when both temporal and spatial data are examined. Second, most genes are expressed in multiple trophoblast cell subtypes though none were detected in the chorion, where trophoblast stem cells reside, or in syncytiotrophoblast of the labyrinth layer. Third, bioinformatic comparisons of upstream regulatory regions identified predicted transcription factor binding site modules that are shared by genes expressed in the same trophoblast subtype. Fourth, further diversification of gene products from the PRL/PL locus occurs through alternative splice isoforms for several genes.
Subject(s)
Computational Biology , Gene Expression Profiling , Placenta/metabolism , Placental Lactogen/genetics , Prolactin/genetics , Animals , Binding Sites , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Embryo, Mammalian/cytology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , In Situ Hybridization , Mice , Multigene Family , Phylogeny , Placenta/cytology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pregnancy , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Sequence Alignment , Transcription Factors/genetics , Trophoblasts/cytologyABSTRACT
A number of placenta-specific genes (e.g., Tpbp, Plac1, Syncytin, and retrotransposon-associated genes such as Peg10, Rtl1, Endothelin B receptor, Insl4, Leptin, Midline1, and Pleiotrophin), enhancer elements (e.g., glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit) and gene isoforms (e.g., 3betaHSD, Cyp19), as well as placenta-specific members of gene families (e.g., Gcm1, Mash2, Rhox, Esx1, Cathepsin, PAG, TKDP, Psg, Siglec) have been identified. This review summarizes their evolution, regulation, and biochemical functions and discusses their significance for placental development and function. Strikingly, the number of unique, truly placenta-specific genes that have been discovered to date is very small. The vast majority of placenta-specific gene products have resulted from one of three mechanisms: evolution of placenta-specific promoters, evolution of large gene families with several placenta-specific members, or adoption of functions associated with endogenous retroviruses and retroelements. Interestingly, nearly all the examples of placenta-specific genes that have been discovered to date are not present in all placental mammals.