ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding imparts numerous health and social benefits for families. Barriers deter some individuals from breastfeeding. Rates are lower among certain populations, including participants of the federally funded Women, Infants, and Children's Program (WIC). Women, Infants, and Children's Program provides low-income pregnant and postpartum women and children under 5 with nutrition education, supplemental foods, breastfeeding education and support, and resource linkages. Investigation of WIC participants' hospital experiences and breastfeeding decisions is limited. We explore qualitative themes associated with breastfeeding-related hospital maternity care practices experienced by WIC participants. METHODS: Thirty pregnant individuals intending to breastfeed were recruited at WIC clinics to complete in-depth interviews at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months of postpartum. Using the Thematic Framework methodology, we analyzed data from the two-week interviews of 29 participants with respect to hospital breastfeeding experiences. RESULTS: Fourteen participants were exclusively breastfeeding at discharge (EBFD). Fifteen were partially breastfeeding at discharge (PBFD). Differences between groups were found in hospital breastfeeding experiences, particularly in staff support. All participants EBFD reported positive breastfeeding-related staff experiences. Most participants PBFD reported limited and ineffective staff interaction, leading to formula introduction. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals EBFD and those PBFD reported about the same rate of hospital breastfeeding difficulties, yet half introduced formula within the first few days postpartum. Results reiterate the importance of hospital staff support to breastfeeding exclusivity at 2-3 days postpartum. The challenges that these individuals faced may have been resolved through available, responsive, and effective intervention. Data-driven breastfeeding education programs for hospital health professionals are critical to affect patient breastfeeding outcomes.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Maternal Health Services , Infant , Child , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Maryland , Patient Discharge , PovertyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative is an effective intervention to support maternal practices around breastfeeding. However, little is known about its impact on participants of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Baby Friendly Hospital (BFH) designation in Maryland improved breastfeeding practices among Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) participants. METHODS: Breastfeeding practices of WIC participants (22,543 mother-infant dyads) were analyzed utilizing WIC management information system de-identified data from four Maryland WIC agencies during 2010-12 and 2017-19. Participants lived in areas served by a hospital that became BFH in 2016 or remained non-BFH. Pre-post implementation breastfeeding practices (breastfeeding initiation, at 3 months and 6 months) of women associated with a BFH were compared to women associated with a non-BFH using propensity score weighting and a difference-in-difference modeling. RESULTS: From pre to post intervention no differences in breastfeeding initiation or any breastfeeding at 6 months were attributable to BFH status. There was some evidence that BFH designation in 2016 was associated with an absolute percent change of 2.4% (P = 0.09) for any breastfeeding at 3 months. DISCUSSION: Few differences in breastfeeding outcomes among WIC participants were attributable to delivery in a BFH. Results from this study inform policy about maternity practices impacting WIC breastfeeding outcomes. More study needed to determine the impact of BFH delivery on differences in breastfeeding outcomes between sub-groups of women.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Health Promotion , Child , Female , Health Promotion/methods , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Maryland , Mothers , PregnancyABSTRACT
The effect of diet, usual (44 +/- 4% energy as fat), high-fat (49 +/- 4% energy as fat), and moderate-fat (33 +/- 2% energy as fat), on gastric function (lipase and pepsin activities, pH, emptying rate) and intragastric digestion of fat were assessed in six children with cystic fibrosis. Fasting and postprandial activity of digestive enzymes, gastric pH, and gastric volume measured before, during, and after 120 min of feeding did not differ significantly as a function of fat intake. Postprandial gastric lipase output (units per kilogram of body weight) during usual, moderate-fat, and high-fat diets was close to or higher than (38.8 +/- 7.2, 44.9 +/- 8.6, and 54.8 +/- 5.5 U/kg per 20 min) gastric lipase output of premature infants (22.5 +/- 6.4 to 28.3 +/- 6.6 U/kg per 20 min) or of healthy adults (5.4 +/- 0.4 U/kg per 15 min) fed a high-fat diet. Postprandial pepsin output was higher (4749 +/- 797, 6117 +/- 925, and 5444 +/- 819 U/kg per 20 min) than in premature infants (597 +/- 77 to 743 +/- 97 U/kg per 20 min) or healthy adults (781 +/- 56 U/kg per 15 min). Eighty minutes after feeding gastric lipolysis reached 20 to 36%. This study shows that gastric lipase activity is high in cystic fibrosis patients maintained on diets providing 32% to 49% energy as fat, and that gastric lipase level did not increase over the ranges of dietary fat intake tested.