ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The management of uncomplicated (Modified Hinchey Classification Ia) acute diverticulitis (AD) has become increasingly conservative, with a focus on symptomatic relief and supportive management. Clear criteria for patient selection are required to implement this safely. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for severe clinical course in patients with uncomplicated AD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to General Surgery at two New Zealand tertiary centres over a period of 18 months were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out in order to identify factors associated with a more severe clinical course. This was defined by three endpoints: need for procedural intervention, admission >7 days and 30-day readmission; these were analysed separately and as a combined outcome. RESULTS: Uncomplicated AD was identified in 319 patients. Fifteen patients (5%) required procedural intervention; this was associated with SIRS (OR 3.92). Twenty-two (6.9%) patients were admitted for >7 days; this was associated with patient-reported pain score >8/10 (OR 5.67). Thirty-one patients (9.8%) required readmission within 30 days; this was associated with pain score >8/10 (OR 6.08) and first episode of AD (OR 2.47). Overall, 49 patients had a severe clinical course, and associated factors were regular steroid/immunomodulator use (OR 4.34), pain score >8/10 (OR 5.9) and higher temperature (OR 1.51) and CRP ≥200 (OR 4.1). CONCLUSION: SIRS, high pain score and CRP, first episode and regular steroid/immunomodulator use were identified as predictors of worse outcome in uncomplicated AD. These findings have the potential to inform prospective treatment decisions in this patient group.
Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Diverticulitis/therapy , Patient Selection , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Temperature , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Diverticulitis/blood , Diverticulitis/complications , Diverticulitis/surgery , Female , Fever/etiology , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Pain Measurement , Patient Readmission , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Steroids/therapeutic use , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer are well established. Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea is a common adverse effect of these regimens. The occurrence of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea not only directly affects patient health but may also compromise treatment efficacy because of consequent dosing alterations or discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of diverting loop ileostomy during chemotherapy on the occurrence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. DESIGN: This was a retrospective evaluation of a prospective surgical database. SETTINGS: This was a single-institution retrospective study. PATIENTS: All patients receiving curative adjuvant chemotherapy after anterior resection for colorectal cancer at Auckland Hospital from 2002 to 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-, perioperative-, and chemotherapy-related variables were collected. Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea occurrence was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for chemotherapy-induced diarrhea occurrence, treatment modifications, and hospital admission. RESULTS: A total of 109 identified patients received 691 chemotherapy cycles; 84% of patients with a diverting ileostomy experienced chemotherapy-induced diarrhea compared with 47% in those who were not defunctioned (p < 0.01). On logistic regression analysis, the presence of a diverting ileostomy during chemotherapy was an independent predictor of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea grade 3 or higher (OR, 13.6 (95% CI: 1.2-150.9); p = 0.02), the need for a dosing reduction (OR, 4.0 (95% CI: 1.3-12.4); p = 0.02), and the need for any modification in the chemotherapy regimen (OR, 3.4 (95% CI: 1.2-9.6); p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its retrospective design, potentially limiting the accuracy of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea grade reporting. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an ileostomy during adjuvant chemotherapy is a predictor of severe chemotherapy-induced diarrhea and the need for modifications in the chemotherapy regimen. This may have important consequences for long-term survival. Prospective investigation is needed to further assess the impact of diverting ileostomy on the delivery of chemotherapy and oncologic outcomes.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Ileostomy/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The management of patients with gastroparesis and recurrent reflux after previous fundoplication is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction as a remedial procedure in this select patient population. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively populated database identified all patients that underwent subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (SGRNY) due to reflux symptoms and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Demographic, intra-operative and post-operative data including pre and post-operative modified reflux aspiration scintigraphy studies were evaluated. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess symptomatic outcomes. RESULTS: From 2018 SGRNY has been selectively performed in 13 patients. Preoperative workup confirmed DGE and severe symptomatic reflux in all patients. The median number of previous fundoplication and or hiatal hernia operations was two (range 1-3). The mean hospital length of stay was 10 ± 6 days. Post-operative morbidity was experienced in three patients (23%). Seven patients (64%) had significant improvement or complete resolution of reflux on post-operative scintigraphy. Symptom improvement was reported in 92% of patients. CONCLUSION: In a select patient cohort with post-fundoplication reflux and DGE symptoms, SGRNY is a moderately safe and effective salvage option.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Gastroparesis , Fundoplication/methods , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Emptying , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroparesis/etiology , Gastroparesis/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of oesophagectomy and thought to signal a complicated post-operative course. AF is associated with prolonged admissions, increased healthcare costs and inpatient mortality. However, the impact of post-operative AF on long-term outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients undergoing open Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy from 1994 to 2014 at Palmerston North Hospital, New Zealand, were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic, perioperative and tumour variables were collected. Regression models were used to identify independent predictors of AF and assess post-discharge survival following oesophagectomy. RESULTS: In total, 89 patients were included. New-onset AF developed post-operatively in 27 patients (30%). Median follow-up was 6.3 years. Logistic regression identified volume of intravenous fluid in the first 24 h post-operatively as a predictor of AF. Post-discharge survival was predicted by AF occurrence (hazard ratio (HR): 2.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-6.53, P = 0.006), preoperative chemoradiotherapy (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.91, P = 0.03), 1-4 positive lymph nodes (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.06-4.96, P = 0.04), ≥5 positive nodes (HR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.25-6.94, P = 0.01) and year of operation from 2008 to 2014 (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12-0.75, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Post-operative AF was associated with poorer long-term survival following oesophagectomy in this cohort. Further research should evaluate the influence of AF on cardiovascular and oncological outcomes following oesophagectomy.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent analyses of the surgical literature have suggested a general trend towards increasing numbers of published articles and an improved quality of evidence produced. The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to identify trends in the publication of general surgical research in New Zealand from 1996 to 2015. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE was searched for general surgical publications by New Zealand authors. Two investigators screened results, and a range of data were collected for included articles. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data and identify significant trends. RESULTS: A total of 601 articles were identified, with a progressive increase in the number of publications from 1996 to 2015. Randomized trials and systematic reviews accounted for 33 and 97 publications, respectively. The median number of authors per paper rose from 3.0 to 5.0 (P < 0.001). There was an exponential increase in the publication of randomized trials (P = 0.001) and systematic reviews (P < 0.001), while publication of basic science articles remained relatively steady (P = 0.22). The median impact factor for published articles increased from 1.5 to 2.6, which was equivalent to organic growth of the journal impact factors over the 20-year period. CONCLUSION: The quality and quantity of surgical research in New Zealand has substantially increased over the past two decades. These results reflect the successful growth of a culture of academic surgery and the ongoing support of partner organizations.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , General Surgery , Journal Impact Factor , Publications/trends , Humans , New ZealandABSTRACT
A temporary loop ileostomy is a common surgical procedure to protect colorectal anastomoses. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether early closure of a defunctioning loop ileostomy (<2 weeks from index operation) is safe and reduces stoma-related morbidity. A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL®) databases to identify all publications from January 1996 to March 2014 that reported the outcomes of early ileostomy closure. The following search terms (and their variations) were used as both medical subject headings (MeSH terms) and text words: ileostomy, surgical stoma, stoma, early, reversal, closure. No language restrictions were applied. The main outcomes of interest were stoma-related complications and postclosure complications. Studies that included pediatric patients (<18 years of age), small cohorts (<10 participants), case reports, conference abstracts, reviews, and letters; studies involving defunctioning colostomies or other types of small bowel stomas; and studies where results from closure of an ileostomy at >14 days could not be separated from early closure results were excluded. Where multiple studies were reported by the same institution and/or authors, only the most recent was included. This search strategy identified 4 studies (2 retrospective case series, 1 prospective nonrandomized study, and 1 randomized controlled trial), yielding a pooled population of 142 patients, ages 18-89 years old. Three studies reported indication for ileostomy; colorectal cancer accounted for 96 patients (78%). Time to ileostomy closure ranged from 8-14 days. No reported deaths were related to ileostomy closure. Wound infections were reported in 3 studies and were the most common complications, affecting 24 patients (19.8%). Of the 2 studies that reported ileostomy-related complications, 4 patients (3.6%) experienced a stoma-related complication before closure. Ileus or small bowel obstruction (SBO) occurred in 7 patients (4.9%). Compared to traditionally timed closure (8-12 weeks), reported stoma-related complication rates were lower in patients undergoing early closure. Both mortality and ileus/SBO rates also compare favorably with traditionally timed closure; however, wound infection rates appear to be increased. Additional studies to accurately define which individuals stand to benefit from early closure, as well as to further evaluate the impact of early ileostomy closure on quality of life and health care costs, are warranted.
Subject(s)
Ileostomy/adverse effects , Ileostomy/methods , Patient Outcome Assessment , Postoperative Complications , Time Factors , Wound Closure Techniques/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Ileostomy/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evacuatory dysfunction after distal colorectal resection varies from incontinence to obstructed defaecation and is termed anterior resection syndrome. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of anterior resection syndrome. METHODS: All anterior resections undertaken at Auckland Hospital from 2002 to 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. An assortment of patient and peri-operative variables were recorded. Cases were stratified by the occurrence of anterior resection syndrome symptoms from 1 to 5 years post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients were identified. Prevalence of anterior resection syndrome decreased progressively from 61 % at 1 year to 43 % at 5 years. Univariate analysis identified anastomotic height, surgeon, pT stage, procedure year and temporary diversion ileostomy as recurring significant correlates (p < 0.05). Logistic regression identified lower anastomotic height (odds ratio (OR) 2.11, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-4.27; p = 0.04) and obstructive presenting symptoms (OR 6.71, 95 % CI 1.00-44.80; p = 0.05) as independent predictors at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Post-operative chemotherapy was a predictor at 1 year (OR 1.93, 95 % CI 1.04-3.57; p = 0.03). Temporary diverting ileostomy was an independent predictor at 2 (OR 2.49, 95 % CI 1.04-5.95; p = 0.04), 3 (OR 4.17, 95 % CI 1.04-16.78; p = 0.04), 4 (OR 8.05, 95 % CI 1.21-53.6; p = 0.03), and 5 years (OR 49.60, 95 % CI 2.17-1134.71; p = 0.02) after adjusting for anastomotic height. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic height, post-operative chemotherapy and obstructive presenting symptoms were independent predictors at 1 and 2 years. Temporary diversion ileostomy was an independent predictor for the occurrence of anterior resection syndrome at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years even after correcting for anastomotic height. Prospective assessment is required to facilitate more accurate risk factor analysis.