Accessibility to palliative care services in Colombia: an analysis of geographic disparities.

OBJECTIVES: Due to the increase in the prevalence of non-communicable diseases and the Colombian demographic transition, the necessity of palliative care has arisen. This study used accessibility and coverage indicators to measure the geographic barriers to palliative care. METHODS: Population-based observational study focused on urban areas and adult population from Colombia, which uses three measurements of geographic accessibility to services: a) density of palliative care services per 100,000 inhabitants, b) analysis of geographic distribution by territorial nodes of the country, and c) spatial analysis of palliative care services using Voronoi diagrams. ArcGIS Pro software was used to map services' locations and identify geographic disparities. RESULTS: A total of 504 palliative care services were identified, of which 77% were primary health care services. The density of palliative care services in Colombia is 1.8 primary care services per 100,000 inhabitants and 0.4 specialized services per 100,000 inhabitants. The average palliative care coverage is 41%, two regions of the country have a coverage below 30%. Twenty-eight percent of the services provide care for a population greater than 50,000 inhabitants within their coverage area, exceeding the acceptable limit by international standards. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care services are concentrated in three main regions (Bogotá D.C., the Center, and the Caribbean) and are limited in the Orinoquia and Amazonia nodes. Density of specialized palliative care services is extremely low and there are regions without palliative services for adults with palliative needs.

Cancer and Non-cancer Fatigue Treated With Bupropion: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Fatigue is a predominant and distressing symptom in cancer and non-cancer conditions for which there is a paucity of recommendations for pharmacological interventions. Bupropion is a novel treatment whose efficacy and safety in the treatment of fatigue are unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically assess the evidence on the efficacy and safety of bupropion in the treatment of fatigue in people with cancer and non-cancer conditions. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid Medline databases were searched up to July 26, 2022. Studies were included if they reported bupropion as an intervention for cancer and non-cancer-related fatigue and used an objective scale to assess symptom outcomes. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies in adult patients published in English were included. RESULTS: This review reports on seven studies (three randomized studies, three non-randomized studies, and one case series) that enrolled a total of 584 patients. Bupropion was tested in five studies for treating cancer-related fatigue and in two studies for treating fatigue in non-cancer conditions. The reviewed studies were heterogeneous in relation to the scales used to assess fatigue. Six out of seven studies reported that bupropion significantly reduced the fatigue burden without causing major adverse effects. These positive results must be taken with caution caused by the small sample sizes and low quality of the studies reviewed. CONCLUSION: Bupropion may prove to be an effective and safe intervention for fatigue in cancer and non-cancer conditions. A high-quality randomized trial is warranted to test current preliminary results.

Rural Palliative Care Telemedicine for Advanced Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

Context: Telemedicine offers the opportunity to provide remote palliative care for patients to control symptoms and improve quality of life, even for patients with advanced diseases. Objectives: Establish a telemedicine model of rural palliative care for advanced cancer patients with difficulties in accessing standard care. Methods: This review comports with the minimum standards described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and uses the palliative care literature review iterative method (PALETTE) proposed by Zwakman et al in 2018. Results: Three hundred, ninety-two articles were identified in PubMed and EMBASE databases and alternative search engines such as Google Scholar and OpenGrey. A telemedicine delivery model was developed for patients with limited access to standard care, which consists of identifying the candidate population, establishing the most convenient telemedicine modality, agreeing with patients and caregivers on palliative care needs, and evaluating the interventions effectiveness. Conclusion: Telemedicine is a revolutionary tool to provide palliative care to advanced cancer patients whose clinical condition or location prevent them from accessing conventional care.

Building an action plan to tackle palliative care inequality through multi-stakeholder platforms.

Background: To achieve universal care and overcome existing barriers, the most effective strategy is to devise an action plan that incorporates palliative care into primary health care (PHC), as recommended by the World Health Organization's (WHO) Astana Declaration. In Colombia, a country with an upper-middle-income status, about 128,000 individuals experience severe health-related suffering (SHS) that necessitates palliative care. Although the country's healthcare system has made steady strides in the integration and development of palliative care, there is still no national plan in place for palliative care. Objective: Build up Colombia's palliative care plan through stakeholder consensus. Method: Based on the participatory action research method and the multi-stakeholder platforms model, this study convened 142 stakeholders from different levels of the health system (patient representatives, journalists, health professionals, government entities, insurance companies, universities, and drug regulatory authorities). Results: The national plan aims to achieve its objectives through a series of strategic actions. These include integrating and diversifying palliative care services, improving access to opioids, increasing palliative care education, promoting community-based palliative care programs, securing funding, and implementing a regulatory framework for palliative care by public policymakers. Conclusions: The national palliative care is an alliance that aims to reduce palliative care inequity in Colombia by 2026 by empowering stakeholders nationwide to collaborate around specific goals and objectives.

Barriers to Access to Palliative Care in Colombia: A Social Mapping Approach Involving Stakeholder Participation.

This study aimed to identify barriers to access to palliative care through a social mapping approach. In Colombia, the barriers to access to palliative care denote an enormous geographic disparity of resources and health needs, making it necessary to conduct community-based participatory research using an approach such as social mapping. A qualitative research design was used. Stakeholders from health insurance companies, regulatory authorities, regional health secretariats, health care professionals, patient and caregiver organizations, scientific societies, and medical journalists from 7 Colombian regions participated. It involved 3 stages. Stage 1: Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted with 36 stakeholders and were subsequently transcribed and analyzed. Stage 2: An electronic survey was conducted to obtain feedback on the first outline of the map and the categories that emerged from stage 1. Stage 3: The nominal group technique was used to analyze and validate the barriers to access to palliative care included in the final map. The COREQ checklist was used. Twenty-seven barriers to access to palliative care related to limited availability of medications, stakeholders' poor knowledge of regulations, limited formal education in palliative care, few patients' support networks, patient care fragmentation, few specialized programs of palliative care, and mistaken beliefs about palliative care were identified. Stakeholders' diverse perspectives and opinions were crucial to understanding the development of palliative care in Colombia and its challenges. Better knowledge about palliative care can open opportunities to overcome the barriers identified in this study, directly impacting access to palliative care.

The Development of Palliative Care in Colombia: An Analysis of Geographical Inequalities Through the Application of International Indicators.

CONTEXT: The national evaluation of an individual country is a tool used to improve the universal provision of palliative care. The evaluation of a country's internal situation, by means of an analysis of the development of palliative care by region, may also be an instrument for improvement. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to understand the regional development of palliative care in Colombia, through the application of international indicators. METHODS: Regional development was analyzed for Colombia, with a country-specific adaptation of the evaluation method used in the latest edition of the Palliative Care World Map (Clark D, 2020), the need for palliative care per death with serious health-related suffering (Knaul FN, 2019), and the coverage of specialized services, following European standards (Centeno, 2016). A total of 33 of the country's regions were classified. RESULTS: Some 41% of the people who die in Colombia need palliative care. The average figure for specialized services is 0.5/100,000 inhabitants, with a maximum coverage of 51%. In Colombia, there are 12 regions with a generalized level of provision; six regions with isolated provision, nine regions developing their capacity, four with no known activity, and two at an advanced level of palliative care integration. The regions with the highest level of palliative care development coincide with higher demand and coverage of specialized services. CONCLUSION: Regional palliative care development is unequal and unbalanced. Applying international indicators to levels of regional development allows for the identification of geographical inequalities and highlights low palliative care development, especially in the rural areas of the country.

Availability and accessibility of opioids for pain and palliative care in Colombia: a survey study / Disponibilidad y accesibilidad de los opioides para manejo del dolor y cuidado paliativo en Colombia: estudio tipo encuesta

Abstract Introduction: Access to essential medicines, including opioids, is a component of the right to health. Objective: To identify barriers to opioid availability and accessibility for pain and palliative care. Methods: Online survey with Colombian prescribers. Availability barriers were analyzed for each facility (distribution and/or dispensing). Accessibility barriers were analyzed by type. Descriptive analyses were conducted using relative frequencies. Significance within categories and regions was measured using Fisher's exact test. Results: Out of 1,208 prescribers invited, 806 (66.7%) completed the survey. Availability: 76.43% reported barriers. The most cited barrier was "Pharmacies authorized by health insurance companies", where opioids are frequently unavailable. Accessibility: 74.6% reported barriers. Most frequently cited was "Difficulty securing payment authorization for medication from health insurance companies". Significant differences were observed in terms of regions and "Cost" (p=0.02). Lack of coordination among procuring and distributing agencies affects availability. Limited awareness and bureaucratic procedures affect accessibility. Conclusions: There are barriers to opioid availability and access in Colombia, related to the existing structure for guaranteeing equitable supply. From the perspective of healthcare providers, problems related to pharmacy availability, prescription and cost of medicines hinder pain treatment.

Resumen Introducción: El acceso a medicamentos esenciales, incluidos los opioides, es un componente del derecho a la salud. Objetivo: Identificar las barreras de disponibilidad y acceso a los opioides para dolor y cuidados paliativos. Métodos: Encuesta virtual a prescriptores colombianos. Las barreras de disponibilidad se analizaron para cada centro (distribución y/o dispensación) y las barreras de acceso se analizaron por tipo. Los análisis descriptivos se realizaron utilizando frecuencias relativas. La significancia dentro de categorías y regiones se midió utilizando la prueba exacta de Fischer. Resultados: De los 1208 prescriptores invitados, 806 (66.7%) respondieron la encuesta. Disponibilidad: el 76,43% reportó barreras. La barrera más citada fue la relacionada con las "farmacias autorizadas por las aseguradoras de salud", donde los opioides con frecuencia no están disponibles. Acceso: el 74,6% reportó barreras. Se citó con mayor frecuencia la "Dificultad para obtener la autorización de pago de medicamentos por parte de las aseguradoras". Se observaron diferencias significativas entre regiones y "costos" (p=0,02). La falta de coordinación entre las entidades de adquisición y distribución afecta la disponibilidad. La limitada conciencia y los procedimientos burocráticos afectan la accesibilidad. Conclusiones: Existen barreras de disponibilidad y acceso a los opioides en Colombia, las cuales están relacionadas con la estructura disponible para garantizar un suministro equitativo. Desde el punto de vista de los prescriptores, los problemas relacionados con la disponibilidad de las farmacias, la prescripción y el costo de los medicamentos, obstaculizan el tratamiento adecuado del dolor.