Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(3): e380-e397, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Few prospective studies have assessed the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in elective endoscopy. Our primary aim was to compare the risks of endoscopy-related gastrointestinal bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients on DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this setting. Secondarily, we examined the impact of the timing of anticoagulant resumption on the risk of delayed bleeding in high-risk therapeutic procedures. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study from January 2018 to March 2020 of 1602 patients on oral anticoagulants (1004 on VKAs and 598 on DOACs) undergoing 1874 elective endoscopic procedures. Our primary outcomes were 90-day thromboembolic events and 30-day endoscopy-related gastrointestinal bleeding. The inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score method was used for baseline covariate adjustment. RESULTS: The 2 groups had similar risks of endoscopy-related gastrointestinal bleeding (VKAs vs DOACs, 6.2% vs 6.7%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.67-1.65) and thromboembolic events (VKAs vs DOACs, 1.3% vs 1.5%; adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.34-2.38). In high bleeding risk procedures (n = 747), delayed anticoagulant resumption (> 48 hours or 24-48 hours vs < 24 hours) did not reduce the risk of postprocedural bleeding (10.3%, 9%, and 5.8%, respectively; adjusted P = .43). Hot and cold snare polypectomy were the most frequent high-risk interventions (41.8% and 39.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In a prospective study of patients on DOACs or VKAs undergoing elective endoscopy, endoscopy-related bleeding and thromboembolic events showed similar risk. Our study suggests that early anticoagulant resumption is safe in most patients, but more data are needed for advanced high-risk therapeutic procedures.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Colonoscopy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Vitamin K
2.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(4): 732-742.e6, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of delayed (within 30 days) postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) has not been standardized. Patients often undergo colonoscopies that do not provide any benefit. We aimed to identify factors associated with therapeutic intervention and active bleeding after DPPB. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 548 patients with bleeding within 30 days after an index polypectomy (DPPB; 71.9% underwent colonoscopy, 2.6% underwent primary angiographic embolization, and 25.5% were managed without intervention) at 6 tertiary centers in Spain, from January 2010 through September 2018. We collected demographic and medical data from patients. The primary outcomes were the need for therapeutic intervention and the presence of active bleeding during colonoscopy. RESULTS: A need for therapeutic intervention was associated independently with the use of antithrombotic agents, hemoglobin decrease greater than 2 g/dL, hemodynamic instability, and comorbidities (P < .05). The bleeding point during colonoscopy was identified in 344 patients; 74 of these patients (21.5%) had active bleeding. Active use of anticoagulants (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.5), left-sided polyps (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1-3.8), prior use of electrocautery (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.1), and pedunculated polyp morphology (OR, 1.8, 95% CI, 1-3.2) significantly increased the risk of encountering active bleeding. We developed a visual nomogram to estimate the risk of active bleeding. Overall, 43% of the cohort did not require any hemostatic therapy. Rebleeding (<6%) and transfusion requirements were low in those managed without intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In a study of patients with DPPB, we found that almost half do not warrant any therapeutic intervention. Colonoscopy often is overused for patients with DPPB. We identified independent risk factors for active bleeding that might be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from colonoscopy.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Cohort Studies , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Humans , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Retrospective Studies
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 113(7): 505-511, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33244982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: diabetes has been reported as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in population-based studies but there are controversial data in patients with cirrhosis. Metformin could have a protective role in HCC development. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of diabetes on the risk of developing HCC in patients with alcohol- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis. METHODS: a cohort of 982 Caucasian patients were analyzed with alcoholic or HCV cirrhosis, included from 1992 to 2014 in a HCC surveillance program and prospectively followed. The influence of diabetes on the development of HCC was analyzed by Kaplan Meier analysis and adjusted with a Cox regression for relevant co-factors. RESULTS: after a median follow-up of 49.5 (24.0-96.0) months, 156 patients (15.8 %) developed HCC. There were no differences in the cumulative incidences of HCC after 20 years between diabetic and non-diabetic patients in the global (53.5 % vs 45.4 %; p = 0.26), alcoholic (50.4 % vs 45.4 %; p = 0.21) or HCV (60 % vs 43.1 %; p = 0.57) cirrhosis series. Diabetes did not constitute a risk factor after adjusting for other potential co-factors, neither in the whole series (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, 95 % CI: 0.78-1.51; p = 0.26), alcoholic (HR: 1.160, 95 % CI: 0.74-1.82; p = 0.50) or HCV cirrhosis cohort (HR: 1.17, 95 % CI: 0.63-2.19; p = 0.60). These figures did not change after excluding patients treated with metformin. CONCLUSIONS: in Caucasian patients with alcoholic or HCV cirrhosis, diabetes is not a risk factor for developing HCC. This lack of an association does not seem to be a consequence of the protective effect of metformin.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Diabetes Mellitus , Hepatitis C , Liver Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/complications , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors
4.
Pancreatology ; 20(3): 331-337, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32165149

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well characterized. Our purpose was to better understand this condition and its natural history. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted at nine Spanish IBD referral centers. Patients with IBD and a first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) between 1998 and 2018 were included. Patients with a previous episode of AP or a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis were excluded. IAP and non-IAP were compared by multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis. RESULTS: We identified 185 patients with IBD (68.7% Crohn's disease) and a first episode of AP. Thirty-eight of those 185 (20.6%) fulfilled criteria for IAP. There were no severe cases of IAP. On multivariate analysis, AP before IBD diagnosis (21.1% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.04) and ulcerative colitis (52.6% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.002) were significantly more common in IAP. Further work-up was performed in 16/38 (42%) IAP patients, and a cause was identified in 6/16 (37.5%). Median time from AP to the end of follow-up was 6.3 years (3.1-10). Five-year risk of AP recurrence was significantly higher in IAP group (28% vs. 5.1%, log-rank p = 0.001), with a median time to first recurrence of 4.4 months (2.9-12.2). CONCLUSIONS: IAP represents the second cause of AP in patients with IBD. It is more frequent in ulcerative colitis, and presents a high risk of recurrence. Additional imaging work-up after a first episode of IAP in IBD patients is highly advisable, as it identifies a cause in more than one-third of cases.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/etiology , Pancreatitis/complications , Adult , Cohort Studies , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/epidemiology , Endpoint Determination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
5.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(3): 216-218, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31960683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: the stag-beetle knife is a new scissor-like endoscopic device that can be used for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum, although experience is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SB Knife™ for the endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. METHODS: a single-center prospective study of 16 patients was performed between May 2017 and April 2019. The rate of complications and symptom changes was evaluated. RESULTS: the median age was 78 years and 62.5% of the patients were male. All had dysphagia, 43.8% choking, 31.3% regurgitation and 6.3% respiratory symptoms. The median size of the diverticulum was 20 mm and the median follow-up was 281 days. There were no intra-procedure complications and only one major post-procedure complication was reported that was a microperforation. All patients had clinical improvement. Two patients had relapsing symptoms and were successfully treated with the same method. CONCLUSIONS: the SB Knife™ seems to be a safe and effective technique for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Zenker Diverticulum , Aged , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Esophagoscopy , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Zenker Diverticulum/diagnostic imaging , Zenker Diverticulum/surgery
6.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 42(10): 595-603, 2019 Dec.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519387

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In Europe, gastric adenocarcinoma (GADC) is commonly regarded as a disease of the elderly. This study aims to assess the proportion, characteristics, and survival of patients diagnosed with GADC under the age of 60. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentric, and analytical study conducted at four tertiary Spanish hospitals. All patients diagnosed with GADC between 2008 and 2015 were included. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and survival data were retrieved. A multivariate analysis was performed to compare GADC in young (age≤60 years) and elderly patients. RESULTS: A total of 1374 patients with GADC were included. The mean age was 74 years (SD:11.1); 62.2% were males. There were 177 patients under the age of 60 (12.9%, 95% CI: 11.2-14.8%). GADC was frequently encountered as a metastatic disease in both young and elderly patients (Stage IV: 45.7% and 41%, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol abuse, ASA functional status I-II, diffuse subtype, neoadjuvant, and palliative therapy were independently associated (P<0.05) with age ≤60 years. No differences were found in 2-year survival (GADC ≤60: 39% vs. 35%, P=0.45). Curative-intent surgery, TNM stage I-II, body mass index<30kg/m2, and better functional status at diagnosis were independent predictors of survival in GADC under the age of 60. CONCLUSIONS: One out of eight cases of GADC were diagnosed under the age of 60. Metastatic disease was frequent at diagnosis and overall survival was poor regardless of age. Factors associated with localized disease correlated with improved survival in younger patients. Our results underline the need for early diagnosis strategies in our country.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Stomach Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate
7.
Helicobacter ; 22(5)2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance is an increasing problem worldwide. Pylera® may be an option as salvage therapy. AIM: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and tolerance of Pylera® as a third-line in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, prospective database study in four Spanish hospitals. Consecutive H. pylori-infected individuals treated with Pylera® and a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) were invited to participate if they had failed to respond to PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin as first-line and to levofloxacin-amoxicillin-PPI as second-line therapy. Eradication was tested 4-8 weeks after Pylera® using a C13 -urea breath test. Treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) were assessed through a questionnaire and by reviewing databases. A questionnaire on patient satisfaction was completed in the last visit. RESULTS: Of 103 subjects fulfilling the selection criteria, 101 were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 97 in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. A 10 day course was prescribed in all patients. Esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. was the most used PPI regimen (ITT=94.1%). Ninety-seven individuals (ITT=96.04%) completed more than 90% of the treatment. Overall eradication rates were ITT=80.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.3%-88.1%) and PP=84.4% (95% CI: 76.8%-91.8%). One or more TRAEs were experienced by 67.3% (95% CI: 57.7%-75.7%), all mild or moderate. TRAEs and the number of pills were the main complaints. CONCLUSION: In an area of high antibiotic resistance to H. pylori, 10-day Pylera® plus double-dose PPI emerged as an alternative as third-line therapy, although not achieving optimal eradication rates. TRAEs were common but were neither severe nor did they condition compliance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Bismuth/administration & dosage , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Salvage Therapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breath Tests , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Urea/analysis , Young Adult
9.
Rom J Morphol Embryol ; 62(1): 313-318, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609438

ABSTRACT

Oxyntic gastric heterotopia (GH) in the colon is not common. Its presence in a colon tubular adenoma is even rare. A 73-year-old woman with a history of resected colon carcinoma underwent periodical colonoscopies for the removal of tubular adenomas for 12 years. In the last colonoscopy, a sessile, non-ulcerated polyp, centrally depressed, with a smooth surface, measuring 20 mm, located at 50 cm from the anal verge was excised. A histological study identified a tubular adenoma with focal low-grade dysplasia and ectopic gastric oxyntic epithelium. The GH, composed of parietal and chief cells, and was found incidentally. Oxyntic GH in a tubular adenoma is extraordinarily rare. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one previously published case. The main possible difficulties and∕or errors in the diagnosis include a tissue floater or a cross-contaminant. Precise diagnosis of oxyntic GH is basic for appropriate management. Diagnosis relies on histopathological examination. The immunohistochemical study for mucin 6 (MUC6) can confirm the nature of the epithelium. Oxyntic GH has the potential to produce serious complications including tumor development. However, GH is considered a benign disease and adenocarcinoma rarely occurs in the heterotopic mucosa. The optimal treatment of oxyntic GH associated with a tubular adenoma is endoscopic complete polypectomy.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonic Neoplasms , Colonic Polyps , Aged , Colonoscopy , Female , Humans
10.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 7(2): 189-198, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31080603

ABSTRACT

Background: Missed oesophageal cancer (MEC) at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is poorly documented. Objective: The objectives of this study were: (1) to assess the rate, predictors and survival of MEC; (2) to compare MEC and non-MEC tumours. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at four tertiary centres. Oesophageal cancers (ECs) diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were included. Patients with a premalignant condition (Barrett, achalasia), prior diagnosis of EC or oesophagogastric junction tumour of gastric origin were excluded. MEC was defined as EC detected within 36 months after negative UGE. Results: 123,395 UGEs were performed during the study period, with 502 ECs being diagnosed (0.4%). A total of 391 ECs were finally included. Overall MEC rate was 6.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.4-9.3%). The interval between negative and diagnostic UGE was less than 2 years in 84% of the cases. Multivariate analysis showed that a negative endoscopy was associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and less experienced endoscopists. MEC was smaller than non-MEC at diagnosis (25 versus 40 mm, p = 0.021), more often flat or depressed (p = 0.013) and less frequently diagnosed as metastatic disease (p = 0.013). Overall 2-year survival rate was similar for MEC (20%) and non-MEC (24.1%) (p = 0.95). Conclusions: MEC accounted for 6.4% of all ECs and was associated with poor survival. High-quality UGE and awareness of MEC may help to reduce its incidence.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Digestive System , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Missed Diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
11.
Dig Liver Dis ; 51(6): 894-900, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30898522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Missed gastric cancer (MGC) is poorly documented in Mediterranean populations. AIMS: (1) To assess the rate, predictors and survival of MGC. (2) To compare MGC and non-MGC tumors. METHODS: This is a retrospective-cohort study conducted at four centers. MGC was defined as cancer detected within three years after negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastric adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 2008-2015 were included. Patients with no follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: During the study period 123,395 esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, with 1374 gastric cancers being diagnosed (1.1%). A total of 1289 gastric cancers were finally included. The overall rate of MGC was 4.7% (61/1289, 3.7-6%). A negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy in MGC patients was independently associated with PPI therapy (p < 0.001), previous Billroth II anastomosis (p = 0.002), and lack of alarm symptoms (p < 0.001). The most frequent location for MGC was the gastric body(52.4%). MGCs were smaller than non-MGCs (31 vs 41 mm, p = 0.047), more often flat or depressed (p = 0.003) and less likely to be encountered as advanced disease. Overall 2-year survival was similar between MGC (34.1%) and Non-MGC (35.3 %) (p = 0.59). CONCLUSION: MGC accounted for nearly five percent of newly-diagnosed gastric adenocarcinomas. Overall survival was poor and not different between MGC and non-MGC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Endoscopy, Digestive System/statistics & numerical data , Missed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality
13.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 112(3): 216-218, mar. 2020. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS (Spain) | ID: ibc-195797

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVO: la pinza disectora SB Knife(TM) es un nuevo dispositivo endoscópico que se puede utilizar en el tratamiento del divertículo de Zenker, pero la experiencia es limitada. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del SB Knife(TM) en el tratamiento del divertículo de Zenker. MÉTODOS: estudio unicéntrico prospectivo en el que se incluyeron 16 pacientes entre mayo de 2017 y abril de 2019. Se evaluaron las complicaciones del procedimiento y la evolución clínica. RESULTADOS: la mediana de edad fue de 78 años y el 62,5% fueron varones. El 100% presentaba disfagia; el 43,8%, atragantamientos; el 31,3%, regurgitación; y el 6,3%, aspiraciones. La mediana de tamaño del divertículo fue de 20 mm y la mediana de seguimiento, 281 días. No hubo ninguna complicación intraprocedimiento y solo una posprocedimiento importante (microperforación). En todos los pacientes hubo mejoría inicial, pero en dos hubo recurrencia clínica que se trató con el mismo sistema con buen resultado. CONCLUSIONES: el SB Knife(TM) parece una opción segura y eficaz en el tratamiento del divertículo de Zenker


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Zenker Diverticulum/surgery , Endoscopy, Digestive System/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up Studies , Prospective Studies
14.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 42(10): 595-603, dic. 2019. graf, tab
Article in English | IBECS (Spain) | ID: ibc-188185

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In Europe, gastric adenocarcinoma (GADC) is commonly regarded as a disease of the elderly. This study aims to assess the proportion, characteristics, and survival of patients diagnosed with GADC under the age of 60. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, multicentric, and analytical study conducted at four tertiary Spanish hospitals. All patients diagnosed with GADC between 2008 and 2015 were included. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and survival data were retrieved. A multivariate analysis was performed to compare GADC in young (age≤60 years) and elderly patients. Results: A total of 1374 patients with GADC were included. The mean age was 74 years (SD:11.1); 62.2% were males. There were 177 patients under the age of 60 (12.9%, 95% CI: 11.2-14.8%). GADC was frequently encountered as a metastatic disease in both young and elderly patients (Stage IV: 45.7% and 41%, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, alcohol abuse, ASA functional status I-II, diffuse subtype, neoadjuvant, and palliative therapy were independently associated (P<0.05) with age ≤60 years. No differences were found in 2-year survival (GADC ≤60: 39% vs. 35%, P=0.45). Curative-intent surgery, TNM stage I-II, body mass index<30kg/m2, and better functional status at diagnosis were independent predictors of survival in GADC under the age of 60. Conclusions: One out of eight cases of GADC were diagnosed under the age of 60. Metastatic disease was frequent at diagnosis and overall survival was poor regardless of age. Factors associated with localized disease correlated with improved survival in younger patients. Our results underline the need for early diagnosis strategies in our country


Introducción: En Europa, el adenocarcinoma gástrico (ADCG) afecta principalmente a pacientes de edad avanzada. Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar la proporción, las características y la supervivencia de los pacientes diagnosticados de ADCG menores de 60 años. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, multicéntrico y analítico realizado en 4 hospitales terciarios españoles. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes diagnosticados con ADCG entre los años 2008-2015. Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, endoscópicos, histológicos y de supervivencia. Se realizó un análisis multivariante para comparar el ADCG en pacientes jóvenes (edad≤60 años) y de edad avanzada. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 1.374 pacientes con ADCG. La edad media fue de 74 años (DE: 11,1), el 62,2% varones. Ciento setenta y siete pacientes tenían menos de 60 años (12,9%, IC 95%: 11,2-14,8%). El ADCG se diagnosticó con frecuencia como enfermedad metastásica en pacientes jóvenes y ancianos (estadio IV: 45,7 y 41%, respectivamente). En el análisis multivariante, el abuso de alcohol, la clase funcional ASA I-II, el subtipo difuso, el tratamiento neoadyuvante y el tratamiento paliativo se asociaron de forma independiente (p<0,05) con una edad ≤60 años. No se encontraron diferencias en la supervivencia a 2 años (ADCG≤60: 39 vs. 35%; p=0,45). La cirugía con intención curativa, el estadio TNM I-II, el índice de masa corporal <30kg/m2 y un mejor estado funcional al diagnóstico fueron factores predictivos independientes de supervivencia en el subgrupo de pacientes menores de 60 años. Conclusiones: Uno de cada 8 casos de ADCG se diagnosticaron por debajo de los 60 años. Independientemente de la edad, la presencia de metástasis al diagnóstico fue frecuente y la supervivencia global baja. Los factores asociados a enfermedad localizada se correlacionaron con una mejor supervivencia en pacientes más jóvenes. Nuestros resultados apoyan la necesidad de implementar estrategias de diagnóstico temprano en nuestro país


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Survival Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Analysis of Variance , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Palliative Care , Body Mass Index , Gastroscopy/methods , Odds Ratio , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL