Therapeutic Interventions and Outcomes in Civilian and Military Isolated Gunshot Wounds to the Head: A Department of Defense Trauma Registry and ACS TQIP-matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare therapeutic strategies and outcomes, following isolated gunshot wounds of the head, between military and civilian populations. BACKGROUND: Recent military conflicts introduced new concepts in trauma care, including aggressive surgical intervention in severe head trauma. METHODS: This was a cohort-matched study, using the civilian Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR), during the period 2013 to 2016. Included in the study were patients with isolated gunshots to the head. Exclusion criteria were dead on arrival, civilians transferred from other hospitals, and patients with major extracranial associated injuries (body area Abbreviated Injury Scale >3). Patients in the military database were propensity score-matched 1:3 with patients in the civilian database. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients in the DoDTR database were matched for age, sex, year of injury, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale with 408 patients from TQIP. Utilization of blood products was significantly higher in the military population ( P <0.001). In the military group, patients were significantly more likely to have intracranial pressure monitoring (17% vs 6%, P <0.001) and more likely to undergo craniotomy or craniectomy (34% vs 13%, P <0.001) than in the civilian group. Mortality in the military population was significantly lower (27% vs 38%, P =0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Military patients are more likely to receive blood products, have intracranial pressure monitoring and undergo craniectomy or craniotomy than their civilian counterparts after isolated head gunshot wounds. Mortality is significantly lower in the military population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

The Impact of Seat Belt Use in Pregnancy on Injuries and Outcomes After Motor Vehicle Collisions.

BACKGROUND: Seat belt use during motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) has been shown to alter adults' intra-abdominal injury patterns, although the effect of seat belt use in pregnant women is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of seat belt use in pregnancy on injuries and outcomes after MVCs. METHODS: Patients injured by MVCs were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2014). The exclusion criteria were transfer from an outside hospital, male or unspecified sex, missing restraint data, and nonchildbearing age. Demographics, clinical/injury data, pregnancy status, seat belt use, and outcomes were collected. Study groups were dichotomized by pregnancy status with subgroup analysis by seat belt use. Univariate/multivariate analyses compared outcomes and determined predictors of seat belt use. RESULTS: After exclusions, 162,964 women were included, of which 680 (<1%) were pregnant. Intra-abdominal injuries during pregnancy did not vary according to seat belt use (P > 0.05). Unrestrained pregnant women were more injured (Injury Severity Score: 13 versus 7, P < 0.001), more likely to need emergent operation (14% versus 10%, P < 0.001), and had a longer hospital stay (6 versus 4 d, P = 0.012) than restrained counterparts. On multivariate analysis among pregnant women, seat belt use was associated with age ≥25 y (odds ratio: 2.033, P = 0.001). The lack of restraint use was associated with the position in the passenger seat (odds ratio: 0.521, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Seat belt use in pregnancy does not alter abdominal injury patterns but is associated with lower injury severity, reduced need for emergent surgery, and shortened hospital stay. Public health interventions emphasizing the importance of seat belts could be focused on younger patients and vehicle passengers to reach the high-risk pregnant subset.

Litigation Patterns in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A 25 Year Review.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal herniorraphyis among the most common procedures performed by general surgeons, but risk factors for litigation related to this surgery are poorly defined. METHODS: Cases were retrieved by searching the Westlaw database from 1991 through 2016 using the search terms "inguinal hernia" OR "inguinal herniorrhaphy" OR "inguinal hernioplasty" and "medical malpractice." Data were compiled on the demographics of the patient, operative case details, nature of injury, legal allegations, verdicts, and indemnities. RESULTS: Forty-six cases met inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Verdicts for the defendant predominated (67%). The average plaintiff's monetary award for a plaintiff verdict or settlement was $1.21 million (median $500,000). The most frequent legal argument was improper performance (n = 35, 76%), followed by failure of informed consent (n = 14, 30%). The most common complications were nerve/chronic pain (n = 20, 45%) and testicular damage (n = 10, 23%). No association was discovered between case outcome and patient gender (P = 0.231) or age (P = 0.899). Case outcome was not different between open and laparoscopic repairs (P = 0.722). Patient mortality was not associated with case outcome (P = 0.311). There was no chronological trend in case outcome or award amount. Settlement award amounts were not significantly different than plaintiff awards (P = 0.390). CONCLUSIONS: Successful litigation after inguinal hernia surgery was relatively infrequent-only 21.7%-with an additional 10.9% resulting in settlement awards. Case outcome in litigation for hernia surgery was not predicted by patient demographics, type of procedure, or type of complication in this data set.

Effects of Gynecomastia Surgery on Readiness and Return to Duty in an Active Duty Military Population.

INTRODUCTION: Simple mastectomies are routinely performed in the military health care system as gynecomastia can cause significant pain and discomfort when wearing body armor. Postoperative recovery negatively impacts personnel readiness. In this study, we sought to study time to return to duty in active duty service members who undergo surgery for gynecomastia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of active duty patients undergoing a surgical operation for gynecomastia from July 2020-June 2022. A total of 96 patients were included. Our primary outcome of interest was time from surgery to return to duty. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess for factors independently associated with surgical complications including patient demographics and operative techniques. RESULTS: The median number of days to return to duty after surgery was 28 days (IQR 13-37). The median loss of duty days because of gynecomastia without surgery was 19 days (IQR 10-21), which was different on the Mann-Whitney U test. Surgical complications were observed in 19 patients (19.7%) with the most common complications being seroma (11), hematoma (4), nipple-areolar complex necrosis (2), and infection (2). Patients with a complication have significantly more time to return to duty (28 vs. 49 days, P < .001). Risk factors associated with an increased risk of complication include ranks E1-E4, behavioral health diagnosis, "open" vs. "combined" technique with liposuction, length of operation greater than 58 minutes, and excised breast mass greater than 17.9 g. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecomastia surgery is associated with a detriment to personnel readiness. Surgery should be reserved for patients with severe symptoms that prevent the performance of daily duties. Furthermore, factors associated with an increased risk for complications include ranks E1-E5, behavioral health diagnosis, length of operation >58 minutes, and excised breast mass >17.9 g. The operating surgeon should be mindful of these factors.

Pectin based biologic Velcro effectively seals traumatic solid organ and small bowel injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Injuries to the liver and small bowel are common in multiple injuries. While there are currently a variety of accepted damage-control techniques to expeditiously manage such injuries, morbidity and mortality remain high. Pectin polymers have previously been shown to effectively seal visceral organ injuries ex vivo through physiochemical entanglement with the glycocalyx. We sought to compare the standard of care for the management of penetrating liver and small bowel injuries with a pectin-based bioadhesive patch in a live animal model. METHODS: Fifteen adult male swine underwent a laparotomy with standardized laceration to the liver. Animals were randomized to one of three treatment arms: packing with laparotomy pads (n = 5), suture repair (n = 5), or pectin patch repair (n = 5). Following 2 hours of observation, fluid was evacuated from the abdominal cavity and weighed. Next, a full-thickness small bowel injury was created, and animals were randomized to either a sutured repair (n = 7) or pectin patch repair (n = 8). The segment of bowel was then pressurized with saline, and the burst pressure was recorded. RESULTS: All animals survived the protocol to completion. There were no clinically significant differences between groups regarding baseline vitals or laboratory studies. On one-way analysis of variance, there was a statistically significant difference between groups regarding blood loss after liver repair (26 mL suture vs. 33 mL pectin vs. 142 mL packing, p < 0.01). On post hoc analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between suture and pectin ( p = 0.9). After repair, small bowel burst pressures were similar between pectin and suture repair (234 vs. 224 mm Hg, p = 0.7). CONCLUSION: Pectin-based bioadhesive patches performed similarly to the standard of care for the management of liver lacerations and full-thickness bowel injuries. Further testing is warranted to assess the biodurability of a pectin patch repair, as it may offer a simple option to effectively temporize traumatic intra-abdominal injuries.

Bioadhesive patch as a parenchymal sparing treatment of acute traumatic pulmonary air leaks.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic pulmonary injuries are common in chest trauma. Persistent air leaks occur in up to 46% of patients depending on injury severity. Prolonged leaks are associated with increased morbidity and cost. Prior work from our first-generation pectin patches successfully sealed pulmonary leaks in a cadaveric swine model. We now test the next-generation pectin patch against wedge resection in the management of air leaks in anesthetized swine. METHODS: A continuous air leak of 10% to 20% percent was created to the anterior surface of the lung in intubated and sedated swine. Animals were treated with a two-ply pectin patch or stapled wedge resection (SW). Tidal volumes (TVs) were recorded preinjury and postinjury. Following repair, TVs were recorded, a chest tube was placed, and animals were observed for presence air leak at closure and for an additional 90 minutes while on positive pressure ventilation. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test used to compare continuous and categorical data between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one animals underwent either SW (15) or pectin patch repair (PPR, 16). Baseline characteristics were similar between animals excepting baseline TV (SW, 10.3 mL/kg vs. PPR, 10.9 mL/kg; p = 0.03). There was no difference between groups for severity of injury based on percent of TV loss (SW, 15% vs. PPR, 14%; p = 0.5). There was no difference in TV between groups following repair (SW, 10.2 mL/kg vs. PPR, 10.2 mL/kg; p = 1) or at the end of observation (SW, 9.8 mL/kg vs. PPR, 10.2 mL/kg; p = 0.4). One-chamber intermittent air leaks were observed in three of the PPR animals, versus one in the SW group ( p = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Pectin patches effectively sealed the lung following injury and were noninferior when compared with wedge resection for the management of acute traumatic air leaks. Pectin patches may offer a parenchymal sparing option for managing such injuries, although studies evaluating biodurability are needed.

Pulmonary toxicity after exposure to military-relevant heavy metal tungsten alloy particles.

Significant controversy over the environmental and public health impact of depleted uranium use in the Gulf War and the war in the Balkans has prompted the investigation and use of other materials including heavy metal tungsten alloys (HMTAs) as nontoxic alternatives. Interest in the health effects of HMTAs has peaked since the recent discovery that rats intramuscularly implanted with pellets containing 91.1% tungsten/6% nickel/2.9% cobalt rapidly developed aggressive metastatic tumors at the implantation site. Very little is known, however, regarding the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with the effects of inhalation exposure to HMTAs despite the recognized risk of this route of exposure to military personnel. In the current study military-relevant metal powder mixtures consisting of 92% tungsten/5% nickel/3% cobalt (WNiCo) and 92% tungsten/5% nickel/3% iron (WNiFe), pure metals, or vehicle (saline) were instilled intratracheally in rats. Pulmonary toxicity was assessed by cytologic analysis, lactate dehydrogenase activity, albumin content, and inflammatory cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid 24h after instillation. The expression of 84 stress and toxicity-related genes was profiled in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage cells using real-time quantitative PCR arrays, and in vitro assays were performed to measure the oxidative burst response and phagocytosis by lung macrophages. Results from this study determined that exposure to WNiCo and WNiFe induces pulmonary inflammation and altered expression of genes associated with oxidative and metabolic stress and toxicity. Inhalation exposure to both HMTAs likely causes lung injury by inducing macrophage activation, neutrophilia, and the generation of toxic oxygen radicals.