Knowledge and competences in hematological malignancies amongst radiation oncology residents in Germany-results from a national survey.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation oncology is a pivotal modality in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. To enable state-of-the-art patient care, structured education during residency is essential. However, given the lack of detailed data, the scope of educational opportunities available to trainees remains elusive. This prompted our group to perform a national survey amongst radiation oncology residents in Germany assessing the status quo of competences in the treatment of lymphoma and leukemia patients. Furthermore, areas of potential improvement were identified to further the goal of competence-based education for residents. METHODS: A survey-based analysis was conducted to assess the knowledge and competence of radiation oncology residents in Germany regarding hematological malignancies. A decisive questionnaire covering demographics, self-assessment of competences, and areas for improvement was developed in adaption of a survey by the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology and distributed amongst 1439 members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology. Responses were collected anonymously via an online survey tool and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 59 complete and 22 partial responses were collected, yielding a 5.6% response rate. Participants' competence varied, with notable experience gaps in pediatric cases, proton therapy, and large-field techniques like total-skin irradiation or pediatric total body irradiation. While participants felt confident in treatment planning and patient counseling, they showed deficiencies in the definition of the planning target volume for modern involved site radiotherapy. Resources for education included national and international guidelines, scientific reviews, and textbooks. Board-certified radiation oncologists and physicians from specialized lymphoma centers demonstrated higher overall competence levels. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights the diversity of resident education regarding hematological malignancies in German radiation oncology programs. Knowledge gaps exist in key areas, including pediatric cases and specialized techniques. Competence-based education, interactive teaching formats, and rotations to specialized centers are potential strategies to address these gaps. The study contributes to the understanding of the federal educational landscape, underscoring the need for standardized and comprehensive training to ensure optimal patient care in hematological malignancies within the context of radiation oncology. Further research and collaborations are warranted to enhance training and expertise in this critical domain.

Impact of dose escalation on colostomy-free survival and treatment outcome in squamous cell anal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Primary radiochemotherapy (RCT) constitutes the standard of care for early- and advanced-stage anal carcinoma. This retrospective study investigates the impact of dose escalation on colostomy-free survival (CFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and acute and late toxicities in patients with squamous cell anal cancer. METHODS: Considered were the outcomes of 87 patients with anal cancer treated with radiation/RCT between May 2004 and January 2020 at our institution. Toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). RESULTS: The 87 patients received treatment with a median boost of 63 Gy to the primary tumor. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3­year CFS, OS, LRC, and PFS were 79.5%, 71.4%, 83.9%, and 78.5%, respectively. Tumor relapse occurred in 13 patients (14.9%). Dose escalation to > 63 Gy (maximum 66.6 Gy) to the primary tumor in 38/87 patients revealed a nonsignificant trend for improved 3­year CFS (82.4% vs. 97%, P = 0.092), a significantly improved CFS for T2/T3 tumors (72.6% vs. 100%, P = 0.008), and a significantly improved 3­year PFS for T1/T2 tumors (76.7% vs. 100%, P = 0.035). While acute toxicities did not differ, dose escalation > 63 Gy led to a higher rate of chronic skin toxicities (43.8% vs. 69%, P = 0.042). Treatment with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) showed a significant improvement in 3­year OS (75.4% vs. 53.8%, P = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, significant improvements for T1/T2 tumors (CFS, OS, LRC, PFS), G1/2 tumors (PFS), and IMRT (OS) were shown. The nonsignificant trend for CFS improvement with dose escalation > 63 Gy was also apparent in multivariate analysis (P = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Dose escalation > 63 Gy (maximum 66.6 Gy) may improve CFS and PFS for certain subgroups, with a concomitant increase in chronic skin toxicities. Modern IMRT seems to be associated with an improvement in OS.

Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy plus oral bexarotene maintenance therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) combined with systemic therapy or maintenance treatment is a reasonable approach to enhance the remission rate and duration in mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). This study assesses the efficacy of oral bexarotene therapy after low-dose TSEBT for patients with MF and SS. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we recruited MF/SS patients for treatment with low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) with or without bexarotene therapy to describe outcomes and toxicities. RESULTS: Forty-six subjects with MF or SS underwent TSEBT between 2016 and 2021 at our institute. Following TSEBT, 27 patients (59 %) received oral bexarotene treatment. The median follow-up was 13 months. The overall response rate (ORR) for the cohort was 85 %. The response rate was significantly higher with combined modality (CM) than TSEBT alone (96 % vs. 68 %, p = 0.03). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for the CM was 17 months versus five months following TSEBT alone (p = 0.001). One patient (4 %) in the retinoid group discontinued the bexarotene therapy because of adverse events. The administration of bexarotene therapy did not increase radiation-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Response rate and progression-free survival might be improved with TSEBT in combination with oral bexarotene compared to TSEBT alone.

Assessment of strain and dyssynchrony in normal fetuses using speckle tracking echocardiography - comparison of three different ultrasound probes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate segmental left (LV-S) and right (RV-S) ventricular strain as well as longitudinal mechanical myocardial dyssynchrony as a time difference between peaks in strain of both ventricles in fetuses (two-chamber-dyssynchrony, 2C-DYS) using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of data acquisition on the results of STE measurement using different ultrasound probes. METHODS: We prospectively recorded cardiac cycles of four-chamber views of 56 normal fetuses with three different ultrasound probes and analyzed them offline with speckle tracking imaging software. Furthermore, we looked at a possible influence of heartbeat variability (beat-to-beat variability). RESULTS: The evaluation of the parameters was feasible with all three probes in 53 cases. There was no influence of heartbeat variability and no noticeable differences in 2C-DYS, LV-S and RV-S in all cases and for all three probes determined. CONCLUSION: Assessment of strain and dyssynchrony using STE with three different probes is comparable. Further research is needed to validate dyssynchrony as a predictor for fetal outcome.

Ultrahypofractionated Low-Dose Total Skin Electron Beam in Advanced-Stage Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of an ultrahypofractionated low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) regimen in patients with advanced mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this multicenter observational study from 5 German centers, 18 total patients with MF or SS underwent TSEBT with a total dose of 8 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. RESULTS: Fifteen of 18 patients with stage IIB-IV MF or SS were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior systemic therapies. The overall response rate was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.3-98.6), with 3 complete responses (16.9%; 95% CI, 3.6-41.4). At a median follow-up period of 13 months, the median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 12 months (95% CI, 8.2-15.8), and the median progression-free survival was 8 months (95% CI, 2-14). A significant reduction in the modified severity-weighted assessment tool, total Skindex-29 score (Bonferroni-corrected P < .005), and all subdomains (Bonferroni-corrected P < .05) was observed after TSEBT. Half of the irradiated patients (n = 9) developed grade 2 acute and subacute toxicities. One patient had confirmed grade 3 acute toxicity. Chronic grade 1 toxicity has been observed in 33% of patients. Patients with erythroderma/SS or prior radiation therapy appear at higher risk of skin toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: TSEBT with 8 Gy in 2 fractions achieves good disease control and symptom palliation with acceptable toxicity, greater convenience, and fewer hospital visits.

Impact of Modern Low Dose Involved Site Radiation Therapy on Normal Tissue Toxicity in Cervicothoracic Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Biophysical Study.

This biophysical study aimed to determine fitting parameters for the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) dose-response model for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations of acute side effects and to investigate the impact of reduced radiation doses on the probability of their occurrence in supradiaphragmatic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) irradiation. A cohort of 114 patients with NHL in the cervicothoracic region, treated between 2015 and 2021 at the University Hospitals of Münster, Hamburg, and Essen, with involved site radiation therapy (ISRT), were included. Among them, 68 patients with aggressive NHL (a-NHL) received consolidative radiation therapy with 24-54 Gy following (R-)CHOP chemotherapy. Additionally, 46 patients with indolent NHL (i-NHL) underwent radiotherapy with 22.5-45.0 Gy. Two treatment plans were prospectively created for each patient (a-NHL: 30.0/40.0 Gy; i-NHL: 24.0/30.0 Gy). NTCP were then calculated using the optimized LKB model. The adapted dose-response models properly predicted the patient's probability of developing acute side effects when receiving doses ≤ 50 Gy. In addition, it was shown that reduced radiation doses can influence the NTCP of acute side effects depending on the aggressiveness of NHL significantly. This study provided a foundation to prospectively assess the probability of adverse side effects among today's reduced radiation doses in the treatment of NHL.

[Radiotherapy for cutaneous lymphomas]. / Radiotherapie kutaner Lymphome.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous lymphomas (CL) are highly radiosensitive. Therefore, radiotherapy is an integral part of multimodality treatment. AIM: The present work provides an overview of indications, technical developments, and dose concepts for total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT), local radiotherapy as well as maintenance therapy, and current combination studies regarding cutaneous T­ and B­cell lymphomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a selective literature search in the PubMed database on the topic of radiotherapy for CL and a search for current studies using clinicaltrials.gov. Furthermore, we describe our own treatment strategies and summarize national and international guidelines. RESULTS: Low-dose TSEBT is nationally and internationally recommended as an alternative to conventional 36 Gy TSEBT. The main advantages are better tolerability, the possibility of retreatment, a shorter treatment course (approximately 3 weeks), and a short time to response. In current studies, TSEBT is usually delivered to a total dose of 12 Gy and combined with immunotherapy and epigenetic therapy. Local radiotherapy is indicated for mycosis fungoides (MF) tumors and is a curative treatment regimen for other CL, particularly primary cutaneous B­cell lymphomas. CONCLUSION: TSEBT is a very effective treatment for MF and is a highly effective palliative treatment, leading to rapid symptom relief and improvement in quality of life. It is an important treatment option, especially in patients with extensive generalized lesions or advanced tumor stage. Local radiation is used as part of TSEBT for tumors and as a boost to undertreated areas. Other CLs are primarily curable with local radiotherapy.

Development of Organ-Preserving Radiation Therapy in Gastric Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

Gastric marginal zone lymphoma (gMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) may persist even after H. pylori eradication, or it can be primarily Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) independent. For patients without the successful eradication of lymphoma, or with progressive disease, treatment options have historically included partial or total gastrectomy. Presently, in these instances, curative radiation therapy (RT) is the current standard of care. This review emphasizes the historically changing role of radiation therapy in gMZL, progressing from large-volume RT without surgery, to localized RT, on its own, as a curative organ-preserving treatment. This overview shows the substantial progress in radiation therapy during the recent two to three decades, from high-dose, large-field techniques to low-dose, localized target volumes based on advanced imaging, three-dimensional treatment planning, and advanced treatment delivery techniques. RT has evolved from very large extended field techniques (EF) with prophylactic treatment of the whole abdomen and the supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes, applying doses between 30 and 50 Gy, to involved-field RT (IF), to the current internationally recommended involved site radiation therapy (ISRT) with a radiation dose of 24-30 Gy in gMZL. Stage-adapted RT is a highly effective and safe treatment with excellent overall survival rates and very rare acute or late treatment-related toxicities, as shown not only in retrospective studies, but also in large prospective multicenter studies, such as those conducted by the German Study Group on Gastrointestinal Lymphoma (DSGL). Further de-escalation of the radiation treatments with low-dose 20 Gy, as well as ultra-low-dose 4 Gy radiation therapy, is under investigation within ongoing prospective clinical trials of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) and of the German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA).

Definition of an Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model for the Inner Ear in Definitive Radiochemotherapy of Nasopharynx Carcinoma.

Background: Definitive radiochemotherapy is the treatment of choice for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Due to the vicinity of the nasopharynx to the inner ear and the use of ototoxic platinum-based chemotherapy, there is a risk for irreversible damage to the auditory system. To avoid or minimize these critical side effects, radiation exposure to each inner ear must be balanced between target volume coverage and toxicity. However, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models of the inner ear validated by clinical data are rare. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study investigates the inner ear toxicity of 46 patients who received radio(chemo-)therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at our institution from 2004 to 2021 according to CTCAE 5.0 criteria. For each inner ear, the mean (Dmean) and maximum (Dmax) dose in Gray (Gy) was evaluated and correlated with clinical toxicity data. Based on the data, an NTCP model and a cutoff dose logistic regression model (CDLR) were created. Results: In 11 patients (23.9%) hearing impairment and/or tinnitus was observed as a possible therapy-associated toxicity. Dmean was between 15−60 Gy, whereas Dmax was between 30−75 Gy. There was a dose-dependent, sigmoidal relation between inner ear dose and toxicity. A Dmean of 44 Gy and 65 Gy was associated with inner ear damage in 25% and 50% of patients, respectively. The maximum curve slope (m) was found at 50% and is m=0.013. The Dmax values showed a 25% and 50% complication probability at 58 Gy and 69 Gy, respectively, and a maximum slope of the sigmoid curve at 50% with m=0.025. Conclusion: There is a sigmoidal relation between radiation dose and incidence of inner ear toxicities. Dose constraints for the inner ear of <44 Gy (Dmean) or <58 Gy (Dmax) are suggested to limit the probability of inner ear toxicity <25%.

Acute and sub-acute toxicity profile of ultra-hypofractionated low-dose total skin electron beam with two 4 Gy fractions for cutaneous T cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Low-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) over 3 weeks has proved to be a safe and effective treatment for cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL). In this prospective trial, we examined the feasibility of ultra-hypofractionated low-dose TSEBT regimen in two fractions with 4 Gy combined with systemic therapy to minimize the number of visits to radiation centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) received TSEBT with a total radiation dose of 8 Gy in two fractions between April 2020 and June 2020. Patient and treatment characteristics, tumor burden, the impact on the quality of life using Skindex-29 questionnaires, and acute toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS: During TSEBT, all patients developed grade 1 toxicities while two patients developed grade 2 toxicities. One patient experienced sepsis. The most common adverse effects were erythema and edema. All grade 2 toxicities regressed after 4 weeks following TSEBT. Based on the reported symptoms measured by Skindex-29, we detected a significant reduction in total Skindex-29 score after 8 weeks of radiation (P = 0.03), particularly in the symptoms (P = 0.01) and emotional domains (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Ultra-hypofractionated low-dose TSEBT followed by systemic therapy seems to be a safe and feasible alternative to conventional fractionated TSEBT for patients with MF/SS. The skin tumor burden and the health-related quality of life have been significantly improved within 8 weeks following radiotherapy.

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Patients With Aggressive Extranodal Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma of the Head and Neck.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) is increasingly being used to treat patients with head and neck malignancies. This analysis compared conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and IMRT outcomes for head and neck aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (EN-NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients who underwent irradiation between 2005 and 2019 were identified. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 42 months. Patients treated with IMRT experienced higher overall responde rate than patients who received 3DCRT (85% vs. 73%, p=0.4). There was non-significant longer survival following IMRT compared with 3DCRT in terms of 5-year OS (p=0.16). Complete responders after primary treatments had a significantly higher 5-year progression-free (p<0.001) and overall survival (p=0.003) in comparison with those without a complete response. Regarding toxicities, IMRT was associated with less acute and chronic adverse events. CONCLUSION: IG-IMRT following systemic therapy seems to be associated with a favorable survival and toxicity profile in patients with EN-NHL.

The Lymph-Sparing Quotient: A Retrospective Risk Analysis on Extremity Radiation for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment.

Radiation therapy (RT) for extremity soft tissue sarcoma is associated with lymphedema risk. In this study, we analyzed the influence of lymph-sparing volume on the lymphedema occurrence in patients who received adjuvant extremity RT. The lymph-sparing quotient (LSQ) was calculated by dividing the lymph-sparing volume by the total extremity volume with double weightingfor the narrowest lymph-sparing region. A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this analysis. The median applied total radiation dose was 66.3 Gy in 36 fractions. Acute lymphedema appeared in 12 patients (35%). Most of them (n = 8) were lymphedema grade 1 and five patients had grade 2 to 3 lymphedema. Chronic lymphedema appeared in 22 patients (65%). 17 of these patients had at least a grade 2 lymphedema. In 13 of 14 patients with an LSQ ≤ 0.2 and 11 of 20 patients with an LSQ > 0.2, an acute or chronic lymphedema ≥ grade 2 was observed. A Kaplan-Meier Analysis of the two groups with the endpoint of a two-year lymph edema-free survival (=2-YLEFS) was estimated with an univariate, significant result (2-YLEFS LSQ ≤ 0.2 vs. LSQ > 0.2: 0% vs. 39%; p = 0.006; hazard ratio LSQ ≤ 0.2 vs. > 0.2 2-YLEFS 2.822 (p = 0.013); 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-6.42). Maximizing the potential oncologically-justifiable lymph-sparing volume should be considered to reduce the risk of high-grade lymphedema when applying RT to extremities.

Radiotherapy as Part of Treatment Strategies in Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinus Malignancies.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is frequently applied to treat patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus (NC/PNS) malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) between 1994 and 2020 were recognized. This analysis compared conventional-radiotherapy (CRT) and image-guided IMRT outcomes for NC/PNS malignancies. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 69 months. Eighty-eight patients (85%) were managed with image-guided IMRT. The median initial radiation dose was 65 Gy, with 68 Gy applied for patients treated with primary RT versus 63 Gy applied for adjuvant therapy (p=0.1). The 5-year locoregional control (LRC) was 85%. The locoregional recurrence rate was 18% following IMRT versus 31% in the 2D/3D-conventional RT group (p=0.09). Moreover, IMRT was associated with a lower inner-ear toxicity rate (8% vs. 20%, respectively; p=0.045). CONCLUSION: IMRT appears to be linked with higher LRC and lower inner-ear acute toxicities compared to conventional RT.

Impact of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients With Male Breast Cancer: A Multicenter International Analysis.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer in men accounts for approximately 1% of all breast cancers. Breast cancer trials have routinely excluded men. The aim of this analysis was to determine the effect of different treatment factors, in particular, postoperative radiation therapy (RT) on long-term outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-one patients with male breast cancer treated in 5 closely cooperating institutions between 2003 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: Almost all patients (95%) underwent surgical resection. Forty-two patients (59%) received chemotherapy, and 59 (83%) received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Of the 71 patients, 52 (73%) were treated with RT. The rate of recurrence was 20% in the whole cohort, with a locoregional recurrence rate of 3%. In the entire group, the 5-year local control (LC) was 95%, whereas 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 62% and 96%, respectively. There was a lower rate of relapses after adjuvant RT (19% vs 32%, P = .05) without in-field relapse after postoperative RT (0%) versus 10% in patients without RT (P = .02). In the multivariate analysis performed, hormonal therapy administration was found to have a possible significant effect on LC and PFS. Administration of adjuvant RT and stage affect PFS. In patients who received RT, there were no grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT is an effective and safe treatment for male breast cancer patients with no infield relapses and better PFS. Hormonal therapy administration was found to have a possible effect on LC and PFS.