Destroyed bladders: Characterization of progressive inflammatory cystitis.

PURPOSE: We identified a subset of patients with noninfectious cystitis who develop refractory symptoms marked by diffuse inflammatory changes, reduced bladder capacity, and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), termed here as "progressive inflammatory cystitis" (PIC). Our objective was to describe the phenotype, disease outcomes, and pathologic findings of PIC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single institution retrospective cohort study of patients with PIC. Patients with a history of pelvic radiation, urologic malignancy, or neurogenic bladder were excluded. We describe cohort characteristics and use bivariate analyses to compare subgroups. Kaplan-Meier methods estimate time to urinary diversion. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2020, 46 patients with PIC were identified. The median age of symptom onset was 63 years old (interquartile range [IQR]: 56, 70) and the most common presenting symptoms were urinary urgency/frequency (54%) and incontinence (48%). Urodynamics showed a median maximum bladder capacity of 80 mL (IQR: 34, 152), commonly with VUR (68%) and hydronephrosis (59%). Ultimately 36 patients (78%) underwent urinary diversion at a median of 4.5 years (IQR: 2, 6.5) after symptom onset. Significant pathologic findings include presence of ulceration (52%), acute and chronic inflammation (68%), including eosinophils (80%), lymphoid follicles (56%), and mast cells in both lamina and muscularis propria (76%). CONCLUSIONS: PIC is a newly defined entity characterized by significantly diminished bladder capacity, upper tract changes, and relatively quick progression to urinary diversion. Larger prospective cohort studies are required to further characterize this severe phenotype of chronic noninfectious cystitis, aid earlier diagnosis, and guide management decisions.

Distinguishing Features of the Urinary Bacterial Microbiome in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.

PURPOSE: We aimed to characterize the urinary microbiome of catheterizing patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and to evaluate differences based on type of bladder management or frequency of urinary tract infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of urine samples from asymptomatic, catheterizing patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction who used either clean intermittent catheterization or indwelling catheters. Patients without symptoms of urinary tract infection provided a catheterized urine sample for urinalysis, culture and bacterial community microbiome analysis. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients submitted urine for analysis, of whom 69 had sufficient sequence reads (>1,203) for microbiome analysis. Cases with low bacterial signal amplification were associated with use of vaginal estrogen, no intradetrusor botulinum toxin A use and no growth on standard urine culture. The most abundant operational taxonomic units were from the phylum Proteobacteria, classified as Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia. Alpha diversity varied among those who used indwelling catheters vs clean intermittent catheterization, and those who underwent botulinum toxin A injection vs not. On linear discriminate analysis, the relative abundance of the operational taxonomic units identified as Pseudomonas was higher among patients using indwelling catheters relative to clean intermittent catheterization. The operational taxonomic unit identified as Aerococcus was at a higher relative abundance among males compared to females. CONCLUSIONS: Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia were the most abundant genera in the urinary microbiome of patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urinary microbiome diversity varied based on bladder management type. Future clinical correlations between microbiome of neurogenic patients and clinical presentation may help guide treatment strategies.

Depth and Location of Sacral Suture Placement During Cadaveric Simulation of Open Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the location and depth of placement of sacral sutures in a cadaveric sacrocolpopexy model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a 1-hour instructional session, trainees performed an open sacrocolpopexy on unembalmed cadavers under guidance by a Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery board-certified surgeon. At completion of the session, the presacral tissues were dissected and the location and depth of each sacral suture was identified. RESULTS: A total of 19 sutures were placed by 9 trainees into 8 cadavers. The majority of sutures (14/19, 74%) were placed between L5 and S1. Three sutures (16%) were placed at L5 and 2 (11%) were placed at the S1 vertebral body. The mean depth of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) was 1.4 mm. When assessing depth of suture placement, 13 of 19 (68%) were placed into the ALL without penetrating the disc space. Two sutures (11%) were placed in the tissues superficial to the ALL and 4 (22%) were placed deep to the ALL into the periosteum or disc. CONCLUSION: This study of cadaveric simulation of open sacrocolpopexy finds that location of sacral suture placement is most commonly at the level of the L5-S1 disc space and that placement of sutures into the underlying disc occurs about 1 in 5 times.