Betamethasone treatment-to-delivery interval, retreatment, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage in infants <28 weeks' gestation.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal corticosteroids decrease the incidence of severe intraventricular hemorrhages (grades 3,4) in preterm infants. It is unclear whether their beneficial effects on intraventricular hemorrhage wane with time (as occurs in neonatal respiratory distress) and if repeat courses can restore this effect. Prior randomized controlled trials of betamethasone retreatment found no benefit on severe intraventricular hemorrhage rates. However, the trials may have included an insufficient number of infants at risk for intraventricular hemorrhage to be able to adequately address this question. Severe intraventricular hemorrhages occur almost exclusively in infants born <28 weeks, whereas only 7% (0%-16%) of the retreatment trials' populations were <28 weeks. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the risk of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in infants delivered <28 weeks increases when the betamethasone treatment-to-delivery interval increases beyond 9 days and to determine if betamethasone retreatment prior to delivery decreases the rate of hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study examining the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage before (epoch 1) and after (epoch 2) a practice change that encouraged obstetricians to retreat pregnant women still at high risk of delivery before 28 weeks' gestation when >9 days elapsed from the first dose of betamethasone. Multivariable analyses with logistic regression using generalized estimating equations techniques were conducted to examine the rates of intraventricular hemorrhage among 410 infants <28 weeks' gestation who either delivered between 1-9 days (n=290) after the first 2-dose betamethasone course or delivered ≥10 days (and eligible for retreatment) (n=120). RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounding variables, infants who delivered ≥10 days after a single betamethasone course had an increased risk of either severe intraventricular hemorrhage alone or the combined outcome severe intraventricular hemorrhage or death before 4 days (OR (95%CI): 2.8 (1.2, 6.6)) compared with infants who delivered between 1-9 days after betamethasone. Among the 120 infants who delivered ≥10 days after the first dose of betamethasone, 64 (53%) received a second/retreatment course of antenatal betamethasone. The severe intraventricular hemorrhage rate in infants whose mothers received a second/retreatment course of betamethasone was similar to the rate in infants who delivered within 1-9 days and significantly lower than in those who delivered ≥10 days without retreatment (OR (95%CI): 0.10 (0.02, 0.65). Following the change in guidelines, the rate of retreatment in infants who delivered ≥10 days after the first betamethasone course (and before 28 weeks) increased from epoch 1 to epoch 2 (25% to 87%, p<0.001) and the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage decreased from 22% to 0% (p<0.001). In contrast, the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in infants who delivered 1-9 days after the initial betamethasone dose (who were not eligible for retreatment) did not change between epochs 1 and 2 (12% and 11%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although betamethasone's benefits on severe intraventricular hemorrhage appear to wane after the first dose, retreatment with a second course appears to restore its beneficial effects. Encouraging earlier retreatment of women at high risk of delivery before 28 weeks was associated with a lower rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhages among infants delivering <28 weeks.

Patient Decisions Regarding Fetal Monitoring in the Periviable Period and Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Management of delivery at periviable gestation requires complex counseling and decision making, including difficult choices about monitoring and potential cesarean delivery (CD) for fetal benefit. Our objective was to characterize decisions that patients make regarding fetal monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit when delivering in the periviable period, and associations with perinatal and obstetric outcomes. We hypothesize that a significant number of patients forgo monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit in the periviable period when offered the opportunity to do so. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of nonanomalous singleton pregnancies delivering between 230/7 and 256/7 weeks at a tertiary care center from 2015 to 2020 as based on our institutional clinical practice. Since 2015, these patients are offered the ability to accept or decline fetal monitoring, potential CD for fetal benefit, and active resuscitation of a liveborn neonate. The frequency of patients desiring potential CD for fetal benefit was identified, and associations with CD and intrapartum demise were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were included. Seventy-eight percent (n = 39) desired monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit, and 84% (n = 42) desired resuscitation if the neonate was born alive. This varied by gestational age: 55% (6/11) of patients delivering between 230/7 and 236/7 weeks desired fetal monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit, while 90% (19/21) of patients delivering between 250/7 and 256/7 weeks desired fetal monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit (p = 0.02). Sixty-nine percent of pregnancies in which potential CD for fetal benefit was desired resulted in CD (27/39), of which 85% were classical (23/27). Intrapartum fetal demise occurred in 45% (5/11) of pregnancies in which monitoring was not performed. CONCLUSION: While a majority of patients delivering between 230/7 and 256/7 weeks desired monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit, this varied significantly by gestational age. The decision to perform monitoring and potential CD for fetal benefit was associated with a high frequency of CD, while the decision to forgo monitoring was associated with high frequency of intrapartum demise. KEY POINTS: · Patients desires vary in the setting of periviable delivery.. · Periviable monitoring is associated with cesarean delivery.. · Forgoing monitoring is associated with intrapartum demise..

Is Preimplantation Genetic Testing Associated with Increased Risk of Abnormal Placentation After Frozen Embryo Transfer?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with abnormal placentation among a cohort of pregnancies conceived after frozen embryo transfer (FET). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who conceived via FET at the University of California, San Francisco from 2012 to 2016 with resultant delivery at the same institution. The primary outcome was abnormal placentation, including placenta accreta, retained placenta, abruption, placenta previa, vasa previa, marginal or velamentous cord insertion, circumvallate placenta, circummarginate placenta, placenta membranacea, bipartite placenta, and placenta succenturiata. Diagnosis was confirmed by reviewing imaging, delivery, and pathology reports. Our secondary outcome was hypertensive disease of pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 311 pregnancies were included in analysis; 158 (50.8%) underwent PGT. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups except for age at conception and infertility diagnosis. Women with PGT were more likely to undergo single embryo transfer (82.3 vs. 64.1%, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of the primary outcome (26.6 vs. 27.4%, p = 0.86) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (33.5 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.97), which remained true after multivariate analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: Among pregnancies conceived after FET, PGT is not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of abnormal placentation or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. KEY POINTS: · In pregnancies conceived by FET, PGT is not associated with increased risk of abnormal placentation.. · In pregnancies conceived by FET, PGT is not associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders.. · Differences in outcomes of PGT pregnancies may be related to FET rather than trophectoderm biopsy..

Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.

Importance: Safe reduction of the cesarean delivery rate is a national priority. Objective: To evaluate the rates of cesarean delivery for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) births in California in the context of a statewide multifaceted intervention designed to reduce the rates of cesarean delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study of cesarean delivery rates from 2014 to 2019 among 7 574 889 NTSV births in the US and at 238 nonmilitary hospitals providing maternity services in California. From 2016 to 2019, California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative partnered with Smart Care California to implement multiple approaches to decrease the rates of cesarean delivery. Hospitals with rates of cesarean delivery greater than 23.9% for NTSV births were invited to join 1 of 3 cohorts for an 18-month quality improvement collaborative between July 2016 and June 2019. Exposures: Within the collaborative, multidisciplinary teams implemented multiple strategies supported by mentorship, shared learning, and rapid-cycle data feedback. Partnerships among nonprofit organizations, state governmental agencies, purchasers, and health plans addressed the external environment through transparency, award programs, and incentives. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in cesarean delivery rates for NTSV births in California and a difference-in-differences analysis was performed to compare cesarean delivery rates for NTSV births in California vs the rates in the rest of the US. A mixed multivariable logistic regression model that adjusted for patient-level and hospital-level confounders also was used to assess the collaborative and the external statewide actions. The cesarean delivery rates for NTSV births at hospitals participating in the collaborative were compared with the rates from the nonparticipating hospitals and the rates in the participating hospitals prior to participation in the collaborative. Results: A total of 7 574 889 NTSV births occurred in the US from 2014 to 2019, of which 914 283 were at 238 hospitals in California. All California hospitals were exposed to the statewide actions to reduce the rates of cesarean delivery, including the 149 hospitals that had baseline rates of cesarean delivery greater than 23.9% for NTSV births, of which 91 (61%) participated in the quality improvement collaborative. The rate of cesarean delivery for NTSV births in California decreased from 26.0% (95% CI, 25.8%-26.2%) in 2014 to 22.8% (95% CI, 22.6%-23.1%) in 2019 (relative risk, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.89). The rate of cesarean delivery for NTSV births in the US (excluding California births) was 26.0% in both 2014 and 2019 (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.996-1.005). The difference-in-differences analysis revealed that the reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery for NTSV births in California was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.5%) higher than in the US (excluding California). Compared with the hospitals and the periods not exposed to the collaborative activities, and after adjusting for patient characteristics and time using a modified stepped-wedge analysis, exposure to collaborative activities was associated with a lower odds of cesarean delivery for NTSV births (24.4% vs 24.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.85-0.89]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this observational study of NTSV births in California from 2014 to 2019, the rates of cesarean delivery decreased over time in the setting of the implementation of a coordinated hospital-level collaborative and statewide initiatives designed to support vaginal birth.

Hospital bans on trial of labor after cesarean and antepartum transfer of care.

BACKGROUND: Hospital policies restricting access to trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) are prevalent. Many women with a previous cesarean birth are affected by these bans, but there are limited data on the effect of these bans and whether women would consider changing delivery hospitals in the setting of a real or hypothetical TOLAC ban. METHODS: This was a survey of TOLAC-eligible women receiving prenatal care at four hospitals where TOLAC is available, and 1 non-TOLAC site. Participants were asked about their likelihood of switching hospitals to pursue TOLAC if it were unavailable. Women at the non-TOLAC site had their medical records reviewed to ascertain final location and approach to delivery. RESULTS: A total of 297 women were interviewed, 48 from the non-TOLAC site. 162 (54%) participants indicated they would transfer care if TOLAC were unavailable. Among women at the non-TOLAC site, 57% who indicated an intention to switch hospitals did so. In a multivariable logistic regression model, variables associated with transferring care included race/ethnicity other than Latina (aOR 25.20 [95% CI 2.23-284.26]), being unaware of the TOLAC ban (19.81 [1.99-196.64]), and perceiving that a close friend/relative thought they should undergo TOLAC (17.31 [1.70-176.06]). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of women with prior cesarean would consider transferring care if TOLAC became unavailable, and more than 1 of 3 of women at a non-TOLAC site transferred care. More research is needed on the impact of TOLAC bans and how to facilitate transfer for those who desire TOLAC.

Application of Implementation Science to OB/GYN Quality Improvement Efforts.

Although there is no shortage of guidelines and toolkits outlining clinical practices that are evidence-based and have been shown to improve outcomes, many hospitals, and L&D units struggle to figure out exactly how to implement strategies that have been shown to work. This paper will describe suggestions to help obstetrics and gynecology units successfully implement evidence-based strategies to improve quality and safety based on the theoretical framing structures of implementation science, including theories such as the Health Beliefs Model, the Theory of Planned Behavior, Ecological Perspectives, COM-B, CFIR, and tools such as Driver Diagrams.

Ultrasound-guided instrumental removal of the retained placenta after vaginal delivery.

The standard treatment for retained placenta is manual extraction, in which a hand is introduced inside the uterus to cleave a plane between the placenta and the uterine wall. For women without an epidural, the procedure is extremely uncomfortable and may require additional measures such as intravenous narcotics or regional anesthesia. Although ultrasound-guided instrumental removal of the placenta is standard practice as part of second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation and may be done at many institutions, especially after failed manual extraction, it has not yet been described in the literature as a technique following vaginal birth. Our experience with this technique is that it causes less discomfort to the patient than a traditional manual extraction, because the instrument entering the uterus is much narrower than a hand. With the patient in dorsal lithotomy, we locate the cervix and stabilize it either with fingers or a ring forceps on the anterior lip. We introduce Bierer ovum forceps into the uterus under direct ultrasound guidance. The Bierer forceps are preferred because of their long length, large head, and serrated teeth that allow for a firm, secure grip on the placenta. We grasp the placental tissue with the forceps and apply slow, gentle traction in short strokes, regrasping increasingly more distal areas of placenta as necessary to tease out the placenta. After 1-2 minutes, the placenta separates and can be pulled out of the uterus, usually intact. Our experience suggests that this technique is a well-tolerated option for women without an epidural who have a retained placenta. Further study is needed to quantify the amount of discomfort and anesthesia that can be avoided with this technique, as well as whether there is any change in the frequency of infectious complications or the necessity of postremoval curettage.

The mortality risk of expectant management compared with delivery stratified by gestational age and race and ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the mortality risk of expectant management with the risk of delivery at each week of term pregnancy in 4 racial/ethnic groups. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all nonanomalous, term deliveries in California from 1997 to 2006 among white, black, Hispanic, and Asian women. In each racial/ethnic group, we compared the risk of infant death at each week with a composite risk representing the mortality risk of 1 week of expectant management. RESULTS: The risk of stillbirth and infant death is highest in black women (stillbirth risk: 18.0 per 10,000, infant death: 24.4 per 10,000, compared with 9.4 per 10,000 and 10.8 per 10,000 in white women, respectively; P < .001). Although absolute risks differ by race/ethnicity, the composite risk of expectant management does not surpass the risk of delivery until 39 weeks in any group. At 39 weeks these absolute risk differences are low, however, with a number needed to deliver to prevent 1 death ranging from 751 (among black women) to 2587 (among Asian women). CONCLUSION: The mortality risk of expectant management exceeds the risk of delivery at 39 weeks in all racial/ethnic groups, despite variation in absolute risks.

Dilation and evacuation training in maternal-fetal medicine fellowships.

OBJECTIVE: Many maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialists provide dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures for their patients with fetal or obstetric complications. Our study describes the D&E training opportunities that are available to MFM trainees during their fellowship. STUDY DESIGN: National surveys of MFM fellows and fellowship program directors assessed the availability of D&E training in fellowship. Univariate and multivariate comparisons of correlates of D&E training and provision were performed. RESULTS: Of the 270 MFM fellows and 79 fellowship directors who were contacted, 92 (34%) and 44 (56%) responded, respectively. More than one-half of fellows (60/92) and almost one-half of fellowship programs (20/44) report organized training opportunities for D&E. Three-quarters of fellows who were surveyed believe that D&E training should be part of MFM fellowship, and one-third of fellows who have not yet been trained would like training opportunities. Being at a fellowship that offers D&E training is associated with 7.5 times higher odds of intending to provide D&E after graduation (P = .005; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-30). CONCLUSION: MFM physicians are in a unique position to provide termination services for their patients with pregnancy complications. Many MFM subspecialists provide D&E services during fellowship and plan to continue after graduation. MFM fellows express a strong interest in D&E training; therefore, D&E training opportunities should be offered as a part of MFM fellowship.

Performance Characteristics of Sepsis Screening Tools During Antepartum and Postpartum Admissions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance characteristics of existing screening tools for the prediction of sepsis during antepartum and postpartum readmissions. METHODS: This was a case-control study using electronic health record data obtained between 2016 and 2021 from 67 hospitals for antepartum sepsis admissions and 71 hospitals for postpartum readmissions up to 42 days. Patients in the sepsis case group were matched in a 1:4 ratio to a comparison cohort of patients without sepsis admitted antepartum or postpartum. The following screening criteria were evaluated: the CMQCC (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative) initial sepsis screen, the non-pregnancy-adjusted SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), the MEWC (Maternal Early Warning Criteria), UKOSS (United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System) obstetric SIRS, and the MEWT (Maternal Early Warning Trigger Tool). Time periods were divided into early pregnancy (less than 20 weeks of gestation), more than 20 weeks of gestation, early postpartum (less than 3 days postpartum), and late postpartum through 42 days. False-positive screening rates, C-statistics, sensitivity, and specificity were reported for each overall screening tool and each individual criterion. RESULTS: We identified 525 patients with sepsis during an antepartum hospitalization and 728 patients with sepsis during a postpartum readmission. For early pregnancy and more than 3 days postpartum, non-pregnancy-adjusted SIRS had the highest C-statistics (0.78 and 0.83, respectively). For more than 20 weeks of gestation and less than 3 days postpartum, the pregnancy-adjusted sepsis screening tools (CMQCC and UKOSS) had the highest C-statistics (0.87-0.94). The MEWC maintained the highest sensitivity rates during all time periods (81.9-94.4%) but also had the highest false-positive rates (30.4-63.9%). The pregnancy-adjusted sepsis screening tools (CMQCC, UKOSS) had the lowest false-positive rates in all time periods (3.9-10.1%). All tools had the lowest C-statistics in the periods of less than 20 weeks of gestation and more than 3 days postpartum. CONCLUSION: For admissions early in pregnancy and more than 3 days postpartum, non-pregnancy-adjusted sepsis screening tools performed better than pregnancy-adjusted tools. From 20 weeks of gestation through up to 3 days postpartum, using a pregnancy-adjusted sepsis screening tool increased sensitivity and minimized false-positive rates. The overall false-positive rate remained high.

Performance Characteristics of Sepsis Screening Tools During Delivery Admissions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the screening performance characteristics of existing tools for the diagnosis of sepsis during delivery admissions. METHODS: This was a case-control study using electronic health record data, including vital signs and laboratory results, for all delivery admissions of patients with sepsis from 59 nationally distributed hospitals. Patients with sepsis were matched by gestational age at delivery in a 1:4 ratio with patients without sepsis to create a comparison group. Patients with chorioamnionitis and sepsis were compared with a complete cohort of patients with chorioamnionitis without sepsis. Multiple screening criteria for sepsis were evaluated: the CMQCC (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative), SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), the MEWC (the Maternal Early Warning Criteria), UKOSS (United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System), and the MEWT (Maternal Early Warning Trigger Tool). Sensitivity, false-positive rates, and C-statistics were reported for each screening tool. Analyses were stratified into cohort 1, which excluded patients with chorioamnionitis-endometritis, and cohort 2, which included those patients. RESULTS: Delivery admissions at 59 hospitals were extracted for patients with sepsis. Cohort 1 comprised 647 patients with sepsis, including 228 with end-organ injury, matched with a control group of 2,588 patients without sepsis. Cohort 2 comprised 14,591 patients with chorioamnionitis-endometritis, of whom 1,049 had sepsis and 238 had end-organ injury. In cohort 1, the CMQCC and the UKOSS pregnancy-adjusted criteria had the lowest false-positive rates (6.9% and 9.6%, respectively) and the highest C-statistics (0.92 and 0.91, respectively). Although other screening criteria, such as SIRS and the MEWC, had similar sensitivities, it was at the cost of much higher false-positive rates (21.3% and 38.3%, respectively). In cohort 2, including all patients with chorioamnionitis-endometritis, the highest C-statistics were again for the CMQCC (0.67) and UKOSS (0.64). All screening tools had high false-positive rates, but the false-positive rates for the CMQCC and UKOSS were substantially lower than those for SIRS and the MEWC. CONCLUSION: During delivery admissions, the CMQCC and UKOSS pregnancy-adjusted screening criteria have the lowest false-positive results while maintaining greater than 90% sensitivity rates. Performance of all screening tools was degraded in the setting of chorioamnionitis-endometritis.

The risk of stillbirth and infant death by each additional week of expectant management stratified by maternal age.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine fetal/infant mortality by gestational age at term stratified by maternal age. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 2005 US national birth certificate data. For each week of term gestation, the risk of mortality associated with delivery was compared with composite mortality risk of expectant management. The expectant management measure included stillbirth and infant death. This expectant management risk was calculated to estimate the composite mortality risk with remaining pregnant an additional week by combining the risk of stillbirth during the additional week of pregnancy and infant death risk following delivery at the next week. Maternal age was stratified by 35 years or more compared with women younger than 35 years as well as subgroup analyses of younger than 20, 20-34, 35-39, or 40 years old or older. RESULTS: The fetal/infant mortality risk of expectant management is greater than the risk of infant death at 39 weeks' gestation in women 35 years old or older (15.2 vs 10.9 of 10,000, P < .05). In women younger than 35 years old, the risk of expectant management also exceeded that of infant death at 39 weeks (21.3 vs 18.8 of 10,000, P < .05). For women younger than 35 years old, the overall expectant management risk is influenced by higher infant death risk and does not rise significantly until 41 weeks compared with women 35 years old or older in which it increased at 40 weeks. CONCLUSION: Risk varies by maternal age, and delivery at 39 weeks minimizes fetal/infant mortality for both groups, although the magnitude of the risk reduction is greater in older women.

Hospital-level variation in racial disparities in low-risk nulliparous cesarean delivery rates.

BACKGROUND: Nationally, rates of cesarean delivery are highest among Black patients compared with other racial/ethnic groups. These observed inequities are a relatively new phenomenon (in the 1980s, cesarean delivery rates among Black patients were lower than average), indicating an opportunity to narrow the gap. Cesarean delivery rates vary greatly among hospitals, masking racial disparities that are unseen when rates are reported in aggregate. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore reasons for the current large Black-White disparity in first-birth cesarean delivery rates by first examining the hospital-level variation in first-birth cesarean delivery rates among different racial/ethnic groups. We then identified hospitals that had low first-birth cesarean delivery rates among Black patients and compared them with hospitals with high rates. We sought to identify differences in facility or patient characteristics that could explain the racial disparity. STUDY DESIGN: A population cross-sectional study was performed on 1,267,493 California live births from 2018 through 2020 using birth certificate data linked with maternal patient discharge records. Annual nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery (first-birth) rates were calculated for the most common racial/ethnic groups statewide and for each hospital. Self-identified race/ethnicity categories as selected on the birth certificate were used. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals for first-birth cesarean delivery comparing 2019 with 2015 were estimated using a log-binomial model for each racial/ethnic group. Patient and hospital characteristics were compared between hospitals with first-birth cesarean delivery rates <23.9% for Black patients and hospitals with rates ≥23.9% for Black patients. RESULTS: Hospitals with at least 30 nulliparous term singleton vertex Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White patients each were identified. Black patients had a very different distribution, with a significantly higher rate (28.4%) and wider standard deviation (7.1) and interquartile range (6.5) than other racial groups (P<.01). A total of 29 hospitals with a low first-birth cesarean delivery rate among Black patients were identified using the Healthy People 2020 target of 23.9% and compared with 106 hospitals with higher rates. The low-rate group had a cesarean delivery rate of 19.9%, as opposed to 30.7% in the higher-rate group. There were no significant differences between the groups in hospital characteristics (ownership, delivery volume, neonatal level of care, proportion of midwife deliveries) or patient characteristics (age, education, insurance, onset of prenatal care, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Among the 106 hospitals that did not meet the target for Black patients, 63 met it for White patients with a mean rate of 21.4%. In the same hospitals, the mean rate for Black patients was 29.5%. Among Black patients in the group that did not meet the 23.9% target, there were significantly higher rates of all cesarean delivery indications: labor dystocia, fetal concern (spontaneous labor), and no labor (eg, macrosomia), which are all indications with a high degree of subjectivity. CONCLUSION: The statewide cesarean delivery rate of Black patients is significantly higher and has substantially greater hospital variation compared with other racial or ethnic groups. The lack of difference in facility or patient characteristics between hospitals with low cesarean delivery rates among Black patients and those with high rates suggests that unconscious bias and structural racism potentially play important roles in creating these racial differences.

Improving the Rate of Delayed Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants: A Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed cord clamping (DCC) provides many benefits for preterm infants. The aim of this quality improvement project was to increase the rate of DCC by 25% within 12 months for neonates <34 weeks' gestation born at a tertiary care hospital. METHOD: A multidisciplinary team investigated key drivers and developed targeted interventions to improve DCC rates. The primary outcome measure was the rate of DCC for infants <34 weeks' gestation. Process measures were adherence to the DCC protocol and the rate of births with an experienced neonatology provider present at the bedside. Balancing measures included the degree of neonatal resuscitation, initial infant temperature, and maternal blood loss. Data were collected from chart review and a perinatal research database and then analyzed on control charts. The preintervention period was from July 2019 to June 2020 and the postintervention period was from July 2020 to December 2021. RESULTS: 322 inborn neonates born at <34 weeks' met inclusion criteria (137 preintervention and 185 postintervention). The rate of DCC increased by 63%, from a baseline of 40% to 65% (P <.001), with sustained improvement over 18 months. Significant improvement occurred for all process measures without a significant change in balancing measures. CONCLUSION: Using core quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team implemented a series of targeted interventions which was associated with an increased rate of DCC in early preterm infants.

Data-driven longitudinal characterization of neonatal health and morbidity.

Although prematurity is the single largest cause of death in children under 5 years of age, the current definition of prematurity, based on gestational age, lacks the precision needed for guiding care decisions. Here, we propose a longitudinal risk assessment for adverse neonatal outcomes in newborns based on a deep learning model that uses electronic health records (EHRs) to predict a wide range of outcomes over a period starting shortly before conception and ending months after birth. By linking the EHRs of the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and the Stanford Healthcare Adult Hospital, we developed a cohort of 22,104 mother-newborn dyads delivered between 2014 and 2018. Maternal and newborn EHRs were extracted and used to train a multi-input multitask deep learning model, featuring a long short-term memory neural network, to predict 24 different neonatal outcomes. An additional cohort of 10,250 mother-newborn dyads delivered at the same Stanford Hospitals from 2019 to September 2020 was used to validate the model. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve at delivery exceeded 0.9 for 10 of the 24 neonatal outcomes considered and were between 0.8 and 0.9 for 7 additional outcomes. Moreover, comprehensive association analysis identified multiple known associations between various maternal and neonatal features and specific neonatal outcomes. This study used linked EHRs from more than 30,000 mother-newborn dyads and would serve as a resource for the investigation and prediction of neonatal outcomes. An interactive website is available for independent investigators to leverage this unique dataset: https://maternal-child-health-associations.shinyapps.io/shiny_app/.

The risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age in women with gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the different mortality risks between delivery and expectant management in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study that included singleton pregnancies of women diagnosed with GDM delivering at 36-42 weeks' gestational age in California from 1997 through 2006. A composite mortality rate was developed to estimate the risk of expectant management at each gestational age incorporating the stillbirth risk during the week of continuing pregnancy plus the infant mortality risk at the gestational age 1 week hence. RESULTS: In women with GDM, the risk of expectant management is lower than the risk of delivery at 36 weeks (17.4 vs 19.3/10,000), but at 39 weeks, the risk of expectant management exceeds that of delivery (relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6). CONCLUSION: In women with GDM, infant mortality rates at 39 weeks are lower than the overall mortality risk of expectant management for 1 week; absolute risks of stillbirth and infant death are low.

Maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists' provision of second-trimester termination services.

OBJECTIVE: Most abortions for pregnancy complications occur in the second trimester. Little is known about whether maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists (MFMs) perform terminations for these women. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed all members of Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine by e-mail or mail regarding second-trimester abortion provision. We conducted analyses of whether MFMs perform abortions, by what method, and how frequently. RESULTS: Our response rate was 32.4% (689/2,125). Over two-thirds of respondents perform either dilation and evacuation (D&E) or induction; 31% perform D&Es. Male gender, frequent chorionic villus sampling provision, and being trained in D&E during fellowship are associated with performing D&Es. Nonprovision of any second-trimester abortion is significantly associated with age over 50, nonacademic practice setting, and less supportive abortion attitudes (p < 0.001). A nonsignificant trend toward association between south/southeast region and nonprovision of any second-trimester abortion is seen (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Many MFMs include D&E and induction termination services in their practice. Supporting current D&E providers and expanding training options for MFMs may optimize care for women diagnosed with serious pregnancy complications.

External cephalic version: Success rates with and without nitrous oxide.

BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is a technique used to reduce the incidence of cesarean deliveries due to malpresentation. Nitrous oxide is an inhaled analgesic that may be used for pain relief for women undergoing external cephalic version. OBJECTIVE: To compare the conversion rate of non-cephalic to cephalic presentation in ECV with and without nitrous oxide. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all singleton, term gestation ECVs between January 2016 and June 2017 at a single institution. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare women who had ECV with nitrous oxide versus ECV without nitrous oxide. The primary outcome was successful rate of conversion to cephalic presentation and the secondary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery. RESULTS: During the study period, 167 women underwent ECV: 77 with nitrous oxide and 90 without nitrous oxide. Of the 77 women who used nitrous oxide, 25 (32.5%) were successful and 17 of these women delivered vaginally (68%). Of the women who underwent ECV without nitrous oxide, 29 (32.2%) successfully converted and 21 of these delivered vaginally (72%). After controlling for confounders, the use of nitrous oxide had no clinically or statistically significant difference on ECV success rates (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.52-2.23). CONCLUSION: Nitrous oxide does not seem to affect conversion rate to cephalic presentation in ECV. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of nitrous oxide on women's decision to undergo ECV and on patient satisfaction and tolerability.