Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Prev Med ; 94: 60-64, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27856341

ABSTRACT

Routine pelvic examinations have been a fundamental part of the annual female examination. The 2014 American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline recommends against routine pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk women. Our aim was to evaluate women's attitudes and beliefs about pelvic examinations and how knowledge of the new guidelines contributes to attitudes and beliefs. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using a self-administered written survey developed through literature review and pretested and revised on the basis of staff suggestions. Nonpregnant women age≥21years presenting to outpatient clinics at Mayo Clinic in Arizona or Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, received the survey. After being asked about pelvic examination practices and beliefs, participants were informed of the ACP guideline, to determine effect on attitudes and beliefs. Demographic characteristics and pertinent medical history questions were collected from participants. In total, 671 women who were predominantly white, married, and educated completed surveys. Participants described pelvic examinations as reassuring, and a majority believed the examinations were useful in detecting ovarian cancer (74.6%), necessary for screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (71.0%), or necessary before initiating contraception (67.0%). After reading the 2014 ACP guideline, significantly fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations (P<0.001). Despite evidence to the contrary, women believed pelvic examinations were necessary for STI screening, contraception initiation, and ovarian cancer detection. After education on the ACP screening guideline, fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Gynecological Examination , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Adult , Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Women's Health
2.
Mycoses ; 56(2): 145-9, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22809175

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary coccidioidomycosis is caused by inhaling airborne arthroconidia of Coccidioides, a soil-dwelling fungus endemic to the desert southwestern United States. Although uncommon, disseminated coccidioidal infection can be associated with well-defined risk factors, such as cell-mediated immunodeficiency, certain racial heritages (e.g. African or Filipino), male sex, or pregnancy. Before widespread use of computed tomography (CT), the presence or persistence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy was postulated to be a risk factor for disseminated coccidioidal infection. To investigate the use of CT scanning to identify the presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with pulmonary coccidioidomycosis, and to correlate such lymphadenopathy with disseminated coccidioidal infection, we performed a retrospective review of patients with pulmonary coccidioidomycosis who were evaluated by chest CT. Two radiologists independently interpreted 150 CT scans from patients with pulmonary coccidioidomycosis. Forty-nine patients met CT criteria for mediastinal lymphadenopathy, whereas 101 patients did not. Disseminated coccidioidal infection was observed in 5 (10%) of the 49 patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and in 6 of the 101 (6%; P = .34) without such adenopathy. Among patients with coccidioidomycosis, patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, as assessed by CT, had a higher rate of disseminated infection, but the difference was not statistically significant.


Subject(s)
Coccidioidomycosis/etiology , Coccidioidomycosis/immunology , Lymphatic Diseases/complications , Mediastinal Diseases/complications , Adult , Aged , Coccidioides/physiology , Coccidioidomycosis/microbiology , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Male , Mediastinal Diseases/immunology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 31(3): 356-361, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041492

ABSTRACT

Background: Understanding the accuracy of a woman's perceived breast cancer risk can enhance shared decision-making about breast cancer screening through provider and patient discussion. We aim to report and compare women's perceived lifetime breast cancer risk to calculated lifetime breast cancer risk. Methods: Women presenting to Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Minnesota in July 2016 completed a survey assessing their perceived breast cancer risk. Lifetime Gail risk scores were calculated from questions pertaining to health history and were then compared with perceived breast cancer risk. Results: A total of 550 predominantly white, married, and well-educated (≥college) women completed surveys. Using lifetime Gail risk scores, 5.6% were classified as high risk (>20% lifetime risk), 7.7% were classified as intermediate risk (15%-20%), and 86.6% were classified as average risk (<15%). Of the 27 women who were classified as high risk, 18 (66.7%) underestimated their risk and of the 37 women who were intermediate risk, 12 (32.4%) underestimated risk. Women more likely to underestimate their risk had a reported history of an abnormal mammogram and at least one or more relative with a history of breast cancer. Surveyed women tended to overestimate risk 4.3 (130/30) times as often as they underestimated risk. Conclusion: In a group of predominantly white, educated, and married cohort of women, there was a large portion of women in the elevated risk groups who underestimated risk. Specific aspects of medical history were associated with underestimation including a history of abnormal mammogram and family history of breast cancer. Overall, in our sample, more women overestimated than underestimated risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 28(3): 302-313, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30204537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recently updated breast cancer screening guidelines, the American Cancer Society (ACS) and United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended increasing mammography screening intervals for various age groups. In addition, ACS does not recommend clinical breast examination (CBE) for routine screening among average-risk women. Our study explores women's attitudes regarding screening mammography and CBE and evaluates the impact of the updated USPSTF and ACS guidelines on these attitudes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred fourteen patients presenting to Mayo Clinic, Arizona and Minnesota, in July 2016 completed a self-administered survey, which included a summary of the updated guidelines. RESULTS: A majority of the 555 women who fit the inclusion criteria reported that CBE and mammogram are useful in detecting breast cancer and should be performed annually, and 51% of participants were unaware of the updated guidelines. Before reviewing the guidelines, 77% believed yearly CBE and 76% believed yearly mammogram was needed for routine screening. After reviewing the guidelines, the percentage of women who planned to continue with yearly CBE and mammogram decreased significantly to 61% and 64%, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Nearly half the participants (48%) believed the most influential reason for the guideline change was to decrease healthcare spending. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer screening is well received among patients, and a majority of surveyed women were unaware of recent guideline changes. After reviewing the guidelines, there was a significant downward shift in intended screening frequency, although the majority still planned to undergo annual screening. Informing women about updated evidence-based guidelines may influence their knowledge, preferences, and opinions.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Adult , Advisory Committees , Age Factors , Aged , American Cancer Society , Arizona , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Mammography/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 86(1): 63-9, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21193657

ABSTRACT

Coccidioidomycosis is caused by Coccidioides species, a fungus endemic to the desert regions of the southwestern United States, and is of particular concern for African Americans. We performed a PubMed search of the English-language medical literature on coccidioidomycosis in African Americans and summarized the pertinent literature. Search terms were coccidioidomycosis, Coccidioides, race, ethnicity, African, black, and Negro. The proceedings of the national and international coccidioidomycosis symposia were searched. All relevant articles and their cited references were reviewed; those with epidemiological, immunologic, clinical, and therapeutic data pertaining to coccidioidomycosis in African Americans were included in the review. Numerous studies documented an increased predilection for severe coccidioidal infections, coccidioidomycosis-related hospitalizations, and extrapulmonary dissemination in persons of African descent; however, most of the published studies are variably problematic. The immunologic mechanism for this predilection is unclear. The clinical features and treatment recommendations are summarized. Medical practitioners need to be alert to the possibility of coccidioidomycosis in persons with recent travel to or residence in an area where the disease is endemic.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Coccidioidomycosis/ethnology , Coccidioidomycosis/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Travel , United States/epidemiology
6.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(4): 535-8, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19361321

ABSTRACT

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare disease of unknown cause that traditionally affects young women of reproductive age. It is characterized by a proliferation of atypical smooth muscle cells, preferentially along the bronchovascular structures, that causes progressive respiratory failure. LAM is almost universally fatal without a lung transplant, although new clinical trials are ongoing. Because of its rareness and nonspecific presenting symptoms, patients often receive a missed or delayed diagnosis. We present the case of a 51-year-old postmenopausal woman who had hemoptysis ultimately determined to be due to LAM. As is common for patients with LAM, the initial chest radiograph was unremarkable, whereas subsequent computed tomography (CT) demonstrated the distinctive pulmonary parenchymal cysts. Biopsy of an HMB-45-positive, para-aortic lymphangiomyoma provided further confirmation of the diagnosis. LAM may be more common than previously recognized, and it is imperative for primary care providers to be able to recognize this disease so they can make prompt referrals to appropriate specialty centers.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lymphangioleiomyomatosis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Hemoptysis/etiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lymphangioleiomyomatosis/complications , Middle Aged , Postmenopause , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL