Human microRNA sequencing and cytomegalovirus infection risk after kidney transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with detectable CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity according to the QuantiFERON-CMV assay (QTF-CMV) are expected to have adequate immune protection. Nevertheless, a proportion of patients still develop CMV infection. Human microRNAs (hsa-miRNAs) are promising biomarkers owing to their high stability and easy detection. We performed whole blood miRNA sequencing in samples coincident with the first reactive QTF-CMV after transplantation or cessation of antiviral prophylaxis to investigate hsa-miRNAs differentially expressed according to the occurrence of CMV infection. One-year incidence of CMV viremia was 55.0% (median interval from miRNA sequencing sampling of 29 days). After qPCR validation, we found that hsa-miR-125a-5p was downregulated in KTRs developing CMV viremia within the next 90 days (ΔCt: 7.9 ± 0.9 versus 7.3 ± 1.0; P = .011). This difference was more evident among KTRs preemptively managed (8.2 ± 0.9 versus 6.9 ± 0.8; P < .001), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.865. Functional enrichment analysis identified hsa-miR-125a-5p targets involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis, including the BAK1 gene, which was significantly downregulated in KTRs developing CMV viremia. In conclusion, hsa-miR-125a-5p may serve as biomarker to identify CMV-seropositive KTRs at risk of CMV reactivation despite detectable CMV-CMI.

Predictive value of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin levels for negative outcomes in Clostridioides difficile infection.

PURPOSE: We investigated the role of fecal calprotectin (FC) and lactoferrin (FL) as predictive biomarkers in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: We assembled a prospective cohort including all patients with a laboratory-confirmed CDI diagnosis between January and December 2017. FL and FC levels were measured at diagnosis by commercial ELISA and EIA kits. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of FC and FL to predict CDI recurrence and severity (study outcomes) and explored optimal cut-off values in addition to those proposed by the manufacturers (200 µg/g and 7.2 µg/mL, respectively). RESULTS: We included 170 CDI cases (152 first episodes and 18 recurrences). The rates of recurrence (first episodes only) and severity (entire cohort) were 9.2% (14/152) and 46.5% (79/170). Both FL and FC levels were significantly higher in patients who developed study outcomes. Optimal cut-off values for FC and FL to predict CDI recurrence were 1052 µg/g and 6.0 µg/mL. The optimal cut-off value for FC yielded higher specificity (60.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (16.9%) than that proposed by the manufacturer. Regarding CDI severity, the optimal cut-off value for FC (439 µg/g) also provided higher specificity (43.9%) and PPV (54.1%) than that of the manufacturer, whereas the optimal cut-off value for FL (4.6 µg/mL) resulted in an improvement of PPV (57.5%). CONCLUSION: By modifying the thresholds for assay positivity, the measurement of FC and FL at diagnosis is useful to predict recurrence and severity in CDI. Adding these biomarkers to current clinical scores may help to individualize CDI management.

Novel intervention based on an individualized bundle of care to decrease infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Infection remains a relevant complication after kidney transplantation (KT). A well-established strategy in modern medicine is the application of bundles of evidence-based practice in clinical settings. The objective of this study is to explore the application of a personalized bundle of measures aimed to reduce the incidence of infection in the first 12 months after KT. METHODS: A single-center prospective cohort of 148 patients undergoing KT between February 2018 and September 2019 that received an individualized infection prevention strategy was compared to a preintervention cohort (n = 159). The bundle comprised a review of the patient's immunization history, infection risk by country of origin, screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), antimicrobial prophylaxis, and immunological assessment. Individualized recommendations were accordingly provided at a scheduled visit at day +30 after transplantation. RESULTS: The intervention cohort showed a higher compliance rate with the recommended vaccine schedule, screening for geographically restricted infections and LTBI, and intravenous immunoglobulin and vitamin D supplementation (p values <.001). The 1-year incidence rate of infection was lower in the intervention cohort (42.6% vs. 57.9%; p value = .037), as was the rate of infection-related hospitalization (17.6% vs. 32.1%; p value = .003) and the incidence of severe bacterial infection. There were no differences in graft rejection or mortality rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention, including a bundle of evidence-based practices, enhanced compliance with recommended preventive measures and was correlated with a reduction in the 12-month incidence of infection after KT.

Post-transplant dynamics and clinical significance of CMV-specific neutralizing antibodies in kidney transplant recipients treated with T-cell-depleting agents.

We measured cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific antibodies that neutralize epithelial cell infection (CMV-AbNEIs) in 101 CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) at baseline and post-transplant months 3 and 6. All the patients received antithymocyte globulin and 3-month valganciclovir prophylaxis. There were no significant differences in pre-transplant AbNEIs titers between KTRs that developed or did not develop any-level CMV infection or the composite of high-level infection and/or disease. One-year CMV infection-free survival was comparable between KTRs with or without pre-transplant CMV-AbNEIs. No differences were observed by months 3 and 6 either. We observed no protective role for CMV-AbNEIs among CMV-seropositive KTRs undergoing T-cell-depleting induction.

Comparison of intracellular cytokine staining versus an ELISA-based assay to assess CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity in high-risk kidney transplant recipients.

The best method for monitoring cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) among high-risk kidney transplant (KT) recipients remains uncertain. We assessed CMV-CMI by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) by flow cytometry and a commercial interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (QuantiFERON®-CMV [QTF-CMV]) at posttransplant months 3, 4, and 5 in 53 CMV-seropositive KT recipients that had received induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and a 3-month course of valganciclovir prophylaxis. The discriminative capacity (areas under receiver operating characteristics curve [auROCs]) and diagnostic accuracy to predict immune protection against CMV infection from the discontinuation of prophylaxis to month 12 were compared between both methods. There was significant although moderate correlations between CMV-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T-cell counts enumerated by ICS and IFN-γ levels by QTF-CMV at months 3 (rho: 0.493; p = 0.005) and 4 (rho: 0.440; p = 0.077). The auROCs for CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells by ICS were nonsignificantly higher than that of QTF-CMV (0.696 and 0.733 vs. 0.678; p = 0.900 and 0.692, respectively). The optimal cut-off of ≥0.395 CMV-specific CD8+ T-cells yielded a sensitivity of 86.4%, specificity of 54.6%, positive predictive value of 79.2% and negative predictive value of 66.7% to predict protection. The corresponding estimates for QTF-CMV (IFN-γ levels ≥0.2 IU/mL) were 78.9%, 37.5%, 75.0%, and 42.9%, respectively. The enumeration of CMV-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T-cells at the time of cessation of prophylaxis performed slightly better than the QTF-CMV assay to predict immune protection in seropositive KT recipients previously treated with ATG.

Previous use of statins does not improve the outcome of bloodstream infection after kidney transplantation.

Previous studies have suggested that exposure to statins confers a protective effect in bloodstream infection (BSI) due to the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties attributed to these lipid-lowering drugs. Scarce evidence is available for the solid organ transplant population. Therefore, we compared the time to clinical cure (primary outcome) and the time to fever resolution, new requirement of intensive care unit admission or renal replacement therapy, and 30-day all-cause mortality (secondary outcomes) between kidney transplant (KT) recipients with post-transplant BSI that were receiving or not statin therapy for at least the previous 30 days. We included 80 KT recipients that developed 109 BSI episodes (43 [39.4%] and 66 [60.6%] episodes within the statin and non-statin groups, respectively). The median interval since the initial prescription to BSI was 512 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 172-1388). Most episodes were of urinary source and due to Enterobacterales. There were no differences in the median time to clinical cure in the statin and non-statin groups (3.4 [IQR: 3-6.8] versus 4 [IQR: 2-6] days; p-value = .112). The lack of effect was confirmed by multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors (standardized ß coefficient = 0.040; p-value = .709). No significant differences were observed for any of the secondary outcomes either. Vital signs and laboratory values at BSI onset and after 72-96 h were similar in both groups. In conclusion, previous statin therapy had no apparent protective effect on the outcome of post-transplant BSI among KT recipients.

Human pegivirus type 1 infection in kidney transplant recipients: Replication kinetics and clinical correlates.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that infection with the nonpathogenic human pegivirus type 1 (HPgV-1) exerts a clinical benefit in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients, which could be attributable to immunomodulatory effects. Whether this impact can be extrapolated to kidney transplantation (KT) remains largely unknown. METHODS: We measured plasma HPgV-1 RNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction targeting the 5' untranslated region at various points (pretransplantation, day 7, months 1, 3, 6, and 12) in 199 KT recipients. Study outcomes included posttransplant serious infection, immunosuppression-related adverse event (opportunistic infection and/or de novo cancer), and acute graft rejection. RESULTS: HPgV-1 infection was demonstrated in 52 (26.1%) patients, with rates increasing from 14.7% at baseline to 19.1% by month 12 (p-value = .071). De novo infection occurred in 13.8% of patients with no detectable HPgV-1 RNA before transplantation. Double-organ (liver-kidney or kidney-pancreas) transplantation (odds ratio [OR]: 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-20.82) and donation after brain death (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.00-4.88) were associated with posttransplant HPgV-1 infection, whereas pretransplant hypertension was protective (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09-0.55). There were no significant differences in the incidence of study outcomes according to HPgV-1 status. Plasma HPgV-1 RNA levels at different points did not significantly differ between patients that subsequently developed outcomes and those remaining free from these events. No correlation between HPgV-1 RNA and immune parameters or torque teno virus DNA load was observed either. CONCLUSION: Unlike patients living with HIV, HPgV-1 infection does not seem to influence patient or graft outcomes after KT.

T cell-mediated response to SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant recipients with prior COVID-19.

Whether immunosuppression impairs severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific T cell-mediated immunity (SARS-CoV-2-CMI) after liver transplantation (LT) remains unknown. We included 31 LT recipients in whom SARS-CoV-2-CMI was assessed by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and interferon (IFN)-γ FluoroSpot assay after a median of 103 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. Serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. A control group of nontransplant immunocompetent patients were matched (1:1 ratio) by age and time from diagnosis. Post-transplant SARS-CoV-2-CMI was detected by ICS in 90.3% (28/31) of recipients, with higher proportions for IFN-γ-producing CD4+ than CD8+ responses (93.5% versus 83.9%). Positive spike-specific and nucleoprotein-specific responses were found by FluoroSpot in 86.7% (26/30) of recipients each, whereas membrane protein-specific response was present in 83.3% (25/30). An inverse correlation was observed between the number of spike-specific IFN-γ-producing SFUs and time from diagnosis (Spearman's rho: -0.418; p value = .024). Two recipients (6.5%) failed to mount either T cell-mediated or IgG responses. There were no significant differences between LT recipients and nontransplant patients in the magnitude of responses by FluoroSpot to any of the antigens. Most LT recipients mount detectable-but declining over time-SARS-CoV-2-CMI after a median of 3 months from COVID-19, with no meaningful differences with immunocompetent patients.

Cytomegalovirus Exposure and the Risk of Overall Infection After Kidney Transplantation: A Cohort Study on the Indirect Effects Attributable to Viral Replication.

Previous reports hypothesized that cytomegalovirus (CMV) may predispose to non-CMV infection after kidney transplantation (KT). We analysed the incidence of non-CMV infection (overall, bacterial and opportunistic) in 291 KT recipients according to the previous development of any level or high-level (≥1,000 IU/ml) CMV viremia. Exposure to CMV replication was assessed throughout fixed intervals covering first the 30, 90, 180 and 360 post-transplant days (cumulative exposure) and non-overlapping preceding periods (recent exposure). Adjusted Cox models were constructed for each landmark analysis. Overall, 67.7 and 50.5% patients experienced non-CMV and CMV infection, respectively. Patients with cumulative CMV exposure had higher incidence of non-CMV infection beyond days 30 (p-value = 0.002) and 90 (p-value = 0.068), although these associations did not remain after multivariable adjustment. No significant associations were observed for the remaining landmark models (including those based on high-level viremia or recent CMV exposure), or when bacterial and opportunistic infection were separately analysed. There were no differences in viral kinetics (peak CMV viremia and area under curve of CMV viral load) either. Our findings do not support the existence of an independent association between previous CMV exposure and the overall risk of post-transplant infection, although results might be affected by power limitations.

CMV infection, valganciclovir exposure, and the risk of BK viremia and associated nephropathy after kidney transplantation: Is there a link?

BACKGROUND: Immunomodulatory effects attributable to cytomegalovirus (CMV) would predispose to BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection after kidney transplantation (KT), although available evidence is conflicting. It has been suggested that (val)ganciclovir therapy may increase the risk of BKPyV viremia and BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) as a result of drug-induced T-cell impairment. METHODS: We investigated whether CMV replication and/or (val)ganciclovir exposure (either as prophylaxis or treatment) were associated with the development of BKPyV viremia or BKPyVAN in a prospective cohort of 399 KT recipients. CMV infection (any level or high-level viremia and area under the curve of DNAemia) and (val)ganciclovir exposure (any duration of therapy and cumulative days of treatment) during the first post-transplant year were explored through separate landmark survival analyses. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN after a median follow-up of 551 days was 23.1% and 2.5%, respectively. One-year rates of CMV infection and (val)ganciclovir therapy were 47.4% and 54.1%, respectively. No differences were observed in BKPyV viremia- or BKPyVAN-free survival according to previous CMV infection or (val)ganciclovir exposure in any of the landmark analyses. Adjusted Cox models confirmed this lack of association. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not confirm the existence of a relevant impact of CMV infection or (val)ganciclovir therapy on the risk of post-transplant BKPyV events.

A New Clinical and Immunovirological Score for Predicting the Risk of Late Severe Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The CLIV Score.

BACKGROUND: We aimed at constructing a composite score based on Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia (EBVd) and simple clinical and immunological parameters to predict late severe infection (LI) beyond month 6 in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. METHODS: Kidney and liver transplant recipients between May 2014 and August 2016 at 4 participating centers were included. Serum immunoglobulins and complement factors, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, and whole blood EBVd were determined at months 1, 3, and 6. Cox regression analyses were performed to generate a weighted score for the prediction of LI. RESULTS: Overall, 309 SOT recipients were followed-up for a median of 1000 days from transplant (interquartile range, 822-1124). Late severe infection occurred in 104 patients (33.6%). The CLIV Score consisted of the following variables at month 6: high-level EBVd (>1500 IU/mL) and recurrent infection during the previous months (6 points); recipient age ≥70 years and chronic graft dysfunction (5 points); cytomegalovirus mismatch (4 points); and CD8+ T-cell count <400 cells/µL (2 points). The area under receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84). The risk of LI at day 1000 was as follows: score 0, 12.6%; score 2-5, 25.5%; score 6-9, 52.7%; score ≥10, 73.5%. CONCLUSIONS: While waiting for further external validation, the CLIV Score based on clinical and immune-virological parameters is potentially useful to stratify the risk of LI after SOT.

Monitoring of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity with a commercial ELISA-based interferon-γ release assay in kidney transplant recipients treated with antithymocyte globulin.

Monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) may be useful for individualizing valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis after kidney transplantation (KT). We performed a commercial ELISA-based interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (QTF-CMV) from posttransplant months 2-5 (362 points) in 120 CMV-seropositive KT recipients that received antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy and VGCV prophylaxis (median of 92 days). Forty-seven patients (39.3%) had CMV infection after discontinuation of prophylaxis. The QTF-CMV assay was reactive, nonreactive, and indeterminate in 264 (72.9%), 90 (24.9%), and 8 points (2.2%). The QTF-CMV assay at prophylaxis discontinuation exhibited suboptimal accuracy for predicting protective CMV-CMI (sensitivity: 77.4%; specificity: 34.3%; positive predictive value [PPV]: 64.1%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 50.0%), with no differences in 1-year CMV infection rates between patients with negative (nonreactive or indeterminate) or reactive results (45.8% vs 36.1%; P = .244). Specificity and PPV to predict protective CMV-CMI improved by elevating the IFN-γ cutoff value to 1.13 IU/mL (65.7% and 71.4%) and 7.0 IU/mL (85.7% and 76.2%), although NPVs decreased. The QTF-CMV assay as per manufacturer's interpretative criteria performed poorly to predict protection from CMV infection following discontinuation of VGCV prophylaxis among ATG-treated CMV-seropositive KT recipients. This performance is slightly improved by modifying the IFN-γ positivity threshold.

Monitoring of alphatorquevirus DNA levels for the prediction of immunosuppression-related complications after kidney transplantation.

The replication kinetics of nonpathogenic anelloviruses belonging to the Alphatorquevirus genus (such as torque teno virus) might reflect the overall state of posttransplant immunosuppression. We analyzed 221 kidney transplant (KT) recipients in whom plasma alphatorquevirus DNA load was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction at baseline and regularly through the first 12 posttransplant months. Study outcomes included posttransplant infection and a composite of opportunistic infection and/or de novo malignancy (immunosuppression-related adverse event [iRAE]). Alphatorquevirus DNA loads at month 1 were higher among patients who subsequently developed posttransplant infection (P  = .023) or iRAE (P  = .009). Likewise, those with iRAE beyond months 3 and 6 also exhibited higher peak viral loads over the preceding periods. Areas under the curve for log10 alphatorquevirus DNAemia estimated by months 1 or 6 were significantly higher in patients experiencing study outcomes. Alphatorquevirus DNA loads above 3.15 and 4.56 log10 copies/mL at month 1 predicted the occurrence of posttransplant infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-7.36; P  = .027) and iRAE (aHR: 5.17; 95% CI: 2.01-13.33; P  = .001). In conclusion, posttransplant monitoring of plasma alphatorquevirus DNA kinetics may be useful to identify KT recipients at increased risk of immunosuppression-related complications.

Toxin B PCR Amplification Cycle Threshold Adds Little to Clinical Variables for Predicting Outcomes in Clostridium difficile Infection: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the value of the PCR cycle threshold (CT ) for predicting the recurrence/severity of infection compared to that of toxin detection plus clinical variables. First episodes of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosed during 2015 at our institution were included. Samples were tested for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B by use of a single enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The Xpert C. difficile PCR assay was performed on GDH-positive samples. Medical data were reviewed by investigators blinded to diagnostic results for comparison of patients with and without recurrence or a poor outcome (severe/severe-complicated CDI episodes and all-cause death). We generated two sets of predictive models by incorporating the presence of a positive toxin EIA ("EIA-including model") or the optimal PCR CT cutoff value ("PCR-including model") into the clinical variables. Among 227 episodes of CDI included in the study, the rates of recurrence and poor outcome were 15.8% and 30.8%, respectively. The mean PCR CT was lower for episodes with recurrence (24.00 ± 3.28 versus 26.02 ± 4.54; P = 0.002) or a poor outcome (24.9 ± 4.24 versus 26.05 ± 4.47; P = 0.07). The optimal cutoff value for recurrence was 25.65 (sensitivity, 77.8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 60.9 to 89.9]; and specificity, 46.6% [95% CI, 39.4 to 53.9]). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (auROC) for the "PCR-including model" was similar to that for the "EIA-including model" (0.785 versus 0.775, respectively). The optimal PCR CT value for poor outcome was 27.55 (sensitivity, 78.6% [95% CI, 67.1 to 87.5]; and specificity, 35.7% [95% CI, 28.2 to 43.7]). The auROC of the "PCR-including model" was again similar to that of the "EIA-including model" (0.804 versus 0.801). Despite the inverse correlation between PCR CT and the risk of CDI recurrence/severity, this determination does not meaningfully increase the predictive value of clinical variables plus toxin EIA.

Herpes zoster in kidney transplant recipients: protective effect of anti-cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and natural killer cell count. A single-center cohort study.

Despite its impact on quality of life and potential for complications, specific risk and protective factors for herpes zoster (HZ) after kidney transplantation (KT) remain to be clarified. We included 444 patients undergoing KT between November 2008 and March 2013. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations were measured at baseline and months 1 and 6. The risk factors for early (first post-transplant year) and late HZ (years 1-5) were separately assessed. We observed 35 episodes of post-transplant HZ after a median follow-up of 48.3 months (incidence rate: 0.057 per 1000 transplant-days). Median interval from transplantation was 18.3 months. Six patients (17.1%) developed disseminated infection. Postherpetic neuralgia occurred in 10 cases (28.6%). The receipt of anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with (val)ganciclovir decreased the risk of early HZ [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-1.13; P-value = 0.062], whereas the natural killer (NK) cell at month 6 was protective for the occurrence of late HZ [aHR (per 10-cells/µl increase): 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-1.00; P-value = 0.054]. In conclusion, two easily ascertainable factors (whether the patient is receiving anti-CMV prophylaxis and the NK cell count at month 6) might be potentially useful to tailor preventive strategies according to individual susceptibility to post-transplant HZ.

Association between baseline serum hepcidin levels and infection in kidney transplant recipients: Potential role for iron overload.

BACKGROUND: The liver-synthesized peptide hepcidin is a key regulator of iron metabolism and correlates with total iron stores. We analyzed the association between pre-transplant hepcidin-25 levels and infection after kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: Serum hepcidin-25 levels were measured at baseline by high-sensitivity ELISA in 91 patients undergoing KT at our institution between December 2011 and March 2013. The impact of this biomarker on the incidence of post-transplant infection (excluding lower urinary tract infection) during the first year was assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean hepcidin-25 level was 82.3 ± 67.4 ng/mL and strongly correlated with serum ferritin (Spearman's rho = 0.703; P < .001). There were no significant differences in hepcidin-25 levels between patients with or without overall infection (96.4 ± 67.5 vs 72.6 ± 66.7 ng/mL; P = .101). Such difference was evident for opportunistic (128.9 ± 75.0 vs 73.0 ± 62.3 ng/mL; P = .003) and, to a lesser extent, surgical-site infection (107.5 ± 73.3 vs 76.5 ± 65.2 ng/mL; P = .087). Patients with hepcidin-25 levels ≥72.5 ng/mL had higher 12-month cumulative incidence of overall infection (51.2% vs 29.2%; P = .032). After multivariate adjustment, hepcidin-25 ≥72.5 ng/mL acted as an independent risk factor for overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-9.96; P = .005) and opportunistic infection (aHR 4.32; 95% CI 1.18-15.75; P = .027). CONCLUSION: Elevated baseline serum hepcidin-25 levels were associated with increased risk of infection after KT, suggesting a role for iron overload in the individual susceptibility to post-transplant infection.

Vitamin D deficiency and infection risk in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported an increased susceptibility to infection among vitamin D-deficient kidney transplant (KT) recipients, although methodological concerns remain. METHODS: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured in 246 KT recipients at post-transplant months 1, 3, 6 and 12. Vitamin D status was analysed in terms of deficiency (Endocrine Society [<20 ng/mL] and Institute of Medicine [IoM, <12 ng/mL] criteria) and as a continuous variable. Cox models for overall, bacterial and opportunistic infection were adjusted for nutritional status and immunosuppression-related covariates. RESULTS: Median serum 25(OH)D increased from month 1 (10.5 ng/mL) to month 6 (16.3 ng/mL; P-value = 0.001). Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency at month 1 ranged from 87.0% to 61.0% (depending on the diagnostic criteria) and significantly decreased over the next months. After adjustment for age and nutritional status, vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D < 12 ng/mL) at month 1 was an independent risk factor for overall (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.69; P-value = 0.023) and opportunistic infection (HR: 4.05; 95% CI: 1.57-10.46; P-value = 0.004), but not for bacterial infection. A protective effect for overall (adjusted HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63-0.93; P-value = 0.007) and opportunistic infection (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.45-0.86; P-value = 0.004) was observed when 25(OH)D levels were analyzed per one-quartile increases. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D status influences the risk of infection among KT recipients, with the association being particularly evident for opportunistic events and mainly restricted to the early post-transplant period.

Serum sCD30: A promising biomarker for predicting the risk of bacterial infection after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The transmembrane glycoprotein CD30 contributes to regulate the balance between Th1 and Th2 responses. Previous studies have reported conflicting results on the utility of its soluble form (sCD30) to predict post-transplant infection. METHODS: Serum sCD30 was measured by a commercial ELISA assay at baseline and post-transplant months 1, 3, and 6 in 100 kidney transplant (KT) recipients (279 monitoring points). The impact of sCD30 levels on the incidence of overall, bacterial and opportunistic infection during the first 12 months after transplantation was assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: There were no differences in serum sCD30 according to the occurrence of overall or opportunistic infection. However, sCD30 levels were higher in patients with bacterial infection compared to those without at baseline (P=.038) and months 1 (P<.0001), 3 (P=.043), and 6 after transplantation (P=.006). Patients with baseline sCD30 levels ≥13.5 ng/mL had lower 12-month bacterial infection-free survival (35.0% vs 80.0%; P<.0001). After adjusting for potential confounders, baseline sCD30 levels ≥13.5 ng/mL remained as an independent risk factor for bacterial infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 4.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05-10.53; <.001). Analogously, sCD30 levels ≥6.0 ng/mL at month 1 acted as a risk factor for subsequent bacterial infection (aHR: 5.29; 95% CI: 1.11-25.14; P=.036). CONCLUSION: Higher serum sCD30 levels were associated with an increased risk of bacterial infection after KT. We hypothesize that this biomarker reflects a Th2 -polarized T-cell response, which exerts a detrimental effect on the immunity against bacterial pathogens.

Monitoring of intracellular adenosine triphosphate in CD4(+) T cells to predict the occurrence of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplant recipients.

The measurement of intracellular concentrations of adenosine triphosphate (iATP) in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated CD4(+) T cells constitutes a surrogate marker for post-transplant cell-mediated immunity (CMI). This assay has shown suboptimal accuracy for predicting infection after kidney transplantation (KT). We hypothesize that its predictive capacity depends on the specific contribution of the CMI to host-pathogen interactions. We assessed iATP levels in 100 KT recipients at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6 (363 measurements). No association was found between iATP at month 1 and the risk for overall or bacterial infection, although such association was evident for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio [per 50-unit increment]: 0.83; P-value = 0.048). There were no significant differences in mean iATP between stable patients (319.4 ng/ml) and those developing overall (304.1 ng/ml) or bacterial infection (346.9 ng/ml) over the 45 days following monitoring. However, iATP was significantly lower in patients who developed CMV disease (223.5 ng/ml; P-values <0.002). The optimal cutoff (265 ng/ml) for predicting CMV disease in patients not receiving antiviral prophylaxis yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 85.7%, 68.3%, 15.2%, and 98.6%, respectively. In conclusion, a non-pathogen-specific monitoring of CMI by means of iATP informs the risk of CMV disease in KT recipients.