ABSTRACT
Clinical research studies have navigated many changes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to describe the pandemic's impact on research operations in the context of a clinical genomics research consortium that aimed to enroll a majority of participants from underrepresented populations. We interviewed (July to November 2020) and surveyed (May to August 2021) representatives of six projects in the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, which studies the implementation of genome sequencing in the clinical care of patients from populations that are underrepresented in genomics research or are medically underserved. Questions focused on COVID's impact on participant recruitment, enrollment, and engagement, and the transition to teleresearch. Responses were combined and thematically analyzed. Projects described factors at the project, institutional, and community levels that affected their experiences. Project factors included the project's progress at the pandemic's onset, the urgency of in-person clinical care for the disease being studied, and the degree to which teleresearch procedures were already incorporated. Institutional and community factors included institutional guidance for research and clinical care and the burden of COVID on the local community. Overall, being responsive to community experiences and values was essential to how CSER navigated evolving challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Population Groups , Surveys and Questionnaires , Genomics/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Children's Oncology Group clinical trial for intermediate risk rhabdomyosarcoma randomized participants to a combination of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) alone or VAC alternating with vincristine plus irinotecan (VAC/VI). Clinical outcomes were similar, but toxicity profiles differed. This study estimates the cost differences between arms from the health care system's perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of VAC versus VAC/VI. Protocol-required or recommended medications and laboratory studies were included. Costs were obtained from national databases or supporting literature and inflated to 2019 US dollars. Demographic and outcome data were obtained from the clinical trial and directed chart reviews. Life-years (LY) were estimated from life-expectancy tables and discounted by 3% annually. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and alternative clinical scenarios identified factors driving costs. RESULTS: Mean direct medical costs of VAC and VAC/VI were $164,757 and $102,303, respectively. VAC was associated with an additional 0.97 LY and an ICER of $64,386/LY compared with VAC/VI. The ICER was sensitive to survival estimations and to alternative clinical scenarios including outpatient cyclophosphamide delivery (ICER $49,037/LY) or substitution of alternative hematopoietic growth factor schedules (ICER $73,191-$91,579/LY). Applying drug prices from 2012 decreased the total costs of VAC by 20% and VAC/VI by 15% because of changes in dactinomycin and pegfilgrastim prices. CONCLUSIONS: Neither arm was clearly more cost-effective. Pharmaceutical pricing and location of treatment drove costs and may inform future treatment decisions. Rising pharmaceutical costs added $30,000 per patient, a finding important for future drug-pricing policy decisions. LAY SUMMARY: Two chemotherapy regimens recently tested side-by-side for rhabdomyosarcoma had similar tumor outcomes, but different side effects. The health care costs of each regimen were compared; neither was clearly more cost-effective. However, the costs of each treatment changed dramatically with choices of supportive medicines and location of treatment. Costs of treatment rose by 15% to 20% because of rising US drug costs not associated with the clinical trial.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Drug Costs , Rhabdomyosarcoma , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cyclophosphamide/economics , Dactinomycin/economics , Humans , Rhabdomyosarcoma/drug therapy , Vincristine/economicsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: There is limited payer coverage for genome sequencing (GS) relative to exome sequencing (ES) in the U.S. Our objective was to assess payers' considerations for coverage of GS versus coverage of ES and requirements payers have for coverage of GS. The study was conducted by the NIH-funded Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium (CSER). METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives of private payer organizations (payers, N = 12) on considerations and evidentiary and other needs for coverage of GS and ES. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We described four categories of findings and solutions: demonstrated merits of GS versus ES, enhanced methods for evidence generation, consistent laboratory processes/sequencing methods, and enhanced implementation/care delivery. Payers see advantages to GS vs. ES and are open to broader GS coverage but need more proof of these advantages to consider them in coverage decision-making. Next steps include establishing evidence of benefits in specific clinical scenarios, developing quality standards, ensuring transparency of laboratory methods, developing clinical centers of excellence, and incorporating the role of genetic professionals. CONCLUSION: By comparing coverage considerations for GS and ES, we identified a path forward for coverage of GS. Future research should explicitly address payers' conditions for coverage.
Subject(s)
Exome , Insurance Coverage , Base Sequence , Chromosome Mapping , Exome/genetics , Humans , Exome SequencingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Methodological challenges have limited economic evaluations of genome sequencing (GS) and exome sequencing (ES). Our objective was to develop conceptual frameworks for model-based cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of diagnostic GS/ES. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of economic analyses to develop and iterate with experts a set of conceptual CEA frameworks for GS/ES for prenatal testing, early diagnosis in pediatrics, diagnosis of delayed-onset disorders in pediatrics, genetic testing in cancer, screening of newborns, and general population screening. RESULTS: Reflecting on 57 studies meeting inclusion criteria, we recommend the following considerations for each clinical scenario. For prenatal testing, performing comparative analyses of costs of ES strategies and postpartum care, as well as genetic diagnoses and pregnancy outcomes. For early diagnosis in pediatrics, modeling quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs over ≥20 years for rapid turnaround GS/ES. For hereditary cancer syndrome testing, modeling cumulative costs and QALYs for the individual tested and first/second/third-degree relatives. For tumor profiling, not restricting to treatment uptake or response and including QALYs and costs of downstream outcomes. For screening, modeling lifetime costs and QALYs and considering consequences of low penetrance and GS/ES reanalysis. CONCLUSION: Our frameworks can guide the design of model-based CEAs and ultimately foster robust evidence for the economic value of GS/ES.
Subject(s)
Exome , Genetic Testing , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exome/genetics , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether surveillance imaging had an impact on post-relapse survival in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). We hypothesized that relapse detected by imaging (group IM) would be associated with longer survival compared with relapse detected with a clinical sign or symptom (group SS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an observational multi-institutional study in 127 patients with relapsed RMS comparing overall survival (OS) after relapse using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Relapse was detected in 60 (47%) group IM and 67 (53%) SS patients. Median follow-up in survivors was 4 years (range 1.0 to 16.7 y). Four-year OS rates were similar between group IM (28%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14%-40%) and SS (21%, 95% CI: 11%-31%) ( P =0.14). In multivariable analyses accounting for institution, age at diagnosis, time to relapse, risk group at diagnosis, and primary site, not receiving chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.8, 95% CI: 2.8-16.6), radiation (HR: 3, 95% CI: 1.7-5.3), or surgery (HR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6-4.8) after relapse were independently associated with poor OS. CONCLUSION: These results on whether surveillance imaging provides survival benefit in patients with relapsed RMS are inconclusive. Larger studies are needed to justify current surveillance recommendations. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery to treat recurrence prolong OS.
Subject(s)
Rhabdomyosarcoma , Diagnostic Imaging , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Rhabdomyosarcoma/diagnostic imaging , Rhabdomyosarcoma/therapy , Rhabdomyosarcoma, EmbryonalABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: 131 I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131 I-MIBG) is effective in relapsed neuroblastoma. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) conducted a pilot study (NCT01175356) to assess tolerability and feasibility of induction chemotherapy followed by 131 I- MIBG therapy and myeloablative busulfan/melphalan (Bu/Mel) in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma. METHODS: Patients with MIBG-avid high-risk neuroblastoma were eligible. After the first two patients to receive protocol therapy developed severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), the trial was re-designed to include an 131 I-MIBG dose escalation (12, 15, and 18 mCi/kg), with a required 10-week gap before Bu/Mel administration. Patients who completed induction chemotherapy were evaluable for assessment of 131 I-MIBG feasibility; those who completed 131 I-MIBG therapy were evaluable for assessment of 131 I-MIBG + Bu/Mel feasibility. RESULTS: Fifty-nine of 68 patients (86.8%) who completed induction chemotherapy received 131 I-MIBG. Thirty-seven of 45 patients (82.2%) evaluable for 131 I-MIBG + Bu/Mel received this combination. Among those who received 131 I-MIBG after revision of the study design, one patient per dose level developed severe SOS. Rates of moderate to severe SOS at 12, 15, and 18 mCi/kg were 33.3%, 23.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. There was one toxic death. The 131 I-MIBG and 131 I-MIBG+Bu/Mel feasibility rates at the 15 mCi/kg dose level designated for further study were 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3%-99.4%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 60.0%-92.3%). CONCLUSION: This pilot trial demonstrated feasibility and tolerability of administering 131 I-MIBG followed by myeloablative therapy with Bu/Mel to newly diagnosed children with high-risk neuroblastoma in a cooperative group setting, laying the groundwork for a cooperative randomized trial (NCT03126916) testing the addition of 131 I-MIBG during induction therapy.
Subject(s)
3-Iodobenzylguanidine , Neuroblastoma , 3-Iodobenzylguanidine/adverse effects , 3-Iodobenzylguanidine/therapeutic use , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neuroblastoma/radiotherapy , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Information obtained from clinical exome sequencing (ES) may impact clinical care or other aspects of a patient's life. Little is known about clinicians' perceptions regarding either the value of ES results or which among various outcomes are most relevant to determine value. This study aims to assess clinicians' opinions of the importance of ES results for medical decision making and identify a set of outcomes to be measured in future ES evaluations. METHODS: Expert opinion regarding the value of remarkable (diagnostic/positive) and unremarkable (nondiagnostic/negative) ES results was elicited via the Delphi method, consisting of two survey rounds and a teleconference. Participants had expertise in caring for clinically diverse infants and children with suspected underlying genetic etiologies. Descriptive statistics and (dis)agreement were calculated for each survey item. RESULTS: Remarkable ES results were considered important for 17 outcome domains. Unremarkable ES results were also perceived as important in terms of psychological impact and ability to inform follow-up diagnostic test decisions. CONCLUSION: Clinicians regard remarkable ES results as more important in many ways than findings from other diagnostic modalities. Unremarkable ES results were not considered unimportant for decision making, but rather uncertain in most outcome domains.
Subject(s)
Delphi Technique , Exome Sequencing/methods , Physicians/psychology , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: As exome sequencing (ES) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool, we aimed to compare ES with status quo genetic diagnostic workup for infants with suspected genetic disorders in terms of identifying diagnoses, survival, and cost of care. METHODS: We studied newborns and infants admitted to intensive care with a suspected genetic etiology within the first year of life at a US quaternary-referral children's hospital over 5 years. In this propensity-matched cohort study using electronic medical record data, we compared patients who received ES as part of a diagnostic workup (ES cohort, n = 368) with clinically similar patients who did not receive ES (No-ES cohort, n = 368). RESULTS: Diagnostic yield (27.4% ES, 25.8% No-ES; p = 0.62) and 1-year survival (80.2% ES, 84.8% No-ES; p = 0.10) were no different between cohorts. ES cohort patients had higher cost of admission, diagnostic investigation, and genetic testing (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ES did not differ from status quo genetic testing collectively in terms of diagnostic yield or patient survival; however, it had high yield as a single test, led to complementary classes of diagnoses, and was associated with higher costs. Further work is needed to define the most efficient use of diagnostic ES for critically ill newborns and infants.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Exome , Cohort Studies , Exome/genetics , Genetic Testing , Humans , Infant , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Standard supportive care during induction therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) includes primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) aimed at limiting duration of neutropenia, reducing infection risk, and minimizing treatment delays. Preclinical models suggest that G-CSF promotes maintenance of neuroblastoma cancer stem cells and may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy. This study's objective was to determine the safety and feasibility of administering induction chemotherapy without routine use of prophylactic G-CSF. DESIGN/METHODS: Children with newly diagnosed HR-NBL received six-cycle induction chemotherapy regimen without prophylactic G-CSF in four cycles. G-CSF was administered for stem cell mobilization after cycle 3 and granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor after cycle 5 prior to surgical resection of primary disease. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of grade 3 or higher infection. We hypothesized that the per patient infection rate would be comparable to our institutional baseline rate of 58% in patients with HR-NBL receiving induction chemotherapy with prophylactic growth factor support. The trial used an A'Hern single-stage design. RESULTS: Twelve patients with HR-NBL received 58 cycles of chemotherapy on study. Three patients completed the entire six-cycle regimen with no infections. Nine patients experienced grade 3 infections (bacteremia four, urinary tract infection two, skin/soft tissue infection three). No patients experienced grade 4 infections or required intensive care treatment for infection. CONCLUSION: A greater than expected number of serious bacterial infections were observed during administration of induction chemotherapy for HR-NBL without primary prophylactic G-CSF. These results support continued prophylactic administration growth factor during induction chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Neuroblastoma/drug therapy , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Neuroblastoma/pathology , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Time-to-TreatmentABSTRACT
The increasing intensity of high-risk neuroblastoma (HR NB) treatment over the last decades has resulted in improved survival at the expense of prolonging therapy and exposure to additional potentially toxic agents. Anemia and thrombocytopenia requiring transfusion are common during therapy for HR NB. Risks of cumulative red blood cell and platelet transfusions are incompletely defined in pediatric oncology patients, however, risks of transfusional iron overload are well described in other populations. This study aimed to determine the number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) and platelet transfusions throughout treatment for HR NB and how these numbers have changed with modern therapy. We performed a retrospective review of 92 patients with HR NB from June 2002 until September 2017. Patients received a median of 20 pRBC and 32 platelet transfusions. Our results demonstrated large numbers of transfusions with significantly increased blood product exposures among patients who received intensified therapy, either with additional induction chemotherapy, tandem autologous stem cell transplants, or dinutuximab plus cytokines with isotretinoin. Similar volumes of pRBC transfusions have been associated with iron overload in other populations and warrant further discussion of guidelines for long-term follow up of HR NB patients.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/methods , Neuroblastoma/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Availability of clinical genomic sequencing (CGS) has generated questions about the value of genome and exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool. Analysis of reported CGS application can inform uptake and direct further research. This scoping literature review aims to synthesize evidence on the clinical and economic impact of CGS. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2017 on diagnostic CGS for infant and pediatric patients. Articles were classified according to sample size and whether economic evaluation was a primary research objective. Data on patient characteristics, clinical setting, and outcomes were extracted and narratively synthesized. RESULTS: Of 171 included articles, 131 were case reports, 40 were aggregate analyses, and 4 had a primary economic evaluation aim. Diagnostic yield was the only consistently reported outcome. Median diagnostic yield in aggregate analyses was 33.2% but varied by broad clinical categories and test type. CONCLUSION: Reported CGS use has rapidly increased and spans diverse clinical settings and patient phenotypes. Economic evaluations support the cost-saving potential of diagnostic CGS. Multidisciplinary implementation research, including more robust outcome measurement and economic evaluation, is needed to demonstrate clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of CGS.
Subject(s)
Exome Sequencing/trends , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genome, Human/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing/trends , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exome/genetics , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Humans , Pediatrics/trends , Exome Sequencing/economics , Whole Genome Sequencing/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Health disparities related to race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status impact quality, access, and health outcomes for children. Medicaid is a proxy for poverty and restricted access to health care. The goal of this study was to determine if there are discrepancies in the length and cost of hospitalizations between admissions covered by Medicaid or commercial insurance for pediatric patients with cancer. METHODS: Childhood cancer-related admissions were identified from the 2012 Kids Inpatient Database (KID) using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision. Length of hospitalization and cost of hospitalization were compared among hospitalizations paid by Medicaid or commercial insurance. Total admission charges were converted to costs using cost-to-charge ratios, and survey weighting methods were used for all analyses. Linear multiple regression models for both length of hospitalization and cost were developed to include patient-level factors (race, sex, age, diagnosis, reason for admission). RESULTS: In 2012, there were 104 597 childhood cancer-related admissions. Hospitalizations paid by Medicaid were significantly longer than those paid by commercial insurance. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with higher cost of hospitalization regardless of payer, and black race was associated with higher costs within the Medicaid population. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identifies differences in healthcare utilization for pediatric cancer-related admissions paid for by Medicaid compared with commercial insurance. Prolonged hospitalizations and increased costs create burdens on children and their families, medical delivery systems, and third-party payers. Further exploration into the causes of these disparities is warranted.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Hispanic or Latino , Length of Stay/economics , Medicaid/economics , Neoplasms , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
Children with neuroblastoma rarely present with metastatic disease without identifiable primary tumors. We describe the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of 4 patients aged 1, 7, 7, and 11 years with neuroblastoma involving bone or bone marrow without an apparent primary site. One patient presented with a periorbital bone lesion, 1 presented with a distal femoral lesion, and 2 presented with diffuse bone marrow involvement. All tumors were negative for MYCN amplification. All patients were alive without evidence of disease 5 years after completion of multimodality therapy. Patients with neuroblastoma of the bone and bone marrow without an apparent primary site may constitute a unique group characterized by older age at diagnosis, nonamplified MYCN tumors, and good response to treatment.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neuroblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Biopsy , Bone Marrow/diagnostic imaging , Bone Marrow/pathology , Bone Marrow Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Marrow Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Bone and Bones/pathology , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Neuroblastoma/pathology , Neuroblastoma/radiotherapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
On the basis of significant evidence for safety, the international pediatric fever and neutropenia committee recommends the identification and management of patients with "low-risk fever and neutropenia" (LRFN), outpatient with oral antibiotics, instead of traditional inpatient management. The aim of our study was to compare the cost-per-patient with these 2 strategies, and to evaluate parent and provider satisfaction with the outpatient management of LRFN. Between March 2016 and February 2017, 17 LRFN patients (median absolute neutrophil count, 90/µL) were managed at a single institution, per new guidelines. Fifteen patients were discharged on presentation or at 24 to 48 hours postadmission on oral levofloxacin, and 2 were inadvertently admitted off protocol. The mean cost of management for the postimplementation cohort was compared with a historic preimplementation control group. Satisfaction surveys were completed by parents and health care providers of LRFN patients. The mean total cost of an LRFN episode was $12,500 per patient preimplementation and $6168 postimplementation, a decrease of $6332 (51%) per patient. All parents surveyed found outpatient follow-up easy; most (12/14) parents and all (16/16) providers preferred outpatient management. Outpatient management of LRFN patients was less costly, and was preferred by a majority of parents and all health care providers, compared with traditional inpatient management.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Neoplasms/economics , Personal Satisfaction , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Management , Febrile Neutropenia/etiology , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Parents/psychologyABSTRACT
The Inaugural Symposium on Childhood Cancer Health Disparities was held in Houston, Texas, on November 2, 2016. The symposium was attended by 109 scientists and clinicians from diverse disciplinary backgrounds with interests in pediatric cancer disparities and focused on reviewing our current knowledge of disparities in cancer risk and outcomes for select childhood cancers. Following a full day of topical sessions, everyone participated in a brainstorming session to develop a working strategy for the continued expansion of research in this area. This meeting was designed to serve as a springboard for examination of childhood cancer disparities from a more unified and systematic approach and to enhance awareness of this area of need.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Neoplasms , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Congresses as Topic , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Risk Factors , TexasABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of mental distress among survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer and a comparison group. METHODS: A total of 875 AYA cancer survivors who were diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 39 years and who were at least 5 years from their initial diagnosis were identified from the 2013 and 2014 National Health Interview Surveys. A comparison group was created. The Kessler nonspecific mental/psychological distress scale was used to examine none/low, moderate, and severe distress. The issues of whether individuals talked to mental health professionals within the previous year and if they could afford mental health care also were examined. Variables (ie, demographics, behavioral [eg, smoking status], comorbidity, and mental health visits) associated with distress among the 2 groups were identified using multinomial logistic regressions. RESULTS: Survivors reported mental distress more often than the comparison group (moderate: 23.2% vs 16.9%; and severe: 8.4% vs 3.0% [P<.001]). Survivors cited not being able to afford mental health care more often (6.4% vs 2.3%; P = .002). Moreover, 74.7% and 52.2% of survivors, respectively, with moderate and severe distress had not talked to a mental health professional. Contrary to the comparison group, survivors who were current smokers reported severe distress more often compared with nonsmokers (relative risk, 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-8.84 [P = .01]). Having public and no insurance versus private insurance and report of sleep-related trouble within the previous week were found to be associated with greater distress among survivors. CONCLUSIONS: AYA cancer survivors are more likely to demonstrate mental distress than individuals without cancer. Nevertheless, few survivors may be receiving professional mental health services. Survivors need greater access to mental health screening and counseling to address the current gaps in care delivery. Cancer 2017;123:869-78. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Neoplasms/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Survivors/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug shortages require clinical teams to decide how to allocate drugs in limited supply among their patients. Ethical frameworks are invaluable for promoting rational approaches to drug distribution, but gaps remain between ethical theory and clinical application. The goal of this work was to explore how decision modeling could supplement ethical frameworks to inform drug distribution from the perspective of a clinical team. PROCEDURE: We created a hypothetical pediatric oncology clinic with a limited supply of 50,000 mg of methotrexate (MTX) and 21 patients due for treatment on one of six regimens. We constructed a simple decision analytic model to compare the effectiveness of MTX in milligrams per life year saved for each regimen. The robustness of the model was tested under various conditions including alternative drug effectiveness and time horizons. Effects on outcomes and distribution by substituting alternative dosing were explored for each regimen. RESULTS: Prescribed therapy for this group of patients required 108,791 mg MTX. Two regimens for three patients required ≥20,000 mg/m2 . If distributed in order of arrival, only seven patients could receive full treatment. If distributed in order of efficiency, 19 patients could receive treatment. If less effective regimens were substituted, 20 patients could receive treatment. The primary driver of efficiency was dose per square meter. CONCLUSIONS: In this hypothetical drug shortage, no allocation scenario exists that does not result in a worse outcome for some patients. Evidence of drug efficacy affected the decisions to substitute alternative treatments. First-come-first-served allocation resulted in fewer patients receiving treatment than allocation based on efficiency.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Drug Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is the most common germ cell tumor (GCT) of infancy. Up to 35% of infants may have malignant elements. The standard of care for SCT with malignant elements (SCT-ME) has been surgery and chemotherapy. However, cases where low-stage SCT-ME have been successfully observed following resection have been reported. PROCEDURE: To better understand the outcomes of low-stage SCT-ME that do not receive chemotherapy, we reviewed SCT pathology reports from five children's hospitals from 1999 to 2009. Information regarding staging workup, tumor markers, treatment, and outcome was collected for patients with stage I or II SCT-ME. An English language literature review was also performed. RESULTS: Seventy-four SCT were identified: 51 stage I and 23 stage II; 13 (18%) were SCT-ME: 5 stage I and 8 stage II; four stage I and four stage II tumors were not treated with chemotherapy. No stage I tumors recurred; all of the stage II tumors recurred and were successfully salvaged, two had no ME at recurrence. We identified another 10 stage I SCT-ME in the literature managed with active surveillance-two recurred and were successfully treated with surgery and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, of the 14 cases of stage I SCT-ME, 12 survived with no recurrence and the two who did recur were successfully treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (EFS = 86%, overall survival [OS] = 100%); this suggests that patients with stage I SCT-ME could be observed after surgery and treated only upon recurrence. Stage II SCT-ME require further study in a clinical trial setting.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Sacrococcygeal Region/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Sacrococcygeal Region/surgery , Teratoma/pathologyABSTRACT
High-risk neuroblastoma is an aggressive childhood cancer with poor outcomes. Treatment begins with an induction phase comprised of intense multi-agent chemotherapy with the goal of maximally reducing tumor bulk. Given the high intensity of induction chemotherapy, neutropenic fever and infectious complications are common; however, the actual incidence is difficult to determine from clinical trial reports. We performed a retrospective review of infection-related complications in 76 children treated for high-risk neuroblastoma at Texas Children's Hospital. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes, presence, and type of bacterial and fungal infections, and potential risk factors for infection. Fifty-seven percent of patients developed one or more serious bacterial or fungal infections during induction chemotherapy. Additionally, over 75% of patients had at least one admission for FN. Risk factors for developing any infection included female sex, MYCN amplification, and having Medicaid. Patients with external central venous catheters and those requiring parenteral nutrition had higher rates of bacteremia or fungemia. Each cycle, 50% were readmitted for either FN or infection. The overall burden of infectious complications was high, with 70% having two or more unplanned admissions for infection or FN. The incidence of febrile neutropenia and serious bacterial and fungal infections during induction chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma is high. Most patients had at least two additional hospitalizations for infectious complications. Risk factors including female sex, MYCN amplification, payer status, and type of central access were associated with higher rates of infection in this cohort. ABBREVIATIONS: CLABSI Central line associated blood stream infection; CTCAE Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; FN Febrile neutropenia; ANC Absolute neutrophil count; TPN Total parenteral nutrition.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/epidemiology , Induction Chemotherapy/adverse effects , Mycoses/epidemiology , Neuroblastoma/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bacterial Infections/genetics , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/genetics , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Gene Amplification/genetics , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Mycoses/etiology , Mycoses/genetics , Mycoses/therapy , N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein/genetics , Neuroblastoma/epidemiology , Neuroblastoma/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) who complete therapy typically undergo 4 years of surveillance imaging despite lack of evidence that this improves outcomes. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients in whom progression or relapse was detected by routine clinical evaluation or by imaging. PROCEDURE: Children with progressive or relapsed RMS treated at Texas Children's Hospital between 1992 and 2012 were identified and their records were reviewed. Survival time after progression or relapse was compared between two groups: (1) patients in whom progression or relapse was suspected on the basis of clinical history, symptoms, laboratory evaluation, or physical exam; and (2) patients whose progression or relapse was initially detected by imaging. RESULTS: Of the 43 children with progressive or relapsed RMS, 26 (60%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis and 19 (44%) had alveolar histology. With a median follow up time of 5 years in six survivors, there was no difference in OS between patients in whom progression or relapse was diagnosed based on imaging (n = 15) or by clinical evaluation (n = 28) (3-year OS 20% vs. 11%, respectively, P = 0.38). Disease extent, primary site, and risk group at diagnosis were associated with survival after progression or relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Routine surveillance imaging practice should be critically reviewed for children with RMS. Although our findings must be validated by larger studies, they do have substantive implications. Reduced imaging tailored to the risk and pattern of recurrence, associated risks and cost could improve patient quality of life and decrease health-care expenditure without compromising outcome.