Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Endocrine ; 84(3): 1258-1263, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451386

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of insulinoma can be challenging, requiring documentation of hypoglycaemia associated with non-suppressed insulin and C-peptide, often achieved during a prolonged 72 h fast performed in inpatient setting. Our goal is to predict weather a shorter outpatient fasting test initiated overnight and prolonged up until 24 h could be a sensitive method for diagnosing insulinoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study on subjects admitted to our Unit of Endocrinology from 2019 to 2022 for clinical suspicion of insulinoma and underwent the short fasting test. A comparison between the short test group and the group of subjects who underwent the standard prolonged fasting test (from 2003 to 2018) has also been performed. The short fasting test was initiated by the patient overnight at home and proceeded the following day in outpatient setting (Day Hospital). As in the standard protocol, symptoms and capillary blood glucose (CBG) were strictly monitored. Venous blood was drawn for glycaemia, insulin and C-peptide at admission and at established intervals, in case of symptoms of hypoglycaemia or if CBG ≤ 45 mg/dl, when the fast would be suspended. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 37 patients, with mean age of 44.5 ± 12.6 years (17-74). Short and standard tests were performed in 15 and 22 subjects, respectively. Diagnostic values for insulinoma were observed in 12 patients: in 5/15 who underwent the short fasting test, in 6/22 who underwent the prolonged test and in 1 patient who was initially negative on the short test and subsequently showed diagnostic values during the prolonged test. The diagnosis of insulinoma was achieved in 11/12 cases within 24 h of the beginning of the fast (91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A short fasting test could be a valid, sensitive and reliable first-line workup in diagnosing insulinoma.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Fasting , Insulinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Insulinoma/diagnosis , Insulinoma/blood , Fasting/blood , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/blood , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Blood Glucose/analysis , C-Peptide/blood , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/blood , Sensitivity and Specificity , Insulin/blood , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Endocrine ; 85(2): 520-531, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38509261

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies originating from cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The complex relationship between lipid metabolism and cancer is gaining interest and a potential anti-cancer effect of lipid lowering agents is being considered. This review aims to discuss the current understanding and treatment of dyslipidaemia in NENs, focusing on the role of lipid lowering agents, including new therapeutic approaches, and future perspectives as possible tool in cancer prevention and tumor-growth control. METHODS: We performed an electronic-based search using PubMed updated until December 2023, summarizing the available evidence both in basic and clinical research about lipid lowering agents in NENs. RESULTS: Dyslipidemia is an important aspect to be considered in NENs management, although randomized studies specifically addressing this topic are lacking, unlike other cancer types. Available data mainly regard statins, and in vitro studies have demonstrated direct antitumor effects, including antiproliferative effects in some cancers, supporting possible pleiotropic effects also in NENs, but data remain conflicting. Ezetimibe, omega 3-fatty acids, fibrates and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) may enhance the regulation of lipid homeostasis, as demonstrated in other cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting dyslipidemia in NENs should be part of the multidisciplinary management and an integrated approach may be the best option for both metabolic and tumor control. Whether lipid lowering agents may directly contribute to tumor control remains to be confirmed with specific studies, focusing on association with other metabolic risk, disease stage and primary site.


Subject(s)
Dyslipidemias , Hypolipidemic Agents , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypolipidemic Agents/pharmacology , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects
3.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1145926, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37152939

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare thyroid tumour whose management in advanced stages is challenging, despite effective therapeutic options having expanded in recent years. Proteasome inhibitors (PrIn) have shown the ability to improve patient outcomes, including survival and quality of life, in several malignancies, due to their ability to impair cell proliferation and cause apoptosis through the inhibition of the proteasome activity. Consequently, these drugs could represent a useful tool, alone or in combination with other treatments, in MTC patients. Aim of the study: This review aims to summarize the available in vitro and in vivo data about the role of PrIn in MTC. Materials and methods: We performed an extensive search for relevant data sources, including full-published articles in international online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus), preliminary reports in selected international meeting abstract repositories, and short articles published as supplements of international meetings, by using the following terms: medullary thyroid carcinoma, proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, delanzomib, marizomib, oprozomib, and MG132. Additionally, we conducted with the same keywords, an in-depth search in registered clinical trials repositories. Results: Our search revealed in vitro studies in human and murine MTC cell lines, based on the use of PrIns, both alone and in combination with other anticancer drugs, and two pertinent clinical trials. Conclusion: We found a strong discrepancy between the evidence of PrIns effects in preclinical studies, and the scarcity or early interruption of clinical trials. We might speculate that difficulties in enrolling patients, as happens in other rare diseases, may have discouraged trials' implementation in favor of drugs already approved for MTC. However, given the concrete improvement in the comprehension of the molecular basis of PrIn effects in MTC, new clinical trials with accurate inclusion criteria of enrollment might be warranted, in order to ascertain whether this treatment, alone or in combination with other drugs, could indeed represent an option to enhance the therapeutic response, and to ultimately improve patients' outcome and survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Animals , Mice , Proteasome Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proteasome Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Thyroid Neoplasms/drug therapy , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology
4.
Genes (Basel) ; 14(9)2023 09 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37761922

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive role of specific clinical factors for the diagnosis of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type-1 (MEN1) and type-4 (MEN4) in patients with an initial diagnosis of gastrointestinal, bronchial, or thymic neuroendocrine tumor (NET). METHODS: Patients referred to the NET Unit between June 2021 and December 2022 with a diagnosis of NET and at least one clinical criterion of suspicion for MEN1 and MEN4 underwent molecular analysis of the MEN1 and CDKN1B genes. Phenotypic criteria were: (1) age ≤ 40 years; (2) NET multifocality; (3) MEN1/4-associated manifestations other than NETs; and (4) endocrine syndrome related to NETs or pituitary/adrenal tumors. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were studied. In 18 patients (81.8%), the first-level genetic test was negative (Group A), while four patients (25%) were positive for MEN1 (Group B). No patient was positive for MEN4. In Group A, 10 cases had only one clinical criterion, and three patients met three criteria. In Group B, three patients had three criteria, and one met all criteria. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data show that a diagnosis of NET in patients with a negative family history is suggestive of MEN1 in the presence of ≥three positive phenotypic criteria, including early age, multifocality, multiple MEN-associated manifestations, and endocrine syndromes. This indication may allow optimization of the diagnosis of MEN in patients with NET.


Subject(s)
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Pituitary Neoplasms , Humans , Adult , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/diagnosis , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/genetics , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pituitary Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Testing , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL