Bleeding outcomes in critically ill patients on heparin with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity.

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) level via the anti-factor Xa activity assay (anti-Xa) are commonly used assays for UFH monitoring. While discordance between the two assays is common, its impact on critically ill patient outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of major bleeding events among critically ill patients with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity while on UFH, to patients with no discordance. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients who had simultaneous anti-Xa and aPTT levels while receiving continuous UFH infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of a major bleeding event up to 24 h after UFH discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of 30-day thrombosis and hospital length of stay (LOS). Among 264 included patients, 156 patients (59%) had at least one discordant paired level. Patients with discordance had an increased risk of major bleeding events (14% versus 5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; p = 0.01), and increased risk of thrombotic events (4% versus 0%; p = 0.04). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (13.8 days versus 11.4 days; p = 0.08). In this cohort of critically ill patients receiving continuous UFH, discordance in aPTT and anti-Xa activity was frequently observed and was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events. While both assays remain viable monitoring options, evaluating simultaneous levels may aid in the management of critically ill patients. In patients with discordance, an individualized approach balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks should be considered.

Carboxyhemoglobinemia in Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

Carboxyhemoglobinemia is a common but a serious disorder, defined as an increase in carboxyhemoglobin level. Unfortunately, there are few data on carboxyhemoglobinemia in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the incidence and etiologies of carboxyhemoglobinemia in COVID-19 patients and determine any association between carboxyhemoglobinemia and novel coronavirus infection. A retrospective chart review was performed at an academic medical center for all inpatient COVID-19 cases with either single or serial carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels from March 2020 through August 2020.Our study demonstrates that carboxyhemoglobinemia in COVID-19 patients is due to sepsis, hemolysis, and cytokine storm, triggered by the novel coronavirus infection sequela and is not directly from the virulence of novel coronavirus. Given the coexisting illnesses in critically ill COVID-19 patients, it is impossible to establish if coronavirus virulence was the culprit of elevated COHb levels. Moreover, our study found a high incidence of carboxyhemoglobinemia in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry can be inaccurate and unreliable; however, our study could not demonstrate any uniform results on the discrepancy between oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas. In this study, COHb levels were measured using a CO-oximeter. Therefore, we recommend monitoring the COHb level routinely in critically ill COVID-19 patients to allow more effective and prompt treatment.