Triple modal treatment comprising with proton beam radiation, hyperthermia, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II study protocol (TT-LAP trial).

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), accounting for about 30% of PDAC patients, is difficult to cure by radical resection or systemic chemotherapy alone. A multidisciplinary strategy is required and our TT-LAP trial aims to evaluate whether triple-modal treatment with proton beam therapy (PBT), hyperthermia, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is a safe and synergistically effective treatment for patients with locally advanced PDAC. METHODS: This trial is an interventional, open-label, non-randomized, single-center, single-arm phase I/II clinical trial organized and sponsored by the University of Tsukuba. Eligible patients who are diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, including both borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) patients, and selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria will receive triple-modal treatment consisting of chemotherapy, hyperthermia, and proton beam radiation. Treatment induction will include 2 cycles of chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel), proton beam therapy, and 6 total sessions of hyperthermia therapy. The initial 5 patients will move to phase II after adverse events are verified by a monitoring committee and safety is ensured. The primary endpoint is 2-year survival rate while secondary endpoints include adverse event rate, treatment completion rate, response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, resection rate, pathologic response rate, and R0 (no pathologic cancer remnants) rate. The target sample size is set at 30 cases. DISCUSSION: The TT-LAP trial is the first to evaluate the safety and effectiveness (phases1/2) of triple-modal treatment comprised of proton beam therapy, hyperthermia, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Tsukuba University Clinical Research Review Board (reference number TCRB22-007). Results will be analyzed after study recruitment and follow-up are completed. Results will be presented at international meetings of interest in pancreatic cancer plus gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic surgeries and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031220160. Registered 24 th June 2022, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031220160 .

Proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion.

AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion (BDI) (BDIHCC) has a poor prognosis. Moreover, due to the paucity of reports, there is no consensus regarding optimal management of this clinical condition yet. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for BDIHCC. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2018, 15 patients with BDIHCC underwent PBT at our institution. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 23.4 months (range, 7.9-54.3). The median age was 71 years (range, 58-90 years). Many patients were Child A (n = 8, 53.3%) and most had solitary tumors (n = 11, 73.3%). Additionally, most patients had central type BDI (n = 11, 73%). The median tumor size was 4.0 cm (range, 1.5-8.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 80.0%, 58.7% and 40.2%, respectively, and the corresponding LC and PFS rates were 93.3%, 93.3%, and 74.7% and 72.7%, 9.7%, and 0.0%, respectively. Acute grade 1/2 dermatitis (n = 7, 46.7%), and grades 2 (n = 1, 6.7%) and 3 (n = 1, 6.7%) cholangitis were observed. Late toxicities such as grade 3 gastric hemorrhage and pleural effusion were observed. No toxicities of grade 4 or higher were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PBT was feasible with tolerable toxicities for the treatment of BDIHCC.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2021 version (5th JSH-HCC Guidelines).

The fifth version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was revised by the Japan Society of Hepatology, according to the methodology of evidence-based medicine and partly to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, which was published in October 2021 in Japanese. In addition to surveillance-diagnostic and treatment algorithms, a new algorithm for systemic therapy has been created, as multiple drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma can be currently selected. Here, new or revised algorithms and evidence on which the recommendations are based are described.

Gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcer among paediatric cancer patients after proton beam therapy.

BACKGROUND: The details of gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcer in paediatric cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy have not been reported previously. METHODS: Patients aged 15 years or younger at the time of proton beam therapy and whose gastrointestinal tract was included in the irradiated field participated. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients participated in the study; their median age at irradiation was 5.4 years. Concurrent chemotherapies were vincristine-cyclophosphamide (16 patients), irinotecan-based treatment (16 patients), vincristine-cyclophosphamide-ifosfamide-etoposide (14 patients), other chemotherapy (27 patients) and no chemotherapy (51 patients). Gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcer occurred in four patients (3.2%), with no death due to the bleeding/ulcer. The sites of the gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcer were the stomach (two patients) and the duodenum (two patients). The ages of the four patients at PBT were 5.3, 13.8, 14.2 and 14.8 years, which were significantly older than those of patients without GI bleeding/ulcer (p = 0.017). The maximum irradiated doses to the GI tract in the four patients were 43.2, 45, 50.4 and 50.4 gray equivalent, respectively. The concomitant chemotherapy was vincristine-cyclophosphamide-ifosfamide-etoposide 3 and vincristine-cyclophosphamide 1. Weeks from proton beam therapy to bleeding/ulcer were 15, 20, 22 and 264. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcer were treated concurrently with vincristine-cyclophosphamide-ifosfamide-etoposide or vincristine-cyclophosphamide, and their ages were older than those of patients without gastrointestinal bleeding/ulcer. Bleeding occurred in the upper gastrointestinal tract in all the cases, and most cases occurred early and during chemotherapy. Upper gastrointestinal irradiation in older children undergoing intensive chemotherapy may increase the risk of developing gastrointestinal complications.

Longitudinal health-related quality of life analysis in childhood cancer survivors after proton beam therapy.

PURPOSE: Whilst proton beam therapy (PBT) for children with cancer is expected to reduce their comorbidities, to date only a limited number of studies have been published. To analyze the long-term comorbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) after PBT, we conducted a questionnaire-based study. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to CCSs who underwent PBT at the University of Tsukuba Hospital during the period from 1984 to 2020. Scores from 41 CCSs who did not undergo PBT (noPBT-CCSs) and from the general population were used for comparison. RESULTS: In total, 110 individuals who underwent PBT participated in the study. Among them, 40 individuals were longitudinally analyzed. The range of change in the scores was significantly greater in the CCSs whose initial scores were low. Although the comorbidity levels were more severe, HRQoL tended to be better in the PBT-CCSs than in the noPBT-CCSs with central nervous system (CNS) or solid tumors, respectively. When compared with the general population, the psychosocial health summary scores and its components were not different in the noPBT-CNS-CCSs. On the other hand, the psychosocial health summary scores and/or at least one of the scores of emotional, social, and school functioning were significantly higher in the other CCSs groups. CONCLUSIONS: The HRQoL scores of CCSs with low initial scores can be greatly changed over time. Appropriate psychosocial support for this population is warranted. PBT may avoid reduction in HRQoL in terms of the psychosocial functioning of CCSs with CNS tumors.

Large volume was associated with increased risk of acute non-hematologic adverse events in the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: preliminary results of prospective phase I/II clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This is the preliminary results of a multi-center prospective clinical trial evaluating the feasibility of the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB2, IIA2, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA uterine cervical cancer pretreatment width of which was ≥5 cm measured by MRI were eligible. Protocol therapy consisted of 30-30.6 Gy in 15-17 fractions of whole pelvic radiotherapy concurrent with weekly CDDP, followed by 24 Gy in 4 fractions of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial and pelvic radiotherapy with central shield up to 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The primary endpoint of phase I part was that the rate of grade ≥ 3 acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial would be <10%. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and October 2019, 74 patients underwent primary registration, with 52 patients eventually proceeding to the secondary registration. The median pretreatment tumor width was 5.7 cm, and FIGO Stages were IB2 10, IIA2 2, IIB 20 and IIIB 20, respectively. The median high-risk clinical target volume D90 was 72.0 Gy (54.8-86.6 Gy, EQD2), rectum D2cc was 53.7 Gy (29.3-80.3 Gy) and bladder D2cc was 69.8 Gy (38.9-84.8 Gy). The rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial was 1.9% (1/52), and 17.3% (9/52) of patients experienced non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial of any grade. In multivariate analysis, high-risk clinical target volume ≥ 35 ml was associated with an increased risk of any grade of acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: The feasibility and reproducibility of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial were demonstrated from a multi-center prospective clinical trial.

Maximum resection and immunotherapy improve glioblastoma patient survival: a retrospective single-institution prognostic analysis.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a refractory disease with a poor prognosis and various methods, including maximum resection and immunotherapy, have been tested to improve outcomes. In this retrospective study we analyzed the prognostic factors of 277 newly diagnosed GBM patients over 11 years of consecutive cases at our institution to evaluate the effect of these methods on prognosis. Various data, including the extent of removal (EOR) and type of adjuvant therapy, were examined and prognostic relationships were analyzed. The median overall survival (OS) of the entire 277-case cohort, 200 non-biopsy cases, and 77 biopsy cases was 16.6 months, 19.7 months, and 9.7 months, respectively. Gross total removal (GTR; 100% of EOR) was achieved in 32.9% of the cases. Univariate analysis revealed younger age, right side, higher Karnofsky performance status, GTR, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use for removal, proton therapy, combination immunotherapy, and discharge to home as good prognostic factors. Intraoperative MRI use and EOR were closely related. In the multivariate analysis, GTR, proton therapy, and a combination of immunotherapies, including autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine, were the significant prognostic factors. A multivariate analysis of 91 GTR cases showed that immunotherapy contributed to prognostic improvements. The median OS and 5-year OS % values were 36.9 months and 43.3% in GTR cases receiving immunotherapy. In conclusion, GTR, proton therapy, and immunotherapy were good prognostic factors in single-center GBM cases. Tumor vaccine therapy for GTR cases achieved a notably high median survival time and long-term survival ratio, indicating its usefulness in GTR cases.

Cognitive Functions of Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors Treated With Proton Beam Therapy: A Case Series.

Pediatric brain tumor survivors who received proton beam therapy at the University of Tsukuba Hospital from 2004 to 2011 were retrospectively evaluated for cognitive function. Five patients were included. The median age of diagnosis was 5.4 years (range: 1.5 to 12.5 y) and the median follow-up time was 5.8 years (range: 3.1 to 8.1 y). IQ scores at follow-up were decreased in 2 of 5 patients; 1 underwent whole-brain irradiation and the other was examined just after surgical removal of recurrent tumors. Local proton beam therapy may preserve cognitive function in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.

Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This is the first study to compare the long-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed patients with clinical stage IB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (UICC 7th edition) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (2009-2017). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence or regrowth rates were compared between the two treatment groups. Subgroup analyses of overall survival according to baseline characteristics were also performed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery (median follow-up 47.4 months) and 60 received definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (median follow-up 51.5 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for sex, tumor location, and cT classification. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy groups had similar 3-year overall survival rates (73.1% and 61.7%, respectively, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.58, p = 0.66), 3-year progression-free survival rates (46.5% and 45%, respectively, hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.70, p = 0.92), and recurrence or regrowth rates (53.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.84). In the subgroup analysis, favorable survival was observed after definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for cT1-2 disease (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.84-7.99) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery for cT3 or higher disease (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.67, p-for-interaction = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes were comparable between the treatments. The choice of the treatment according to cT classification might affect survival.

Proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is feasible in children with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) requires multidisciplinary treatment with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Surgery and radiotherapy are integral to the local control (LC) of RMS. However, postsurgical and radiotherapy-related complications could develop according to the local therapy and tumor location. In this study, we conducted a single-center analysis of the outcomes and toxicity of multidisciplinary treatment using proton beam therapy (PBT) for pediatric RMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RMS patients aged younger than 20 years whose RMS was newly diagnosed and who underwent PBT at University of Tsukuba Hospital (UTH) during the period from 2009 to 2019 were enrolled in this study. The patients' clinical information was collected by retrospective medical record review. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of all the patients were 68.8% and 94.2%, respectively. The 3-year PFS rates achieved with radical resection, conservative resection, and biopsy only were 65.3%, 83.3%, and 67.6%, respectively (p = 0.721). The 3-year LC rates achieved with radical resection, conservative resection, and biopsy only were 90.9%, 83.3%, and 72.9%, respectively (p = 0.548). Grade 3 or higher mucositis/dermatitis occurred in 14 patients. Although the days of opioid use due to mucositis/dermatitis during the chemotherapy with PBT were longer than those during the chemotherapy without PBT [6.1 and 1.6 (mean), respectively, p = 0.001], the frequencies of fever and elevation of C-reactive protein were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary therapy containing PBT was feasible and provided a relatively fair 3-year PFS, even in children with newly diagnosed RMS without severe toxicity.

Bladder preservation therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: the past, present and future.

Radical cystectomy is the gold standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer, but some patients have medically inoperable disease or refuse cystectomy to preserve their bladder function. Bladder preservation therapy with transurethral resection of the bladder tumor and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, known as trimodal treatment, is regarded to be a curative-intent alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer during the past decade. After the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, a world-changing breakthrough occurred in the field of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and many clinical trials have been conducted against non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Interestingly, preclinical and clinical studies against other malignancies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors interact with the radiation-induced immune reaction. As half of the patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer are elderly, and some have renal dysfunction, not only as comorbidity but also because of hydronephrosis caused by their tumors, immune checkpoint inhibitors are expected to become part of a new therapeutic approach for combination treatment with radiotherapy. Accordingly, clinical trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors have been initiated to preserve bladder for muscle invasive bladder cancer patients using radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors with/without chemotherapy. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence of trimodal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer during the past decade and to discuss the future directions of bladder preservation therapy in immuno-oncology era.

Patient Transfer to Receive Proton Beam Therapy During Intensive Multimodal Therapy is Safe and Feasible for Patients With Newly Diagnosed High-risk Neuroblastoma.

Neuroblastoma (NB) predominantly presents as high-risk disease, requiring intensive multimodal therapy. Proton beam therpy (PBT) is a promising option for many childhood cancers, but is not widely available. Patients with NB hoping to receive PBT may therefore need to be transferred between institutions during intensive multimodal therapy, risking undesirable effects. We evaluated patients with high-risk NB who received PBT at our institute as part of first-line therapy, mainly focusing on the safety and feasibility of mid-treatment patient transfer. Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed high-risk NB who received PBT between April 2010 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed for local control, outcomes, and toxicity. Survival (3-y overall survival 71%±11%; 3-y event-free survival 44%±12%) and local control rate (100%) were comparable with previous studies. Few acute adverse events were recorded, and all patients completed PBT without treatment delay. PBT for high-risk NB was safe and feasible for patients requiring mid-treatment interinstitutional transfer.

Urgent Proton Beam Therapy With Interinstitutional Transfer for Patients With Intracranial Rhabdomyosarcoma: Report of 3 Cases.

A number of cases have been reported in recent years regarding the use of proton beam therapy to mitigate adverse events affecting important cranial organs in cases of rhabdomyosarcoma at parameningeal sites. However, few reports have described the use of proton beam therapy as urgent radiotherapy for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with intracranial extension. We treated 3 patients diagnosed with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma extending into the cranium who were assessed at other hospitals as suitable for urgent radiotherapy and transferred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. These patients comprised 2 boys and 1 girl 6 to 12 years of age at diagnosis, and proton beam therapy was started on days 5, 11, and 23 after diagnosis, respectively. Patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma extending into the cranium can be transferred to institutions equipped to perform proton beam therapy. To minimize the interval to starting therapy, medical information should be shared with institutions capable of providing such therapy as soon as the possibility of intracranial soft-tissue sarcoma is recognized. Proton beam therapy is 1 option for radiotherapy in cases of intracranial rhabdomyosarcoma.

Outcomes analysis of pre-brachytherapy MRI in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Various brachytherapy options are available for treating cervical cancer. This study investigated whether pre-brachytherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings could help identify the appropriate brachytherapy technique for cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with cervical cancer who underwent pre-brachytherapy MRI within 7 days before their first high-dose rate brachytherapy treatment between December 2009 and September 2015. Patients who could not undergo MRI at pre-treatment and/or pre-brachytherapy and complete radical radiotherapy were excluded. Conventional intracavitary brachytherapy was the preferred treatment for ≤4 cm and symmetrical tumors. Non-conventional intracavitary brachytherapy, including interstitial brachytherapy, was the preferred treatment for bulky tumors, asymmetrical tumors, tumors with severe vaginal invasion, or bulky barrel-shaped tumors. The 3-year rates of overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Overall survival and local control rates were assessed using Cox regression analysis to identify risk factors for poor overall survival and local control outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included in the study. The median tumor sizes were 52 mm (range 17-85) at the pre-treatment MRI and 30 mm (range 0-78) at the pre-brachytherapy MRI. Six patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2, 67 patients had stage II, 64 patients had stage III, and nine patients had stage IVA disease. A total of 124 (85%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 22 (15%) patients had adenosquamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. The MRI findings showed severe vaginal invasion (pre-treatment: 19 patients, pre-brachytherapy: 10 patients), asymmetrical bulky tumors (pre-treatment: 28 patients, pre-brachytherapy: 16 patients), and severe corpus invasion (pre-treatment: 39 patients, pre-brachytherapy: 18 patients). Based on the pre-brachytherapy MRI findings, non-conventional intracavitary brachytherapy was administered to 34 (23.3%) patients. Brachytherapy seemed to be appropriate for 133 (91.1%) patients and inappropriate for 13 (8.9%) patients. The 3-year rates were 84.2% for overall survival and 90.1% for local control. Grade 3 late rectal complications occurred in two (1%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor characteristics (size, shape, and extent of invasion) were not risk factors, although inappropriate brachytherapy was significantly related to poor local control (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-brachytherapy MRI may help to select appropriate brachytherapy for cervical cancer and reduce the likelihood of inappropriate brachytherapy leading to poor local control.

A single-institute experience of trimodal bladder-preserving therapy for histologic variants of urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with histologic variants of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with trimodal bladder-preserving therapy (TMT). METHODS: Among 148 patients with clinical T2-3N0M0 MIBC treated with TMT at Tsukuba University Hospital from 1990 to 2015, 11 patients (7.4%) had pathological components of variant urothelial carcinoma (UC). The complete response (CR), overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were analyzed in these 11 patients. RESULTS: Among the 11 patients with variant UC, 7 (64%) had UC with squamous and/or glandular differentiation and 4 (36%) had sarcomatoid (n = 1), plasmacytoid (n = 1), signet ring cell (n = 1), or clear cell variant (n = 1). Median follow-up was 49.0 months. Nine (82%) out of 11 patients achieved CR and 2 (22%) out of the 9 developed recurrence. Among seven patients who had UC with squamous and/or glandular differentiation, two developed recurrence and one died of disease. In contrast, 2 (50%) out of four patients with other variants, which were sarcomatoid variant or signet ring cell, developed recurrence and died of disease. Overall, the 5-year OS, CSS, and PFS rates of variant UC were 75%, 75%, and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TMT might provide acceptable clinical outcomes for well-selected MIBC patients with histologic variants, especially for those with squamous and/or glandular differentiation. However, we need to pay special attention to other variants such as sarcomatoid variant or signet ring cell. TMT might be an alternative treatment option for patients with histologic variants, although further experiments will be needed to confirm this.

Proton therapy for newly diagnosed pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a type of brain malignancy with a very poor prognosis. Although various radiation and chemotherapy protocols have been attempted, only conventional radiotherapy has yielded improvements in survival. In this study, we aimed to compare proton therapy versus conventional photon radiotherapy in terms of the outcomes of pediatric patients with DIPG. METHODS: This retrospective review included 12 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed DIPG who received a total proton therapy dose of 54 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 30 fractions at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2011 and 2017 (proton group). We additionally reviewed the medical records of 10 patients with DIPG who previously underwent conventional photon radiotherapy at our institute (historical cohort). RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (PFS) duration was 5 months (range 1-11 months), and the 6-, 12-, and 18-month PFS rates were 50%, 33%, and 25%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) duration was 9 months (range 4-48 months), and the 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month OS rates were 66.8%, 50%, 41%, and 20%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival between the proton and historical groups (PFS, p = 0.169 and OS, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy was well tolerated by the majority of patients. No severe adverse events, including radiation necrosis, were recorded. Proton therapy did not yield superior survival outcomes vs. conventional photon radiotherapy in patients with DIPG at our institution. Further research is needed to identify the factors associated with better survival in this population.

Key considerations in reviewing "a comparison of the outcomes between surgical resection and proton beam therapy for single primary hepatocellular carcinoma": the importance of scientific objective perspectives in clinical studies.

Proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiotherapy, also known as particle beam therapy, are gaining popularity in cancer care and liver tumor treatment is one of the main areas of interest. Comparative studies are in high demand and the article highlights this. While the data presented in this article are without doubt valuable, we raise concerns about their interpretation.

Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2017 (4th JSH-HCC guidelines) 2019 update.

The fourth version of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was revised by the Japan Society of Hepatology, according to the methodology of evidence-based medicine and partly to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, which was published in October 2017 in Japanese. New or revised recommendations were described, herein, with a special reference to the surveillance, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms.

Particle therapy for prostate cancer: The past, present and future.

Although prostate cancer control using radiotherapy is dose-dependent, dose-volume effects on late toxicities in organs at risk, such as the rectum and bladder, have been observed. Both protons and carbon ions offer advantageous physical properties for radiotherapy, and create favorable dose distributions using fewer portals compared with photon-based radiotherapy. Thus, particle beam therapy using protons and carbon ions theoretically seems suitable for dose escalation and reduced risk of toxicity. However, it is difficult to evaluate the superiority of particle beam radiotherapy over photon beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer, as no clinical trials have directly compared the outcomes between the two types of therapy due to the limited number of facilities using particle beam therapy. The Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology organized a joint effort among research groups to establish standardized treatment policies and indications for particle beam therapy according to disease, and multicenter prospective studies have been planned for several common cancers. Clinical trials of proton beam therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and carbon-ion therapy for high-risk prostate cancer have already begun. As particle beam therapy for prostate cancer is covered by the Japanese national health insurance system as of April 2018, and the number of facilities practicing particle beam therapy has increased recently, the number of prostate cancer patients treated with particle beam therapy in Japan is expected to increase drastically. Here, we review the results from studies of particle beam therapy for prostate cancer and discuss future developments in this field.