First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Selpercatinib, a highly selective potent and brain-penetrant RET inhibitor, was shown to have efficacy in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nonrandomized phase 1-2 study. METHODS: In a randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib as compared with control treatment that consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in both the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population (i.e., patients whose physicians had planned to treat them with pembrolizumab in the event that they were assigned to the control group) and the overall intention-to-treat population. Crossover from the control group to the selpercatinib group was allowed if disease progression as assessed by blinded independent central review occurred during receipt of control treatment. RESULTS: In total, 212 patients underwent randomization in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. At the time of the preplanned interim efficacy analysis, median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 to not estimable) with selpercatinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 16.8) with control treatment (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 84% (95% CI, 76 to 90) with selpercatinib and 65% (95% CI, 54 to 75) with control treatment. The cause-specific hazard ratio for the time to progression affecting the central nervous system was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68). Efficacy results in the overall intention-to-treat population (261 patients) were similar to those in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. The adverse events that occurred with selpercatinib and control treatment were consistent with those previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with selpercatinib led to significantly longer progression-free survival than platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab among patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04194944.).

Phase III study of selpercatinib versus chemotherapy ± pembrolizumab in untreated RET positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Selpercatinib, a novel, highly selective and potent, inhibitor of RET, demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated and treatment-naive RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients in a Phase I/II clinical trial. LIBRETTO-431 (NCT04194944) is a randomized, global, multicenter, open-label, Phase III trial, evaluating selpercatinib versus carboplatin or cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in treatment-naive patients with locally advanced/metastatic RET fusion-positive nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point is progression-free survival by independent review. Key secondary end points include overall survival, response rate, duration of response and progression-free survival. Clinical trial registration: NCT04194944 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A phase I/II study of valemetostat (DS-3201b), an EZH1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has few effective treatments. The EZH2-SLFN11 pathway is a driver of acquired chemoresistance that may be targeted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I/II trial investigated valemetostat, an EZH1/2 inhibitor, with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with recurrent SCLC. Phase I primary objectives were to assess safety and a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The phase II primary objective was to determine overall response rate (ORR), with secondary objectives of duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immunohistochemistry of pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies and pharmacokinetics analysis were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients enrolled (phase I, n=12; phase II n=10); one withdrew consent prior to treatment. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in dose-escalation resulted in valemetostat 100 mg orally daily selected as RP2D. Among 21 toxicity-evaluable patients, the most frequent (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and rash; 3 patients discontinued treatment for toxicity. In phase II, 3/10 patients experienced DLTs triggering a stopping rule. The ORR was 4/19 (21%, 95% CI 6 to 46%). The median DoR, PFS and OS were 4.6 mo, 2.2 mo (95% CI 1.3 to 7.6 mo) and 6.6 mo (95% CI 4.3 to not reached). SLFN11, EZH2 and SCLC subtyping markers did not correlate with response. MHC-I protein expression increased in 4/4 patients with paired biopsies, including 3/3 responders; two responders demonstrated subtype switching on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Valemetostat and irinotecan was not tolerated but demonstrated efficacy in recurrent SCLC. Valemetostat may warrant further investigation in SCLC.

Clinical and Genomic Features of Response and Toxicity to Sotorasib in a Real-World Cohort of Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: With the recent approval of the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib for patients with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is a new need to identify factors associated with activity and toxicity among patients treated in routine practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with sotorasib outside of clinical trials to identify factors associated with real-world progression free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Among 105 patients with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC treated with sotorasib, treatment led to a 5.3-month median rwPFS, 12.6-month median OS, and 28% real-world response rate. KEAP1 comutations were associated with shorter rwPFS and OS (rwPFS hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; P = .004; OS HR, 4.10; P = .003); no significant differences in rwPFS or OS were observed across TP53 (rwPFS HR, 1.10; P = .731; OS HR, 1.19; P = .631) or STK11 (rwPFS HR, 1.66; P = .098; OS HR, 1.73; P = .168) comutation status. Notably, almost all patients who developed grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (G3+ TRAEs) had previously been treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Among these patients, anti-PD-(L)1 therapy exposure within 12 weeks of sotorasib was strongly associated with G3+ TRAEs (P < .001) and TRAE-related sotorasib discontinuation (P = .014). Twenty-eight percent of patients with recent anti-PD-(L)1 therapy exposure experienced G3+ TRAEs, most commonly hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with sotorasib in routine practice, KEAP1 comutations were associated with resistance and recent anti-PD-(L)1 therapy exposure was associated with toxicity. These observations may help guide use of sotorasib in the clinic and may help inform the next generation of KRAS G12C-targeted clinical trials.

Radiogenomics in personalized management of lung cancer patients: Where are we?

With the rise of artificial intelligence, radiomics has emerged as a field of translational research based on the extraction of mineable high-dimensional data from radiological images to create "big data" datasets for the purpose of identifying distinct sub-visual imaging patterns. The integrated analysis of radiomic data and genomic data is termed radiogenomics, a promising strategy to identify potential imaging biomarkers for predicting driver mutations and other genomic parameters. In lung cancer, recent advances in whole-genome sequencing and the identification of actionable molecular alterations have led to an increased interest in understanding the complex relationships between imaging and genomic data, with the potential of guiding therapeutic strategies and predicting clinical outcomes. Although the integration of the radiogenomics data into lung cancer management may represent a new paradigm in the field, the use of this technique as a clinical biomarker remains investigational and still necessitates standardization and robustness to be effectively translated into the clinical practice. This review summarizes the basic concepts, potential contributions, challenges, and opportunities of radiogenomics in the management of patients with lung cancer.

NTRK fusions in lung cancer: From biology to therapy.

Fusions involving TRK protein tyrosine kinases are oncogenic drivers in a variety of tumors in children and adults, with a prevalence of ∼0.2% in non-small cell lung cancer. Diagnosis can be challenging due to structural features such as NTRK intron length, but next-generation sequencing (NGS), including RNA-based NGS, increases detection. The first-generation TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, have demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity in TRK fusion-positive cancers in a tumor-agnostic fashion and should be considered first-line therapeutic options for TRK fusion-positive lung cancers. Furthermore, the first-generation TRK inhibitors are well tolerated. Care should be taken, however, to monitor on-target adverse events, such as dizziness, weight gain, paresthesias, and withdrawal pain. On-target and off-target mechanisms mediating TRK inhibitor resistance may occur. Next-generation TRK inhibitors, such as selitrectinib, repotrectinib, and taletrectinib, are available on ongoing clinical trials and address on-target resistance. This review will focus on NTRK fusions and TRK-directed targeted therapy specifically in the context of lung cancer.

Optimizing the sequencing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for 80-85% of cases. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are observed in approximately 40% and 20% of patients with NSCLC in Asian and non-Asian populations, respectively. First-generation (gefitinib, erlotinib) and second-generation (afatinib, dacomitinib) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been standard-of-care (SoC) first-line treatment for patients with sensitizing EGFR mutation positive advanced NSCLC following Phase III trials versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. However, most patients treated with first-line first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs develop resistance. Osimertinib, a third-generation, central nervous system active EGFR-TKI which potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitizing (EGFRm) and the most common EGFR T790 M resistance mutations, has shown superior efficacy versus first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib / erlotinib). Osimertinib is now a treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFRm in the first-line setting, and treatment of choice for patients with T790 M positive NSCLC following disease progression on first-line EGFR-TKIs. The second-generation EGFR-TKI dacomitinib has also recently been approved for the first-line treatment of EGFRm positive metastatic NSCLC. There remains a need to determine appropriate sequencing of EGFR-TKIs in this setting, including EGFR-TKIs as monotherapy or in combination with other TKIs / signaling pathway inhibitors. This review considers the evolving role of sequencing treatments to maximize benefits for patients with EGFRm positive advanced NSCLC.

PD-1/PD-L1 Axis in Lung Cancer.

Cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Yet, only a small subset of patients will benefit from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade. PD-L1 tumor cell expression is the only approved biomarker at present. Tumor mutational burden and other emerging biomarkers should improve patient selection. Combination therapy approaches with chemotherapy or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade may increase the proportion of patients who benefit from immunotherapy. Although use of immunotherapy in lung cancers with targetable oncogenes has not been particularly successful, the benefit of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in early-stage disease is emerging. This review briefly describes the evolution of the clinical development and future directions of PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with lung cancers.

Clinical outcomes of patients with resected, early-stage ALK-positive lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Reports of the prognostic significance of ALK-rearrangement in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been contradictory. We aimed to determine the prognosis of early-stage ALK-positive lung cancers relative to KRAS- and EGFR-mutant lung cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of patients with resected NSCLC harboring an ALK rearrangement (n = 29) or a driver mutation in EGFR (n = 255) or KRAS (n = 480). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated for each genotype with the differences reported as a hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Among the 764 patients, 555 (73%), 101 (13%), and 108 (14%) had stage I, II, and III NSCLC, respectively. ALK-positive patients were distributed across all stages: 10 (34%) stage I, 6 (21%) stage II, and 13 (45%) stage III. Median RFS was not reached for EGFR-mutant patients, 24.3 months (95%CI 11.4-65.3) for ALK-positive patients, and 72.9 months (95%CI 59.7 to undefined) for KRAS-mutant patients. When adjusted for stage, ALK-positive NSCLC remained associated with worse RFS compared to EGFR-mutant (HR 1.8, 95%CI: 1.1-3.1), but not when compared to KRAS-mutant (HR 1.3, 95%CI: 0.8-2.1) NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of resected NSCLC, ALK rearrangements were associated with a trend toward inferior disease outcomes compared to other clinically relevant genomic subsets. These data support the need for clinical trials evaluating use of ALK inhibitors among ALK-positive patients with localized or locally-advanced disease.

Safety and Efficacy of Re-treating with Immunotherapy after Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients with NSCLC.

Considering retreatment following recovery from an immune-related adverse event (irAE) is a common clinical scenario, but the safety and benefit of retreatment is unknown. We identified patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-PD-(L)1 who had treatment held due to irAEs and divided them into two groups: those retreated with anti-PD-(L)1 (retreatment cohort) or those who had treatment stopped (discontinuation cohort). Out of 482 NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1, 68 (14%) developed a serious irAE requiring treatment interruption. Of these, 38 (56%) were retreated and 30 (44%) had treatment discontinued. In the retreatment cohort, 18 (48%) patients had no subsequent irAEs, 10 (26%) had recurrence of the initial irAE, and 10 (26%) had a new irAE. Most recurrent/new irAEs were mild (58% grade 1-2) and manageable (84% resolved or improved to grade 1). Two treatment-related deaths occurred. Recurrent/new irAEs were more likely if the initial irAE required hospitalization, but the initial grade and time to retreatment did not influence risk. Among those with no observed partial responses prior to the irAE, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in the retreatment cohort. Conversely, for those with objective responses prior to the irAE, PFS and OS were similar in the retreatment and discontinuation cohorts. Among patients with early objective responses prior to a serious irAE, outcomes were similar, whether or not they were retreated. Together, data suggest that benefit may occur with retreatment in patients with irAEs who had no treatment response prior to irAE onset. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(9); 1093-9. ©2018 AACR.

Atezolizumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The immune system can restrain or promote cancer development and growth. Antibodies targeting immune checkpoints have revolutionized cancer treatment. Among the best responses have been in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which is largely caused by chronic exposure to carcinogens; associated with high neoantigen creation and sensitization to immune recognition. Atezolizumab was the first approved antibody that targets the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1). Areas covered: This drug profile article covers the basics of the cancer-immunity cycle and reviews some aspects of innate and adaptive immunology. We discuss the discovery of PD-L1 and PD-L2 while highlight the potential differences in targeting PD-L1 versus PD-1. In addition, we briefly summarized the available pre-clinical and clinical data of atezolizumab use in NSCLC. A special section covers the challenges of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay. Expert commentary: PD-1:PD-L1 blockade has taken the lead in the immunotherapeutics field and represents the backbone of developing combination immunotherapies. Atezolizumab represents a step forward in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, nonetheless PD1:PD-L1 blockade in early-stage lung cancer is still a matter of debate.

Endocrine side effects of cancer immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become a cornerstone for the treatment of different advanced cancers. These drugs, represented mainly by monoclonal antibodies anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and anti-PD-1 ligand molecules (PD-L1 and L2), have the ability to reactivate the immune system against tumor cells, but can also trigger a myriad of autoimmune side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In particular, there are a number of endocrine-related irAEs. Current data from clinical trials show increased incidence of hypophysitis with CTLA4 inhibition and thyroid dysfunction with PD-(L)1 blockade. In addition, a few cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus and primary adrenal insufficiency have been reported. We discuss the incidence, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management of immune-related endocrinopathies in this highly complex context of oncological patients in need of immunotherapies.

The activity, safety, and evolving role of brigatinib in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancers.

Brigatinib (AP26113) is a dimethylphosphine oxide group-containing tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) constructed around a bisanilinopyrimidine scaffold with potent activity against the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and several other targets. Despite the activity of first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in advanced ALK-rearranged lung cancers, the development of acquired resistance represents an ongoing challenge. Later generation ALK inhibitors such as brigatinib are important potential tools in the management of patients with acquired resistance characterized by continued dependency on ALK. Brigatinib is active in vitro against many ALK kinase domain mutations that may mediate acquired resistance to other ALK TKIs, with reported activity (IC50 <50 nM) against ALK C1156Y, I1171S/T, V1180L, L1196M, L1152R/P, E1210K, and G1269A. In patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancers who receive brigatinib after crizotinib, substantial and durable responses and intracranial disease control can be achieved based on early-phase clinical trial data. The drug is also being explored in TKI-naïve patients. From a safety perspective, early pulmonary toxicity has been observed, prompting the decision to pursue lead-in dosing for the drug. Early data point to ALK G1202R and ALK E1210K as potential mechanisms of clinical resistance to brigatinib.