Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0147681, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26808671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan toxicity correlates with UGT1A1 activity. We explored whether phenotyping UGT1A1 using a probe approach works better than current genotyping methods. METHODS: Twenty-four Asian cancer patients received irinotecan as part of the FOLFIRI regimen. Subjects took raltegravir 400 mg orally and intravenous midazolam 1 mg. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using WinNonLin and NONMEM. Genomic DNA was isolated and screened for the known genetic variants in UGT1A1 and CYP3A4/5. RESULTS: SN-38G/SN-38 AUC ratio correlated well with Raltegravir glucuronide/ Raltegravir AUC ratio (r = 0.784 p<0.01). Midazolam clearance correlated well with irinotecan clearance (r = 0.563 p<0.01). SN-38 AUC correlated well with Log10Nadir Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) (r = -0.397 p<0.05). Significant correlation was found between nadir ANC and formation rate constant of raltegravir glucuronide (r = 0.598, P<0.005), but not UGT1A1 genotype. CONCLUSION: Raltegravir glucuronide formation is a good predictor of nadir ANC, and can predict neutropenia in East Asian patients. Prospective studies with dose adjustments should be done to develop raltegravir as a probe to optimize irinotecan therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00808184.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacokinetics , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Glucuronosyltransferase/metabolism , Raltegravir Potassium/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/pharmacokinetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Genotype , Glucuronosyltransferase/genetics , Humans , Irinotecan , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype
2.
J Mol Diagn ; 17(3): 242-50, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25746798

ABSTRACT

DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues has been used in the past to analyze genetic polymorphisms. We evaluated the technical reproducibility of different types of assays for gene polymorphisms using DNA extracted from FFPE material. By using the MassARRAY iPLEX system, we investigated polymorphisms in DPYD (rs1801159 and rs3918290), UMPS (rs1801019), ERCC1 (rs11615), ERCC1 (rs3212986), and ERCC2 (rs13181) in 56 FFPE DNA samples. By using PCR, followed by size-based gel electrophoresis, we also examined TYMS 5' untranslated region 2R/3R repeats and GSTT1 deletions in 50 FFPE DNA samples and 34 DNAs extracted from fresh-frozen tissues and cell lines. Each polymorphism was analyzed by two independent runs. We found that iPLEX biomarker assays measuring single-nucleotide polymorphisms provided consistent concordant results. However, by using FFPE DNA, size-based PCR biomarkers (GSTT1 and TYMS 5' untranslated region) were discrepant in 32.7% (16/49, with exact 95% CI, 19.9%-47.5%; exact binomial confidence limit test) and 4.2% (2/48, with exact 95% CI, 0.5%-14.3%) of cases, respectively, whereas no discrepancies were observed using intact genomic DNA. Our findings suggest that DNA from FFPE material can be used to reliably test single-nucleotide polymorphisms. However, results based on size-based PCR biomarkers, and particularly GSTT1 deletions, using FFPE DNA need to be interpreted with caution. Independent repeated assays should be performed on all cases to assess potential discrepancies.


Subject(s)
DNA/genetics , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Paraffin Embedding , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Tissue Fixation , Cell Line , DNA/isolation & purification , Formaldehyde/chemistry , Gene Dosage , Genetic Markers/genetics , Humans , Paraffin/chemistry , Paraffin Embedding/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Tissue Fixation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL