Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Br J Surg ; 108(10): 1192-1198, 2021 10 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34370826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population screening for AAA in women is unlikely to be clinically or economically effective. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of a targeted AAA screening programme for women at high risk of AAA. METHOD: Women aged 65-74 years deemed at high risk of having an AAA (current smokers, ex-smokers, or with a history of coronary artery disease) were invited to attend ultrasound screening (July 2016 to March 2019) for AAA in the Female Aneurysm screening STudy (FAST). Primary outcomes were attendance for screening and prevalence of AAA. Biometric data, medical history, quality of life (QoL) and aortic diameter on ultrasound imaging were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Some 6037 women were invited and 5200 attended screening (86.7 per cent). Fifteen AAAs larger than 29 mm were detected (prevalence 0.29 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 0.48) per cent). Current smokers had the highest prevalence (0.83 (95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 1.89) per cent) but lowest attendance (75.2 per cent). Three AAAs greater than 5.5 cm were identified and referred for consideration of surgical repair; one woman underwent repair. There was a significant reduction in patient-reported QoL scores following screening. CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of AAA was detected in high-risk women, with lowest screening uptake in those at highest risk. Screening for AAA in high-risk women may not be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/epidemiology , Mass Screening , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Ultrasonography , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Br J Surg ; 108(2): 152-159, 2021 03 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711140

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of, and risk factors for, acute kidney injury (AKI) after endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease (PAD) remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of patients who develop AKI and explore the risk factors. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention for symptomatic PAD across three vascular centres were analysed. The proportion of patients developing AKI (according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition) within 48 h, and the proportion developing the composite Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) endpoints (death, dialysis, drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate at least 25 per cent) at 30 days (MAKE30) and remains 90 days (MAKE90) were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess predictors of AKI, and the association between AKI and death. RESULTS: Some 2041 patients were included in the analysis. AKI developed in 239 patients (11.7 per cent), with 47 (2.3 per cent) requiring dialysis within 30 days, and 18 (0.9 per cent) requiring ongoing dialysis. The MAKE30 and MAKE90 composite endpoints were reached in 358 (17.5 per cent) and 449 (22.0 per cent) patients respectively. Risk factors for AKI were age, sex, congestive heart failure, chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, emergency procedure, and pre-existing chronic kidney disease. AKI, dementia, congestive heart failure, and major amputation were risk factors for medium-term mortality. CONCLUSION: AKI is a common complication after intervention for PAD and is associated with medium-term mortality.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Aged , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Br J Surg ; 106(9): 1168-1177, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259387

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are not offered adequate risk factor modification, despite their high cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to assess the cardiovascular profiles of patients with PAD and quantify the survival benefits of target-based risk factor modification. METHODS: The Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN) prospectively collected cardiovascular profiles of patients with PAD from ten UK vascular centres (April to June 2018) to assess practice against UK and European goal-directed best medical therapy guidelines. Risk and benefits of risk factor control were estimated using the SMART-REACH model, a validated cardiovascular prediction tool for patients with PAD. RESULTS: Some 440 patients (mean(s.d.) age 70(11) years, 24·8 per cent women) were included in the study. Mean(s.d.) cholesterol (4·3(1·2) mmol/l) and LDL-cholesterol (2·7(1·1) mmol/l) levels were above recommended targets; 319 patients (72·5 per cent) were hypertensive and 343 (78·0 per cent) were active smokers. Only 11·1 per cent of patients were prescribed high-dose statin therapy and 39·1 per cent an antithrombotic agent. The median calculated risk of a major cardiovascular event over 10 years was 53 (i.q.r. 44-62) per cent. Controlling all modifiable cardiovascular risk factors based on UK and European guidance targets (LDL-cholesterol less than 2 mmol/l, systolic BP under 140 mmHg, smoking cessation, antiplatelet therapy) would lead to an absolute risk reduction of the median 10-year cardiovascular risk by 29 (20-38) per cent with 6·3 (4·0-9·3) cardiovascular disease-free years gained. CONCLUSION: The medical management of patients with PAD in this secondary care cohort was suboptimal. Controlling modifiable risk factors to guideline-based targets would confer significant patient benefit.


Subject(s)
Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Aged , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lipids/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Smoking Cessation , United Kingdom
4.
Br J Surg ; 105(3): 203-208, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29405273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is known to reduce AAA-related mortality; however, the psychological impact of population AAA screening is unclear. The aim was to assess the impact of AAA diagnosis on quality of life (QoL) using data from an established AAA screening programme. METHODS: Mental and physical QoL scores for men diagnosed with AAA through participation in the English and Welsh AAA screening programmes were compared with no-AAA controls. Participants were identified through the United Kingdom Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS), a nationwide prospective cohort study of men with an AAA of less than 55 mm diagnosed through voluntary participation in screening. The UKAGS participants completed QoL questionnaires at the time of screening and annually thereafter. RESULTS: A transient reduction in mental QoL scores was observed following the diagnosis of AAA, returning to baseline levels after 12 months. Physical QoL remained consistently lower in the AAA cohort. Participants thought about their AAA and the AAA growth progressively less 12 months after the initial screening diagnosis. AAA growth rate had no influence over QoL parameters. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that screening for AAA does reduce mental QoL; however, this effect is transient (less than 12 months). Men diagnosed with AAA have a consistently worse physical QoL compared with controls.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Mass Screening/adverse effects , Mass Screening/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom
5.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 56(4): 497-506, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29576336

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) is currently used routinely to treat AAA. Suprarenal fixation (SRF) of EVAR grafts can lead to renal dysfunction. A meta-analysis of studies using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a measure of renal injury to assess the effect of SRF on renal function was performed. METHODS: An electronic search was carried out to identify all articles that reported on renal injury following SRF versus infrarenal fixation (IRF) EVAR, and 24 studies were identified. Formal meta-analysis was used to assess eGFR drop at 1 and 5 years. The primary outcome measure was a drop in eGFR >20% at 1 year; secondary measures included eGFR drop >20% at 5 years and "renal dysfunction" based on the definition used in each publication. RESULTS: Five series reported eGFR reduction >20% at 1 year. The weighted odds ratio (OR) was 1.53 (95% CI 0.67-3.51, p = .31, I2 = 53.2%); 9.3% for SRF versus 7.4% for IRF. One study reported eGFR based renal dysfunction at 5 years: OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.04-3.02, p = .03); 16.9% for SRF versus 10.3% for IRF. Nineteen series reported some form of renal dysfunction (5287 SRF vs. 4386 IRF patients, mean follow up: 20.5 months, range 72 h to 5 years). The weighted OR was 1.32 (95% CI 1.01-1.71, p = .03, I2 = 28.4%); 5.1% for SRF versus 4.6% for IRF. "Renal dysfunction" definitions varied greatly and were based on creatinine or other inaccurate methods. CONCLUSION: EVAR using SRF does not lead to a significant drop in renal function at 1 year, based on eGFR. Long-term results are limited. Authors should report long-term renal injury using eGFR and not inaccurate arbitrary measures, which are currently common in the literature.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Kidney/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Br J Surg ; 104(12): 1656-1664, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28745403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The UK abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programmes currently invite only men for screening because the benefit in women is uncertain. Perioperative risk is critical in determining the effectiveness of screening, and contemporary estimates of these risks in women are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare mortality following AAA repair between women and men in the UK. METHODS: Anonymized data from the UK National Vascular Registry (NVR) for patients undergoing AAA repair (January 2010 to December 2014) were analysed. Co-variables were extracted for analysis by sex. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures included mortality by 5-year age groups and duration of hospital stay. Logistic regression was performed to adjust for age, calendar time, AAA diameter and smoking status. NVR-based outcomes were checked against Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. RESULTS: A total of 23 245 patients were included (13·0 per cent women). Proportionally, more women than men underwent open repair. For elective open AAA repair, the in-hospital mortality rate was 6·9 per cent in women and 4·0 per cent in men (odds ratio (OR) 1·48, 95 per cent c.i. 1·08 to 2·02; P = 0·014), whereas for elective endovascular AAA repair it was 1·8 per cent in women and 0·7 per cent in men (OR 2·86, 1·72 to 4·74; P < 0·001); the results in HES were similar. For ruptured AAA, there was no sex difference in mortality within the NVR; however, in HES, for ruptured open AAA repair, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in women (33·6 versus 27·1 per cent; OR 1·36, 1·16 to 1·59; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Women have a higher in-hospital mortality rate than men after elective AAA repair even after adjustment. This higher mortality may have an impact on the benefit offered by any screening programme offered to women.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Hospital Mortality , Age Factors , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Elective Surgical Procedures/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Registries , United Kingdom/epidemiology
7.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(3): 309-319, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28094166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine 30-day outcomes in patients with concurrent carotid and cardiac disease who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) followed by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: This was a systematic review with searches of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. "Same-day" procedures involved CAS + CABG being performed on the same day, and "staged" interventions involved at least 1 day's delay between undergoing CAS and then CABG. RESULTS: There were 31 eligible studies (2727 patients), with 80% being neurologically asymptomatic with unilateral stenoses. Overall, the 30-day death/stroke rate was 7.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-9.2), while death/stroke/MI was 8.8% (95% CI 7.3-10.5). Staged CAS + CABG was associated with 30-day death/stroke rate of 8.5% (95% CI 7.3-9.7) compared with 5.9% (95% CI 4.0-8.5) after "same-day" procedures. Outcomes following CAS + CABG in neurologically symptomatic patients were poorer, with procedural stroke rates of 15%. There were five antiplatelet (APRx) strategies: (a) no APRx (death/stroke/MI, 4.2%; no data on bleeding complications); (b) single APRx before CAS and CABG, then dual APRx after CABG (death/stroke/MI, 6.7%; 7.3% bleeding complications); (c) dual APRx pre-CAS down to one APRx pre-CABG (death/stroke/MI, 10.1%; 2.8% bleeding complications); (d) dual APRx pre-CAS, both stopped pre-CABG (death/stroke/MI, 14.4%); (e) dual APRx pre-CAS and continued through CABG (death/stroke/MI, 16%). There were insufficient data on bleeding complication in the last two strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of predominantly asymptomatic patients with unilateral carotid stenoses, the 30-day rate of death/stroke was about 8%. Notwithstanding the effect of potential biases, this meta-analysis did not find evidence that outcomes after same-day CAS + CABG were higher than after staged interventions. However, outcomes were poorer in neurologically symptomatic patients. More data are required to establish the optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients undergoing same-day or staged CAS + CABG.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Stents , Carotid Stenosis/complications , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Stroke/etiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 54(1): 116-122, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28554728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiovascular events and death in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is high. Screening has been introduced to reduce AAA related mortality; however, after AAA diagnosis, cardiovascular modification may be as important to patient outcomes as surveillance. The aim of this study was to assess cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with small AAA. METHODS: Institutional approval was granted for The Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN) to retrospectively collect data pertaining to cardiovascular risk reduction from four tertiary vascular units in England. Patients with small AAA (January 2013-December 2015) were included. Demographic details, postcode, current medications, and smoking status were recorded using a bespoke electronic database and analysed. In a secondary analysis VERN contacted all AAA screening units in England and Wales to assess their current protocols relating to CV protection. RESULTS: In total, 1053 patients were included (mean age 74 ± 9 years, all men). Of these, 745 patients (70.8%) had been prescribed an antiplatelet agent and 787 (74.7%) a statin. Overall, only 666 patients (63.2%) were prescribed both a statin and antiplatelet. Two hundred and sixty eight patients (32.1%) were current smokers and the proportion of patients who continued to smoke decreased with age. Overall, only 401 patients (48.1%) were prescribed a statin, antiplatelet, and had stopped smoking. In the secondary analysis 38 AAA screening units (84% national coverage) replied. Thirty-one units (82%) suggest changes to the patient's prescription; however, none monitor compliance with these recommendations or assess whether the general practitioner has been made aware of the AAA diagnosis or prescription advice. CONCLUSION: Many patients with small AAA are not prescribed an antiplatelet/statin, and still smoke cigarettes, and therefore remain at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. National guidance to ensure this high risk group of patients is adequately protected from poor cardiovascular outcomes is lacking.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Mass Screening/methods , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Smoking Cessation , Smoking/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Disease Progression , Drug Prescriptions , England , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking/trends , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wales
9.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(2): 193-198, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28003104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires a high-level of technical-competency to avoid device-related complications. Virtual reality simulation-based training (SBT) may offer an alternative method of psychomotor skill acquisition; however, its role in EVAR training is undefined. This study aimed to: a) benchmark competency levels using EVAR SBT, and b) investigate the impact of supervised SBT on trainee performance. METHODS: EVAR procedure-related metrics were benchmarked by six experienced consultants using a Simbionix Angiomentor EVAR simulator. Sixteen vascular surgical trainees performing a comparable EVAR before and after structured SBT (>4 teaching sessions) were assessed utilising a modified Likert-scale score. These were benchmarked for comparison against the standard set by the consultant body. RESULTS: Median procedural-time for consultants was 43.5 min (IQR 7.5). A significant improvement in trainee procedural-time following SBT was observed (median procedural time 77 min [IQR 20.75] vs. 56 min [IQR: 7.00], p < .0001). The mean (SD) trainee Likert score pre- and post-SBT improved (16.6 [SD 1.455] vs. 28.63 [SD 2.986], p < .0001). Fewer endoleaks were observed (p = .0063) and trainees chose an appropriately sized device more often after SBT. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that EVAR-SBT should be considered as an adjunct to standard psychomotor skill teaching techniques for EVAR within the vascular surgery training curricula.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/education , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Endovascular Procedures/education , High Fidelity Simulation Training , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Endoleak/etiology , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Humans , Learning Curve , Operative Time , Pilot Projects , Prosthesis Design , Task Performance and Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(2): 255-260, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27884711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at significant risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Recent implementation of AAA-screening means thousands of patients are now diagnosed with small-AAA; however, CV risk factors are not always addressed. This study aimed at assessing and quantifying the CV characteristics of patients with small AAA following the introduction of screening programmes. METHODS: CV profiles of 384 men with a small AAA (<55 mm diameter) were assessed through the United Kingdom Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS), a nationwide prospective cohort study of men with small AAA. A prospective local cohort of an additional 142 patients with small AAA with available blood pressure (BP) and lipid profiles was also included and followed-up for 1 year. RESULTS: In the UKAGS population, 54% were current and 30% ex-smokers; 58% were hypertensive and 54% hypercholesterolaemic. In the local group, 54% were current and 40% were ex-smokers, and 94% were hypertensive. Patients were not more likely to receive CV medication after entering AAA surveillance in either group. All local patients were clustered "high-risk" for future CV events based on the Framingham score (mean 21.8%, 95% CI 20.0-23.6), JBS-2 (16.3%, 14.7-17.9) and ASSIGN (25.2%, 22.7-27.7). No change was seen in systolic BP levels between baseline and 1 year (140.9 mmHg vs. 142.5 mmHg, p=.435). A rise was seen in cholesterol (4.0 mmol-4.2 mmol, p<.0001) values at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with small AAA are at significant risk for developing CV events and this is not currently addressed, which is evident by the "high-risk" CV risk profiles of these patients despite being in AAA surveillance. Design and implementation of a CV risk reduction programme tailored for this population is necessary.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/epidemiology , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Aged , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/drug therapy , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Pressure , Cholesterol/blood , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Hypercholesterolemia/mortality , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/mortality , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
11.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(5): 717-724, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28320577

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after endovascular intervention, associated with poor short and long-term outcomes. However, the mechanisms underlying AKI development remain poorly understood. The impact of pre-existing cardiovascular disease and low cardiovascular reserve (CVR) in AKI is unclear; it remains unknown whether AKI is primarily related to pre-existing comorbidity or to procedural parameters. The association between CVR and AKI after EVAR was therefore assessed. METHODS: This is a case control study. From a database of 484 patients, 292 undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in two tertiary centres were included. Of these, 73 patients who had developed AKI after EVAR were case matched, based on pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; within 5 mL/min/1.73 m2) and age, with patients who had not developed AKI. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was used to assess CVR using the anaerobic threshold (AT). Development of AKI was defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Outcomes (KDIGO) guidance. Associations between CVR (based on AT levels) and AKI development were then analysed. RESULTS: Pre-operative AT levels were significantly different between those who did and did not develop AKI (12.1±2.9 SD vs. 14.8±3.0 mL/min/kg, p < .001). In multivariate analysis, a higher level of AT (per 1 mL/min/kg) was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.82, p < .001), relative to AKI development. A pre-operative AT level of < 11 mL/min/kg was associated with post-operative AKI development in adjusted analysis, with an OR of 7.8 (95% CI, 3.75-16.51, p < .001). The area under the curve (receiver operating characteristic) for AT as a predictor of post-operative AKI was 0.81 (standard error, 0.06, 95% CI, 0.69-0.93, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Poor CVR was strongly associated with the development of AKI. This provides pathophysiological insights into the mechanisms underlying AKI.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Cardiorespiratory Fitness , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaerobic Threshold , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/physiopathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Databases, Factual , England , Exercise Test , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Health Status , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Linear Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 53(6): 766-775, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28363431

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Do asymptomatic restenoses > 70% after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) increase the risk of late ipsilateral stroke? METHODS: Systematic review identified 11 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting rates of restenosis > 70% (and/or occlusion) in patients who had undergone CEA/CAS for the treatment of primary atherosclerotic disease, and nine RCTs reported late ipsilateral stroke rates. Proportional meta-analyses and odds ratios (OR) at end of follow-up were performed. RESULTS: The weighted incidence of restenosis > 70% was 5.8% after "any" CEA, median 47 months (11 RCTs; 4249 patients); 4.1% after patched CEA, median 32 months (5 RCTs; 1078 patients), and 10% after CAS, median 62 months (5 RCTs; 2716 patients). In four RCTs (1964 patients), one of 125 (0.8%) with restenosis > 70% (or occlusion) after CAS suffered late ipsilateral stroke over a median 50 months, compared with 37 of 1839 (2.0%) in CAS patients with no significant restenosis (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.24-3.21; p = .8339). In seven RCTs (2810 patients), 13 out of 141 (9.2%) with restenosis > 70% (or occlusion) after CEA suffered late ipsilateral stroke over a median 37 months, compared with 33 out of 2669 (1.2%) in patients with no significant restenoses (OR 9.02; 95% CI 4.70-17.28; p < .0001). Following data correction to exclude patients whose surveillance scan showed no evidence of restenosis > 70% before stroke onset, the prevalence of stroke ipsilateral to an untreated asymptomatic > 70% restenosis was seven out of 135 (5.2%) versus 40 out of 2704 (1.5%) in CEA patients with no significant restenosis (OR 4.77; 95% CI 2.29-9.92). CONCLUSIONS: CAS patients with untreated asymptomatic > 70% restenosis had an extremely low rate of late ipsilateral stroke (0.8% over 50 months). CEA patients with untreated, asymptomatic > 70% restenosis had a significantly higher risk of late ipsilateral stroke (compared with patients with no restenosis), but this was only 5% at 37 months. Overall, 97% of all late ipsilateral strokes after CAS and 85% after CEA occurred in patients without evidence of significant restenosis or occlusion.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Endovascular Procedures , Stroke/epidemiology , Asymptomatic Diseases , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Endarterectomy, Carotid/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Incidence , Odds Ratio , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stents , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Br J Surg ; 108(5): 590, 2021 05 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043779
15.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 52(6): 747-756, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27592036

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The management of concomitant intra-abdominal malignancy (IAM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains a challenge, even though malignancy is common in an elderly population. By means of systematic review and meta-analysis, the aim was to investigate outcomes in patients undergoing open (OAR) or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) that have a concomitant malignancy. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed (Medline and EMBASE databases) to identify all series reporting outcomes of AAA repair (OAR or EVAR) in patients with concomitant IAM. Meta-analysis was applied to assess mortality and major morbidity at 30 days and long term. RESULTS: The literature review identified 36 series (543 patients) and the majority (18 series) reported on patients with colorectal malignancy and AAA. Mean weighted mortality for OAR at 30 days was 11% (95% CI: 6.6% to 17.9%); none of the EVAR patients died peri-operatively. The weighted 30-day major complication rate for EVAR was 20.4% (10.0-37.4%) and for OAR it was 15.4% (7.0-30.8%). Most patients had their AAA and malignancy treated non-simultaneously (56.6%, 95% CI, 42.1-70.1%). In the EVAR cohort, three patients (4.6%) died at last follow-up (range 24-64 months). In the OAR cohort 23 (10.6%) had died at last follow up (range from 4 to 73 months). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, OAR was associated with significant peri-operative mortality in patients with an IAM. EVAR should be the first-line modality of AAA repair. The majority of patients were not treated simultaneously for the two pathologies, but further investigation is necessary to define the optimal timing for each procedure and malignancy.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Neoplasms/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Abdominal Neoplasms/mortality , Abdominal Neoplasms/pathology , Abdominal Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 49(5): 534-40, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25736516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important post-operative complication that may impact on mortality, morbidity, and cost. The incidence after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains unknown, as the current literature has not employed consistent definitions. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of AKI after elective EVAR and examine the impact of AKI on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity using the current universally accepted definitions. METHODS: This was a cohort study using prospectively collected data, including consecutive patients undergoing elective EVAR for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Those with end stage renal failure were excluded. The primary endpoint was incidence of AKI as per the "Acute Kidney Injury Network" (AKIN), and "Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) criteria. Secondary endpoints included AKI stage, drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. RESULTS: 149 patients were included (16 females, 11%; mean age: 69 ± 8 years; mean AAA diameter: 6.0 ± 1.1 cm), 28 (18.8%) of whom developed AKI (26 patients classified as stage 1 and 2 as stage 2). Within 48 hours, those with AKI dropped their eGFR from 61 ± 20 mL/kg/1.73 m(2) to 51 ± 20 units (p < .001), and those without from 75 ± 9 to 74 ± 10 units (p < .001). None required dialysis during a 33 ± 11 month follow up. Development of AKI was associated with mortality (HR 0.035, 95% CI: 0.005 to 0.240, p < .001) and cardiovascular morbidity (HR: 0.021, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.11, p < .001) on adjusted regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AKI after EVAR is significant and is independently associated with medium-term mortality and morbidity.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
17.
Acta Chir Belg ; 113(1): 60-3, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23550474

ABSTRACT

Isolated necrosis of the caecum is a rare cause of abdominal pain. In the absence of occlusive vascular disease it has a number of well documented associations, the commonest of which is patients' receiving haemodialysis for endstage renal failure. It has also been associated with shock states, cardiac failure, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes and drugs such as cocaine, thiopentone and cytotoxic agents. However, there are few reported cases in the literature without the aforementioned associations and the majority of cases, regardless of aetiology, were treated with either hemicolectomy or wedge resection and ileocolic anastamosis. This report describes a case of isolated caecal necrosis, mimicking acute appendicitis, successfully treated by local excision of the necrotic segment. It also provides a systematic review of the literature and proposes an updated classification of associations in isolated caecal necrosis.


Subject(s)
Cecum/pathology , Cecum/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Aged , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Colectomy/methods , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Necrosis
18.
Colorectal Dis ; 14(9): 1084-9, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22122559

ABSTRACT

AIM: Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs) are used in the colorectal cancer screening programme. Recent data suggested that the immunological faecal occult blood test illustrated a variation in positivity according to season and ambient temperature. Our aim was to assess the effect of season and ambient temperature on the positivity rates of the gFOBT during pilot screening for colorectal cancer. METHOD: Data from the first year of round 1 of the pilot screening programme in Coventry and Warwickshire were analysed. Patients with positive and negative gFOBT samples were included. Patients with spoilt samples or incomplete data were excluded. Of the total of 59513 patients, 30311 were men and 29202 women. Mean age was 56 years. Daily temperature data were provided by the meteorological office. RESULTS: Median exposure of the gFOBT test card was 6 days (range 1-17). Median daily maximum temperature was 14°C. Spring and summer illustrated significantly decreased positivity rates compared with autumn and winter (Pearson's chi-squared test, P<0.001). Mean daily maximum temperature for the test card exposure showed no significant difference in positivity rates (P=0.53). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in positive samples in the >25°C subgroup (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: There is a seasonal variation in positivity rates of gFOBTs with increased positivity in spring and summer months. There is no difference in positivity rates in relation to ambient temperature except in subgroup analysis where there is a significant reduction in positivity rates above 25°C.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Indicators and Reagents , Occult Blood , Seasons , Temperature , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Guaiac , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Weather
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL